Unions and NGOs positions on the risks and regulation of nanotechnology
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Publication Date: | 2013 |
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | por eng |
Source: | Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
Download full: | https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/128 |
Summary: | This article discusses the perspectives of a number of Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) and trade unions on the risks and regulation of nanotechnology. In the context of large public and private investments in nanotechnology, and its rapid incorporation into processes and products, these groups have sought to advance their interests through diverse strategies. Their positions are centered in the application of the precautionary principle and include demands for moratoria, more investigation on environmental, health and occupational risks, specific and mandatory regulation, transparent information and broad public participation in the governance of nanotechnology. We show that these civil society organizations are constructing collaborations and alliances and have had some degree of success in placing the issues of risks and regulation into the government´s agendas. |
id |
FIOCRUZ-9_27ba8a6e945fc42ce31a9623cfe0a7e7 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br:article/128 |
network_acronym_str |
FIOCRUZ-9 |
network_name_str |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Unions and NGOs positions on the risks and regulation of nanotechnologyPosições de Sindicatos e ONGs sobre os riscos e a regulação da nanotecnologiananotechnologyrisksregulationNGOstrade unionsnanotecnologiariscosregulaçãoONGssindicatosThis article discusses the perspectives of a number of Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) and trade unions on the risks and regulation of nanotechnology. In the context of large public and private investments in nanotechnology, and its rapid incorporation into processes and products, these groups have sought to advance their interests through diverse strategies. Their positions are centered in the application of the precautionary principle and include demands for moratoria, more investigation on environmental, health and occupational risks, specific and mandatory regulation, transparent information and broad public participation in the governance of nanotechnology. We show that these civil society organizations are constructing collaborations and alliances and have had some degree of success in placing the issues of risks and regulation into the government´s agendas.Este trabalho discute os posicionamentos de Organizações não Governamentais (ONGs) e sindicatos de trabalhadores sobre os riscos e a regulação da nanotecnologia.Baseia-se na análise de declarações e documentos produzidos por essas organizações entre 2002 e 2010. No contexto de fortes investimentos públicos e privados em nanotecnologia e de sua rápida incorporação a produtos e processos, esses grupos têm buscado representar seus interesses através de diversas estratégias. Seus posicionamentos se centram na aplicação do princípio de precaução e incluem pedidos de moratória, realização de mais investigação sobre riscos à saúde, ocupacionais e ambientais, regulação específica e obrigatória, transparência de informação e ampla participaçãopública na governança da nanotecnologia. Mostramos que essas organizações da sociedade civil vêm tecendo colaborações e alianças e tiveram algum êxito em posicionar a temática de riscos e regulação nas agendas dos governos.Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde2013-11-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion"Peer-reviewed article""Artículo revisado por pares""Artigo avaliado pelos pares"application/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/12810.3395/vd.v1n4.128Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology ; Vol. 1 No. 4 (2013): November - Nanotecnologia & Vigilância Sanitária; 72-84Vigilancia en Salud en Debate: Sociedad, Ciencia y Tecnología; Vol. 1 Núm. 4 (2013): Noviembre - Nanotecnologia & Vigilância Sanitária; 72-84Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro; v. 1 n. 4 (2013): Novembro - Nanotecnologia & Vigilância Sanitária; 72-842317-269Xreponame:Vigilância Sanitária em Debateinstname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)instacron:FIOCRUZporenghttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/128/75https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/128/104Copyright (c) 2013 Vigilância Sanitária em Debate: Sociedade, Ciência & Tecnologia (Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology) – Visa em Debatehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessInvernizzi, NoelaFoladori, Guillermo2023-06-27T15:10:06Zoai:ojs.visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br:article/128Revistahttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebatePUBhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/oaiincqs.visaemdebate@fiocruz.br || gisele.neves@fiocruz.br2317-269X2317-269Xopendoar:2023-06-27T15:10:06Vigilância Sanitária em Debate - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Unions and NGOs positions on the risks and regulation of nanotechnology Posições de Sindicatos e ONGs sobre os riscos e a regulação da nanotecnologia |
title |
Unions and NGOs positions on the risks and regulation of nanotechnology |
spellingShingle |
Unions and NGOs positions on the risks and regulation of nanotechnology Invernizzi, Noela nanotechnology risks regulation NGOs trade unions nanotecnologia riscos regulação ONGs sindicatos |
title_short |
Unions and NGOs positions on the risks and regulation of nanotechnology |
title_full |
Unions and NGOs positions on the risks and regulation of nanotechnology |
title_fullStr |
Unions and NGOs positions on the risks and regulation of nanotechnology |
title_full_unstemmed |
Unions and NGOs positions on the risks and regulation of nanotechnology |
title_sort |
Unions and NGOs positions on the risks and regulation of nanotechnology |
author |
Invernizzi, Noela |
author_facet |
Invernizzi, Noela Foladori, Guillermo |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Foladori, Guillermo |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Invernizzi, Noela Foladori, Guillermo |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
nanotechnology risks regulation NGOs trade unions nanotecnologia riscos regulação ONGs sindicatos |
topic |
nanotechnology risks regulation NGOs trade unions nanotecnologia riscos regulação ONGs sindicatos |
description |
This article discusses the perspectives of a number of Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) and trade unions on the risks and regulation of nanotechnology. In the context of large public and private investments in nanotechnology, and its rapid incorporation into processes and products, these groups have sought to advance their interests through diverse strategies. Their positions are centered in the application of the precautionary principle and include demands for moratoria, more investigation on environmental, health and occupational risks, specific and mandatory regulation, transparent information and broad public participation in the governance of nanotechnology. We show that these civil society organizations are constructing collaborations and alliances and have had some degree of success in placing the issues of risks and regulation into the government´s agendas. |
publishDate |
2013 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2013-11-29 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion "Peer-reviewed article" "Artículo revisado por pares" "Artigo avaliado pelos pares" |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/128 10.3395/vd.v1n4.128 |
url |
https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/128 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.3395/vd.v1n4.128 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por eng |
language |
por eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/128/75 https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/128/104 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology ; Vol. 1 No. 4 (2013): November - Nanotecnologia & Vigilância Sanitária; 72-84 Vigilancia en Salud en Debate: Sociedad, Ciencia y Tecnología; Vol. 1 Núm. 4 (2013): Noviembre - Nanotecnologia & Vigilância Sanitária; 72-84 Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro; v. 1 n. 4 (2013): Novembro - Nanotecnologia & Vigilância Sanitária; 72-84 2317-269X reponame:Vigilância Sanitária em Debate instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) instacron:FIOCRUZ |
instname_str |
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) |
instacron_str |
FIOCRUZ |
institution |
FIOCRUZ |
reponame_str |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
collection |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
incqs.visaemdebate@fiocruz.br || gisele.neves@fiocruz.br |
_version_ |
1797042043407564800 |