Comparison between the rotary (Hyflex EDM®) and manual (k-file) technique for instrumentation of primary molars: a 12-month randomized clinical follow-up study

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Amorim, Andressa Cardoso
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Caldeira, Amanda Valentim, Sampaio, Samara Catarino, Lourenço Neto, Natalino, Oliveira, Thais Marchini, Nogueira, Denismar Alves, Moretti, Ana Beatriz da Silveira, Sakai, Vivien Thiemy
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Journal of applied oral science (Online)
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/195820
Resumo: Rotational instrumentation is an alternative for the clinical practice of pediatric dentists. However, there are few records in the literature on the clinical and radiographic aspects of treated teeth over time. Objectives: Compare instrumentation time and filling quality between manual (k-file) and rotary (Hyflex EDM®) files, and clinically and radiographically follow-up the treated teeth for 12 months. Moreover, the characteristics of glass ionomer restorations and their interference in the treatment prognosis over time were evaluated. Methodology: In total, 40 children with pulp involvement in primary molars received treatment with Hyflex EDM® or manual rotary files, performed by an operator. Clinical and radiographic aspects were observed at different times to determine the effectiveness of each technique. Results: The rotary system reduced instrumentation time when compared to the use of manual files (p≤0.05), but there was no difference in filling quality between the groups (p≥0.05). Moreover, both types of instrumentation were effective for 12 months (p≥0.05), and restoration retention influenced the emergence of periapical lesions (p≤0.05). Conclusion: Although rotary files reduce clinical time, the clinical and radiographic aspects of both techniques were similar over 12 months. Moreover, restoration retention has been shown to be related to treatment prognosis.
id USP-17_ebaf708a07271ca89f0450fc3adabc64
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/195820
network_acronym_str USP-17
network_name_str Journal of applied oral science (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Comparison between the rotary (Hyflex EDM®) and manual (k-file) technique for instrumentation of primary molars: a 12-month randomized clinical follow-up studyDental pulpPulpectomyDeciduous toothRotational instrumentation is an alternative for the clinical practice of pediatric dentists. However, there are few records in the literature on the clinical and radiographic aspects of treated teeth over time. Objectives: Compare instrumentation time and filling quality between manual (k-file) and rotary (Hyflex EDM®) files, and clinically and radiographically follow-up the treated teeth for 12 months. Moreover, the characteristics of glass ionomer restorations and their interference in the treatment prognosis over time were evaluated. Methodology: In total, 40 children with pulp involvement in primary molars received treatment with Hyflex EDM® or manual rotary files, performed by an operator. Clinical and radiographic aspects were observed at different times to determine the effectiveness of each technique. Results: The rotary system reduced instrumentation time when compared to the use of manual files (p≤0.05), but there was no difference in filling quality between the groups (p≥0.05). Moreover, both types of instrumentation were effective for 12 months (p≥0.05), and restoration retention influenced the emergence of periapical lesions (p≤0.05). Conclusion: Although rotary files reduce clinical time, the clinical and radiographic aspects of both techniques were similar over 12 months. Moreover, restoration retention has been shown to be related to treatment prognosis.Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru2022-03-21info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/19582010.1590/1678-7757-2021-0527Journal of Applied Oral Science; Vol. 30 (2022); e20210527Journal of Applied Oral Science; Vol. 30 (2022); e20210527Journal of Applied Oral Science; v. 30 (2022); e202105271678-77651678-7757reponame:Journal of applied oral science (Online)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/195820/180682Copyright (c) 2022 Journal of Applied Oral Sciencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAmorim, Andressa Cardoso Caldeira, Amanda Valentim Sampaio, Samara Catarino Lourenço Neto, Natalino Oliveira, Thais Marchini Nogueira, Denismar Alves Moretti, Ana Beatriz da Silveira Sakai, Vivien Thiemy 2022-03-21T12:05:22Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/195820Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/jaosPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/oai||jaos@usp.br1678-77651678-7757opendoar:2022-03-21T12:05:22Journal of applied oral science (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparison between the rotary (Hyflex EDM®) and manual (k-file) technique for instrumentation of primary molars: a 12-month randomized clinical follow-up study
