Selecting soil quality indicators for different soil management systems in the Brazilian Cerrado

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Stefanoski, Diane Cristina
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Figueiredo, Cícero Célio de, Santos, Glenio Guimarães, Marchão, Robélio Leandro
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
Texto Completo: https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/22454
Resumo: The objective of this work was to assess soil quality indicators obtained with different datasets to compare soil management systems in the Brazilian Cerrado. Three criteria were used to select soil physical, chemical, and biological indicators: the full set of indicators obtained, with 36 parameters, for which all the physical, chemical, and biological soil properties were determined; a subset of indicators selected by principal component analysis (20 parameters); and a subset of indicators with some frequency of use in the literature (16 parameters). These indicators were obtained from the following management systems: no-tillage, conventional tillage, and native cerrado vegetation. Soil samples were collected at 0.0–0.1-m soil depth, and soil quality indicators were subjected to analysis of variance and their means were compared. The incorporation of soil native cerrado into agriculture decreased soil quality. The most commonly used indicators in the scientific literature are sensitive enough to detect differences in soil quality according to land use. Therefore, the selection of a minimum set of representative data can be more useful than a complex set of properties to compare management systems as to their soil quality.
id EMBRAPA-4_3895d3b32eafa01bfd03a971133da4ce
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.seer.sct.embrapa.br:article/22454
network_acronym_str EMBRAPA-4
network_name_str Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Selecting soil quality indicators for different soil management systems in the Brazilian CerradoSeleção de indicadores da qualidade do solo para diferentes sistemas de manejo do solo no Cerradono-tillage, principal component analysis, soil functioning, soil health, soil management, soil security.plantio direto, análise de componentes principais, funcionamento do solo, saúde do solo, manejo do solo, segurança do solo.The objective of this work was to assess soil quality indicators obtained with different datasets to compare soil management systems in the Brazilian Cerrado. Three criteria were used to select soil physical, chemical, and biological indicators: the full set of indicators obtained, with 36 parameters, for which all the physical, chemical, and biological soil properties were determined; a subset of indicators selected by principal component analysis (20 parameters); and a subset of indicators with some frequency of use in the literature (16 parameters). These indicators were obtained from the following management systems: no-tillage, conventional tillage, and native cerrado vegetation. Soil samples were collected at 0.0–0.1-m soil depth, and soil quality indicators were subjected to analysis of variance and their means were compared. The incorporation of soil native cerrado into agriculture decreased soil quality. The most commonly used indicators in the scientific literature are sensitive enough to detect differences in soil quality according to land use. Therefore, the selection of a minimum set of representative data can be more useful than a complex set of properties to compare management systems as to their soil quality.O objetivo deste trabalho foi avaliar indicadores da qualidade do solo, obtidos de diferentes bases de dados, para comparar sistemas de manejo do solo no Cerrado. Três critérios foram utilizados para a seleção de indicadores físicos, químicos e biológicos do solo: o conjunto completo de indicadores obtido, com 36 parâmetros, entre os quais todas as propriedades físicas, químicas e biológicas foram determinadas; um subconjunto de indicadores selecionados por análise de componentes principais (20 parâmetros); e um subconjunto de indicadores com alguma frequência de uso na literatura (16 parâmetros). Esses indicadores foram obtidos a partir dos seguintes sistemas de manejo: plantio direto, preparo convencional e cerrado nativo. As amostras de solo foram coletadas a 0,0–0,1 m de profundidade, e os indicadores de qualidade do solo foram submetidos à análise de variância e suas médias foram comparadas. A incorporação do solo de cerrado nativo à agricultura diminuiu a qualidade do solo. Os indicadores mais comumente utilizados na literatura científica são suficientemente sensíveis para detectar diferenças de qualidade do solo de acordo com o uso da terra. Portanto, a seleção de um conjunto mínimo de dados representativos pode ser mais útil do que um conjunto complexo de atributos, para comparar sistemas de manejo quanto à qualidade do solo.Pesquisa Agropecuaria BrasileiraPesquisa Agropecuária BrasileiraStefanoski, Diane CristinaFigueiredo, Cícero Célio deSantos, Glenio GuimarãesMarchão, Robélio Leandro2016-10-17info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/22454Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira; v.51, n.9, set. 2016: Número Temático O solo como fator de integração entre os componentes ambientais e a produção agropecuária; 1643-1651Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira; v.51, n.9, set. 2016: Número Temático O solo como fator de integração entre os componentes ambientais e a produção agropecuária; 1643-16511678-39210100-104xreponame:Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)instacron:EMBRAPAenghttps://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/22454/13532https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/downloadSuppFile/22454/14482Direitos autorais 2016 Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileirainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2016-10-31T17:52:12Zoai:ojs.seer.sct.embrapa.br:article/22454Revistahttp://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pabPRIhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phppab@sct.embrapa.br || sct.pab@embrapa.br1678-39210100-204Xopendoar:2016-10-31T17:52:12Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Selecting soil quality indicators for different soil management systems in the Brazilian Cerrado
Seleção de indicadores da qualidade do solo para diferentes sistemas de manejo do solo no Cerrado
title Selecting soil quality indicators for different soil management systems in the Brazilian Cerrado
spellingShingle Selecting soil quality indicators for different soil management systems in the Brazilian Cerrado
Stefanoski, Diane Cristina
no-tillage, principal component analysis, soil functioning, soil health, soil management, soil security.
plantio direto, análise de componentes principais, funcionamento do solo, saúde do solo, manejo do solo, segurança do solo.
title_short Selecting soil quality indicators for different soil management systems in the Brazilian Cerrado
title_full Selecting soil quality indicators for different soil management systems in the Brazilian Cerrado
title_fullStr Selecting soil quality indicators for different soil management systems in the Brazilian Cerrado
title_full_unstemmed Selecting soil quality indicators for different soil management systems in the Brazilian Cerrado
title_sort Selecting soil quality indicators for different soil management systems in the Brazilian Cerrado
author Stefanoski, Diane Cristina
author_facet Stefanoski, Diane Cristina
Figueiredo, Cícero Célio de
Santos, Glenio Guimarães
Marchão, Robélio Leandro
author_role author
author2 Figueiredo, Cícero Célio de
Santos, Glenio Guimarães
Marchão, Robélio Leandro
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv

dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Stefanoski, Diane Cristina
Figueiredo, Cícero Célio de
Santos, Glenio Guimarães
Marchão, Robélio Leandro
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv no-tillage, principal component analysis, soil functioning, soil health, soil management, soil security.
plantio direto, análise de componentes principais, funcionamento do solo, saúde do solo, manejo do solo, segurança do solo.
topic no-tillage, principal component analysis, soil functioning, soil health, soil management, soil security.
plantio direto, análise de componentes principais, funcionamento do solo, saúde do solo, manejo do solo, segurança do solo.
description The objective of this work was to assess soil quality indicators obtained with different datasets to compare soil management systems in the Brazilian Cerrado. Three criteria were used to select soil physical, chemical, and biological indicators: the full set of indicators obtained, with 36 parameters, for which all the physical, chemical, and biological soil properties were determined; a subset of indicators selected by principal component analysis (20 parameters); and a subset of indicators with some frequency of use in the literature (16 parameters). These indicators were obtained from the following management systems: no-tillage, conventional tillage, and native cerrado vegetation. Soil samples were collected at 0.0–0.1-m soil depth, and soil quality indicators were subjected to analysis of variance and their means were compared. The incorporation of soil native cerrado into agriculture decreased soil quality. The most commonly used indicators in the scientific literature are sensitive enough to detect differences in soil quality according to land use. Therefore, the selection of a minimum set of representative data can be more useful than a complex set of properties to compare management systems as to their soil quality.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-10-17
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/22454
url https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/22454
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/22454/13532
https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/downloadSuppFile/22454/14482
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Direitos autorais 2016 Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Direitos autorais 2016 Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira; v.51, n.9, set. 2016: Número Temático O solo como fator de integração entre os componentes ambientais e a produção agropecuária; 1643-1651
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira; v.51, n.9, set. 2016: Número Temático O solo como fator de integração entre os componentes ambientais e a produção agropecuária; 1643-1651
1678-3921
0100-104x
reponame:Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
instacron:EMBRAPA
instname_str Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
instacron_str EMBRAPA
institution EMBRAPA
reponame_str Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
collection Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv pab@sct.embrapa.br || sct.pab@embrapa.br
_version_ 1793416715734876160

Registros relacionados