Reference evapotranspiration during rainy and dry seasons in Mossoró, RN, Brazil

• Autor(a) principal: Oliveira, Anna Kézia Soares de
• Data de Publicação: 2020
• Outros Autores: Freitas, Isaac Alves da Silva, Silva, Tecla Ticiane Félix da, Sobrinho, José Espínola, Maniçoba, Rudah Marques, Santos, Wesley de Oliveira, Bezerra, Joel Medeiros, Silva, Saulo Tasso Araújo da
• Tipo de documento: Artigo
• Idioma: eng
• Título da fonte: Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
• Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/37209
• topic: Agrometeorology; Irrigation management; Empirical methods.; Agrometeorologia; Manejo da irrigação; Métodos empíricos.

Mossoró, RN, Brazil, is considered one of the fruit growing centers of the Northeast region. This municipality has a persistent water deficit, with the need to develop irrigated agriculture with efficient water use and rational management of irrigation. The objective of this study was to evaluate estimation methods of reference evapotranspiration (ETo) for different climate conditions of Mossoró, comparing them with the standard Penman-Monteith-FAO 56 method. A daily data series of two distinct years, a rainy (2011) and a dry year (2012), was used. The data were obtained from the weather station of the Federal Rural University of the Semi-Arid Region (UFERSA). An analysis was performed to identify methods that best fit those of Penman-Monteith-FAO 56, and for this, ten methods were evaluated using statistical indices. The Penman-Original, Radiation-Temperature, and Hargreaves-Original methods stood out and satisfactorily met ETo estimation for the rainy season, while the Jensen-Haise, Radiation-Temperature, and Hargreaves-Original methods achieved satisfactory performance for the dry season. The Hargreaves-Samani method did not demonstrate viability in the use of ETo estimation, as it was the worst method in both studied periods and is not recommended for irrigation management.