INTERNET UBIQUITY: TRANSNATIONALITY OF JURISDICTION?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2183-95222022000100133 |
Resumo: | Abstract The objective of this essay is to carry out a comparative study of the conflicts of jurisdiction resulting from litigations in the internet environment, taking as paradigms (1) the case of the European Court of Justice of 6 October 2015, case C 362/14; (2) Special Appeal n. 1,168,547, judged in February 2011, by the Brazilian Superior Court of Justice and (3) Direct Constitutionality Action N. 51, pending before the Supreme Federal Court of Brazil. Furthermore, it studies the adequacy, foreseen in the principiological catalog of Law 13.709/2018 as an assumption of validity for the international transfer of data. The anachronism of adherence to the territory as a criterion for defining jurisdiction, in such cases, is the work hypothesis. This essay uses, in the approach, the hypothetical-deductive method; in research, the typological and structuralist procedure; topic-systematic interpretation using exploratory and explanatory research techniques, instrumentally documentary (bibliographic and jurisprudential). |
id |
RCAP_a1efae136450b868abe1f291519f0053 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S2183-95222022000100133 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
INTERNET UBIQUITY: TRANSNATIONALITY OF JURISDICTION?internetjurisdictionubiquitytransnationality.Abstract The objective of this essay is to carry out a comparative study of the conflicts of jurisdiction resulting from litigations in the internet environment, taking as paradigms (1) the case of the European Court of Justice of 6 October 2015, case C 362/14; (2) Special Appeal n. 1,168,547, judged in February 2011, by the Brazilian Superior Court of Justice and (3) Direct Constitutionality Action N. 51, pending before the Supreme Federal Court of Brazil. Furthermore, it studies the adequacy, foreseen in the principiological catalog of Law 13.709/2018 as an assumption of validity for the international transfer of data. The anachronism of adherence to the territory as a criterion for defining jurisdiction, in such cases, is the work hypothesis. This essay uses, in the approach, the hypothetical-deductive method; in research, the typological and structuralist procedure; topic-systematic interpretation using exploratory and explanatory research techniques, instrumentally documentary (bibliographic and jurisprudential).Editorial Juruá2022-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2183-95222022000100133Revista Internacional CONSINTER de Direito - Publicação Oficial do Conselho Internacional de Estudos Contemporâneos em Pós-Graduação n.14 2022reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttp://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2183-95222022000100133Mua,Cíntia Teresinha BurhaldeNeto,Eugênio Facchiniinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-07-27T12:35:30ZPortal AgregadorONG |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
INTERNET UBIQUITY: TRANSNATIONALITY OF JURISDICTION? |
title |
INTERNET UBIQUITY: TRANSNATIONALITY OF JURISDICTION? |
spellingShingle |
INTERNET UBIQUITY: TRANSNATIONALITY OF JURISDICTION? Mua,Cíntia Teresinha Burhalde internet jurisdiction ubiquity transnationality. |
title_short |
INTERNET UBIQUITY: TRANSNATIONALITY OF JURISDICTION? |
title_full |
INTERNET UBIQUITY: TRANSNATIONALITY OF JURISDICTION? |
title_fullStr |
INTERNET UBIQUITY: TRANSNATIONALITY OF JURISDICTION? |
title_full_unstemmed |
INTERNET UBIQUITY: TRANSNATIONALITY OF JURISDICTION? |
title_sort |
INTERNET UBIQUITY: TRANSNATIONALITY OF JURISDICTION? |
author |
Mua,Cíntia Teresinha Burhalde |
author_facet |
Mua,Cíntia Teresinha Burhalde Neto,Eugênio Facchini |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Neto,Eugênio Facchini |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Mua,Cíntia Teresinha Burhalde Neto,Eugênio Facchini |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
internet jurisdiction ubiquity transnationality. |
topic |
internet jurisdiction ubiquity transnationality. |
description |
Abstract The objective of this essay is to carry out a comparative study of the conflicts of jurisdiction resulting from litigations in the internet environment, taking as paradigms (1) the case of the European Court of Justice of 6 October 2015, case C 362/14; (2) Special Appeal n. 1,168,547, judged in February 2011, by the Brazilian Superior Court of Justice and (3) Direct Constitutionality Action N. 51, pending before the Supreme Federal Court of Brazil. Furthermore, it studies the adequacy, foreseen in the principiological catalog of Law 13.709/2018 as an assumption of validity for the international transfer of data. The anachronism of adherence to the territory as a criterion for defining jurisdiction, in such cases, is the work hypothesis. This essay uses, in the approach, the hypothetical-deductive method; in research, the typological and structuralist procedure; topic-systematic interpretation using exploratory and explanatory research techniques, instrumentally documentary (bibliographic and jurisprudential). |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-06-01 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2183-95222022000100133 |
url |
http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2183-95222022000100133 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2183-95222022000100133 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editorial Juruá |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editorial Juruá |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Internacional CONSINTER de Direito - Publicação Oficial do Conselho Internacional de Estudos Contemporâneos em Pós-Graduação n.14 2022 reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1777304478900289536 |