Repúblicas monárquicas y monarquías republicanas en la constitución del mundo ibérico

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: González, Ángeles Lario
Data de Publicação: 2017
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: spa
Título da fonte: Estudos Ibero-Americanos
Texto Completo: https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/index.php/iberoamericana/article/view/25897
Resumo: ***Monarchic republics and republican monarchies in the constitution of the Iberian world***Throughout the making of modern States, while the existence of a monarchy defined the European Constitutional model as a parliamentary system, in America, it was the lack of it which defined that continent’s model, and the first, both constitutional and presidential, republic was established. During the post revolutionary era, while seeking how to temper the revolution, emerged the need to reorganize the balance of powers in favor of the executive branch. However, this was a problem for monarchies, where this executive branch was an undetachable and politically irresponsible king. For that reason, it became necessary to search for an alternative executive power named by the king, but actually responsible before the parliament, and, therefore, detachable. It could be dismissed in case of conflict. This was the monarchy’s “constitutional costume”: the parliamentary system was thus understood as a republican model under a monarchical superstructure. In America, where the elected president was responsible before its electors, it was not necessary to diminish the principle of separation of powers. That was the key difference in the making of the two different constitutional models in both continents up to day. However, several Latin American conservative republics did considered those features of the monarchy and its moderating role. This article deals with the evolution of both monarchical and republican political systems and historical transferences between them both.
id PUC_RS-20_7a868617f4b9d4eb7be2a594f1c1eb64
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/25897
network_acronym_str PUC_RS-20
network_name_str Estudos Ibero-Americanos
repository_id_str
spelling Repúblicas monárquicas y monarquías republicanas en la constitución del mundo ibéricoRepúblicas monárquicas y monarquías republicanas en la constitución del mundo ibéricoRepúblicas monárquicas y monarquías republicanas en la constitución del mundo ibéricoMonarchy and republicPolitical modelsParlamenctarismPresidential govermentEuropeAmericaMonarquía y repúblicaModelos políticosParlamentarismoPresidencialismoEuropaAméricaMonarquia e RepúblicaModelos políticosParlamentarismoPresidencialismoEuropaAmérica***Monarchic republics and republican monarchies in the constitution of the Iberian world***Throughout the making of modern States, while the existence of a monarchy defined the European Constitutional model as a parliamentary system, in America, it was the lack of it which defined that continent’s model, and the first, both constitutional and presidential, republic was established. During the post revolutionary era, while seeking how to temper the revolution, emerged the need to reorganize the balance of powers in favor of the executive branch. However, this was a problem for monarchies, where this executive branch was an undetachable and politically irresponsible king. For that reason, it became necessary to search for an alternative executive power named by the king, but actually responsible before the parliament, and, therefore, detachable. It could be dismissed in case of conflict. This was the monarchy’s “constitutional costume”: the parliamentary system was thus understood as a republican model under a monarchical superstructure. In America, where the elected president was responsible before its electors, it was not necessary to diminish the principle of separation of powers. That was the key difference in the making of the two different constitutional models in both continents up to day. However, several Latin American conservative republics did considered those features of the monarchy and its moderating role. This article deals with the evolution of both monarchical and republican political systems and historical transferences between them both.En la construcción del Estado contemporáneo, la existencia de la monarquía definió un modelo constitucional europeo, el parlamentario, mientras que la carencia de la misma en América definió el modelo de aquél continente, donde se levantó la primera república constitucional, presidencialista. En el momento post-revolucionario, cuando se buscó moderar la revolución, surgió la necesidad de corregir el equilibrio de poderes en favor de un mayor poder para el ejecutivo; pero esto era un problema en la monarquía, donde el ejecutivo era un rey inavomible e irresponsable políticamente; por ello se necesitó buscar “otro” ejecutivo que el rey nombraba pero era responsable ante las cortes y por ello era movible, se le podía cambiar en caso de conflicto: era el “traje constitucional” de la monarquía, el gobierno parlamentario que se entendió como un modelo republicano bajo una superestrucutra monárquica. En los Estados Unidos de América, con un presidente elegido y responsable ante sus electores, no hizo falta mitigar el principio de la separación de poderes, lo que fue el factor decisivo en la diferenciación de modelos constitucionales entre en ambos continentes hasta hoy; en diversas repúblicas conservadoras latinoamericanas, sin embargo, se tuvo en cuenta las características de la monarquía y su poder moderador. El artículo trata de la evolución de la monarquía y la república y la transferencia entre ambos modelos. ***Repúblicas monárquicas e monarquias republicanas na constituição do mundo ibérico***Na construção do Estado contemporâneo, a existência da monarquia definiu um modelo europeu constitucional, o parlamentar, sendo que a falta do mesmo na América configurou o modelo próprio daquele continente onde foi estabelecida a primeira república constitucional presidencialista. No momento pós revolucionário quando foi tentado moderar a revolução, surgiu a necessidade de corrigir o equilíbrio de poderes reforçando-se o poder executivo; mas este era um problema na monarquia, caracterizada por um rei inamovível e politicamente irresponsável. Foi então necessário um “outro” executivo que o rei nomeava mas era responsável perante as cortes e por isso não inamovível, podendo ser substituído em caso de conflito: era o “figurino constitucional” da monarquia, o governo parlamentar que foi entendido como um modelo republicano sob uma superestrutura monárquica. Nos Estados Unidos da América, com um presidente eleito e responsável perante os eleitores, não houve necessidade de mitigar o princípio da separação de poderes, o que constituiu fator decisivo para a diferenciação entre os modelos constitucionais em ambos os continentes até hoje; em várias repúblicas conservadoras latino-americanas foram porem tomadas em consideração as características da monarquia e do seu poder moderador. O artigo aborda o desenvolvimento e as transferências da monarquia e da república em ambas as áreas.Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS2017-12-04info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/index.php/iberoamericana/article/view/2589710.15448/1980-864X.2017.3.25897Estudos Ibero-Americanos; Vol. 43 No. 3 (2017): Dossier: Amor Mundi – Actuality and Reception of Hannah Arendt’s Work; 626-641Estudos Ibero-Americanos; Vol. 43 Núm. 3 (2017): Dossier: Amor Mundi - Actualidad y Recepción de Hannah Arendt; 626-641Estudos Ibero-Americanos; v. 43 n. 3 (2017): Dossiê: Amor Mundi: atualidade e recepção da obra de Hannah Arendt; 626-6411980-864X0101-406410.15448/1980-864X.2017.3reponame:Estudos Ibero-Americanosinstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)instacron:PUC_RSspahttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/index.php/iberoamericana/article/view/25897/16230Copyright (c) 2017 Angeles Lario Gonzalezhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGonzález, Ángeles Lario2017-12-05T19:38:48Zoai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/25897Revistahttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/index.php/iberoamericanaPRIhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/index.php/iberoamericana/oaieditora.periodicos@pucrs.br||eia@pucrs.br1980-864X0101-4064opendoar:2017-12-05T19:38:48Estudos Ibero-Americanos - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Repúblicas monárquicas y monarquías republicanas en la constitución del mundo ibérico
Repúblicas monárquicas y monarquías republicanas en la constitución del mundo ibérico
Repúblicas monárquicas y monarquías republicanas en la constitución del mundo ibérico
title Repúblicas monárquicas y monarquías republicanas en la constitución del mundo ibérico
spellingShingle Repúblicas monárquicas y monarquías republicanas en la constitución del mundo ibérico
González, Ángeles Lario
Monarchy and republic
Political models
Parlamenctarism
Presidential goverment
Europe
America
Monarquía y república
Modelos políticos
Parlamentarismo
Presidencialismo
Europa
América
Monarquia e República
Modelos políticos
Parlamentarismo
Presidencialismo
Europa
América
title_short Repúblicas monárquicas y monarquías republicanas en la constitución del mundo ibérico
title_full Repúblicas monárquicas y monarquías republicanas en la constitución del mundo ibérico
title_fullStr Repúblicas monárquicas y monarquías republicanas en la constitución del mundo ibérico
title_full_unstemmed Repúblicas monárquicas y monarquías republicanas en la constitución del mundo ibérico
title_sort Repúblicas monárquicas y monarquías republicanas en la constitución del mundo ibérico
author González, Ángeles Lario
author_facet González, Ángeles Lario
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv González, Ángeles Lario
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Monarchy and republic
Political models
Parlamenctarism
Presidential goverment
Europe
America
Monarquía y república
Modelos políticos
Parlamentarismo
Presidencialismo
Europa
América
Monarquia e República
Modelos políticos
Parlamentarismo
Presidencialismo
Europa
América
topic Monarchy and republic
Political models
Parlamenctarism
Presidential goverment
Europe
America
Monarquía y república
Modelos políticos
Parlamentarismo
Presidencialismo
Europa
América
Monarquia e República
Modelos políticos
Parlamentarismo
Presidencialismo
Europa
América
description ***Monarchic republics and republican monarchies in the constitution of the Iberian world***Throughout the making of modern States, while the existence of a monarchy defined the European Constitutional model as a parliamentary system, in America, it was the lack of it which defined that continent’s model, and the first, both constitutional and presidential, republic was established. During the post revolutionary era, while seeking how to temper the revolution, emerged the need to reorganize the balance of powers in favor of the executive branch. However, this was a problem for monarchies, where this executive branch was an undetachable and politically irresponsible king. For that reason, it became necessary to search for an alternative executive power named by the king, but actually responsible before the parliament, and, therefore, detachable. It could be dismissed in case of conflict. This was the monarchy’s “constitutional costume”: the parliamentary system was thus understood as a republican model under a monarchical superstructure. In America, where the elected president was responsible before its electors, it was not necessary to diminish the principle of separation of powers. That was the key difference in the making of the two different constitutional models in both continents up to day. However, several Latin American conservative republics did considered those features of the monarchy and its moderating role. This article deals with the evolution of both monarchical and republican political systems and historical transferences between them both.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-12-04
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/index.php/iberoamericana/article/view/25897
10.15448/1980-864X.2017.3.25897
url https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/index.php/iberoamericana/article/view/25897
identifier_str_mv 10.15448/1980-864X.2017.3.25897
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/index.php/iberoamericana/article/view/25897/16230
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Angeles Lario Gonzalez
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Angeles Lario Gonzalez
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Estudos Ibero-Americanos; Vol. 43 No. 3 (2017): Dossier: Amor Mundi – Actuality and Reception of Hannah Arendt’s Work; 626-641
Estudos Ibero-Americanos; Vol. 43 Núm. 3 (2017): Dossier: Amor Mundi - Actualidad y Recepción de Hannah Arendt; 626-641
Estudos Ibero-Americanos; v. 43 n. 3 (2017): Dossiê: Amor Mundi: atualidade e recepção da obra de Hannah Arendt; 626-641
1980-864X
0101-4064
10.15448/1980-864X.2017.3
reponame:Estudos Ibero-Americanos
instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
instacron:PUC_RS
instname_str Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
instacron_str PUC_RS
institution PUC_RS
reponame_str Estudos Ibero-Americanos
collection Estudos Ibero-Americanos
repository.name.fl_str_mv Estudos Ibero-Americanos - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv editora.periodicos@pucrs.br||eia@pucrs.br
_version_ 1799128859417772032