The Role of the Judicial Branch in the Effectiveness of Health Public Policies in the State of Espírito Santo: (NON) Existence of Dialogue Between the Parties
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2015 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista de Direito Sociais e Políticas Públicas |
Texto Completo: | http://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistadspp/article/view/433 |
Resumo: | The fundamental right to health, especially from the 1988 Constitution on, is inserted in the list of social rights that have been going through the process of judicialization. In this context, the present study had as its goal to analyze the (non)existence of dialogue between the parties involved in the judicialization of health in the state of Espirito Santo. The research was made by the evaluation of the mechanisms currently available to the fulfillment of health public policies set by the constitution. After that, the participation of the Center of Technical Support with the judges in the State of Espirito Santo was also evaluated. A case analysis was also conducted on the entered decision on the Court Injunction nº 0025675-15.2013.8.08.0000 (100130043811), looking to evaluate how the process of granting the medication took place. Lastly, some instruments that could effectively help in the concretion of the fundamental right to health were suggested. Through these analysis, it was perceived that with the lack of Technical Support and especially in sight of the disability of communication between the Public and the Judicial Branches, many times premature and onerous judgments are made to one of the parties. However, the mechanisms on the New Code of Civil Procedures and the Center of Technical Support for Judges are important instruments that seek to promote cooperation between social actors and that must be used to materialize the fundamental dialogue between the parties. |
id |
CONPEDI-9_e47696c617bd7f1fbec973c4e676ed42 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.indexlaw.org:article/433 |
network_acronym_str |
CONPEDI-9 |
network_name_str |
Revista de Direito Sociais e Políticas Públicas |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The Role of the Judicial Branch in the Effectiveness of Health Public Policies in the State of Espírito Santo: (NON) Existence of Dialogue Between the PartiesO Papel do Poder Judiciário na Efetivação das Políticas Públicas de Saúde no Estado do Espírito Santo: (IN) Existência de Diálogo entre as PartesRight to health; Judicialization of health; Free grant of medication by the public authority; Dialogue between the partiesDireito à saúde; Judicialização da saúde; Concessão de medicamentos gratuitos pelo poder público; Diálogo entre as partesThe fundamental right to health, especially from the 1988 Constitution on, is inserted in the list of social rights that have been going through the process of judicialization. In this context, the present study had as its goal to analyze the (non)existence of dialogue between the parties involved in the judicialization of health in the state of Espirito Santo. The research was made by the evaluation of the mechanisms currently available to the fulfillment of health public policies set by the constitution. After that, the participation of the Center of Technical Support with the judges in the State of Espirito Santo was also evaluated. A case analysis was also conducted on the entered decision on the Court Injunction nº 0025675-15.2013.8.08.0000 (100130043811), looking to evaluate how the process of granting the medication took place. Lastly, some instruments that could effectively help in the concretion of the fundamental right to health were suggested. Through these analysis, it was perceived that with the lack of Technical Support and especially in sight of the disability of communication between the Public and the Judicial Branches, many times premature and onerous judgments are made to one of the parties. However, the mechanisms on the New Code of Civil Procedures and the Center of Technical Support for Judges are important instruments that seek to promote cooperation between social actors and that must be used to materialize the fundamental dialogue between the parties.O direito fundamental à saúde, principalmente a partir da Constituição de 1988, insere-se no rol de direitos sociais que vêm sofrendo o processo de judicialização. Nesse contexto, o presente estudo teve por objetivo analisar a (in)existência de diálogo entre as partes envolvidas na judicialização da saúde no Estado do Espírito Santo. A pesquisa realizou-se por meio da avaliação de atuais mecanismos disponíveis para a realização de políticas públicas de saúde previstas no texto constitucional. Posteriormente, também foi avaliada a atuação do Núcleo de Assessoramento Técnico (NAT) aos Juízes no Estado do Espírito Santo. Também foi feita análise de caso da decisão proferida no Mandado de Segurança nº 0025675-15.2013.8.08.0000 (100130043811), com o intuito de avaliar como se desenvolveu, naquele processo, o procedimento de concessão de medicamento. Por fim, foram sugeridos alguns instrumentos que poderiam ajudar na efetiva concretização do direito fundamental à saúde. A partir de tais análises, percebeu-se que diante da falta de assessoramento técnico e principalmente tendo em vista a deficiência de comunicação existente entre o Poder Público e o Judiciário, muitas vezes realizam-se julgamentos precoces e onerosos a uma das partes. Todavia, os mecanismos do Novo Código de Processo Civil e do Núcleo de Assessoramento aos Juízes, são importantes instrumentos que objetivam promover a cooperação entre os atores sociais e que devem ser utilizados para que se concretize o fundamental diálogo entre as partes.Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDIJunquilho, Tainá AguiarMondoni, Marceli Stelzer2015-12-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo Avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttp://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistadspp/article/view/43310.26668/IndexLawJournals/2525-9881/2015.v1i1.433Revista de Direito Sociais e Políticas Públicas; v. 1, n. 1 (2015): JANEIRO-DEZEMRBO; 68 -872525-98812525-9881reponame:Revista de Direito Sociais e Políticas Públicasinstname:Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)instacron:CONPEDIporhttp://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistadspp/article/view/433/pdfDireitos autorais 2016 Tainá Aguiar Junquilho, Marceli Stelzer Mondonihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2020-09-11T16:57:40Zoai:ojs.indexlaw.org:article/433Revistahttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistadsppONGhttp://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistadspp/oai||indexlawjournals@gmail.com2525-98812525-9881opendoar:2020-09-11T16:57:40Revista de Direito Sociais e Políticas Públicas - Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The Role of the Judicial Branch in the Effectiveness of Health Public Policies in the State of Espírito Santo: (NON) Existence of Dialogue Between the Parties O Papel do Poder Judiciário na Efetivação das Políticas Públicas de Saúde no Estado do Espírito Santo: (IN) Existência de Diálogo entre as Partes |
