Frequency of antiphospholipid antibodies in patients with infectious diseases using three different ELISA methods

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Santiago,Mittermayer Barreto
Data de Publicação: 2006
Outros Autores: Martinelli,Reinaldo, Reis,Mitermayer G., Reis,Eliana Almeida, Ko,Albert, Fontes,Roberto Dias, Silva,Moacir Paranhos, Nascimento,Eliane Goes, Espinola,Ricardo, Harris,Nigel, Gharavi,Azzudin, Pierangeli,Silvia
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Jornal Brasileiro de Patologia e Medicina Laboratorial (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1676-24442006000100004
Resumo: OBJECTIVE: The standard enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for anticardiolipin (aCL) antibodies is the most important test for the diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). However, the test is also positive in some infectious diseases and other non-related syndromes. It has been suggested that the detection of antibodies to a mixture of phospholipids or to beta2-glycoprotein I (beta2-GP I) has higher specificity for APS than the standard aCL ELISA. The aim of the present work is to compare the diagnostic specificity of three different antiphospholipid (aPL) assays in patients with infectious diseases. METHODS: Antiphospholipid antibodies were searched by three ELISA techniques, namely standard aCL, APhL® ELISA kit and anti-beta2-GP I, in sera of patients with infectious diseases, including syphilis (69), leptospirosis (33) and visceral leishmaniasis (30). RESULTS: The frequency of positivity of IgG aPL in patients with syphilis, leptospirosis and Kala-azar was 13/69 (19%), 9/33 (27%) and 2/30 (6%), respectively, using standard ELISA, versus only 1/69 (1.4%), 0/33 (0%) and 0/30 (0%) positivity by the APhL® ELISA kit. The positivity of the isotype IgM aPL was 10/69 (14%), 4/33 (12%) and 1/30 (3%), respectively, by the standard ELISA, and 1/69 (1.4%), 0/33 (0%) and 0/30 (0%) by the APhL® ELISA kit. The presence of significant levels of IgG anti-beta2GPI was observed in 14/69 cases of syphilis (20%), 6/33 cases of leptospirosis (18%) and 16/30 cases of Kala-azar (53%). The APhL® ELISA kit had superior performance showing the highest specificity: 97% (95% CI: 92%-99%) for IgG compared to 81% (95% CI: 74%-87%) for standard ELISA and 72% (95% CI: 64%-79%) for anti-beta2 GPI assay. CONCLUSIONS: The APhL® ELISA kit proved to be significantly more specific than the aCL standard ELISA and the anti-beta2GPI ELISA, and it should be used to help in the diagnosis and confirmation of APS.
id SBP-1_82d9bc51ea8aa070bf580060117a6780
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1676-24442006000100004
network_acronym_str SBP-1
network_name_str Jornal Brasileiro de Patologia e Medicina Laboratorial (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Frequency of antiphospholipid antibodies in patients with infectious diseases using three different ELISA methodsAnticardiolipin antibodiesAntiphospholipid antibodiesAntiphospholipid syndromeInfectious diseasesELISAOBJECTIVE: The standard enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for anticardiolipin (aCL) antibodies is the most important test for the diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). However, the test is also positive in some infectious diseases and other non-related syndromes. It has been suggested that the detection of antibodies to a mixture of phospholipids or to beta2-glycoprotein I (beta2-GP I) has higher specificity for APS than the standard aCL ELISA. The aim of the present work is to compare the diagnostic specificity of three different antiphospholipid (aPL) assays in patients with infectious diseases. METHODS: Antiphospholipid antibodies were searched by three ELISA techniques, namely standard aCL, APhL® ELISA kit and anti-beta2-GP I, in sera of patients with infectious diseases, including syphilis (69), leptospirosis (33) and visceral leishmaniasis (30). RESULTS: The frequency of positivity of IgG aPL in patients with syphilis, leptospirosis and Kala-azar was 13/69 (19%), 9/33 (27%) and 2/30 (6%), respectively, using standard ELISA, versus only 1/69 (1.4%), 0/33 (0%) and 0/30 (0%) positivity by the APhL® ELISA kit. The positivity of the isotype IgM aPL was 10/69 (14%), 4/33 (12%) and 1/30 (3%), respectively, by the standard ELISA, and 1/69 (1.4%), 0/33 (0%) and 0/30 (0%) by the APhL® ELISA kit. The presence of significant levels of IgG anti-beta2GPI was observed in 14/69 cases of syphilis (20%), 6/33 cases of leptospirosis (18%) and 16/30 cases of Kala-azar (53%). The APhL® ELISA kit had superior performance showing the highest specificity: 97% (95% CI: 92%-99%) for IgG compared to 81% (95% CI: 74%-87%) for standard ELISA and 72% (95% CI: 64%-79%) for anti-beta2 GPI assay. CONCLUSIONS: The APhL® ELISA kit proved to be significantly more specific than the aCL standard ELISA and the anti-beta2GPI ELISA, and it should be used to help in the diagnosis and confirmation of APS.Sociedade Brasileira de Patologia Clínica2006-02-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1676-24442006000100004Jornal Brasileiro de Patologia e Medicina Laboratorial v.42 n.1 2006reponame:Jornal Brasileiro de Patologia e Medicina Laboratorial (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Patologia (SBP)instacron:SBP10.1590/S1676-24442006000100004info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSantiago,Mittermayer BarretoMartinelli,ReinaldoReis,Mitermayer G.Reis,Eliana AlmeidaKo,AlbertFontes,Roberto DiasSilva,Moacir ParanhosNascimento,Eliane GoesEspinola,RicardoHarris,NigelGharavi,AzzudinPierangeli,Silviaeng2006-06-26T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1676-24442006000100004Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/jbpmlhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||jbpml@sbpc.org.br1678-47741676-2444opendoar:2006-06-26T00:00Jornal Brasileiro de Patologia e Medicina Laboratorial (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Patologia (SBP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Frequency of antiphospholipid antibodies in patients with infectious diseases using three different ELISA methods
title Frequency of antiphospholipid antibodies in patients with infectious diseases using three different ELISA methods
spellingShingle Frequency of antiphospholipid antibodies in patients with infectious diseases using three different ELISA methods
Santiago,Mittermayer Barreto
Anticardiolipin antibodies
Antiphospholipid antibodies
Antiphospholipid syndrome
Infectious diseases
ELISA
title_short Frequency of antiphospholipid antibodies in patients with infectious diseases using three different ELISA methods
title_full Frequency of antiphospholipid antibodies in patients with infectious diseases using three different ELISA methods
title_fullStr Frequency of antiphospholipid antibodies in patients with infectious diseases using three different ELISA methods
title_full_unstemmed Frequency of antiphospholipid antibodies in patients with infectious diseases using three different ELISA methods
title_sort Frequency of antiphospholipid antibodies in patients with infectious diseases using three different ELISA methods
author Santiago,Mittermayer Barreto
author_facet Santiago,Mittermayer Barreto
Martinelli,Reinaldo
Reis,Mitermayer G.
