Yield of bunching onion in mono-cropping system and intercropped with roquette with and without soil covering with chicken manure

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Zárate, Néstor Antonio Heredia
Data de Publicação: 2006
Outros Autores: Vieira, Maria do Carmo, Graciano, João Dimas, Gassi, Rosimeire Pereira, Ono, Fábio Benedito, Amadori, Ana Helaise
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/2490
Resumo: The objectives of this work were to evaluate yield and gross income of ‘Todo Ano’ bunching onion and ‘Cultivada’ roquette under mono-cropping and intercropping system, with (C) and without (S) soil covering with chicken manure (CF). Harvest of roquette was on 81 days after sowing and of bunching onion on 81, 139 and 174 days after planting. Height of bunching onion was influenced by type of cropping in the first harvest and by soil covering in both three harvests. The greatest and the smallest average fresh masses of bunching onion which were obtained in the first (1.55 and 3.58 t ha-1) and in the second (1.31 and 3.07 t ha-1) re-sprouting were superior in 355.88% and 285.29% and in 203.39% and 160.17%, respectively, than the smallest (0.34 t ha-1) and the greatest yield (1.18 t ha-1) of the first harvest. The highest height (24.59 cm) and the greatest fresh mass (11.40 t ha-1) of roquette plants were from mono-cropping system with CF soil covering. Relating Land Equivalent Ratios-LER (1.29 and 1.71) with gross income (R$ 34,695.95 and 16,251.10) which were obtained from soils CCF and SCF, respectively, it was observed that the smaller LER induced the best gross income. For bunching onion, the highest yield and gross income were obtained with mono-cropping system in soil CCF and, for Dourados market, the resprouting of plants can be used. For roquette, intercrop system with bunching onion in soil CCF was the best.
id UEL-11_9ba51fb49b2290138fadb4f4bac79308
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/2490
network_acronym_str UEL-11
network_name_str Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Yield of bunching onion in mono-cropping system and intercropped with roquette with and without soil covering with chicken manureProdução de cebolinha, solteira e consorciada com rúcula, com e sem cobertura do solo com cama-de-frangoAllium fistulosumL. Eruca sativa MillIntercroppingOrganic residueIncome.Allium fistulosumL. Eruca sativa MillAssociação de culturasResíduo orgânicoRetorno.The objectives of this work were to evaluate yield and gross income of ‘Todo Ano’ bunching onion and ‘Cultivada’ roquette under mono-cropping and intercropping system, with (C) and without (S) soil covering with chicken manure (CF). Harvest of roquette was on 81 days after sowing and of bunching onion on 81, 139 and 174 days after planting. Height of bunching onion was influenced by type of cropping in the first harvest and by soil covering in both three harvests. The greatest and the smallest average fresh masses of bunching onion which were obtained in the first (1.55 and 3.58 t ha-1) and in the second (1.31 and 3.07 t ha-1) re-sprouting were superior in 355.88% and 285.29% and in 203.39% and 160.17%, respectively, than the smallest (0.34 t ha-1) and the greatest yield (1.18 t ha-1) of the first harvest. The highest height (24.59 cm) and the greatest fresh mass (11.40 t ha-1) of roquette plants were from mono-cropping system with CF soil covering. Relating Land Equivalent Ratios-LER (1.29 and 1.71) with gross income (R$ 34,695.95 and 16,251.10) which were obtained from soils CCF and SCF, respectively, it was observed that the smaller LER induced the best gross income. For bunching onion, the highest yield and gross income were obtained with mono-cropping system in soil CCF and, for Dourados market, the resprouting of plants can be used. For roquette, intercrop system with bunching onion in soil CCF was the best.Os objetivos do trabalho foram avaliar a produtividade e a renda bruta da cebolinha ‘Todo Ano’ e da Rúcula ‘Cultivada’, sob cultivo solteiro e consorciado, com-C e sem–S cobertura do solo com cama-defrango-CF. A colheita da rúcula foi aos 81 dias após a semeadura e da cebolinha aos 81, 139 e 174 dias após o plantio. A altura das cebolinhas foi influenciada pelo tipo de cultivo na primeira colheita e pela cobertura do solo nas três colheitas. As menores e maiores massas frescas médias de cebolinha obtidas na primeira (1,55 e 3,58 t ha-1) e na segunda rebrota (1,31 e 3,07 t ha-1) superaram em 355,88% e 285,29% e em 203,39% e 160,17%, respectivamente, a menor (0,34 t ha-1) e a maior produção (1,18 t ha-1) da primeira colheita. A maior altura (24,59 cm) e a maior massa fresca (11,40 t ha-1) das plantas de rúcula foram do cultivo solteiro com CCF. Ao relacionar as Razões de Área Equivalente-RAEs (1,29 e 1,71) e as rendas brutas (R$ 34.695,95 e 16.251,10) obtidas nos solos CCF e SCF, respectivamente, observou-se que a menor RAE induziu à maior renda bruta. Na cebolinha, as maiores produtividade e renda bruta foram com o cultivo solteiro em solo CCF e, para o mercado de Dourados, pode-se aproveitar a rebrota das plantas. Para rúcula, foi melhor o consórcio com a cebolinha em solo CCF.UEL2006-07-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/249010.5433/1679-0359.2006v27n4p505Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 27 No. 4 (2006); 505-514Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 27 n. 4 (2006); 505-5141679-03591676-546Xreponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/2490/2115Zárate, Néstor Antonio HerediaVieira, Maria do CarmoGraciano, João DimasGassi, Rosimeire PereiraOno, Fábio BeneditoAmadori, Ana Helaiseinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2010-03-17T17:57:34Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/2490Revistahttp://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrariasPUBhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/oaisemina.agrarias@uel.br1679-03591676-546Xopendoar:2010-03-17T17:57:34Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Yield of bunching onion in mono-cropping system and intercropped with roquette with and without soil covering with chicken manure
Produção de cebolinha, solteira e consorciada com rúcula, com e sem cobertura do solo com cama-de-frango
title Yield of bunching onion in mono-cropping system and intercropped with roquette with and without soil covering with chicken manure
spellingShingle Yield of bunching onion in mono-cropping system and intercropped with roquette with and without soil covering with chicken manure
Zárate, Néstor Antonio Heredia
Allium fistulosum
L. Eruca sativa Mill
Intercropping
Organic residue
Income.
