Evaluation of Eye Protection Filters Used with Broad-Spectrum and Conventional LED Curing Lights

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Soares,Carlos José
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Rodrigues,Monise de Paula, Vilela,Andomar Bruno Fernandes, Rizo,Erick René Cerda, Ferreira,Lorraine Braga, Giannini,Marcelo, Price,Richard Bengt
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian Dental Journal
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402017000100009
Resumo: Abstract The high irradiance and the different emission spectra from contemporary light curing units (LCU) may cause ocular damage. This study evaluated the ability of 15 eye protection filters: 2 glasses, 1 paddle design, and 12 dedicated filters to block out harmful light from a monowave (HP-3M ESPE) and a broad-spectrum (Valo, Ultradent) LED LCU. Using the anterior sensor in the MARC-Patient Simulator (BlueLight Analytics) the irradiance that was delivered through different eye protection filters was measured three times. The LCUs delivered a similar irradiance to the top of the filter. The mean values of the light that passed through the filters as percent of the original irradiance were analyzed using two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey test (a= 0.05). The emission spectra from the LCUs and through the filters were also obtained. Two-way ANOVA showed that the interaction between protective filters and LCUs significantly influenced the amount of light transmitted (p< 0.001). Tukey test showed that the amount of light transmitted through the protective filters when using the HP-3M-ESPE was significantly greater compared to when using the Valo, irrespective of the protective filter tested. When using the HP-3M-ESPE, the Glasses filter allowed significantly more light through, followed by XL 3000, ORTUS, Google Professional, Gnatus filters. The Valo filter was the most effective at blocking out the harmful light. Some protective filters were less effective at blocking the lower wavelengths of light (<420 nm). However, even in the worst scenario, the filters were able to block at least 97% of the irradiance.
id FUNORP-1_0157026e676eb17bf6868f58f83b96cf
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0103-64402017000100009
network_acronym_str FUNORP-1
network_name_str Brazilian Dental Journal
repository_id_str
spelling Evaluation of Eye Protection Filters Used with Broad-Spectrum and Conventional LED Curing Lightsprotection filterslight curing unitirradianceretinal damage.Abstract The high irradiance and the different emission spectra from contemporary light curing units (LCU) may cause ocular damage. This study evaluated the ability of 15 eye protection filters: 2 glasses, 1 paddle design, and 12 dedicated filters to block out harmful light from a monowave (HP-3M ESPE) and a broad-spectrum (Valo, Ultradent) LED LCU. Using the anterior sensor in the MARC-Patient Simulator (BlueLight Analytics) the irradiance that was delivered through different eye protection filters was measured three times. The LCUs delivered a similar irradiance to the top of the filter. The mean values of the light that passed through the filters as percent of the original irradiance were analyzed using two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey test (a= 0.05). The emission spectra from the LCUs and through the filters were also obtained. Two-way ANOVA showed that the interaction between protective filters and LCUs significantly influenced the amount of light transmitted (p< 0.001). Tukey test showed that the amount of light transmitted through the protective filters when using the HP-3M-ESPE was significantly greater compared to when using the Valo, irrespective of the protective filter tested. When using the HP-3M-ESPE, the Glasses filter allowed significantly more light through, followed by XL 3000, ORTUS, Google Professional, Gnatus filters. The Valo filter was the most effective at blocking out the harmful light. Some protective filters were less effective at blocking the lower wavelengths of light (<420 nm). However, even in the worst scenario, the filters were able to block at least 97% of the irradiance.Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto2017-02-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402017000100009Brazilian Dental Journal v.28 n.1 2017reponame:Brazilian Dental Journalinstname:Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP)instacron:FUNORP10.1590/0103-6440201701380info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSoares,Carlos JoséRodrigues,Monise de PaulaVilela,Andomar Bruno FernandesRizo,Erick René CerdaFerreira,Lorraine BragaGiannini,MarceloPrice,Richard Bengteng2017-03-07T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0103-64402017000100009Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/bdj/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpbdj@forp.usp.br||sergio@fosjc.unesp.br1806-47600103-6440opendoar:2017-03-07T00:00Brazilian Dental Journal - Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Evaluation of Eye Protection Filters Used with Broad-Spectrum and Conventional LED Curing Lights
title Evaluation of Eye Protection Filters Used with Broad-Spectrum and Conventional LED Curing Lights
spellingShingle Evaluation of Eye Protection Filters Used with Broad-Spectrum and Conventional LED Curing Lights
Soares,Carlos José
protection filters
light curing unit
irradiance
retinal damage.
