Systematic review of bibliometric studies on SARS-CoV-2

• Main Author: Silva, Thainá Ferreira
• Publication Date: 2020
• Other Authors: Melo, Amanda Alves de, Santos, Dener Lucas Araújo dos, Vaz, Elisa Carvalho, Corvalan, Leonardo Carlos Jeronimo, Ribeiro, Marcela de Lacerda, Rodrigues, Flávia Melo
• Format: Article
• Language: eng
• Source: Revista Ciências em Saúde
• Download full: https://portalrcs.hcitajuba.org.br/index.php/rcsfmit_zero/article/view/1023
• topic: bibliometry; COVID-19; coronavirus; research; 2019-nCoV epidemic; Coronavirus; Bibliometry; bibliometria; epidemia por 2019-nCoV; COVID-19; coronavirus; pesquisa; Coronavirus; Bibliometria

Objective: To perform a systematic review of articles that evaluated the scientific production on SARS-CoV-2 through bibliometric analyzes. Methods: Scopus, Web of Science and Google Scholar databases were used. After applying the pre-established inclusion criteria, 30 articles were included. Results. The total number of articles found in the bibliometric studies on SARS-CoV-2 varied widely from 153 to 21,395 articles and an average equal to 4,279 (± 5,510). A total of 17 countries published within the scope of this study, but only six published more than one article, emphasizing authors from Chinese institutions (17%). Scopus was the most used database in bibliometric studies (50%, n = 15). The articles used 72 different keywords with emphasis on: COVID-19 (15%), SARS-CoV-2 (12%) and 2019-nCoV (9%). Conclusion. We are facing an unprecedented scenario of information about SARS-CoV-2 and this has required a collective scientific effort reflected in the daily publication of hundreds of studies (articles, pre-prints, clinical guides, protocols). Bibliometric methods are being increasingly used by the scientific community to systematize this information. Therefore, the systematic review carried out in this study provided an overview of the bibliometric literature on the SARS-CoV-2 virus.