Efeito do azeite de oliva extravirgem e da dieta tradicional brasileira sobre parâmetros da sarcopenia em obesos graves: ensaio clínico randomizado e análise de fatores associados

• Autor(a) principal: Souza, Jacqueline Danesio de
• Data de Publicação: 2017
• Tipo de documento: Tese
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFG
• Texto Completo: http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/handle/tede/8730
• topic: Composição corporal; Massa muscular esquelética; Força muscular; Velocidade de caminhada; Azeite de oliva; Alimentação saudável; Body composition; Skeletal muscle mass; Muscle strength; Walking speed; Olive oil; Healthy eating; CIENCIAS DA SAUDE

The study is part of a randomized, parallel clinical trial entitled "Effect of nutritional intervention and olive oil in severely obesity (DieTBra Trial)." The original articles seek to investigate sarcopenia in severe obese adults in terms of prevalence, factors associated with its diagnosis and the effectiveness of extra virgin olive oil and the traditional Brazilian diet as a dietary intervention. A total of 111 severe obese individuals (body mass index [BMI] ≥ 35.0 kg/m²) participated in the clinical trial, with a follow-up of 12 weeks and three intervention groups: Olive oil = extra virgin olive oil (52 mL/day); DieTBra = traditional Brazilian diet; DieTBra + Olive Oil = DieTBra + extra virgin olive oil (52 mL/day). Appendicular skeletal muscle mass (MMEA), measured in the total form (kg), adjusted by squared height (appendicular skeletal muscle mass index [IMMEA]) and by BMI (MMEA/BMI), strength of manual (FPM) and BMI adjusted (FPM/BMI), and walking speed. The prevalence calculation considered the cutoff points proposed in the literature and the calculation of -2 standard deviation (SD) of the mean value of the parameters of muscle mass evaluated in the study population. The ANOVA test was applied to evaluate the difference between the means of the parameters of second to the age group. The prevalence according to cutoff points proposed in the literature varied from 2.88% for IMMEA, 6.73% for total MMEA and 62.50% according to MMEA/BMI. When adopting - 2 SD below the mean of the study population, the prevalence was 2.88% for total MMEA and 3.85% for IMMEA and MMEA/BMI. Although no statistically significant difference (p > 0.05) was found between the means of the parameters according to the age group, prevalence values higher than those previously demonstrated in the age group ≥ 40 years were observed. In the second article, the explanatory variables considered were age, lifestyle, health conditions, food consumption and biochemical tests. Those with p value < 0.20 in simple linear regression were included in multiple linear regression. Among the factors inversely associated with IMMEA are serum levels of tetraiodothyronine (T4) and smoking. MMEA/BMI was inversely associated with age, serum T4 levels and presence of diabetes. MMEA also remained inversely associated with serum T4 levels and diabetes. The reduction of FPM and FPM/BMI were associated with advancing age and presence of hypercholesterolemia. Already the low speed of march was associated with the presence of diabetes and hypothyroidism. The primary endpoint considered in the third article was the IMMEA and the secondary ones were: FPM, gait speed, MMEA/IMC, total MMEA, total body fat and percentage. In the endpoints and covariates analyzed, the delta was also calculated, which is the difference between the value of the end of follow-up and the baseline. Covariance analysis (ANCOVA) was performed to analyze the effect of covariates delta weight, delta physical activity, delta time of sedentary lifestyle, sex and age, on the outcomes. A significance level of 5% was adopted. After performing the ANCOVA, the covariates of the delta weight adjusted the following outcomes in the DieTBra intervention group: reduction of delta total body fat (p = 0.016), increase in delta walking speed (p = 0.042) and delta FPM (p = 0.044 ). And also for reduction of delta body fat in the DieTBra + Olive oil group (p = 0.004). When adjusted for the delta time of sedentary lifestyle, total body fat presented a significant reduction in the DieTBra + Olive oil group (p = 0.001). The prevalence of sarcopenia differed as different assessments were used for muscle mass, evidencing the need to standardize the criteria and cutoff points used in its classification. The factors associated with the evaluation parameters, evidenced the importance of the creation of clinical measures and public health aimed at the prevention of sarcopenia. The positive effects of DieTBra and DieTBra + Olive oil on the parameters of sarcopenia and adiposity, reveal the importance of the adequate evaluation, diagnosis and treatment of sarcopenia in adults with severe obesity.