Dynamic Movement Assessment and Functional Movement Screening for injury prediction: a systematic review

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Bunn, Priscila dos Santos
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Silva, Elirez Bezerra da
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Fisioterapia e Pesquisa
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/fpusp/article/view/152798
Resumo: Dynamic Movement Assessment™ (DMA™) and Functional Movement Screening™ (FMS™) are tools to predict the risk of musculoskeletal injuries in individuals who practice physical activities. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the association of DMA™ and FMS™ with the risk of musculoskeletal injuries, in different physical activities, categorizing by analysis. A research without language or time filters was carried out in November 2016 in MEDLINE, Google Scholar, SciELO, SCOPUS, SPORTDiscus, CINAHL and BVS databases using the keywords: “injury prediction”, “injury risk”, “sensitivity”, “specificity”, “functional movement screening”, and “dynamic movement assessment”. Prospective studies that analyzed the association between DMA™ and FMS™ with the risk of musculoskeletal injuries in physical activities were included. The data extracted from the studies were: participant’s profile, sample size, injury’s classification criteria, follow-up time, and the results presented, subdivided by the type of statistical analysis. The risk of bias was performed with Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for cohort studies. No study with DMA™ was found. A total of 20 FMS™ studies analyzing one or more of the following indicators were included: diagnostic accuracy (PPV, NPV and AUC), odds ratios (OR) or relative risk (RR). FMS™ showed a sensitivity=12 to 99%; specificity=38 to 97%; PPV=25 to 91%; NPV=28 to 85%; AUC=0.42 to 0.68; OR=0.53 to 54.5; and RR=0.16-5.44. The FMS™ has proven to be a predictor of musculoskeletal injuries. However, due to methodological limitations, its indiscriminate usage should be avoided.
id USP-9_92a3c6eaf4172da963a7e8d39b5e903e
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/152798
network_acronym_str USP-9
network_name_str Fisioterapia e Pesquisa
repository_id_str
spelling Dynamic Movement Assessment and Functional Movement Screening for injury prediction: a systematic reviewDynamic Movement Assessment e Functional Movement Screen para predição de lesões: uma revisão sistemáticaDynamic Movement Assessment y Functional Movement Screen para la predicción de la lesión: una revisión sistemáticaTranstornos Traumáticos CumulativosTraumatismos em AtletasMovimentoTranstornos de Traumas AcumuladosTraumatismos en AtletasMovimientoCumulative Trauma DisordersAthletic InjuriesMovementDynamic Movement Assessment™ (DMA™) and Functional Movement Screening™ (FMS™) are tools to predict the risk of musculoskeletal injuries in individuals who practice physical activities. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the association of DMA™ and FMS™ with the risk of musculoskeletal injuries, in different physical activities, categorizing by analysis. A research without language or time filters was carried out in November 2016 in MEDLINE, Google Scholar, SciELO, SCOPUS, SPORTDiscus, CINAHL and BVS databases using the keywords: “injury prediction”, “injury risk”, “sensitivity”, “specificity”, “functional movement screening”, and “dynamic movement assessment”. Prospective studies that analyzed the association between DMA™ and FMS™ with the risk of musculoskeletal injuries in physical activities were included. The data extracted from the studies were: participant’s profile, sample size, injury’s classification criteria, follow-up time, and the results presented, subdivided by the type of statistical analysis. The risk of bias was performed with Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for cohort studies. No study with DMA™ was found. A total of 20 FMS™ studies analyzing one or more of the following indicators were included: diagnostic accuracy (PPV, NPV and AUC), odds ratios (OR) or relative risk (RR). FMS™ showed a sensitivity=12 to 99%; specificity=38 to 97%; PPV=25 to 91%; NPV=28 to 85%; AUC=0.42 to 0.68; OR=0.53 to 54.5; and RR=0.16-5.44. The FMS™ has proven to be a predictor of musculoskeletal injuries. However, due to methodological limitations, its indiscriminate usage should be avoided.A Dynamic Movement Assessment (DMA™) e o Functional Movement Screening (FMS™) são ferramentas utilizadas para classificar o risco de lesões musculoesqueléticas em