Reis,Eliana Almeida
Ko,Albert
Fontes,Roberto Dias
Silva,Moacir Paranhos
Nascimento,Eliane Goes
Espinola,Ricardo
Harris,Nigel
Gharavi,Azzudin
Pierangeli,Silvia
author_role author
author2 Martinelli,Reinaldo
Reis,Mitermayer G.
Reis,Eliana Almeida
Ko,Albert
Fontes,Roberto Dias
Silva,Moacir Paranhos
Nascimento,Eliane Goes
Espinola,Ricardo
Harris,Nigel
Gharavi,Azzudin
Pierangeli,Silvia
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Santiago,Mittermayer Barreto
Martinelli,Reinaldo
Reis,Mitermayer G.
Reis,Eliana Almeida
Ko,Albert
Fontes,Roberto Dias
Silva,Moacir Paranhos
Nascimento,Eliane Goes
Espinola,Ricardo
Harris,Nigel
Gharavi,Azzudin
Pierangeli,Silvia
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Anticardiolipin antibodies
Antiphospholipid antibodies
Antiphospholipid syndrome
Infectious diseases
ELISA
topic Anticardiolipin antibodies
Antiphospholipid antibodies
Antiphospholipid syndrome
Infectious diseases
ELISA
description OBJECTIVE: The standard enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for anticardiolipin (aCL) antibodies is the most important test for the diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). However, the test is also positive in some infectious diseases and other non-related syndromes. It has been suggested that the detection of antibodies to a mixture of phospholipids or to beta2-glycoprotein I (beta2-GP I) has higher specificity for APS than the standard aCL ELISA. The aim of the present work is to compare the diagnostic specificity of three different antiphospholipid (aPL) assays in patients with infectious diseases. METHODS: Antiphospholipid antibodies were searched by three ELISA techniques, namely standard aCL, APhL® ELISA kit and anti-beta2-GP I, in sera of patients with infectious diseases, including syphilis (69), leptospirosis (33) and visceral leishmaniasis (30). RESULTS: The frequency of positivity of IgG aPL in patients with syphilis, leptospirosis and Kala-azar was 13/69 (19%), 9/33 (27%) and 2/30 (6%), respectively, using standard ELISA, versus only 1/69 (1.4%), 0/33 (0%) and 0/30 (0%) positivity by the APhL® ELISA kit. The positivity of the isotype IgM aPL was 10/69 (14%), 4/33 (12%) and 1/30 (3%), respectively, by the standard ELISA, and 1/69 (1.4%), 0/33 (0%) and 0/30 (0%) by the APhL® ELISA kit. The presence of significant levels of IgG anti-beta2GPI was observed in 14/69 cases of syphilis (20%), 6/33 cases of leptospirosis (18%) and 16/30 cases of Kala-azar (53%). The APhL® ELISA kit had superior performance showing the highest specificity: 97% (95% CI: 92%-99%) for IgG compared to 81% (95% CI: 74%-87%) for standard ELISA and 72% (95% CI: 64%-79%) for anti-beta2 GPI assay. CONCLUSIONS: The APhL® ELISA kit proved to be significantly more specific than the aCL standard ELISA and the anti-beta2GPI ELISA, and it should be used to help in the diagnosis and confirmation of APS.
publishDate 2006
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2006-02-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1676-24442006000100004
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1676-24442006000100004
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S1676-24442006000100004
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv
Sociedade Brasileira de Patologia Clínica
publisher.none.fl_str_mv
Sociedade Brasileira de Patologia Clínica
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Jornal Brasileiro de Patologia e Medicina Laboratorial v.42 n.1 2006
reponame:Jornal Brasileiro de Patologia e Medicina Laboratorial (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Patologia (SBP)
instacron:SBP
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Patologia (SBP)
instacron_str SBP
institution SBP
reponame_str Jornal Brasileiro de Patologia e Medicina Laboratorial (Online)
collection Jornal Brasileiro de Patologia e Medicina Laboratorial (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Jornal Brasileiro de Patologia e Medicina Laboratorial (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Patologia (SBP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||jbpml@sbpc.org.br
_version_ 1752122294002515968