Bibliometrics evidences of scientific recognition in book reviews and interviews: theoretical notes and analysis model

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Hayashi, Maria Cristina Piumbato Innocentini
Data de Publicação: 2020
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
eng
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Direito Civil (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rdbci/article/view/8660743
Resumo: Introduction: Reviews and interviews published in scientific journals receive little attention in the field of Information Science. This study defends the idea that the analysis of these textual genres can demonstrate scientific recognition when they are taken as objects of study from bibliometric perspectives. Objective: The purpose of this paper is to make a theoretical essay on book reviews and interviews and develop a model for analyzing these textual genres published in scientific journals. Method: Exploratory and descriptive research using quantitative and qualitative approaches from bibliographic research, bibliometric and content analysis. The literature in the fields of Information Science, Sociology of Science and Linguistics were essential to theoretically support the proposal, which was complemented by reading and analyzing reviews (n=513) and interviews (n=53) published between 1992 and 2019 in the journal Revista de Estudos Feministas. Results: Among the main results are a theoretical essay that highlighted the characteristics of reviews and interviews, and an analysis model composed of the main categories of indicators present in reviews and interviews: the profiles of the review and the work reviewed, by the author(s) of the work and the reviewer; the profiles of the interviewee, the interviewer and the interview, as well as the academic values and attributes that are usually valued in the elaboration of these textual genres. Conclusion: The analysis model developed signals the scientific recognition present in reviews and interviews, and highlights the importance of these objects of study for the field of Information Science.
id IBDCivil_4b79f4efe681f389302f9fbb280f2468
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8660743
network_acronym_str IBDCivil
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Direito Civil (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Bibliometrics evidences of scientific recognition in book reviews and interviews: theoretical notes and analysis modelEvidências bibliométricas do reconhecimento científico em resenhas e entrevistas: notas teóricas e modelo de análiseReviewInterviewsScicentific reknowlegeBibliometricResenhaEntrevistasReconhecimento científicoBibliometriaIntroduction: Reviews and interviews published in scientific journals receive little attention in the field of Information Science. This study defends the idea that the analysis of these textual genres can demonstrate scientific recognition when they are taken as objects of study from bibliometric perspectives. Objective: The purpose of this paper is to make a theoretical essay on book reviews and interviews and develop a model for analyzing these textual genres published in scientific journals. Method: Exploratory and descriptive research using quantitative and qualitative approaches from bibliographic research, bibliometric and content analysis. The literature in the fields of Information Science, Sociology of Science and Linguistics were essential to theoretically support the proposal, which was complemented by reading and analyzing reviews (n=513) and interviews (n=53) published between 1992 and 2019 in the journal Revista de Estudos Feministas. Results: Among the main results are a theoretical essay that highlighted the characteristics of reviews and interviews, and an analysis model composed of the main categories of indicators present in reviews and interviews: the profiles of the review and the work reviewed, by the author(s) of the work and the reviewer; the profiles of the interviewee, the interviewer and the interview, as well as the academic values and attributes that are usually valued in the elaboration of these textual genres. Conclusion: The analysis model developed signals the scientific recognition present in reviews and interviews, and highlights the importance of these objects of study for the field of Information Science.Introdução: Resenhas e entrevistas publicadas em periódicos científicos têm recebido pouca atenção em pesquisas do campo da Ciência da Informação. O estudo defende a ideia de que a análise desses gêneros textuais pode evidenciar o reconhecimento científico quando são tomados como objetos de estudo a partir de uma perspectiva bibliométrica. Objetivos: Os objetivos foram realizar um ensaio teórico sobre resenhas e entrevistas e elaborar um modelo de análise desses gêneros textuais. Método: Pesquisa exploratória e descritiva que utiliza abordagens quantitativas e qualitativas advindas das análises bibliométrica e de conteúdo. A literatura dos campos da Ciência da Informação, Sociologia da Ciência e da Linguística e a leitura integral de resenhas (n=513) e entrevistas (n=53) publicadas entre 1992 e 2019 no periódico Revista de Estudos Feministas fundamentaram teoricamente o modelo de análise proposto. Resultados: Entre os principais resultados estão um ensaio teórico que destacou as características das resenhas e entrevistas, e um modelo de análise composto pelas principais categorias de indicadores presentes nas resenhas e entrevistas: os perfis da resenha e da obra resenhada, do(s) autor(es) da obra e do resenhista; os perfis do entrevistado, do entrevistador e da entrevista, bem como os valores acadêmicos e atributos que costumam ser valorizados na elaboração desses gêneros textuais. Conclusão: O modelo de análise elaborado sinaliza o reconhecimento científico presente nas resenhas e entrevistas, e destaca a importância desses objetos de estudo para o campo da Ciência da Informação.Universidade Estadual de Campinas2020-12-02info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionTextoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherapplication/pdfapplication/pdfvideo/mp4https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rdbci/article/view/866074310.20396/rdbci.v18i00.8660743RDBCI: Digital Journal of Library and Information Science; Vol. 18 (2020): Continuous Publishing; e020037RDBCI: Revista Digital de Biblioteconomia e Ciência da Informação; v. 18 (2020): Publicação Contínua; e0200371678-765Xreponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito Civil (Online)instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Civil (IBDCivil)instacron:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Civilporenghttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rdbci/article/view/8660743/25722https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rdbci/article/view/8660743/25723https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rdbci/article/view/8660743/25724Brazil; XXIth CenturyBrasil; Século XXICopyright (c) 2020 Maria Cristina Piumbato Innocentini Hayashihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessHayashi, Maria Cristina Piumbato Innocentini2021-04-20T21:02:05Zoai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8660743Revistahttps://rbdcivil.ibdcivil.org.br/rbdchttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rdbci/oai||rbdcivil@ibdcivil.org.br2358-69742358-6974opendoar:2021-04-20T21:02:05Revista Brasileira de Direito Civil (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Civil (IBDCivil)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Bibliometrics evidences of scientific recognition in book reviews and interviews: theoretical notes and analysis model
Evidências bibliométricas do reconhecimento científico em resenhas e entrevistas: notas teóricas e modelo de análise
title Bibliometrics evidences of scientific recognition in book reviews and interviews: theoretical notes and analysis model
spellingShingle Bibliometrics evidences of scientific recognition in book reviews and interviews: theoretical notes and analysis model
Hayashi, Maria Cristina Piumbato Innocentini
Review
Interviews
Scicentific reknowlege
Bibliometric
Resenha
Entrevistas
Reconhecimento científico
Bibliometria
title_short Bibliometrics evidences of scientific recognition in book reviews and interviews: theoretical notes and analysis model
title_full Bibliometrics evidences of scientific recognition in book reviews and interviews: theoretical notes and analysis model
title_fullStr Bibliometrics evidences of scientific recognition in book reviews and interviews: theoretical notes and analysis model
title_full_unstemmed Bibliometrics evidences of scientific recognition in book reviews and interviews: theoretical notes and analysis model
title_sort Bibliometrics evidences of scientific recognition in book reviews and interviews: theoretical notes and analysis model
author Hayashi, Maria Cristina Piumbato Innocentini
author_facet Hayashi, Maria Cristina Piumbato Innocentini
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Hayashi, Maria Cristina Piumbato Innocentini
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Review
Interviews
Scicentific reknowlege
Bibliometric
Resenha
Entrevistas
Reconhecimento científico
Bibliometria
topic Review
Interviews
Scicentific reknowlege
Bibliometric
Resenha
Entrevistas
Reconhecimento científico
Bibliometria
description Introduction: Reviews and interviews published in scientific journals receive little attention in the field of Information Science. This study defends the idea that the analysis of these textual genres can demonstrate scientific recognition when they are taken as objects of study from bibliometric perspectives. Objective: The purpose of this paper is to make a theoretical essay on book reviews and interviews and develop a model for analyzing these textual genres published in scientific journals. Method: Exploratory and descriptive research using quantitative and qualitative approaches from bibliographic research, bibliometric and content analysis. The literature in the fields of Information Science, Sociology of Science and Linguistics were essential to theoretically support the proposal, which was complemented by reading and analyzing reviews (n=513) and interviews (n=53) published between 1992 and 2019 in the journal Revista de Estudos Feministas. Results: Among the main results are a theoretical essay that highlighted the characteristics of reviews and interviews, and an analysis model composed of the main categories of indicators present in reviews and interviews: the profiles of the review and the work reviewed, by the author(s) of the work and the reviewer; the profiles of the interviewee, the interviewer and the interview, as well as the academic values and attributes that are usually valued in the elaboration of these textual genres. Conclusion: The analysis model developed signals the scientific recognition present in reviews and interviews, and highlights the importance of these objects of study for the field of Information Science.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-12-02
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Texto
info:eu-repo/semantics/other
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rdbci/article/view/8660743
10.20396/rdbci.v18i00.8660743
url https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rdbci/article/view/8660743
identifier_str_mv 10.20396/rdbci.v18i00.8660743
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
eng
language por
eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rdbci/article/view/8660743/25722
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rdbci/article/view/8660743/25723
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rdbci/article/view/8660743/25724
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Maria Cristina Piumbato Innocentini Hayashi
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Maria Cristina Piumbato Innocentini Hayashi
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
video/mp4
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv Brazil; XXIth Century
Brasil; Século XXI
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv RDBCI: Digital Journal of Library and Information Science; Vol. 18 (2020): Continuous Publishing; e020037
RDBCI: Revista Digital de Biblioteconomia e Ciência da Informação; v. 18 (2020): Publicação Contínua; e020037
1678-765X
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito Civil (Online)
instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Civil (IBDCivil)
instacron:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Civil
instname_str Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Civil (IBDCivil)
instacron_str Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Civil
institution Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Civil
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Direito Civil (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Direito Civil (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Direito Civil (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Civil (IBDCivil)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||rbdcivil@ibdcivil.org.br
_version_ 1754302105443631104

Registros relacionados