Do live or inactive yeasts improve cattle ruminal environment?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Cunha,Camila Soares
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Marcondes,Marcos Inácio, Silva,Alex Lopes da, Gionbelli,Tathyane Ramalho Santos, Novaes,Marco Aurélio Schiavo, Knupp,Leonardo Sidney, Virginio Júnior,Gercino Ferreira, Veloso,Cristina Mattos
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-35982019000100705
Resumo: ABSTRACT This research was conducted to investigate the effect of live and inactive sugarcane yeast on beef cattle voluntary intake, apparent digestibility of nutrients, ruminal pH, volatile fatty acids (VFA) concentrations, and ruminal ammonia. Five rumen-cannulated Nellore heifers were distributed in a 5×5 Latin square design, with five experimental periods of 15 days, with seven days for adaptation to the additives and the remaining days for data records and sampling. Total mixed ration (TMR) was composed by corn silage (20%) and concentrate (80%) based on corn and soybean meal. Five treatments were evaluated: without additive use (negative control; NC); chemical buffer addition – 0.71% in concentrate DM of sodium bicarbonate and 0.18% of magnesium oxide (positive control, PC); 10 g/day live yeast (LY); 15 g/day of inactive yeast (IY15); and 30 g/day of inactive yeast (IY30). Sugarcane yeasts were directly infused in rumen immediately after morning and afternoon feed supply. Feed additives did not affect voluntary intake, nutrient digestibility, and sorting behavior of animals. However, heifers from all treatments presented preferential intake of fibrous fraction of diet, especially those from NC and IY15. Nitrogen balance, VFA concentrations, and blood parameters were not influenced as well. Sodium bicarbonate and magnesium oxide led to greater ruminal pH than yeast, and IY15 presented greater pH than IY30. Ruminal ammonia was increased by the use of additives. Active and inactive yeasts are not recommended as feed additives for bovines fed diets with 80% of concentrate since it allows animals to select fibrous particles from TMR, and no representative gain in ruminal parameters and digestibilities are guaranteed.
id SBZ-1_12dafc43d171cfb861a1fadd21ad4104
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1516-35982019000100705
network_acronym_str SBZ-1
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Do live or inactive yeasts improve cattle ruminal environment?digestibilityfeed additiveintakepHruminal ammoniavolatile fatty acidsABSTRACT This research was conducted to investigate the effect of live and inactive sugarcane yeast on beef cattle voluntary intake, apparent digestibility of nutrients, ruminal pH, volatile fatty acids (VFA) concentrations, and ruminal ammonia. Five rumen-cannulated Nellore heifers were distributed in a 5×5 Latin square design, with five experimental periods of 15 days, with seven days for adaptation to the additives and the remaining days for data records and sampling. Total mixed ration (TMR) was composed by corn silage (20%) and concentrate (80%) based on corn and soybean meal. Five treatments were evaluated: without additive use (negative control; NC); chemical buffer addition – 0.71% in concentrate DM of sodium bicarbonate and 0.18% of magnesium oxide (positive control, PC); 10 g/day live yeast (LY); 15 g/day of inactive yeast (IY15); and 30 g/day of inactive yeast (IY30). Sugarcane yeasts were directly infused in rumen immediately after morning and afternoon feed supply. Feed additives did not affect voluntary intake, nutrient digestibility, and sorting behavior of animals. However, heifers from all treatments presented preferential intake of fibrous fraction of diet, especially those from NC and IY15. Nitrogen balance, VFA concentrations, and blood parameters were not influenced as well. Sodium bicarbonate and magnesium oxide led to greater ruminal pH than yeast, and IY15 presented greater pH than IY30. Ruminal ammonia was increased by the use of additives. Active and inactive yeasts are not recommended as feed additives for bovines fed diets with 80% of concentrate since it allows animals to select fibrous particles from TMR, and no representative gain in ruminal parameters and digestibilities are guaranteed.Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia2019-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-35982019000100705Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia v.48 2019reponame:Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia (SBZ)instacron:SBZ10.1590/rbz4820180259info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCunha,Camila SoaresMarcondes,Marcos InácioSilva,Alex Lopes daGionbelli,Tathyane Ramalho SantosNovaes,Marco Aurélio SchiavoKnupp,Leonardo SidneyVirginio Júnior,Gercino FerreiraVeloso,Cristina Mattoseng2019-07-17T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1516-35982019000100705Revistahttps://www.rbz.org.br/pt-br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||bz@sbz.org.br|| secretariarbz@sbz.org.br1806-92901516-3598opendoar:2019-07-17T00:00Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia (SBZ)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Do live or inactive yeasts improve cattle ruminal environment?
title Do live or inactive yeasts improve cattle ruminal environment?
spellingShingle Do live or inactive yeasts improve cattle ruminal environment?