indivíduos que praticam exercícios físicos. O objetivo da presente revisão sistemática foi avaliar a associação de DMA™ e FMS™ com o risco de lesões musculoesqueléticas em diferentes atividades físicas, categorizando por análise. Uma pesquisa sem filtros de idioma ou de tempo foi realizada em novembro de 2016 nas bases de dados MEDLINE, Google Scholar, SciELO, SCOPUS, SPORTDiscus, CINAHL e BVS, utilizando as palavras-chave: “predição de lesão”, “risco de lesão”, “sensibilidade”, “especificidade”, “functional movement screening” e “dynamic movement assessment”. Foram incluídos estudos prospectivos que analisaram a associação entre DMA™ e FMS™ com o risco de lesões musculoesqueléticas em atividades físicas. Foram extraídos dos estudos: perfil dos participantes, tamanho da amostra, critérios de classificação da lesão, tempo de seguimento e os resultados apresentados, subdivididos pelo tipo de análise estatística. O risco de viés foi realizado com a Escala Newcastle-Ottawa para estudos de coorte. Não foi encontrado nenhum estudo sobre a DMA™. Foram incluídos 20 estudos, que analisaram um ou mais dos seguintes indicadores: acurácia diagnóstica (VPP, VPN e AUC), razão de chances (OR) ou risco relativo (RR). O FMS™ apresentou sensibilidade=12-99%; especificidade=38-97%; VPP=25-91%; VPN=28-85%; AUC=0,42-0,68; OR=0.53-54.5; e RR=0,16-5,44. O FMS™ apresentou-se como um método preditor de lesões musculoesqueléticas. Entretanto, devido às limitações metodológicas dos estudos, seu uso indiscriminado deve ser evitado.Evaluación Dinámica del Movimiento™ (DMA™) y Detección del Movimiento Funcional ™ (FMS™) son herramientas para predecir el riesgo de lesiones musculoesqueléticas en individuos que practican actividades físicas. Esta revisión sistemática tuvo como objetivo evaluar la asociación de DMA™ y FMS™ con el riesgo de lesiones musculoesqueléticas en diferentes actividades físicas y categorizarlas por análisis. En noviembre de 2016 se llevó a cabo una investigación sin filtros de idioma o de tiempo en las bases de datos MEDLINE, Google Scholar, SciELO, SCOPUS, SPORTDiscus, CINAHL y BVS, utilizando las palabras clave: predicción de lesiones, riesgo de lesiones, sensibilidad, especificidad, detección del movimiento funcional y evaluación dinámica de movimientos. Se incluyeron estudios prospectivos que analizaron la asociación entre DMA™ y FMS™ con el riesgo de lesiones musculoesqueléticas en actividades físicas. Los datos extraídos de los estudios fueron: perfil del participante, tamaño de la muestra, criterios de clasificación de la lesión, tiempo de seguimiento y los resultados presentados, subdivididos por el tipo de análisis estadístico. El riesgo de sesgo se realizó con la Escala Newcastle-Ottawa para estudios de cohorte. No se encontró ningún estudio con DMA™. Se incluyeron un total de 20 estudios FMS™ que analizaron uno o más de los siguientes indicadores: precisión diagnóstica (VPP, VPN y ABC), odds ratios (OR) o riesgo relativo (RR). FMS™ mostró una sensibilidad = del 12 al 99%; especificidad = del 38 al 97%; VPP = del 25 al 91%; VPN = del 28 al 85%; ABC = 0,42 a 0,68; OR = 0,53 a 54,5; y RR = 0,16-5,44. El FMS™ ha demostrado ser un predictor de lesiones musculoesqueléticas. Sin embargo, debido a limitaciones metodológicas, se debe evitar su uso indiscriminado.Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina2018-09-09info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/fpusp/article/view/15279810.1590/1809-2950/17004225032018Fisioterapia e Pesquisa; Vol. 25 No. 3 (2018); 352-361Fisioterapia e Pesquisa; Vol. 25 Núm. 3 (2018); 352-361Fisioterapia e Pesquisa; v. 25 n. 3 (2018); 352-3612316-91171809-2950reponame:Fisioterapia e Pesquisainstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPporhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/fpusp/article/view/152798/149284Copyright (c) 2018 Fisioterapia e Pesquisahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBunn, Priscila dos SantosSilva, Elirez Bezerra da2023-05-26T14:00:51Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/152798Revistahttp://www.revistas.usp.br/fpuspPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/fpusp/oai||revfisio@usp.br2316-91171809-2950opendoar:2023-05-26T14:00:51Fisioterapia e Pesquisa - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Dynamic Movement Assessment and Functional Movement Screening for injury prediction: a systematic review
Dynamic Movement Assessment e Functional Movement Screen para predição de lesões: uma revisão sistemática
Dynamic Movement Assessment y Functional Movement Screen para la predicción de la lesión: una revisión sistemática
