Learning assessment: the docent formation in question

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Gurgel, Carmesina Ribeiro
Data de Publicação: 2007
Outros Autores: Leite, Raimundo Helio
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Título da fonte: Ensaio (Rio de Janeiro. Online)
Texto Completo: https://revistas.cesgranrio.org.br/index.php/ensaio/article/view/582
Resumo: The subject of this research was to analysis assessment practices from the teacher's point of view in an effort to find resources and references that would help the teachers to become competent in learning assessment. The research was carried out in the Federal University of Piaui, specifically on the Teresina Campus. The universe was composed of 473 docentes who were holders of masters or doctoral degrees. The sample for interviews and the application of a questionnaire was comprised of 40 docentes belonging to six different teaching centers. 80% of these docentes had teaching experiences ranging from 16 to 26 years. The data collected during the research was examined using the theoretic model for content analysis suggested by Laurence Bardin. The results showed that: (i) the Federal University of Piaui has an organizational structure that resembles other brazilian universities; (ii) it has adopted a policy consistent with teaching qualifications directed towards; (iii) the learning assessment of the students only demands some institutional norms for the assessment to be carried out, the choice of assessment methods is left to the docentes; (iv) the docente who has obtained a masters or doctoral degree is not necessarily competent to teach at university level; (v) the articulation between teaching at graduate level and research occurs from the development of projects elaborated by monitors, those beginning research, extension courses and orientation from the demanded for the conclusion of the course; (vi) 20% of the docentes holding masters or doctoral degrees have directed their activities more towards research, 65% are more dedicated to teaching than research, while 15% elaborate extension courses; (vii) the greatest obstacles felt by those returning from post-graduation courses to the Federal University of Piaui was to awaken students for research and make research contents available in a language that was not above the ability of the students to understand; (viii) the necessity for pedagogical training is recognized; (ix) 56% of the students of the docentes interviewed showed that they were satisfied with the assessment method used by the docente, the remainder suggested that the methods be reexamined as they were not contemporary models; (x) the docentes regarded the following themes as valid as sources of reference for learning assessment and teaching formation: administration of pedagogical work; administrating new educational paradigms; assessment – a policy instrument for pedagogical work; teaching planning; knowledge for learning assessment; assessment from a knowledge construction perspective; learning conceptions as a basis for assessment; the use of thechnology as a didatic resourse; teaching assessment from a student perspective; routine statistics for a metric analysis of an examination. By way of conclusion we tried to elaborate from the results, obtained suggestions to make viable changes in formation policy for university teaching and consequently for bettering the quality of learning in an neffort to make the students more professionaly competent.
id CESGRANRIO_dbcb5af573e81716e2d88248d35fbb0e
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.localhost:article/582
network_acronym_str CESGRANRIO
network_name_str Ensaio (Rio de Janeiro. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Learning assessment: the docent formation in questionEvaluar el aprendizaje: una cuestion de formacion docenteAvaliar aprendizagem: uma questao de formação docenteLa evaluacion; Aprendiendo; La formacion educativa; La educacion superior; Referenciales para evaluar; Ensegñaza universitariaAssessment; Learning; Docent Formation; Superior Education; Evaluation references; University teachingAvaliação; Aprendizagem; Formação docente; Educação superior; Referenciais para avaliar; Docencia superiorThe subject of this research was to analysis assessment practices from the teacher's point of view in an effort to find resources and references that would help the teachers to become competent in learning assessment. The research was carried out in the Federal University of Piaui, specifically on the Teresina Campus. The universe was composed of 473 docentes who were holders of masters or doctoral degrees. The sample for interviews and the application of a questionnaire was comprised of 40 docentes belonging to six different teaching centers. 