title Comparison between the rotary (Hyflex EDM®) and manual (k-file) technique for instrumentation of primary molars: a 12-month randomized clinical follow-up study
spellingShingle Comparison between the rotary (Hyflex EDM®) and manual (k-file) technique for instrumentation of primary molars: a 12-month randomized clinical follow-up study
Amorim, Andressa Cardoso
Dental pulp
Pulpectomy
Deciduous tooth
title_short Comparison between the rotary (Hyflex EDM®) and manual (k-file) technique for instrumentation of primary molars: a 12-month randomized clinical follow-up study
title_full Comparison between the rotary (Hyflex EDM®) and manual (k-file) technique for instrumentation of primary molars: a 12-month randomized clinical follow-up study
title_fullStr Comparison between the rotary (Hyflex EDM®) and manual (k-file) technique for instrumentation of primary molars: a 12-month randomized clinical follow-up study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between the rotary (Hyflex EDM®) and manual (k-file) technique for instrumentation of primary molars: a 12-month randomized clinical follow-up study
title_sort Comparison between the rotary (Hyflex EDM®) and manual (k-file) technique for instrumentation of primary molars: a 12-month randomized clinical follow-up study
author Amorim, Andressa Cardoso
author_facet Amorim, Andressa Cardoso
Caldeira, Amanda Valentim
Sampaio, Samara Catarino
Lourenço Neto, Natalino
Oliveira, Thais Marchini
Nogueira, Denismar Alves
Moretti, Ana Beatriz da Silveira
Sakai, Vivien Thiemy
author_role author
author2 Caldeira, Amanda Valentim
Sampaio, Samara Catarino
Lourenço Neto, Natalino
Oliveira, Thais Marchini
Nogueira, Denismar Alves
Moretti, Ana Beatriz da Silveira
Sakai, Vivien Thiemy
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Amorim, Andressa Cardoso
Caldeira, Amanda Valentim
Sampaio, Samara Catarino
Lourenço Neto, Natalino
Oliveira, Thais Marchini
Nogueira, Denismar Alves
Moretti, Ana Beatriz da Silveira
Sakai, Vivien Thiemy
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Dental pulp
Pulpectomy
Deciduous tooth
topic Dental pulp
Pulpectomy
Deciduous tooth
description Rotational instrumentation is an alternative for the clinical practice of pediatric dentists. However, there are few records in the literature on the clinical and radiographic aspects of treated teeth over time. Objectives: Compare instrumentation time and filling quality between manual (k-file) and rotary (Hyflex EDM®) files, and clinically and radiographically follow-up the treated teeth for 12 months. Moreover, the characteristics of glass ionomer restorations and their interference in the treatment prognosis over time were evaluated. Methodology: In total, 40 children with pulp involvement in primary molars received treatment with Hyflex EDM® or manual rotary files, performed by an operator. Clinical and radiographic aspects were observed at different times to determine the effectiveness of each technique. Results: The rotary system reduced instrumentation time when compared to the use of manual files (p≤0.05), but there was no difference in filling quality between the groups (p≥0.05). Moreover, both types of instrumentation were effective for 12 months (p≥0.05), and restoration retention influenced the emergence of periapical lesions (p≤0.05). Conclusion: Although rotary files reduce clinical time, the clinical and radiographic aspects of both techniques were similar over 12 months. Moreover, restoration retention has been shown to be related to treatment prognosis.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-03-21
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/195820
10.1590/1678-7757-2021-0527
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/195820
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/1678-7757-2021-0527
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/195820/180682
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Journal of Applied Oral Science
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Journal of Applied Oral Science
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Applied Oral Science; Vol. 30 (2022); e20210527
Journal of Applied Oral Science; Vol. 30 (2022); e20210527
Journal of Applied Oral Science; v. 30 (2022); e20210527
1678-7765
1678-7757
reponame:Journal of applied oral science (Online)
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Journal of applied oral science (Online)
collection Journal of applied oral science (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Journal of applied oral science (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||jaos@usp.br
_version_ 1787713196972310528