The Role of the Judicial Branch in the Effectiveness of Health Public Policies in the State of Espírito Santo: (NON) Existence of Dialogue Between the Parties

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Junquilho, Tainá Aguiar
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Mondoni, Marceli Stelzer
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista de Direito Sociais e Políticas Públicas
Texto Completo: http://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistadspp/article/view/433
Resumo: The fundamental right to health, especially from the 1988 Constitution on, is inserted in the list of social rights that have been going through the process of judicialization. In this context, the present study had as its goal to analyze the (non)existence of dialogue between the parties involved in the judicialization of health in the state of Espirito Santo. The research was made by the evaluation of the mechanisms currently available to the fulfillment of health public policies set by the constitution. After that, the participation of the Center of Technical Support with the judges in the State of Espirito Santo was also evaluated. A case analysis was  also  conducted  on  the  entered  decision  on  the  Court Injunction  nº  0025675-15.2013.8.08.0000 (100130043811), looking to evaluate how the process of granting the medication took place. Lastly, some instruments that could effectively help in the concretion of the fundamental right to health were suggested. Through these analysis, it was perceived that with the lack of Technical Support and especially in sight of the disability of communication between the Public and the Judicial Branches, many times premature and onerous judgments are made to one of the parties. However, the mechanisms on the New Code of Civil Procedures and the Center of Technical Support for Judges are important instruments that seek to promote cooperation between social actors and that must be used to materialize the fundamental dialogue between the parties.
id CONPEDI-9_e47696c617bd7f1fbec973c4e676ed42
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.indexlaw.org:article/433
network_acronym_str CONPEDI-9
network_name_str Revista de Direito Sociais e Políticas Públicas
repository_id_str
spelling The Role of the Judicial Branch in the Effectiveness of Health Public Policies in the State of Espírito Santo: (NON) Existence of Dialogue Between the PartiesO Papel do Poder Judiciário na Efetivação das Políticas Públicas de Saúde no Estado do Espírito Santo: (IN) Existência de Diálogo entre as PartesRight to health; Judicialization of health; Free grant of medication by the public authority; Dialogue between the partiesDireito à saúde; Judicialização da saúde; Concessão de medicamentos gratuitos pelo poder público; Diálogo entre as partesThe fundamental right to health, especially from the 1988 Constitution on, is inserted in the list of social rights that have been going through the process of judicialization. In this context, the present study had as its goal to analyze the (non)existence of dialogue between the parties involved in the judicialization of health in the state of Espirito Santo. The research was made by the evaluation of the mechanisms currently available to the fulfillment of health public policies set by the constitution. After that, the participation of the Center of Technical Support with the judges in the State of Espirito Santo was also evaluated. A case analysis was  also  conducted  on  the  entered  decision  on  the  Court Injunction  nº  0025675-15.2013.8.08.0000 (100130043811), looking to evaluate how the process of granting the medication took place. Lastly, some instruments that could effectively help in the concretion of the fundamental right to health were suggested. Through these analysis, it was perceived that with the lack of Technical Support and especially in sight of the disability of communication between the Public and the Judicial Branches, many times premature and onerous judgments are made to one of the parties. However, the mechanisms on the New Code of Civil Procedures and the Center of Technical Support for Judges are important instruments that seek to promote cooperation between social actors and that must be used to materialize the fundamental dialogue between the parties.O direito fundamental à saúde, principalmente a partir da Constituição de 1988, insere-se no rol de direitos sociais que vêm sofrendo o processo de judicialização. Nesse contexto, o presente estudo teve por objetivo analisar a (in)existência de diálogo entre as partes envolvidas na judicialização da saúde no Estado do Espírito Santo. A pesquisa realizou-se por meio da avaliação de atuais mecanismos disponíveis para a realização de políticas públicas de saúde previstas no texto constitucional. Posteriormente, também foi avaliada a atuação do Núcleo de Assessoramento Técnico (NAT) aos Juízes no Estado do Espírito Santo. Também foi feita análise de caso da decisão proferida no Mandado de Segurança nº 0025675-15.2013.8.08.0000 (100130043811), com o intuito de avaliar como se desenvolveu, naquele processo, o procedimento de concessão de medicamento. Por fim, foram sugeridos alguns instrumentos que poderiam ajudar na efetiva concretização do direito fundamental à saúde. A partir de tais análises, percebeu-se que diante da falta de assessoramento técnico e principalmente tendo em vista a deficiência de comunicação existente entre o Poder Público e o Judiciário, muitas vezes realizam-se julgamentos precoces e onerosos a uma das partes. Todavia, os mecanismos do Novo Código de Processo Civil e do Núcleo de Assessoramento aos Juízes, são importantes instrumentos que objetivam promover a cooperação entre os atores sociais e que devem ser utilizados para que se concretize o fundamental diálogo entre as partes.Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDIJunquilho, Tainá AguiarMondoni, Marceli Stelzer2015-12-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo Avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttp://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistadspp/article/view/43310.26668/IndexLawJournals/2525-9881/2015.v1i1.433Revista de Direito Sociais e Políticas Públicas; v. 1, n. 1 (2015): JANEIRO-DEZEMRBO; 68 -872525-98812525-9881reponame:Revista de Direito Sociais e Políticas Públicasinstname:Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)instacron:CONPEDIporhttp://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistadspp/article/view/433/pdfDireitos autorais 2016 Tainá Aguiar Junquilho, Marceli Stelzer Mondonihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2020-09-11T16:57:40Zoai:ojs.indexlaw.org:article/433Revistahttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistadsppONGhttp://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistadspp/oai||indexlawjournals@gmail.com2525-98812525-9881opendoar:2020-09-11T16:57:40Revista de Direito Sociais e Políticas Públicas - Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The Role of the Judicial Branch in the Effectiveness of Health Public Policies in the State of Espírito Santo: (NON) Existence of Dialogue Between the Parties
