Evaluation of temporary cement to prevent bacterial contamination of the root canal after pulpectomy

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: PEREIRA,Letícia Martins
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: NAVES,Sophia Maria Mateus, COSTA,Júlia Modesto da, MORAES,Igor de Oliveira, SILVA,Sandra Regina Echeverria Pinho da, FONTANA,Carlos Eduardo, PINHEIRO,Sérgio Luiz
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: RGO - Revista Gaúcha de Odontologia (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1981-86372022000100315
Resumo: ABSTRACT To evaluate the ability of temporary cement (TC) and gutta-percha sticks (GP) to prevent bacterial contamination of the root canal through the coronal seal after pulpectomy. Eighty artificial primary maxillary central incisors were selected and randomly divided into 2 groups: TC (n = 40) and GP (n = 40). Endodontic access, rotary instrumentation, root canal filling, and coronal sealing were performed according to group allocation. The root canal opening was seeded with S. mutans and E. faecalis. Both groups were subdivided into 5 experimental time points (24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hours), with 8 specimens per time-point group: 5 in which both root canal filling and coronal sealing were performed (with either TC or GP) and 3 controls (coronal sealing alone, without root canal filling). All specimens were incubated in an anaerobic jar at 37°C, and bacterial contamination was assessed in a spectrophotometer. ANOVA (t-test) was used to compare contamination and the Kruskal-Wallis test to compare filling scores between the experimental groups. A significant difference was observed in sealing in the first 24 hours between GP and controls (p = 0.046). There was no significant difference in the filling pattern between canals sealed with TC versus GP. Specimens sealed with GP showed less contamination than controls in the first 24 hours. At later time points, neither GP nor TC were effective at controlling bacterial contamination; both failed to provide adequate coronal sealing.
id FSLM-1_84240c6ee293f502839244710d1334bb
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1981-86372022000100315
network_acronym_str FSLM-1
network_name_str RGO - Revista Gaúcha de Odontologia (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Evaluation of temporary cement to prevent bacterial contamination of the root canal after pulpectomyEndodontic obturationPulpectomyTooth, deciduousABSTRACT To evaluate the ability of temporary cement (TC) and gutta-percha sticks (GP) to prevent bacterial contamination of the root canal through the coronal seal after pulpectomy. Eighty artificial primary maxillary central incisors were selected and randomly divided into 2 groups: TC (n = 40) and GP (n = 40). Endodontic access, rotary instrumentation, root canal filling, and coronal sealing were performed according to group allocation. The root canal opening was seeded with S. mutans and E. faecalis. Both groups were subdivided into 5 experimental time points (24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hours), with 8 specimens per time-point group: 5 in which both root canal filling and coronal sealing were performed (with either TC or GP) and 3 controls (coronal sealing alone, without root canal filling). All specimens were incubated in an anaerobic jar at 37°C, and bacterial contamination was assessed in a spectrophotometer. ANOVA (t-test) was used to compare contamination and the Kruskal-Wallis test to compare filling scores between the experimental groups. A significant difference was observed in sealing in the first 24 hours between GP and controls (p = 0.046). There was no significant difference in the filling pattern between canals sealed with TC versus GP. Specimens sealed with GP showed less contamination than controls in the first 24 hours. At later time points, neither GP nor TC were effective at controlling bacterial contamination; both failed to provide adequate coronal sealing.Faculdade São Leopoldo Mandic2022-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1981-86372022000100315RGO - Revista Gaúcha de Odontologia v.70 2022reponame:RGO - Revista Gaúcha de Odontologia (Online)instname:Faculdade São Leopoldo Mandic (FSLM)instacron:FSLM10.1590/1981-86372022003520210014info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPEREIRA,Letícia MartinsNAVES,Sophia Maria MateusCOSTA,Júlia Modesto daMORAES,Igor de OliveiraSILVA,Sandra Regina Echeverria Pinho daFONTANA,Carlos EduardoPINHEIRO,Sérgio Luizeng2022-11-17T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1981-86372022000100315Revistahttp://revodonto.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?script=sci_serial&pid=1981-8637&lng=pt&nrm=isohttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||contato@revistargo.com.br1981-86370103-6971opendoar:2022-11-17T00:00RGO - Revista Gaúcha de Odontologia (Online) - Faculdade São Leopoldo Mandic (FSLM)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Evaluation of temporary cement to prevent bacterial contamination of the root canal after pulpectomy