title |
The Role of the Judicial Branch in the Effectiveness of Health Public Policies in the State of Espírito Santo: (NON) Existence of Dialogue Between the Parties |
spellingShingle |
The Role of the Judicial Branch in the Effectiveness of Health Public Policies in the State of Espírito Santo: (NON) Existence of Dialogue Between the Parties Junquilho, Tainá Aguiar Right to health; Judicialization of health; Free grant of medication by the public authority; Dialogue between the parties Direito à saúde; Judicialização da saúde; Concessão de medicamentos gratuitos pelo poder público; Diálogo entre as partes |
title_short |
The Role of the Judicial Branch in the Effectiveness of Health Public Policies in the State of Espírito Santo: (NON) Existence of Dialogue Between the Parties |
title_full |
The Role of the Judicial Branch in the Effectiveness of Health Public Policies in the State of Espírito Santo: (NON) Existence of Dialogue Between the Parties |
title_fullStr |
The Role of the Judicial Branch in the Effectiveness of Health Public Policies in the State of Espírito Santo: (NON) Existence of Dialogue Between the Parties |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Role of the Judicial Branch in the Effectiveness of Health Public Policies in the State of Espírito Santo: (NON) Existence of Dialogue Between the Parties |
title_sort |
The Role of the Judicial Branch in the Effectiveness of Health Public Policies in the State of Espírito Santo: (NON) Existence of Dialogue Between the Parties |
author |
Junquilho, Tainá Aguiar |
author_facet |
Junquilho, Tainá Aguiar Mondoni, Marceli Stelzer |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Mondoni, Marceli Stelzer |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Junquilho, Tainá Aguiar Mondoni, Marceli Stelzer |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Right to health; Judicialization of health; Free grant of medication by the public authority; Dialogue between the parties Direito à saúde; Judicialização da saúde; Concessão de medicamentos gratuitos pelo poder público; Diálogo entre as partes |
topic |
Right to health; Judicialization of health; Free grant of medication by the public authority; Dialogue between the parties Direito à saúde; Judicialização da saúde; Concessão de medicamentos gratuitos pelo poder público; Diálogo entre as partes |
description |
The fundamental right to health, especially from the 1988 Constitution on, is inserted in the list of social rights that have been going through the process of judicialization. In this context, the present study had as its goal to analyze the (non)existence of dialogue between the parties involved in the judicialization of health in the state of Espirito Santo. The research was made by the evaluation of the mechanisms currently available to the fulfillment of health public policies set by the constitution. After that, the participation of the Center of Technical Support with the judges in the State of Espirito Santo was also evaluated. A case analysis was also conducted on the entered decision on the Court Injunction nº 0025675-15.2013.8.08.0000 (100130043811), looking to evaluate how the process of granting the medication took place. Lastly, some instruments that could effectively help in the concretion of the fundamental right to health were suggested. Through these analysis, it was perceived that with the lack of Technical Support and especially in sight of the disability of communication between the Public and the Judicial Branches, many times premature and onerous judgments are made to one of the parties. However, the mechanisms on the New Code of Civil Procedures and the Center of Technical Support for Judges are important instruments that seek to promote cooperation between social actors and that must be used to materialize the fundamental dialogue between the parties. |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-12-06 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artigo Avaliado pelos Pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistadspp/article/view/433 10.26668/IndexLawJournals/2525-9881/2015.v1i1.433 |
url |
http://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistadspp/article/view/433 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.26668/IndexLawJournals/2525-9881/2015.v1i1.433 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistadspp/article/view/433/pdf |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Direitos autorais 2016 Tainá Aguiar Junquilho, Marceli Stelzer Mondoni http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Direitos autorais 2016 Tainá Aguiar Junquilho, Marceli Stelzer Mondoni http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Direito Sociais e Políticas Públicas; v. 1, n. 1 (2015): JANEIRO-DEZEMRBO; 68 -87 2525-9881 2525-9881 reponame:Revista de Direito Sociais e Políticas Públicas instname:Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI) instacron:CONPEDI |
instname_str |
Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI) |
instacron_str |
CONPEDI |
institution |
CONPEDI |
reponame_str |
Revista de Direito Sociais e Políticas Públicas |
collection |
Revista de Direito Sociais e Políticas Públicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Direito Sociais e Políticas Públicas - Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||indexlawjournals@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1798316504025923584 |