Influence of exercise modality on agreement between gas exchange and heart rate variability thresholds

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Cunha,F.A.
Data de Publicação: 2014
Outros Autores: Montenegro,R.A., Midgley,A.W., Vasconcellos,F., Soares,P.P., Farinatti,P.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-879X2014000800706
Resumo: The main purpose of this study was to investigate the level of agreement between the gas exchange threshold (GET) and heart rate variability threshold (HRVT) during maximal cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) using three different exercise modalities. A further aim was to establish whether there was a 1:1 relationship between the percentage heart rate reserve (%HRR) and percentage oxygen uptake reserve ( % V ˙ O 2 R) at intensities corresponding to GET and HRVT. Sixteen apparently healthy men 17 to 28 years of age performed three maximal CPETs (cycling, walking, and running). Mean heart rate and V ˙ O 2 at GET and HRVT were 16 bpm (P<0.001) and 5.2 mL·kg-1·min-1 (P=0.001) higher in running than cycling, but no significant differences were observed between running and walking, or cycling and walking (P>0.05). There was a strong relationship between GET and HRVT, with R2 ranging from 0.69 to 0.90. A 1:1 relationship between %HRR and % V ˙ O 2 R was not observed at GET and HRVT. The %HRR was higher during cycling (GET mean difference=7%; HRVT mean difference=11%; both P<0.001), walking (GET mean difference=13%; HRVT mean difference=13%; both P<0.001), or running (GET mean difference=11%; HRVT mean difference=10%; both P<0.001). Therefore, using HRVT to prescribe aerobic exercise intensity appears to be valid. However, to assume a 1:1 relationship between %HRR and % V ˙ O 2 R at HRVT would probably result in overestimation of the energy expenditure during the bout of exercise.
id ABDC-1_de2fbdf1ab72082a00118ea8591733d6
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0100-879X2014000800706
network_acronym_str ABDC-1
network_name_str Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research
repository_id_str
spelling Influence of exercise modality on agreement between gas exchange and heart rate variability thresholdsAerobic exerciseAutonomic nervous systemHeart rate reserveOxygen uptake reservePoincare plotRamp protocolThe main purpose of this study was to investigate the level of agreement between the gas exchange threshold (GET) and heart rate variability threshold (HRVT) during maximal cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) using three different exercise modalities. A further aim was to establish whether there was a 1:1 relationship between the percentage heart rate reserve (%HRR) and percentage oxygen uptake reserve ( % V ˙ O 2 R) at intensities corresponding to GET and HRVT. Sixteen apparently healthy men 17 to 28 years of age performed three maximal CPETs (cycling, walking, and running). Mean heart rate and V ˙ O 2 at GET and HRVT were 16 bpm (P<0.001) and 5.2 mL·kg-1·min-1 (P=0.001) higher in running than cycling, but no significant differences were observed between running and walking, or cycling and walking (P>0.05). There was a strong relationship between GET and HRVT, with R2 ranging from 0.69 to 0.90. A 1:1 relationship between %HRR and % V ˙ O 2 R was not observed at GET and HRVT. The %HRR was higher during cycling (GET mean difference=7%; HRVT mean difference=11%; both P<0.001), walking (GET mean difference=13%; HRVT mean difference=13%; both P<0.001), or running (GET mean difference=11%; HRVT mean difference=10%; both P<0.001). Therefore, using HRVT to prescribe aerobic exercise intensity appears to be valid. However, to assume a 1:1 relationship between %HRR and % V ˙ O 2 R at HRVT would probably result in overestimation of the energy expenditure during the bout of exercise.Associação Brasileira de Divulgação Científica2014-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-879X2014000800706Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research v.47 n.8 2014reponame:Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Researchinstname:Associação Brasileira de Divulgação Científica (ABDC)instacron:ABDC10.1590/1414-431x20143713info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCunha,F.A.Montenegro,R.A.Midgley,A.W.Vasconcellos,F.Soares,P.P.Farinatti,P.eng2019-07-03T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0100-879X2014000800706Revistahttps://www.bjournal.org/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpbjournal@terra.com.br||bjournal@terra.com.br1414-431X0100-879Xopendoar:2019-07-03T00:00Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research - Associação Brasileira de Divulgação Científica (ABDC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Influence of exercise modality on agreement between gas exchange and heart rate variability thresholds
title Influence of exercise modality on agreement between gas exchange and heart rate variability thresholds
spellingShingle Influence of exercise modality on agreement between gas exchange and heart rate variability thresholds
Cunha,F.A.