80% of these docentes had teaching experiences ranging from 16 to 26 years. The data collected during the research was examined using the theoretic model for content analysis suggested by Laurence Bardin. The results showed that: (i) the Federal University of Piaui has an organizational structure that resembles other brazilian universities; (ii) it has adopted a policy consistent with teaching qualifications directed towards; (iii) the learning assessment of the students only demands some institutional norms for the assessment to be carried out, the choice of assessment methods is left to the docentes; (iv) the docente who has obtained a masters or doctoral degree is not necessarily competent to teach at university level; (v) the articulation between teaching at graduate level and research occurs from the development of projects elaborated by monitors, those beginning research, extension courses and orientation from the demanded for the conclusion of the course; (vi) 20% of the docentes holding masters or doctoral degrees have directed their activities more towards research, 65% are more dedicated to teaching than research, while 15% elaborate extension courses; (vii) the greatest obstacles felt by those returning from post-graduation courses to the Federal University of Piaui was to awaken students for research and make research contents available in a language that was not above the ability of the students to understand; (viii) the necessity for pedagogical training is recognized; (ix) 56% of the students of the docentes interviewed showed that they were satisfied with the assessment method used by the docente, the remainder suggested that the methods be reexamined as they were not contemporary models; (x) the docentes regarded the following themes as valid as sources of reference for learning assessment and teaching formation: administration of pedagogical work; administrating new educational paradigms; assessment – a policy instrument for pedagogical work; teaching planning; knowledge for learning assessment; assessment from a knowledge construction perspective; learning conceptions as a basis for assessment; the use of thechnology as a didatic resourse; teaching assessment from a student perspective; routine statistics for a metric analysis of an examination. By way of conclusion we tried to elaborate from the results, obtained suggestions to make viable changes in formation policy for university teaching and consequently for bettering the quality of learning in an neffort to make the students more professionaly competent.El objeto de estudio de esta investigación era analizar y evaluar las practicas educativas en la perspectiva del maestro con objectivo de obtener referenciales para la que enlata el instrumentalizacion y la adquisicion de competencias para evaluar la aprendizajen de los estudiantes. El campo empirico de investigación fue la Universidad Federal de Piaui - el Campus Teresina y el universo fue formado por 473 de graduados, maestros y doctores. La muestra para el logro de la entrevista y aplicacion de la encuesta fue de 40 docentes que actúan en seis centros de instruccion. El tiempo de enseñar de 80% de esos maestros varia entre 16 y 26 años. Para el tratamiento de los datos se hice uso del analisis de contenido . Los resultados indicaran eso: (1) UFPI presenta un estructura organizacional de que retrata al modelo de las otras universidades brasileñas; (2) adopta una politica consistente de calificacion educativa que contribuye al invigoration de sus maestros em su funcion pedagogica y politica; (3) la comprobacion del aprendizaje de los estudiantes simplemente se institucionaliza em respecto a las normas que regulan las evaluaciones, mientras las metodologias en classe son escojidas por los maestros; (4) el maestro que el possee el postgraduado stricto sensu no se pone por eso mas competente para la ensegñanza superior; (5) la articulacion entre la ensegñanza em la graduacion y la investigación pasa por el desarrollo de proyectos de las monitorias, de la iniciacion a la investigación, de cursos de la extension y de la orientacion de Trabajo de Conclusion de Cursos - TCC; (6) 25% de los maestros o doctores ponderan sus actividades mas em proyectos de la investigación, 60% son envolucrados mas a la enseñanza que a la investigación y 15% desarrollan las actividades de la extension; (7) los problemass mas grandes que afectan a los docentes que hacen studios de post grado cuando regresan a la UFPI estan refiriendose el logro de proyectos de la investigación, y dificultades de transmission de contenidos para los estudiantes de la graduacion; (8) hay el reconocimiento de la necesidad de un entrenamiento en el area pedagogica; (9) 56% de los maestros de los eesestudiantes de la muestra se dicieran satisfechos con las metodologias de la evaluacion desarrolladas por ellos y los otros ellos sugieren un volver a pensar en las practicas evaluativas actuales porque ellas no retratan una metodologia contemporanea; (10) los maestros validaron los temas siguientes para componer las referencias para evaluar el aprendizaje en una perspectiva de formacion educativa de los maestros: La administracion del Trabajo Pedagogico: La administracion de Los Nuevos Paradigmas Educativos; La evaluacion: El instrumento de la Administracion del Trabajo Pedagogico; Planeando la Enseñanza y Aprendiendo; Las concepciones para Evaluar el Aprendizaje; Para evaluar en una Perspectiva de Construccion del Conocimiento; Las Concepciones de Aprender que sirven de base la Evaluacion; El uso de La tecnologia como el Recurso Didactico; Las tecnicas e Instrumentos: La evaluacion y la Medida. En las conclusiones, se hice um delineamento, com base en los resultados y sugerencias de acciones, que haga posibles ajustes en la politica de la formacion para el ejercicio de la ensegñanza superior y, por consiguiente, para la mejora de la calidad de los aprendizajes que se dirigen