O Papel do Poder Judiciário na Efetivação das Políticas Públicas de Saúde no Estado do Espírito Santo: (IN) Existência de Diálogo entre as Partes
title The Role of the Judicial Branch in the Effectiveness of Health Public Policies in the State of Espírito Santo: (NON) Existence of Dialogue Between the Parties
spellingShingle The Role of the Judicial Branch in the Effectiveness of Health Public Policies in the State of Espírito Santo: (NON) Existence of Dialogue Between the Parties
Junquilho, Tainá Aguiar
Right to health; Judicialization of health; Free grant of medication by the public authority; Dialogue between the parties
Direito à saúde; Judicialização da saúde; Concessão de medicamentos gratuitos pelo poder público; Diálogo entre as partes
title_short The Role of the Judicial Branch in the Effectiveness of Health Public Policies in the State of Espírito Santo: (NON) Existence of Dialogue Between the Parties
title_full The Role of the Judicial Branch in the Effectiveness of Health Public Policies in the State of Espírito Santo: (NON) Existence of Dialogue Between the Parties
title_fullStr The Role of the Judicial Branch in the Effectiveness of Health Public Policies in the State of Espírito Santo: (NON) Existence of Dialogue Between the Parties
title_full_unstemmed The Role of the Judicial Branch in the Effectiveness of Health Public Policies in the State of Espírito Santo: (NON) Existence of Dialogue Between the Parties
title_sort The Role of the Judicial Branch in the Effectiveness of Health Public Policies in the State of Espírito Santo: (NON) Existence of Dialogue Between the Parties
author Junquilho, Tainá Aguiar
author_facet Junquilho, Tainá Aguiar
Mondoni, Marceli Stelzer
author_role author
author2 Mondoni, Marceli Stelzer
author2_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv

dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Junquilho, Tainá Aguiar
Mondoni, Marceli Stelzer
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Right to health; Judicialization of health; Free grant of medication by the public authority; Dialogue between the parties
Direito à saúde; Judicialização da saúde; Concessão de medicamentos gratuitos pelo poder público; Diálogo entre as partes
topic Right to health; Judicialization of health; Free grant of medication by the public authority; Dialogue between the parties
Direito à saúde; Judicialização da saúde; Concessão de medicamentos gratuitos pelo poder público; Diálogo entre as partes
description The fundamental right to health, especially from the 1988 Constitution on, is inserted in the list of social rights that have been going through the process of judicialization. In this context, the present study had as its goal to analyze the (non)existence of dialogue between the parties involved in the judicialization of health in the state of Espirito Santo. The research was made by the evaluation of the mechanisms currently available to the fulfillment of health public policies set by the constitution. After that, the participation of the Center of Technical Support with the judges in the State of Espirito Santo was also evaluated. A case analysis was  also  conducted  on  the  entered  decision  on  the  Court Injunction  nº  0025675-15.2013.8.08.0000 (100130043811), looking to evaluate how the process of granting the medication took place. Lastly, some instruments that could effectively help in the concretion of the fundamental right to health were suggested. Through these analysis, it was perceived that with the lack of Technical Support and especially in sight of the disability of communication between the Public and the Judicial Branches, many times premature and onerous judgments are made to one of the parties. However, the mechanisms on the New Code of Civil Procedures and the Center of Technical Support for Judges are important instruments that seek to promote cooperation between social actors and that must be used to materialize the fundamental dialogue between the parties.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-12-06
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artigo Avaliado pelos Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistadspp/article/view/433
10.26668/IndexLawJournals/2525-9881/2015.v1i1.433
url http://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistadspp/article/view/433
identifier_str_mv 10.26668/IndexLawJournals/2525-9881/2015.v1i1.433
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistadspp/article/view/433/pdf
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Direitos autorais 2016 Tainá Aguiar Junquilho, Marceli Stelzer Mondoni
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Direitos autorais 2016 Tainá Aguiar Junquilho, Marceli Stelzer Mondoni
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista de Direito Sociais e Políticas Públicas; v. 1, n. 1 (2015): JANEIRO-DEZEMRBO; 68 -87
2525-9881
2525-9881
reponame:Revista de Direito Sociais e Políticas Públicas
instname:Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)
instacron:CONPEDI
instname_str Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)
instacron_str CONPEDI
institution CONPEDI
reponame_str Revista de Direito Sociais e Políticas Públicas
collection Revista de Direito Sociais e Políticas Públicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Direito Sociais e Políticas Públicas - Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||indexlawjournals@gmail.com
_version_ 1798316504025923584