Performance and carcass quality of broilers supplemented with antibiotics or probiotics

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Contreras-Castillo,CJ
Data de Publicação: 2008
Outros Autores: Brossi,C, Previero,TC, Demattê,LC
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-635X2008000400006
Resumo: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of different additives on broiler performance and meat quality. A total of 1620 one-day-old male Cobb broilers were distributed by a completely randomized experimental design into 5 treatments: positive control - zinc bacitracin (PC); negative control - without additives (NC); probiotic 1 - 10.000 g/ton (PR-I); probiotic 2 - 500 g/ton (PR-II); and probiotic 3 - 50 g/ton (PR-III). The PC treatment promoted better weight gain (WG) than PR-II (1-28 days) and PR-III (1-14; 1-28 days), better feed conversion (1-40 days period), and the highest WG among all treatments (p<0.05). The performance of broilers fed probiotics was not different than those in the negative control group in any rearing phase, but there were performance differences among probiotic-treated birds. Hot and cold carcass yields and breast pH were not influenced by the different additives as compared to the negative control treatment. The only observed differences were in breast color (a*) and carcass yield between PR-III and the negative control group. Probiotics increased water holding capacity (except for PR-II) (p<0.05). The treatment with antibiotic promoted the highest WG. Meat quality suffered little influence from the different additives.
id FACTA-1_46c910c16a3681b2381adf6dce975188
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1516-635X2008000400006
network_acronym_str FACTA-1
network_name_str Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Performance and carcass quality of broilers supplemented with antibiotics or probioticsAdditivesmeat colormeat water holding capacitypolyprobioticszinc bacitracinThe objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of different additives on broiler performance and meat quality. A total of 1620 one-day-old male Cobb broilers were distributed by a completely randomized experimental design into 5 treatments: positive control - zinc bacitracin (PC); negative control - without additives (NC); probiotic 1 - 10.000 g/ton (PR-I); probiotic 2 - 500 g/ton (PR-II); and probiotic 3 - 50 g/ton (PR-III). The PC treatment promoted better weight gain (WG) than PR-II (1-28 days) and PR-III (1-14; 1-28 days), better feed conversion (1-40 days period), and the highest WG among all treatments (p<0.05). The performance of broilers fed probiotics was not different than those in the negative control group in any rearing phase, but there were performance differences among probiotic-treated birds. Hot and cold carcass yields and breast pH were not influenced by the different additives as compared to the negative control treatment. The only observed differences were in breast color (a*) and carcass yield between PR-III and the negative control group. Probiotics increased water holding capacity (except for PR-II) (p<0.05). The treatment with antibiotic promoted the highest WG. Meat quality suffered little influence from the different additives.Fundacao de Apoio a Ciência e Tecnologia Avicolas2008-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-635X2008000400006Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science v.10 n.4 2008reponame:Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science (Online)instname:Fundação APINCO de Ciência e Tecnologia Avícolas (FACTA)instacron:FACTA10.1590/S1516-635X2008000400006info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessContreras-Castillo,CJBrossi,CPreviero,TCDemattê,LCeng2009-03-20T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1516-635X2008000400006Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/rbcahttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||rvfacta@terra.com.br1806-90611516-635Xopendoar:2009-03-20T00:00Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science (Online) - Fundação APINCO de Ciência e Tecnologia Avícolas (FACTA)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Performance and carcass quality of broilers supplemented with antibiotics or probiotics
title Performance and carcass quality of broilers supplemented with antibiotics or probiotics
spellingShingle Performance and carcass quality of broilers supplemented with antibiotics or probiotics
Contreras-Castillo,CJ
Additives
meat color
meat water holding capacity
polyprobiotics
zinc bacitracin
title_short Performance and carcass quality of broilers supplemented with antibiotics or probiotics
title_full Performance and carcass quality of broilers supplemented with antibiotics or probiotics
title_fullStr Performance and carcass quality of broilers supplemented with antibiotics or probiotics
title_full_unstemmed Performance and carcass quality of broilers supplemented with antibiotics or probiotics
title_sort Performance and carcass quality of broilers supplemented with antibiotics or probiotics
author Contreras-Castillo,CJ
author_facet Contreras-Castillo,CJ
Brossi,C
Previero,TC
Demattê,LC
author_role author
author2 Brossi,C
Previero,TC
Demattê,LC
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Contreras-Castillo,CJ
Brossi,C
Previero,TC
Demattê,LC
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Additives
meat color
meat water holding capacity
polyprobiotics
zinc bacitracin
topic Additives
meat color
meat water holding capacity
polyprobiotics
zinc bacitracin
description The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of different additives on broiler performance and meat quality. A total of 1620 one-day-old male Cobb broilers were distributed by a completely randomized experimental design into 5 treatments: positive control - zinc bacitracin (PC); negative control - without additives (NC); probiotic 1 - 10.000 g/ton (PR-I); probiotic 2 - 500 g/ton (PR-II); and probiotic 3 - 50 g/ton (PR-III). The PC treatment promoted better weight gain (WG) than PR-II (1-28 days) and PR-III (1-14; 1-28 days), better feed conversion (1-40 days period), and the highest WG among all treatments (p<0.05). The performance of broilers fed probiotics was not different than those in the negative control group in any rearing phase, but there were performance differences among probiotic-treated birds. Hot and cold carcass yields and breast pH were not influenced by the different additives as compared to the negative control treatment. The only observed differences were in breast color (a*) and carcass yield between PR-III and the negative control group. Probiotics increased water holding capacity (except for PR-II) (p<0.05). The treatment with antibiotic promoted the highest WG. Meat quality suffered little influence from the different additives.
publishDate 2008
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2008-12-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-635X2008000400006
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-635X2008000400006
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S1516-635X2008000400006
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundacao de Apoio a Ciência e Tecnologia Avicolas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundacao de Apoio a Ciência e Tecnologia Avicolas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science v.10 n.4 2008
reponame:Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science (Online)
instname:Fundação APINCO de Ciência e Tecnologia Avícolas (FACTA)
instacron:FACTA
instname_str Fundação APINCO de Ciência e Tecnologia Avícolas (FACTA)
instacron_str FACTA
institution FACTA
reponame_str Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science (Online)
collection Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science (Online) - Fundação APINCO de Ciência e Tecnologia Avícolas (FACTA)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||rvfacta@terra.com.br
_version_ 1754122511702818816