Allium fistulosum
L. Eruca sativa Mill
Associação de culturas
Resíduo orgânico
Retorno.
title_short Yield of bunching onion in mono-cropping system and intercropped with roquette with and without soil covering with chicken manure
title_full Yield of bunching onion in mono-cropping system and intercropped with roquette with and without soil covering with chicken manure
title_fullStr Yield of bunching onion in mono-cropping system and intercropped with roquette with and without soil covering with chicken manure
title_full_unstemmed Yield of bunching onion in mono-cropping system and intercropped with roquette with and without soil covering with chicken manure
title_sort Yield of bunching onion in mono-cropping system and intercropped with roquette with and without soil covering with chicken manure
author Zárate, Néstor Antonio Heredia
author_facet Zárate, Néstor Antonio Heredia
Vieira, Maria do Carmo
Graciano, João Dimas
Gassi, Rosimeire Pereira
Ono, Fábio Benedito
Amadori, Ana Helaise
author_role author
author2 Vieira, Maria do Carmo
Graciano, João Dimas
Gassi, Rosimeire Pereira
Ono, Fábio Benedito
Amadori, Ana Helaise
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Zárate, Néstor Antonio Heredia
Vieira, Maria do Carmo
Graciano, João Dimas
Gassi, Rosimeire Pereira
Ono, Fábio Benedito
Amadori, Ana Helaise
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Allium fistulosum
L. Eruca sativa Mill
Intercropping
Organic residue
Income.
Allium fistulosum
L. Eruca sativa Mill
Associação de culturas
Resíduo orgânico
Retorno.
topic Allium fistulosum
L. Eruca sativa Mill
Intercropping
Organic residue
Income.
Allium fistulosum
L. Eruca sativa Mill
Associação de culturas
Resíduo orgânico
Retorno.
description The objectives of this work were to evaluate yield and gross income of ‘Todo Ano’ bunching onion and ‘Cultivada’ roquette under mono-cropping and intercropping system, with (C) and without (S) soil covering with chicken manure (CF). Harvest of roquette was on 81 days after sowing and of bunching onion on 81, 139 and 174 days after planting. Height of bunching onion was influenced by type of cropping in the first harvest and by soil covering in both three harvests. The greatest and the smallest average fresh masses of bunching onion which were obtained in the first (1.55 and 3.58 t ha-1) and in the second (1.31 and 3.07 t ha-1) re-sprouting were superior in 355.88% and 285.29% and in 203.39% and 160.17%, respectively, than the smallest (0.34 t ha-1) and the greatest yield (1.18 t ha-1) of the first harvest. The highest height (24.59 cm) and the greatest fresh mass (11.40 t ha-1) of roquette plants were from mono-cropping system with CF soil covering. Relating Land Equivalent Ratios-LER (1.29 and 1.71) with gross income (R$ 34,695.95 and 16,251.10) which were obtained from soils CCF and SCF, respectively, it was observed that the smaller LER induced the best gross income. For bunching onion, the highest yield and gross income were obtained with mono-cropping system in soil CCF and, for Dourados market, the resprouting of plants can be used. For roquette, intercrop system with bunching onion in soil CCF was the best.
publishDate 2006
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2006-07-30
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/2490
10.5433/1679-0359.2006v27n4p505
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/2490
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/1679-0359.2006v27n4p505
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/2490/2115
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv UEL
publisher.none.fl_str_mv UEL
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 27 No. 4 (2006); 505-514
Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 27 n. 4 (2006); 505-514
1679-0359
1676-546X
reponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
collection Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv semina.agrarias@uel.br
_version_ 1799306058142842880