hacia la construcción de las competencias de los profesionales del ensegñanza y de los estudiantes.O objeto de estudo desta pesquisa foi analisar as práticas avaliativas na perspectiva do docente para buscar referenciais que possam instrumentalizar a aquisicao de competencias a fim de avaliar aprendizagens. O campo empirico de investigação foi a Universidade Federal do Piaui – Campus Teresina, cujo universo envolveu 473 docentes bachareis doutores e mestres. A amostra para a realização da entrevista e aplicação do questionario foi de 40 docentes dos seis centros de ensino. O tempo de magisterio de 80% desses docentes varia entre 16 e 26 anos. Para tratamento dos dados utilizou-se a analise de conteúdo, conforme Laurence Bardin. Os resultados mostraram que: (1) a UFPI apresenta uma estrutura organizacional que retrata o modelo das demais universidades brasileiras; (2) adota uma politica consistente de qualificação docente, contribuindo para o fortalecimento da sua funcao pesquisadora; (3) a verificação da aprendizagem dos discentes e institucionalizada apenas em relação às normas para a realização das avaliações, ficando as metodologias avaliativas a criterio dos docentes; (4) o docente pos-graduado stricto sensu nao garante que se torne mais ou menos competente para docencia superior; (5) a articulação entre o ensino de graduação e a pesquisa ocorre a partir do desenvolvimento de projetos de monitorias, de iniciação à pesquisa, de cursos de extensao e da orientação de Trabalho de Conclusao de Curso – TCC; (6) 25% dos mestres ou doutores concentram suas atividades em projetos de pesquisa, 60% se dedicam mais ao ensino do que à pesquisa e 15% desenvolvem atividades de extensao; (7) os maiores obstaculos que os egressos da pos-graduação enfrentam ao retornarem à UFPI sao referentes a realização de projetos de pesquisa e dificuldades de transposicao dos conteúdos para os alunos de graduação; (8) ha o reconhecimento da necessidade de uma capacitação na area pedagogica; (9) 56% dos alunos dos docentes da amostra consideram-se satisfeitos com as metodologias de avaliação desenvolvidas por eles e os demais sugerem um repensar na forma de conduzir o processo avaliativo porque nao retrata uma metodologia contemporânea; (10) os docentes validaram os seguintes temas para compor as referencias a fim de avaliar aprendizagem numa perspectiva de formação docente: Gestao do Trabalho Pedagogico: Administrando Novos Paradigmas Educacionais; Avaliação: Instrumento da Gestao do Trabalho Pedagogico; Planejamento de Ensino e Aprendizagem; Os Saberes para Avaliar Aprendizagem; Avaliar numa Perspectiva de Construção do Conhecimento; As Concepcoes de Aprendizagem que Fundamentam a Avaliação; Tecnologia Utilizada como Recurso Didatico; Tecnicas e Instrumentos: Avaliação e Medida. Nas conclusoes, buscou-se, a partir dos resultados, sugerir acoes que viabilizem ajustes na politica de formação para o exercicio da docencia superior e, conseqüentemente, para a melhoria da qualidade das aprendizagens rumo ao estabelecimento de competencias profissionais dos alunos.Fundação CesgranrioGurgel, Carmesina RibeiroLeite, Raimundo Helio2007-01-20info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttps://revistas.cesgranrio.org.br/index.php/ensaio/article/view/582Ensaio: Avaliação e Políticas Públicas em Educação; v. 15, n. 54 (2007): Revista Ensaio - Jan./Mar.; 145-1681809-44650104-4036reponame:Ensaio (Rio de Janeiro. Online)instname:Fundação Cesgranrioinstacron:CESGRANRIO-2pt; en; esDireitos autorais 2016 Revista Ensaio: Avaliação e Politicas Públicas em Educaçãohttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2015-07-09T18:46:16Zoai:ojs.localhost:article/582Revistahttps://revistas.cesgranrio.org.br/index.php/ensaioONGhttps://revistas.cesgranrio.org.br/index.php/ensaio/oaiensaio@cesgranrio.org.br||fatimacunha@cesgranrio.org.br||alan@cesgranrio.org.br1809-44650104-4036opendoar:2015-07-09T18:46:16Ensaio (Rio de Janeiro. Online) - Fundação Cesgranriofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Learning assessment: the docent formation in question
Evaluar el aprendizaje: una cuestion de formacion docente
Avaliar aprendizagem: uma questao de formação docente
title Learning assessment: the docent formation in question
spellingShingle Learning assessment: the docent formation in question
Gurgel, Carmesina Ribeiro
La evaluacion; Aprendiendo; La formacion educativa; La educacion superior; Referenciales para evaluar; Ensegñaza universitaria
Assessment; Learning; Docent Formation; Superior Education; Evaluation references; University teaching
Avaliação; Aprendizagem; Formação docente; Educação superior; Referenciais para avaliar; Docencia superior
title_short Learning assessment: the docent formation in question
title_full Learning assessment: the docent formation in question
title_fullStr Learning assessment: the docent formation in question
title_full_unstemmed Learning assessment: the docent formation in question
title_sort Learning assessment: the docent formation in question
author Gurgel, Carmesina Ribeiro
author_facet Gurgel, Carmesina Ribeiro
Leite, Raimundo Helio
author_role author
author2 Leite, Raimundo Helio
author2_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv


dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Gurgel, Carmesina Ribeiro
Leite, Raimundo Helio
