What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about interventions for age-related macular degeneration?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Mozetic,Vania
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Pacheco,Rafael Leite, Latorraca,Carolina de Oliveira Cruz, Lee,Fernanda Chin Yu Ogasawara, Gomes,João Victor Borges, Riera,Rachel
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: São Paulo medical journal (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-31802019000600530
Resumo: ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is the third largest cause of blindness worldwide, accounting for 8.7% of all cases. A considerable number of preventive or therapeutic interventions have been used for AMD. OBJECTIVE: This study presents a critical view of the interventions that have been assessed through Cochrane systematic reviews. DESIGN AND SETTING: Review of systematic reviews, conducted in the Discipline of Evidence-Based Medicine, Escola Paulista de Medicina (EPM), Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP). METHODS: Review of Cochrane systematic reviews about interventions for AMD. RESULTS: The 18 systematic reviews included assessed the effects of surgical techniques, laser/photo/radiotherapy, intravitreal injections, systemic drugs and phytotherapy/vitamins/supplements. CONCLUSION: The Cochrane systematic reviews found evidence that use of bevacizumab, ranibizumab, pegaptanib, laser photocoagulation, photodynamic therapy and multivitamin compounds may present some benefits for treating AMD. There was insufficient evidence for supporting the use of macular translocation, submacular surgery, steroid implantation, radiotherapy, intravitreal aflibercept, interferon alfa, statins or omega-3 fatty acids for treating AMD; or the use of multivitamin antioxidant vitamins or mineral supplementation for preventing AMD. Future randomized controlled trials are imperative to reduce the uncertainty in several clinical questions regarding AMD.
id APM-1_36f30a25293be738f6cb9358b34d70ba
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1516-31802019000600530
network_acronym_str APM-1
network_name_str São Paulo medical journal (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about interventions for age-related macular degeneration?Review [publication type]Macular degenerationMacular degeneration, age-related, 1 [supplementary concept]Evidence-based medicineEvidence-based practiceCochrane reviewsAge-related macular degenerationSystematic reviewsOverviewABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is the third largest cause of blindness worldwide, accounting for 8.7% of all cases. A considerable number of preventive or therapeutic interventions have been used for AMD. OBJECTIVE: This study presents a critical view of the interventions that have been assessed through Cochrane systematic reviews. DESIGN AND SETTING: Review of systematic reviews, conducted in the Discipline of Evidence-Based Medicine, Escola Paulista de Medicina (EPM), Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP). METHODS: Review of Cochrane systematic reviews about interventions for AMD. RESULTS: The 18 systematic reviews included assessed the effects of surgical techniques, laser/photo/radiotherapy, intravitreal injections, systemic drugs and phytotherapy/vitamins/supplements. CONCLUSION: The Cochrane systematic reviews found evidence that use of bevacizumab, ranibizumab, pegaptanib, laser photocoagulation, photodynamic therapy and multivitamin compounds may present some benefits for treating AMD. There was insufficient evidence for supporting the use of macular translocation, submacular surgery, steroid implantation, radiotherapy, intravitreal aflibercept, interferon alfa, statins or omega-3 fatty acids for treating AMD; or the use of multivitamin antioxidant vitamins or mineral supplementation for preventing AMD. Future randomized controlled trials are imperative to reduce the uncertainty in several clinical questions regarding AMD.Associação Paulista de Medicina - APM2019-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-31802019000600530Sao Paulo Medical Journal v.137 n.6 2019reponame:São Paulo medical journal (Online)instname:Associação Paulista de Medicinainstacron:APM10.1590/1516-3180.2019.010317092019info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMozetic,VaniaPacheco,Rafael LeiteLatorraca,Carolina de Oliveira CruzLee,Fernanda Chin Yu OgasawaraGomes,João Victor BorgesRiera,Racheleng2020-03-02T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1516-31802019000600530Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/spmjhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phprevistas@apm.org.br1806-94601516-3180opendoar:2020-03-02T00:00São Paulo medical journal (Online) - Associação Paulista de Medicinafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about interventions for age-related macular degeneration?
title What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about interventions for age-related macular degeneration?
spellingShingle What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about interventions for age-related macular degeneration?