Cunha,Camila Soares
digestibility
feed additive
intake
pH
ruminal ammonia
volatile fatty acids
title_short Do live or inactive yeasts improve cattle ruminal environment?
title_full Do live or inactive yeasts improve cattle ruminal environment?
title_fullStr Do live or inactive yeasts improve cattle ruminal environment?
title_full_unstemmed Do live or inactive yeasts improve cattle ruminal environment?
title_sort Do live or inactive yeasts improve cattle ruminal environment?
author Cunha,Camila Soares
author_facet Cunha,Camila Soares
Marcondes,Marcos Inácio
Silva,Alex Lopes da
Gionbelli,Tathyane Ramalho Santos
Novaes,Marco Aurélio Schiavo
Knupp,Leonardo Sidney
Virginio Júnior,Gercino Ferreira
Veloso,Cristina Mattos
author_role author
author2 Marcondes,Marcos Inácio
Silva,Alex Lopes da
Gionbelli,Tathyane Ramalho Santos
Novaes,Marco Aurélio Schiavo
Knupp,Leonardo Sidney
Virginio Júnior,Gercino Ferreira
Veloso,Cristina Mattos
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Cunha,Camila Soares
Marcondes,Marcos Inácio
Silva,Alex Lopes da
Gionbelli,Tathyane Ramalho Santos
Novaes,Marco Aurélio Schiavo
Knupp,Leonardo Sidney
Virginio Júnior,Gercino Ferreira
Veloso,Cristina Mattos
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv digestibility
feed additive
intake
pH
ruminal ammonia
volatile fatty acids
topic digestibility
feed additive
intake
pH
ruminal ammonia
volatile fatty acids
description ABSTRACT This research was conducted to investigate the effect of live and inactive sugarcane yeast on beef cattle voluntary intake, apparent digestibility of nutrients, ruminal pH, volatile fatty acids (VFA) concentrations, and ruminal ammonia. Five rumen-cannulated Nellore heifers were distributed in a 5×5 Latin square design, with five experimental periods of 15 days, with seven days for adaptation to the additives and the remaining days for data records and sampling. Total mixed ration (TMR) was composed by corn silage (20%) and concentrate (80%) based on corn and soybean meal. Five treatments were evaluated: without additive use (negative control; NC); chemical buffer addition – 0.71% in concentrate DM of sodium bicarbonate and 0.18% of magnesium oxide (positive control, PC); 10 g/day live yeast (LY); 15 g/day of inactive yeast (IY15); and 30 g/day of inactive yeast (IY30). Sugarcane yeasts were directly infused in rumen immediately after morning and afternoon feed supply. Feed additives did not affect voluntary intake, nutrient digestibility, and sorting behavior of animals. However, heifers from all treatments presented preferential intake of fibrous fraction of diet, especially those from NC and IY15. Nitrogen balance, VFA concentrations, and blood parameters were not influenced as well. Sodium bicarbonate and magnesium oxide led to greater ruminal pH than yeast, and IY15 presented greater pH than IY30. Ruminal ammonia was increased by the use of additives. Active and inactive yeasts are not recommended as feed additives for bovines fed diets with 80% of concentrate since it allows animals to select fibrous particles from TMR, and no representative gain in ruminal parameters and digestibilities are guaranteed.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-35982019000100705
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-35982019000100705
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/rbz4820180259
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia v.48 2019
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia (SBZ)
instacron:SBZ
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia (SBZ)
instacron_str SBZ
institution SBZ
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia (SBZ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||bz@sbz.org.br|| secretariarbz@sbz.org.br
_version_ 1750318153591685120