title Evaluation of temporary cement to prevent bacterial contamination of the root canal after pulpectomy
spellingShingle Evaluation of temporary cement to prevent bacterial contamination of the root canal after pulpectomy
PEREIRA,Letícia Martins
Endodontic obturation
Pulpectomy
Tooth, deciduous
title_short Evaluation of temporary cement to prevent bacterial contamination of the root canal after pulpectomy
title_full Evaluation of temporary cement to prevent bacterial contamination of the root canal after pulpectomy
title_fullStr Evaluation of temporary cement to prevent bacterial contamination of the root canal after pulpectomy
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of temporary cement to prevent bacterial contamination of the root canal after pulpectomy
title_sort Evaluation of temporary cement to prevent bacterial contamination of the root canal after pulpectomy
author PEREIRA,Letícia Martins
author_facet PEREIRA,Letícia Martins
NAVES,Sophia Maria Mateus
COSTA,Júlia Modesto da
MORAES,Igor de Oliveira
SILVA,Sandra Regina Echeverria Pinho da
FONTANA,Carlos Eduardo
PINHEIRO,Sérgio Luiz
author_role author
author2 NAVES,Sophia Maria Mateus
COSTA,Júlia Modesto da
MORAES,Igor de Oliveira
SILVA,Sandra Regina Echeverria Pinho da
FONTANA,Carlos Eduardo
PINHEIRO,Sérgio Luiz
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv PEREIRA,Letícia Martins
NAVES,Sophia Maria Mateus
COSTA,Júlia Modesto da
MORAES,Igor de Oliveira
SILVA,Sandra Regina Echeverria Pinho da
FONTANA,Carlos Eduardo
PINHEIRO,Sérgio Luiz
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Endodontic obturation
Pulpectomy
Tooth, deciduous
topic Endodontic obturation
Pulpectomy
Tooth, deciduous
description ABSTRACT To evaluate the ability of temporary cement (TC) and gutta-percha sticks (GP) to prevent bacterial contamination of the root canal through the coronal seal after pulpectomy. Eighty artificial primary maxillary central incisors were selected and randomly divided into 2 groups: TC (n = 40) and GP (n = 40). Endodontic access, rotary instrumentation, root canal filling, and coronal sealing were performed according to group allocation. The root canal opening was seeded with S. mutans and E. faecalis. Both groups were subdivided into 5 experimental time points (24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hours), with 8 specimens per time-point group: 5 in which both root canal filling and coronal sealing were performed (with either TC or GP) and 3 controls (coronal sealing alone, without root canal filling). All specimens were incubated in an anaerobic jar at 37°C, and bacterial contamination was assessed in a spectrophotometer. ANOVA (t-test) was used to compare contamination and the Kruskal-Wallis test to compare filling scores between the experimental groups. A significant difference was observed in sealing in the first 24 hours between GP and controls (p = 0.046). There was no significant difference in the filling pattern between canals sealed with TC versus GP. Specimens sealed with GP showed less contamination than controls in the first 24 hours. At later time points, neither GP nor TC were effective at controlling bacterial contamination; both failed to provide adequate coronal sealing.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1981-86372022000100315
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1981-86372022000100315
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1981-86372022003520210014
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Faculdade São Leopoldo Mandic
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Faculdade São Leopoldo Mandic
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv RGO - Revista Gaúcha de Odontologia v.70 2022
reponame:RGO - Revista Gaúcha de Odontologia (Online)
instname:Faculdade São Leopoldo Mandic (FSLM)
instacron:FSLM
instname_str Faculdade São Leopoldo Mandic (FSLM)
instacron_str FSLM
institution FSLM
reponame_str RGO - Revista Gaúcha de Odontologia (Online)
collection RGO - Revista Gaúcha de Odontologia (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv RGO - Revista Gaúcha de Odontologia (Online) - Faculdade São Leopoldo Mandic (FSLM)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||contato@revistargo.com.br
_version_ 1754204122900332544