Interdisciplinary graduate programs: context, contradictions, and limits of the CAPES evaluation process

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Oliveira, Marlize Rubin
Data de Publicação: 2011
Outros Autores: Almeida, Jalcione
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: RevistaBrasileiradePós-Graduação
Texto Completo: http://ojs.rbpg.capes.gov.br/index.php/rbpg/article/view/210
Resumo: This text is intended as a reflection on the most important contradictions and limitations of evaluations performed on Graduate Programs submitted to the CAInter/CAPES Interdisciplinary Evaluation Committee. Some of the concerns have to do with the search for quality in the production of knowledge in those programs. This search is, on the one hand, associated with the organization of curricula, the composition of the faculty and student bodies, the dynamics of research groups, the conditions under which theses, dissertations, and research are prepared, where multi- and interdisciplinarity are viewed as goals. On the other hand, it related to the Evaluation System to which the Programs are subordinated and whose origin is based on disciplinarity. The conclusions mainly point to the need for discussing alternatives to the manner by which disciplines are evaluated, for without change there is a risk of jeopardizing the potential for the construction of knowledge aimed at establishing interchanges between distinct scientific areas.
id CAPES-1_26b3f41990630e5b9fa1c5307eb63dd1
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.192.168.0.141:article/210
network_acronym_str CAPES-1
network_name_str RevistaBrasileiradePós-Graduação
spelling Interdisciplinary graduate programs: context, contradictions, and limits of the CAPES evaluation processProgramas de posgrado interdisciplinarios: contexto, contradicciones y límites del proceso de evaluación CapesProgramas de pós-graduação interdisciplinares: contexto, contradições e limites do processo de avaliação CapesAvaliação da Pós-Graduação. Pós-Graduação Interdisciplinar. Interdisciplinaridade.Graduate Program Evaluation. Interdisciplinary Graduate Program. Interdisciplinarity.Evaluación del Posgrado. Posgrado Interdisciplinario. Interdisciplinariedad.This text is intended as a reflection on the most important contradictions and limitations of evaluations performed on Graduate Programs submitted to the CAInter/CAPES Interdisciplinary Evaluation Committee. Some of the concerns have to do with the search for quality in the production of knowledge in those programs. This search is, on the one hand, associated with the organization of curricula, the composition of the faculty and student bodies, the dynamics of research groups, the conditions under which theses, dissertations, and research are prepared, where multi- and interdisciplinarity are viewed as goals. On the other hand, it related to the Evaluation System to which the Programs are subordinated and whose origin is based on disciplinarity. The conclusions mainly point to the need for discussing alternatives to the manner by which disciplines are evaluated, for without change there is a risk of jeopardizing the potential for the construction of knowledge aimed at establishing interchanges between distinct scientific areas.Este texto se propõe a refletir sobre as principais contradições e os limites da avaliação realizada nos programas de pós-graduação submetidos à Comissão de Avaliação Interdisciplinar (CAInter/Capes). Algumas das inquietações se relacionam à busca pela qualidade na produção de conhecimento nesses programas; por um lado, vinculandose à organização dos currículos, à composição do corpo docente e discente, à dinâmica dos grupos de pesquisa, às condições