Yield and gross income of bunching onion and coriander in monocrop and intercrop systems

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Zárate, Néstor Antonio Heredia
Data de Publicação: 2005
Outros Autores: Vieira, Maria do Carmo, Ono, Fábio Benedito, Souza, Cleila Marcondes de
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/2282
Resumo: The objective of this work was to determine yield and income of ‘Todo ano’ bunching onion and ‘Asteca’ coriander, which were carried out in monocrop and intercrop systems with three (Ce3 and Co3) and four rows planted per plot. The work was developed in Dourados-MS, Brazil, between July 13th, and September 15th, 2004. Average yield of fresh mass of bunching onion plants under monocrop system had significative increase of 0.64 t ha-1 (92.75%) in relation to those under intercrop system (0.69 t ha-1). For coriander, yield of fresh mass of plants under monocrop system and with four rows per plot had significative increase of 1.43 t ha-1 (41.21%) in relation to those under three rows (3.47 t ha-1). Land Equivalant Ratio (LER) for bunching onion and coriander intercropped were superior in 21% (Ce3Co4) and 56% (Ce4Co3) in relation to monocrop system. For bunching onion producer, both intercrops were economic viable, but Ce4Co3 could have induced a higher gain per hectare (R$ 3,243.30). By the other side, for coriander producer, Ce3Co4 intercrop was the worst, because, although LER had been superior to 1.00, it could induce loss per hectare of R$ 99.42. Ce4Co3 intercrop was the best because it could induce a gain of R$ 777.77.
id UEL-11_8ced1d3793d39325a6a635aaabe89a3f
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/2282
network_acronym_str UEL-11
network_name_str Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Yield and gross income of bunching onion and coriander in monocrop and intercrop systemsProdução e renda bruta de cebolinha e de coentro, em cultivo solteiro e consorciadoAllium fistulosumCoriandrum sativumIntercropIncome.Allium fistulosumCoriandrum sativumAssociação de culturasRetorno conômico.The objective of this work was to determine yield and income of ‘Todo ano’ bunching onion and ‘Asteca’ coriander, which were carried out in monocrop and intercrop systems with three (Ce3 and Co3) and four rows planted per plot. The work was developed in Dourados-MS, Brazil, between July 13th, and September 15th, 2004. Average yield of fresh mass of bunching onion plants under monocrop system had significative increase of 0.64 t ha-1 (92.75%) in relation to those under intercrop system (0.69 t ha-1). For coriander, yield of fresh mass of plants under monocrop system and with four rows per plot had significative increase of 1.43 t ha-1 (41.21%) in relation to those under three rows (3.47 t ha-1). Land Equivalant Ratio (LER) for bunching onion and coriander intercropped were superior in 21% (Ce3Co4) and 56% (Ce4Co3) in relation to monocrop system. For bunching onion producer, both intercrops were economic viable, but Ce4Co3 could have induced a higher gain per hectare (R$ 3,243.30). By the other side, for coriander producer, Ce3Co4 intercrop was the worst, because, although LER had been superior to 1.00, it could induce loss per hectare of R$ 99.42. Ce4Co3 intercrop was the best because it could induce a gain of R$ 777.77.O objetivo do trabalho foi determinar a produtividade e o retorno econômico da cebolinha ‘Todo Ano’ e do coentro ‘Asteca’, conduzidos em cultivo solteiro e consorciado, com três (Ce3 e Co3) e quatro (Ce4 e Co4) linhas de plantas por canteiro. O trabalho foi desenvolvido em Dourados-MS, entre 13 de julho e 15 de setembro de 2004. A produção média de massa fresca das plantas de cebolinha sob cultivo solteiro teve aumento significativo de 0,64 t ha-1 (92,75%) em relação àquela sob consórcio (0,69 t ha-1). No coentro, a produção de massa fresca das plantas sob cultivo solteiro e com quatro linhas por canteiro teve aumento significativo de 1,43 t ha-1 (41,21%) em relação à produção sob três linhas (3,47 t ha-1). As razões de área equivalente (RAE) para os consórcios cebolinha e coentro foram superiores em 21% (Ce3Co4) e 56% (Ce4Co3) em relação aos cultivos solteiros. Para o produtor de cebolinha, os dois consórcios foram economicamente viáveis, mas o Ce4Co3 poderia ter induzido o maior ganho por hectare (R$ 3.243,30). Por outro lado, para o produtor de coentro, o consórcio Ce3Co4 foi o pior, já que, apesar de a RAE ter sido superior a 1,00, induziria perda por hectare de R$ 99,42. Já, o consórcio Ce4Co3 foi o melhor porque induziria ganho de R$ 