Mozetic,Vania
Review [publication type]
Macular degeneration
Macular degeneration, age-related, 1 [supplementary concept]
Evidence-based medicine
Evidence-based practice
Cochrane reviews
Age-related macular degeneration
Systematic reviews
Overview
title_short What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about interventions for age-related macular degeneration?
title_full What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about interventions for age-related macular degeneration?
title_fullStr What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about interventions for age-related macular degeneration?
title_full_unstemmed What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about interventions for age-related macular degeneration?
title_sort What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about interventions for age-related macular degeneration?
author Mozetic,Vania
author_facet Mozetic,Vania
Pacheco,Rafael Leite
Latorraca,Carolina de Oliveira Cruz
Lee,Fernanda Chin Yu Ogasawara
Gomes,João Victor Borges
Riera,Rachel
author_role author
author2 Pacheco,Rafael Leite
Latorraca,Carolina de Oliveira Cruz
Lee,Fernanda Chin Yu Ogasawara
Gomes,João Victor Borges
Riera,Rachel
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Mozetic,Vania
Pacheco,Rafael Leite
Latorraca,Carolina de Oliveira Cruz
Lee,Fernanda Chin Yu Ogasawara
Gomes,João Victor Borges
Riera,Rachel
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Review [publication type]
Macular degeneration
Macular degeneration, age-related, 1 [supplementary concept]
Evidence-based medicine
Evidence-based practice
Cochrane reviews
Age-related macular degeneration
Systematic reviews
Overview
topic Review [publication type]
Macular degeneration
Macular degeneration, age-related, 1 [supplementary concept]
Evidence-based medicine
Evidence-based practice
Cochrane reviews
Age-related macular degeneration
Systematic reviews
Overview
description ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is the third largest cause of blindness worldwide, accounting for 8.7% of all cases. A considerable number of preventive or therapeutic interventions have been used for AMD. OBJECTIVE: This study presents a critical view of the interventions that have been assessed through Cochrane systematic reviews. DESIGN AND SETTING: Review of systematic reviews, conducted in the Discipline of Evidence-Based Medicine, Escola Paulista de Medicina (EPM), Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP). METHODS: Review of Cochrane systematic reviews about interventions for AMD. RESULTS: The 18 systematic reviews included assessed the effects of surgical techniques, laser/photo/radiotherapy, intravitreal injections, systemic drugs and phytotherapy/vitamins/supplements. CONCLUSION: The Cochrane systematic reviews found evidence that use of bevacizumab, ranibizumab, pegaptanib, laser photocoagulation, photodynamic therapy and multivitamin compounds may present some benefits for treating AMD. There was insufficient evidence for supporting the use of macular translocation, submacular surgery, steroid implantation, radiotherapy, intravitreal aflibercept, interferon alfa, statins or omega-3 fatty acids for treating AMD; or the use of multivitamin antioxidant vitamins or mineral supplementation for preventing AMD. Future randomized controlled trials are imperative to reduce the uncertainty in several clinical questions regarding AMD.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-12-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-31802019000600530
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-31802019000600530
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1516-3180.2019.010317092019
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Paulista de Medicina - APM
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Paulista de Medicina - APM
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Sao Paulo Medical Journal v.137 n.6 2019
reponame:São Paulo medical journal (Online)
instname:Associação Paulista de Medicina
instacron:APM
instname_str Associação Paulista de Medicina
instacron_str APM
institution APM
reponame_str São Paulo medical journal (Online)
collection São Paulo medical journal (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv São Paulo medical journal (Online) - Associação Paulista de Medicina
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistas@apm.org.br
_version_ 1754209266738135040