de elaboração de dissertações, teses e pesquisa em que a multi e a interdisciplinaridade se colocam como meta; pelo outro, ao Sistema de Avaliação a que os programas estão submetidos e têm na disciplinaridade sua gênese. As conclusões apontam principalmente para a necessidade de discutir alternativas à forma de avaliação disciplinar, sob pena de inviabilizar aspossibilidades de construção de conhecimentos que visam estabelecer diálogos entre distintas áreas científicas.Este texto se propone reflexionar sobre las principales contradicciones y límites de la evaluación realizada en los programas de posgrado sometidos a la Comisión de Evaluación Interdisciplinaria (CAInter/Capes). Algunas de las inquietudes se relacionan a la búsqueda por calidad en la producción de conocimiento en esos programas; por un lado, vinculándose a la organización de los currículos, a la composición del cuerpo docente y discente, a la dinámica de los grupos de investigación, a las condiciones de elaboración de disertaciones, tesis e investigación en que la multi y la interdisciplinariedad se colocan como meta; por el otro, al Sistema de Evaluación a que los programas están sometidos y tienen en la disciplinariedad su génesis. Las conclusiones apuntan principalmente a la necesidad de discutir alternativas a la forma de evaluación disciplinaria, bajo pena de hacer inviables las posibilidades de construcción de conocimientos que buscan establecer diálogos entre distintas áreas científicas.Revista Brasileira de Pós-GraduaçãoOliveira, Marlize RubinAlmeida, Jalcione2011-03-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://ojs.rbpg.capes.gov.br/index.php/rbpg/article/view/21010.21713/2358-2332.2011.v8.210RBPG; v. 8, n. 15 (2011)Revista Brasileira de Pós-Graduação; v. 8, n. 15 (2011)2358-23321806-8405reponame:RevistaBrasileiradePós-Graduaçãoinstname:CAPESinstacron:CAPESporhttp://ojs.rbpg.capes.gov.br/index.php/rbpg/article/view/210/pdf##submission.copyrightStatement##info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2019-07-20T15:50:36Zmail@mail.com -
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Interdisciplinary graduate programs: context, contradictions, and limits of the CAPES evaluation process
Programas de posgrado interdisciplinarios: contexto, contradicciones y límites del proceso de evaluación Capes
Programas de pós-graduação interdisciplinares: contexto, contradições e limites do processo de avaliação Capes
title Interdisciplinary graduate programs: context, contradictions, and limits of the CAPES evaluation process
spellingShingle Interdisciplinary graduate programs: context, contradictions, and limits of the CAPES evaluation process
Oliveira, Marlize Rubin
Avaliação da Pós-Graduação. Pós-Graduação Interdisciplinar. Interdisciplinaridade.
Graduate Program Evaluation. Interdisciplinary Graduate Program. Interdisciplinarity.
Evaluación del Posgrado. Posgrado Interdisciplinario. Interdisciplinariedad.
title_short Interdisciplinary graduate programs: context, contradictions, and limits of the CAPES evaluation process
title_full Interdisciplinary graduate programs: context, contradictions, and limits of the CAPES evaluation process
title_fullStr Interdisciplinary graduate programs: context, contradictions, and limits of the CAPES evaluation process
title_full_unstemmed Interdisciplinary graduate programs: context, contradictions, and limits of the CAPES evaluation process
title_sort Interdisciplinary graduate programs: context, contradictions, and limits of the CAPES evaluation process
author Oliveira, Marlize Rubin
author_facet Oliveira, Marlize Rubin
Almeida, Jalcione
author_role author
author2 Almeida, Jalcione
author2_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv


dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Oliveira, Marlize Rubin
Almeida, Jalcione
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv


dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Avaliação da Pós-Graduação. Pós-Graduação Interdisciplinar. Interdisciplinaridade.
Graduate Program Evaluation. Interdisciplinary Graduate Program. Interdisciplinarity.
Evaluación del Posgrado. Posgrado Interdisciplinario. Interdisciplinariedad.
topic Avaliação da Pós-Graduação. Pós-Graduação Interdisciplinar. Interdisciplinaridade.
Graduate Program Evaluation. Interdisciplinary Graduate Program. Interdisciplinarity.
Evaluación del Posgrado. Posgrado Interdisciplinario. Interdisciplinariedad.
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv This text is intended as a reflection on the most important contradictions and limitations of evaluations performed on Graduate Programs submitted to the CAInter/CAPES Interdisciplinary Evaluation Committee. Some of the concerns have to do with the search for quality in the production of knowledge in those programs. This search is, on the one hand, associated with the organization of curricula, the composition of the faculty and student bodies, the dynamics of research groups, the conditions under which theses, dissertations, and research are prepared, where multi- and interdisciplinarity are viewed as goals. On the other hand, it related to the Evaluation System to which the Programs are subordinated and whose origin is based on disciplinarity. The conclusions mainly point to the need for discussing alternatives to the manner by which disciplines are evaluated, for without change there is a risk of jeopardizing the potential for the construction of knowledge aimed at establishing interchanges between distinct scientific areas.
Este texto se propõe a refletir sobre as principais contradições e os limites da avaliação realizada nos programas de pós-graduação submetidos à Comissão de Avaliação Interdisciplinar (CAInter/Capes). Algumas das inquietações se relacionam à busca pela qualidade na produção de conhecimento nesses programas; por um lado, vinculandose à organização dos currículos, à composição do corpo docente e discente, à dinâmica dos grupos de pesquisa, às condições de elaboração de dissertações, teses e pesquisa em que a multi e a interdisciplinaridade se colocam como meta; pelo outro, ao Sistema de Avaliação a que os programas estão submetidos e têm na disciplinaridade sua gênese. As conclusões apontam principalmente para a necessidade de discutir alternativas à forma de avaliação disciplinar, sob pena de inviabilizar aspossibilidades de construção de conhecimentos que visam estabelecer diálogos entre distintas áreas científicas.
Este texto se propone reflexionar sobre las principales contradicciones y límites de la evaluación realizada en los programas de posgrado sometidos a la Comisión de Evaluación Interdisciplinaria (CAInter/Capes). Algunas de las inquietudes se relacionan a la búsqueda por calidad en la producción de conocimiento en esos programas; por un lado, vinculándose a la organización de los currículos, a la composición del cuerpo docente y discente, a la dinámica de los grupos de investigación, a las condiciones de elaboración de disertaciones, tesis e investigación en que la multi y la interdisciplinariedad se colocan como meta; por el otro, al Sistema de Evaluación a que los programas están sometidos y tienen en la disciplinariedad su génesis. Las conclusiones apuntan principalmente a la necesidad de discutir alternativas a la forma de evaluación disciplinaria, bajo pena de hacer inviables las posibilidades de construcción de conocimientos que buscan establecer diálogos entre distintas áreas científicas.
description This text is intended as a reflection on the most important contradictions and limitations of evaluations performed on Graduate Programs submitted to the CAInter/CAPES Interdisciplinary Evaluation Committee. Some of the concerns have to do with the search for quality in the production of knowledge in those programs. This search is, on the one hand, associated with the organization of curricula, the composition of the faculty and student bodies, the dynamics of research groups, the conditions under which theses, dissertations, and research are prepared, where multi- and interdisciplinarity are viewed as goals. On the other hand, it related to the Evaluation System to which the Programs are subordinated and whose origin is based on disciplinarity. The conclusions mainly point to the need for discussing alternatives to the manner by which disciplines are evaluated, for without change there is a risk of jeopardizing the potential for the construction of knowledge aimed at establishing interchanges between distinct scientific areas.
publishDate 2011
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2011-03-31
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv


dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://ojs.rbpg.capes.gov.br/index.php/rbpg/article/view/210
10.21713/2358-2332.2011.v8.210
url http://ojs.rbpg.capes.gov.br/index.php/rbpg/article/view/210
identifier_str_mv 10.21713/2358-2332.2011.v8.210
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://ojs.rbpg.capes.gov.br/index.php/rbpg/article/view/210/pdf
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv ##submission.copyrightStatement##
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv ##submission.copyrightStatement##
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Pós-Graduação
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Pós-Graduação
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv RBPG; v. 8, n. 15 (2011)
Revista Brasileira de Pós-Graduação; v. 8, n. 15 (2011)
2358-2332
1806-8405
reponame:RevistaBrasileiradePós-Graduação
instname:CAPES
instacron:CAPES
reponame_str RevistaBrasileiradePós-Graduação
collection RevistaBrasileiradePós-Graduação
instname_str CAPES
instacron_str CAPES
institution CAPES
repository.name.fl_str_mv -
repository.mail.fl_str_mv mail@mail.com
_version_ 1639987074263154688

Registros relacionados