title_short Evaluation of Eye Protection Filters Used with Broad-Spectrum and Conventional LED Curing Lights
title_full Evaluation of Eye Protection Filters Used with Broad-Spectrum and Conventional LED Curing Lights
title_fullStr Evaluation of Eye Protection Filters Used with Broad-Spectrum and Conventional LED Curing Lights
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Eye Protection Filters Used with Broad-Spectrum and Conventional LED Curing Lights
title_sort Evaluation of Eye Protection Filters Used with Broad-Spectrum and Conventional LED Curing Lights
author Soares,Carlos José
author_facet Soares,Carlos José
Rodrigues,Monise de Paula
Vilela,Andomar Bruno Fernandes
Rizo,Erick René Cerda
Ferreira,Lorraine Braga
Giannini,Marcelo
Price,Richard Bengt
author_role author
author2 Rodrigues,Monise de Paula
Vilela,Andomar Bruno Fernandes
Rizo,Erick René Cerda
Ferreira,Lorraine Braga
Giannini,Marcelo
Price,Richard Bengt
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Soares,Carlos José
Rodrigues,Monise de Paula
Vilela,Andomar Bruno Fernandes
Rizo,Erick René Cerda
Ferreira,Lorraine Braga
Giannini,Marcelo
Price,Richard Bengt
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv protection filters
light curing unit
irradiance
retinal damage.
topic protection filters
light curing unit
irradiance
retinal damage.
description Abstract The high irradiance and the different emission spectra from contemporary light curing units (LCU) may cause ocular damage. This study evaluated the ability of 15 eye protection filters: 2 glasses, 1 paddle design, and 12 dedicated filters to block out harmful light from a monowave (HP-3M ESPE) and a broad-spectrum (Valo, Ultradent) LED LCU. Using the anterior sensor in the MARC-Patient Simulator (BlueLight Analytics) the irradiance that was delivered through different eye protection filters was measured three times. The LCUs delivered a similar irradiance to the top of the filter. The mean values of the light that passed through the filters as percent of the original irradiance were analyzed using two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey test (a= 0.05). The emission spectra from the LCUs and through the filters were also obtained. Two-way ANOVA showed that the interaction between protective filters and LCUs significantly influenced the amount of light transmitted (p< 0.001). Tukey test showed that the amount of light transmitted through the protective filters when using the HP-3M-ESPE was significantly greater compared to when using the Valo, irrespective of the protective filter tested. When using the HP-3M-ESPE, the Glasses filter allowed significantly more light through, followed by XL 3000, ORTUS, Google Professional, Gnatus filters. The Valo filter was the most effective at blocking out the harmful light. Some protective filters were less effective at blocking the lower wavelengths of light (<420 nm). However, even in the worst scenario, the filters were able to block at least 97% of the irradiance.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-02-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402017000100009
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402017000100009
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/0103-6440201701380
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Dental Journal v.28 n.1 2017
reponame:Brazilian Dental Journal
instname:Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP)
instacron:FUNORP
instname_str Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP)
instacron_str FUNORP
institution FUNORP
reponame_str Brazilian Dental Journal
collection Brazilian Dental Journal
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Dental Journal - Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bdj@forp.usp.br||sergio@fosjc.unesp.br
_version_ 1754204094444077056