777,77.UEL2005-06-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/228210.5433/1679-0359.2005v26n2p149Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 26 No. 2 (2005); 149-154Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 26 n. 2 (2005); 149-1541679-03591676-546Xreponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/2282/1959Zárate, Néstor Antonio HerediaVieira, Maria do CarmoOno, Fábio BeneditoSouza, Cleila Marcondes deinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2009-10-08T12:20:10Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/2282Revistahttp://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrariasPUBhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/oaisemina.agrarias@uel.br1679-03591676-546Xopendoar:2009-10-08T12:20:10Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Yield and gross income of bunching onion and coriander in monocrop and intercrop systems
Produção e renda bruta de cebolinha e de coentro, em cultivo solteiro e consorciado
title Yield and gross income of bunching onion and coriander in monocrop and intercrop systems
spellingShingle Yield and gross income of bunching onion and coriander in monocrop and intercrop systems
Zárate, Néstor Antonio Heredia
Allium fistulosum
Coriandrum sativum
Intercrop
Income.
Allium fistulosum
Coriandrum sativum
Associação de culturas
Retorno conômico.
title_short Yield and gross income of bunching onion and coriander in monocrop and intercrop systems
title_full Yield and gross income of bunching onion and coriander in monocrop and intercrop systems
title_fullStr Yield and gross income of bunching onion and coriander in monocrop and intercrop systems
title_full_unstemmed Yield and gross income of bunching onion and coriander in monocrop and intercrop systems
title_sort Yield and gross income of bunching onion and coriander in monocrop and intercrop systems
author Zárate, Néstor Antonio Heredia
author_facet Zárate, Néstor Antonio Heredia
Vieira, Maria do Carmo
Ono, Fábio Benedito
Souza, Cleila Marcondes de
author_role author
author2 Vieira, Maria do Carmo
Ono, Fábio Benedito
Souza, Cleila Marcondes de
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Zárate, Néstor Antonio Heredia
Vieira, Maria do Carmo
Ono, Fábio Benedito
Souza, Cleila Marcondes de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Allium fistulosum
Coriandrum sativum
Intercrop
Income.
Allium fistulosum
Coriandrum sativum
Associação de culturas
Retorno conômico.
topic Allium fistulosum
Coriandrum sativum
Intercrop
Income.
Allium fistulosum
Coriandrum sativum
Associação de culturas
Retorno conômico.
description The objective of this work was to determine yield and income of ‘Todo ano’ bunching onion and ‘Asteca’ coriander, which were carried out in monocrop and intercrop systems with three (Ce3 and Co3) and four rows planted per plot. The work was developed in Dourados-MS, Brazil, between July 13th, and September 15th, 2004. Average yield of fresh mass of bunching onion plants under monocrop system had significative increase of 0.64 t ha-1 (92.75%) in relation to those under intercrop system (0.69 t ha-1). For coriander, yield of fresh mass of plants under monocrop system and with four rows per plot had significative increase of 1.43 t ha-1 (41.21%) in relation to those under three rows (3.47 t ha-1). Land Equivalant Ratio (LER) for bunching onion and coriander intercropped were superior in 21% (Ce3Co4) and 56% (Ce4Co3) in relation to monocrop system. For bunching onion producer, both intercrops were economic viable, but Ce4Co3 could have induced a higher gain per hectare (R$ 3,243.30). By the other side, for coriander producer, Ce3Co4 intercrop was the worst, because, although LER had been superior to 1.00, it could induce loss per hectare of R$ 99.42. Ce4Co3 intercrop was the best because it could induce a gain of R$ 777.77.
publishDate 2005
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2005-06-30
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/2282
10.5433/1679-0359.2005v26n2p149
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/2282
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/1679-0359.2005v26n2p149
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/2282/1959
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv UEL
publisher.none.fl_str_mv UEL
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 26 No. 2 (2005); 149-154
Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 26 n. 2 (2005); 149-154
1679-0359
1676-546X
reponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
collection Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv semina.agrarias@uel.br
_version_ 1799306057602826240