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv La evaluacion; Aprendiendo; La formacion educativa; La educacion superior; Referenciales para evaluar; Ensegñaza universitaria
Assessment; Learning; Docent Formation; Superior Education; Evaluation references; University teaching
Avaliação; Aprendizagem; Formação docente; Educação superior; Referenciais para avaliar; Docencia superior
topic La evaluacion; Aprendiendo; La formacion educativa; La educacion superior; Referenciales para evaluar; Ensegñaza universitaria
Assessment; Learning; Docent Formation; Superior Education; Evaluation references; University teaching
Avaliação; Aprendizagem; Formação docente; Educação superior; Referenciais para avaliar; Docencia superior
description The subject of this research was to analysis assessment practices from the teacher's point of view in an effort to find resources and references that would help the teachers to become competent in learning assessment. The research was carried out in the Federal University of Piaui, specifically on the Teresina Campus. The universe was composed of 473 docentes who were holders of masters or doctoral degrees. The sample for interviews and the application of a questionnaire was comprised of 40 docentes belonging to six different teaching centers. 80% of these docentes had teaching experiences ranging from 16 to 26 years. The data collected during the research was examined using the theoretic model for content analysis suggested by Laurence Bardin. The results showed that: (i) the Federal University of Piaui has an organizational structure that resembles other brazilian universities; (ii) it has adopted a policy consistent with teaching qualifications directed towards; (iii) the learning assessment of the students only demands some institutional norms for the assessment to be carried out, the choice of assessment methods is left to the docentes; (iv) the docente who has obtained a masters or doctoral degree is not necessarily competent to teach at university level; (v) the articulation between teaching at graduate level and research occurs from the development of projects elaborated by monitors, those beginning research, extension courses and orientation from the demanded for the conclusion of the course; (vi) 20% of the docentes holding masters or doctoral degrees have directed their activities more towards research, 65% are more dedicated to teaching than research, while 15% elaborate extension courses; (vii) the greatest obstacles felt by those returning from post-graduation courses to the Federal University of Piaui was to awaken students for research and make research contents available in a language that was not above the ability of the students to understand; (viii) the necessity for pedagogical training is recognized; (ix) 56% of the students of the docentes interviewed showed that they were satisfied with the assessment method used by the docente, the remainder suggested that the methods be reexamined as they were not contemporary models; (x) the docentes regarded the following themes as valid as sources of reference for learning assessment and teaching formation: administration of pedagogical work; administrating new educational paradigms; assessment – a policy instrument for pedagogical work; teaching planning; knowledge for learning assessment; assessment from a knowledge construction perspective; learning conceptions as a basis for assessment; the use of thechnology as a didatic resourse; teaching assessment from a student perspective; routine statistics for a metric analysis of an examination. By way of conclusion we tried to elaborate from the results, obtained suggestions to make viable changes in formation policy for university teaching and consequently for bettering the quality of learning in an neffort to make the students more professionaly competent.
publishDate 2007
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2007-01-20
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistas.cesgranrio.org.br/index.php/ensaio/article/view/582
url https://revistas.cesgranrio.org.br/index.php/ensaio/article/view/582
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv pt; en; es
language_invalid_str_mv pt; en; es
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Direitos autorais 2016 Revista Ensaio: Avaliação e Politicas Públicas em Educação
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Direitos autorais 2016 Revista Ensaio: Avaliação e Politicas Públicas em Educação
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv








dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Cesgranrio
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Cesgranrio
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Ensaio: Avaliação e Políticas Públicas em Educação; v. 15, n. 54 (2007): Revista Ensaio - Jan./Mar.; 145-168
1809-4465
0104-4036
reponame:Ensaio (Rio de Janeiro. Online)
instname:Fundação Cesgranrio
instacron:CESGRANRIO-2
instname_str Fundação Cesgranrio
instacron_str CESGRANRIO-2
institution CESGRANRIO-2
reponame_str Ensaio (Rio de Janeiro. Online)
collection Ensaio (Rio de Janeiro. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Ensaio (Rio de Janeiro. Online) - Fundação Cesgranrio
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ensaio@cesgranrio.org.br||fatimacunha@cesgranrio.org.br||alan@cesgranrio.org.br
_version_ 1754832030592401408