Assessing quality and evaluating performance in higher education: worlds apart or complementary views?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2010 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10773/38004 |
Resumo: | This paper reflects on quality assessment and performance evaluation in higher education, namely by analysing the insufficient link between those two aspects. We start by reviewing the current state of the art regarding different processes and mechanisms of quality assessment and performance evaluation and discuss some of the major issues regarding the implementation of some of them. In particular, we analyse the current limitations regarding data collected, available and publicised on the performance of HEIs and the problems those limitations bring to a fair evaluation of higher education. Through this analysis we intend to contribute to a better understanding of the mechanisms of evaluation in higher education and the way these may lead to the promotion of better quality assessment practices and institutional management. © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010. |
id |
RCAP_d28f906836d41a5270a50f64d735ca20 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ria.ua.pt:10773/38004 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Assessing quality and evaluating performance in higher education: worlds apart or complementary views?QualityPerformanceEvaluationAssessmentHigher educationThis paper reflects on quality assessment and performance evaluation in higher education, namely by analysing the insufficient link between those two aspects. We start by reviewing the current state of the art regarding different processes and mechanisms of quality assessment and performance evaluation and discuss some of the major issues regarding the implementation of some of them. In particular, we analyse the current limitations regarding data collected, available and publicised on the performance of HEIs and the problems those limitations bring to a fair evaluation of higher education. Through this analysis we intend to contribute to a better understanding of the mechanisms of evaluation in higher education and the way these may lead to the promotion of better quality assessment practices and institutional management. © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010.Springer2023-06-13T09:54:51Z2010-03-18T00:00:00Z2010-03-18info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10773/38004eng0026-469510.1007/s11024-010-9142-2Sarrico, Cláudia S.Rosa, Maria J.Teixeira, Pedro N.Cardoso, Margarida F.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-02-22T12:08:05Zoai:ria.ua.pt:10773/38004Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T03:06:23.621363Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Assessing quality and evaluating performance in higher education: worlds apart or complementary views? |
title |
Assessing quality and evaluating performance in higher education: worlds apart or complementary views? |
spellingShingle |
Assessing quality and evaluating performance in higher education: worlds apart or complementary views? Sarrico, Cláudia S. Quality Performance Evaluation Assessment Higher education |
title_short |
Assessing quality and evaluating performance in higher education: worlds apart or complementary views? |
title_full |
Assessing quality and evaluating performance in higher education: worlds apart or complementary views? |
title_fullStr |
Assessing quality and evaluating performance in higher education: worlds apart or complementary views? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Assessing quality and evaluating performance in higher education: worlds apart or complementary views? |
title_sort |
Assessing quality and evaluating performance in higher education: worlds apart or complementary views? |
author |
Sarrico, Cláudia S. |
author_facet |
Sarrico, Cláudia S. Rosa, Maria J. Teixeira, Pedro N. Cardoso, Margarida F. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Rosa, Maria J. Teixeira, Pedro N. Cardoso, Margarida F. |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Sarrico, Cláudia S. Rosa, Maria J. Teixeira, Pedro N. Cardoso, Margarida F. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Quality Performance Evaluation Assessment Higher education |
topic |
Quality Performance Evaluation Assessment Higher education |
description |
This paper reflects on quality assessment and performance evaluation in higher education, namely by analysing the insufficient link between those two aspects. We start by reviewing the current state of the art regarding different processes and mechanisms of quality assessment and performance evaluation and discuss some of the major issues regarding the implementation of some of them. In particular, we analyse the current limitations regarding data collected, available and publicised on the performance of HEIs and the problems those limitations bring to a fair evaluation of higher education. Through this analysis we intend to contribute to a better understanding of the mechanisms of evaluation in higher education and the way these may lead to the promotion of better quality assessment practices and institutional management. © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010. |
publishDate |
2010 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2010-03-18T00:00:00Z 2010-03-18 2023-06-13T09:54:51Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10773/38004 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10773/38004 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
0026-4695 10.1007/s11024-010-9142-2 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Springer |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Springer |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799137718947545088 |