title Dynamic Movement Assessment and Functional Movement Screening for injury prediction: a systematic review
spellingShingle Dynamic Movement Assessment and Functional Movement Screening for injury prediction: a systematic review
Bunn, Priscila dos Santos
Transtornos Traumáticos Cumulativos
Traumatismos em Atletas
Movimento
Transtornos de Traumas Acumulados
Traumatismos en Atletas
Movimiento
Cumulative Trauma Disorders
Athletic Injuries
Movement
title_short Dynamic Movement Assessment and Functional Movement Screening for injury prediction: a systematic review
title_full Dynamic Movement Assessment and Functional Movement Screening for injury prediction: a systematic review
title_fullStr Dynamic Movement Assessment and Functional Movement Screening for injury prediction: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Dynamic Movement Assessment and Functional Movement Screening for injury prediction: a systematic review
title_sort Dynamic Movement Assessment and Functional Movement Screening for injury prediction: a systematic review
author Bunn, Priscila dos Santos
author_facet Bunn, Priscila dos Santos
Silva, Elirez Bezerra da
author_role author
author2 Silva, Elirez Bezerra da
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Bunn, Priscila dos Santos
Silva, Elirez Bezerra da
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Transtornos Traumáticos Cumulativos
Traumatismos em Atletas
Movimento
Transtornos de Traumas Acumulados
Traumatismos en Atletas
Movimiento
Cumulative Trauma Disorders
Athletic Injuries
Movement
topic Transtornos Traumáticos Cumulativos
Traumatismos em Atletas
Movimento
Transtornos de Traumas Acumulados
Traumatismos en Atletas
Movimiento
Cumulative Trauma Disorders
Athletic Injuries
Movement
description Dynamic Movement Assessment™ (DMA™) and Functional Movement Screening™ (FMS™) are tools to predict the risk of musculoskeletal injuries in individuals who practice physical activities. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the association of DMA™ and FMS™ with the risk of musculoskeletal injuries, in different physical activities, categorizing by analysis. A research without language or time filters was carried out in November 2016 in MEDLINE, Google Scholar, SciELO, SCOPUS, SPORTDiscus, CINAHL and BVS databases using the keywords: “injury prediction”, “injury risk”, “sensitivity”, “specificity”, “functional movement screening”, and “dynamic movement assessment”. Prospective studies that analyzed the association between DMA™ and FMS™ with the risk of musculoskeletal injuries in physical activities were included. The data extracted from the studies were: participant’s profile, sample size, injury’s classification criteria, follow-up time, and the results presented, subdivided by the type of statistical analysis. The risk of bias was performed with Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for cohort studies. No study with DMA™ was found. A total of 20 FMS™ studies analyzing one or more of the following indicators were included: diagnostic accuracy (PPV, NPV and AUC), odds ratios (OR) or relative risk (RR). FMS™ showed a sensitivity=12 to 99%; specificity=38 to 97%; PPV=25 to 91%; NPV=28 to 85%; AUC=0.42 to 0.68; OR=0.53 to 54.5; and RR=0.16-5.44. The FMS™ has proven to be a predictor of musculoskeletal injuries. However, due to methodological limitations, its indiscriminate usage should be avoided.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-09-09
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/fpusp/article/view/152798
10.1590/1809-2950/17004225032018
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/fpusp/article/view/152798
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/1809-2950/17004225032018
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/fpusp/article/view/152798/149284
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Fisioterapia e Pesquisa
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Fisioterapia e Pesquisa
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Fisioterapia e Pesquisa; Vol. 25 No. 3 (2018); 352-361
Fisioterapia e Pesquisa; Vol. 25 Núm. 3 (2018); 352-361
Fisioterapia e Pesquisa; v. 25 n. 3 (2018); 352-361
2316-9117
1809-2950
reponame:Fisioterapia e Pesquisa
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Fisioterapia e Pesquisa
collection Fisioterapia e Pesquisa
repository.name.fl_str_mv Fisioterapia e Pesquisa - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revfisio@usp.br
_version_ 1787713739538038784

Registros relacionados