Detalhes bibliográficos
| Autor(a) principal: |
Mendicino,Cássia Cristina Pinto |
| Data de Publicação: |
2020 |
| Outros Autores: |
Silva,Gabriella Jomara da,
Braga,Letícia Penna,
Colosimo,Enrico Antônio,
Guimarães,Mark Drew Crosland,
Pádua,Cristiane Aparecida Menezes de |
| Tipo de documento: |
Artigo
|
| Idioma: |
eng |
| Título da fonte: |
Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical |
| Texto Completo: |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0037-86822020000100388
|
Resumo: |
Abstract INTRODUCTION The first Brazilian HIV treatment recommendation was put forward in 1996, resulting in 12 subsequent guidelines. Several changes were made regarding “when” and “how” to begin treatment. The latest guideline recommends immediate initiation of antiretroviral therapy (ART). This study aimed to describe the evolution of HIV treatment among people living with HIV (PLHIV) who initiated ART between 2004 and 2018 based on the national guideline recommendations concerning T-CD4+ and VL measurements. METHODS A cross-sectional analysis of data of PLHIV aged >18 years, in Minas Gerais who received ART between 2004 and 2018 was conducted. Clinical, therapeutic, and demographic information were obtained from national healthcare databases. The study was divided into four periods: 2004-2007, 2008-2012, 2013-2016, and 2017-2018. Descriptive analyses were performed. RESULTS A total of 60,618 PLHIV initiated ART (67% male and 48% aged 25-39 years), 36% of whom had CD4 counts at ART initiation and 51% documented VL after ART initiation. The median CD4 count ranged from 288 to 373 cells/µL. The median time to ART initiation decreased from 604 to 28 days and was lower among males (p <0.01). The median time from ART initiation to the first VL result decreased from 101 to 62 days over the study period, while the median VL after ART initiation ranged from 2.3 to 1.7 log10 copies/ml. CONCLUSIONS Although our results demonstrated that most recommendations were followed, there seemed to be little impact on CD4 counts and VL testing. This may result in an inadequate evaluation of ART effectiveness. |