Aerobic exercise
Autonomic nervous system
Heart rate reserve
Oxygen uptake reserve
Poincare plot
Ramp protocol
title_short Influence of exercise modality on agreement between gas exchange and heart rate variability thresholds
title_full Influence of exercise modality on agreement between gas exchange and heart rate variability thresholds
title_fullStr Influence of exercise modality on agreement between gas exchange and heart rate variability thresholds
title_full_unstemmed Influence of exercise modality on agreement between gas exchange and heart rate variability thresholds
title_sort Influence of exercise modality on agreement between gas exchange and heart rate variability thresholds
author Cunha,F.A.
author_facet Cunha,F.A.
Montenegro,R.A.
Midgley,A.W.
Vasconcellos,F.
Soares,P.P.
Farinatti,P.
author_role author
author2 Montenegro,R.A.
Midgley,A.W.
Vasconcellos,F.
Soares,P.P.
Farinatti,P.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Cunha,F.A.
Montenegro,R.A.
Midgley,A.W.
Vasconcellos,F.
Soares,P.P.
Farinatti,P.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Aerobic exercise
Autonomic nervous system
Heart rate reserve
Oxygen uptake reserve
Poincare plot
Ramp protocol
topic Aerobic exercise
Autonomic nervous system
Heart rate reserve
Oxygen uptake reserve
Poincare plot
Ramp protocol
description The main purpose of this study was to investigate the level of agreement between the gas exchange threshold (GET) and heart rate variability threshold (HRVT) during maximal cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) using three different exercise modalities. A further aim was to establish whether there was a 1:1 relationship between the percentage heart rate reserve (%HRR) and percentage oxygen uptake reserve ( % V ˙ O 2 R) at intensities corresponding to GET and HRVT. Sixteen apparently healthy men 17 to 28 years of age performed three maximal CPETs (cycling, walking, and running). Mean heart rate and V ˙ O 2 at GET and HRVT were 16 bpm (P<0.001) and 5.2 mL·kg-1·min-1 (P=0.001) higher in running than cycling, but no significant differences were observed between running and walking, or cycling and walking (P>0.05). There was a strong relationship between GET and HRVT, with R2 ranging from 0.69 to 0.90. A 1:1 relationship between %HRR and % V ˙ O 2 R was not observed at GET and HRVT. The %HRR was higher during cycling (GET mean difference=7%; HRVT mean difference=11%; both P<0.001), walking (GET mean difference=13%; HRVT mean difference=13%; both P<0.001), or running (GET mean difference=11%; HRVT mean difference=10%; both P<0.001). Therefore, using HRVT to prescribe aerobic exercise intensity appears to be valid. However, to assume a 1:1 relationship between %HRR and % V ˙ O 2 R at HRVT would probably result in overestimation of the energy expenditure during the bout of exercise.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-08-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-879X2014000800706
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-879X2014000800706
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1414-431x20143713
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Divulgação Científica
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Divulgação Científica
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research v.47 n.8 2014
reponame:Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research
instname:Associação Brasileira de Divulgação Científica (ABDC)
instacron:ABDC
instname_str Associação Brasileira de Divulgação Científica (ABDC)
instacron_str ABDC
institution ABDC
reponame_str Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research
collection Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research - Associação Brasileira de Divulgação Científica (ABDC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bjournal@terra.com.br||bjournal@terra.com.br
_version_ 1754302942917165056