Yield of bunching onion in mono-cropping system and intercropped with roquette with and without soil covering with chicken manure
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2006 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/2490 |
Resumo: | The objectives of this work were to evaluate yield and gross income of ‘Todo Ano’ bunching onion and ‘Cultivada’ roquette under mono-cropping and intercropping system, with (C) and without (S) soil covering with chicken manure (CF). Harvest of roquette was on 81 days after sowing and of bunching onion on 81, 139 and 174 days after planting. Height of bunching onion was influenced by type of cropping in the first harvest and by soil covering in both three harvests. The greatest and the smallest average fresh masses of bunching onion which were obtained in the first (1.55 and 3.58 t ha-1) and in the second (1.31 and 3.07 t ha-1) re-sprouting were superior in 355.88% and 285.29% and in 203.39% and 160.17%, respectively, than the smallest (0.34 t ha-1) and the greatest yield (1.18 t ha-1) of the first harvest. The highest height (24.59 cm) and the greatest fresh mass (11.40 t ha-1) of roquette plants were from mono-cropping system with CF soil covering. Relating Land Equivalent Ratios-LER (1.29 and 1.71) with gross income (R$ 34,695.95 and 16,251.10) which were obtained from soils CCF and SCF, respectively, it was observed that the smaller LER induced the best gross income. For bunching onion, the highest yield and gross income were obtained with mono-cropping system in soil CCF and, for Dourados market, the resprouting of plants can be used. For roquette, intercrop system with bunching onion in soil CCF was the best. |
id |
UEL-11_9ba51fb49b2290138fadb4f4bac79308 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/2490 |
network_acronym_str |
UEL-11 |
network_name_str |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Yield of bunching onion in mono-cropping system and intercropped with roquette with and without soil covering with chicken manureProdução de cebolinha, solteira e consorciada com rúcula, com e sem cobertura do solo com cama-de-frangoAllium fistulosumL. Eruca sativa MillIntercroppingOrganic residueIncome.Allium fistulosumL. Eruca sativa MillAssociação de culturasResíduo orgânicoRetorno.The objectives of this work were to evaluate yield and gross income of ‘Todo Ano’ bunching onion and ‘Cultivada’ roquette under mono-cropping and intercropping system, with (C) and without (S) soil covering with chicken manure (CF). Harvest of roquette was on 81 days after sowing and of bunching onion on 81, 139 and 174 days after planting. Height of bunching onion was influenced by type of cropping in the first harvest and by soil covering in both three harvests. The greatest and the smallest average fresh masses of bunching onion which were obtained in the first (1.55 and 3.58 t ha-1) and in the second (1.31 and 3.07 t ha-1) re-sprouting were superior in 355.88% and 285.29% and in 203.39% and 160.17%, respectively, than the smallest (0.34 t ha-1) and the greatest yield (1.18 t ha-1) of the first harvest. The highest height (24.59 cm) and the greatest fresh mass (11.40 t ha-1) of roquette plants were from mono-cropping system with CF soil covering. Relating Land Equivalent Ratios-LER (1.29 and 1.71) with gross income (R$ 34,695.95 and 16,251.10) which were obtained from soils CCF and SCF, respectively, it was observed that the smaller LER induced the best gross income. For bunching onion, the highest yield and gross income were obtained with mono-cropping system in soil CCF and, for Dourados market, the resprouting of plants can be used. For roquette, intercrop system with bunching onion in soil CCF was the best.Os objetivos do trabalho foram avaliar a produtividade e a renda bruta da cebolinha ‘Todo Ano’ e da Rúcula ‘Cultivada’, sob cultivo solteiro e consorciado, com-C e sem–S cobertura do solo com cama-defrango-CF. A colheita da rúcula foi aos 81 dias após a semeadura e da cebolinha aos 81, 139 e 174 dias após o plantio. A altura das cebolinhas foi influenciada pelo tipo de cultivo na primeira colheita e pela cobertura do solo nas três colheitas. As menores e maiores massas frescas médias de cebolinha obtidas na primeira (1,55 e 3,58 t ha-1) e na segunda rebrota (1,31 e 3,07 t ha-1) superaram em 355,88% e 285,29% e em 203,39% e 160,17%, respectivamente, a menor (0,34 t ha-1) e a maior produção (1,18 t ha-1) da primeira colheita. A maior altura (24,59 cm) e a maior massa fresca (11,40 t ha-1) das plantas de rúcula foram do cultivo solteiro com CCF. Ao relacionar as Razões de Área Equivalente-RAEs (1,29 e 1,71) e as rendas brutas (R$ 34.695,95 e 16.251,10) obtidas nos solos CCF e SCF, respectivamente, observou-se que a menor RAE induziu à maior renda bruta. Na cebolinha, as maiores produtividade e renda bruta foram com o cultivo solteiro em solo CCF e, para o mercado de Dourados, pode-se aproveitar a rebrota das plantas. Para rúcula, foi melhor o consórcio com a cebolinha em solo CCF.UEL2006-07-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/249010.5433/1679-0359.2006v27n4p505Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 27 No. 4 (2006); 505-514Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 27 n. 4 (2006); 505-5141679-03591676-546Xreponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/2490/2115Zárate, Néstor Antonio HerediaVieira, Maria do CarmoGraciano, João DimasGassi, Rosimeire PereiraOno, Fábio BeneditoAmadori, Ana Helaiseinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2010-03-17T17:57:34Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/2490Revistahttp://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrariasPUBhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/oaisemina.agrarias@uel.br1679-03591676-546Xopendoar:2010-03-17T17:57:34Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Yield of bunching onion in mono-cropping system and intercropped with roquette with and without soil covering with chicken manure Produção de cebolinha, solteira e consorciada com rúcula, com e sem cobertura do solo com cama-de-frango |
title |
Yield of bunching onion in mono-cropping system and intercropped with roquette with and without soil covering with chicken manure |
spellingShingle |
Yield of bunching onion in mono-cropping system and intercropped with roquette with and without soil covering with chicken manure Zárate, Néstor Antonio Heredia Allium fistulosum L. Eruca sativa Mill Intercropping Organic residue Income. Allium fistulosum L. Eruca sativa Mill Associação de culturas Resíduo orgânico Retorno. |
title_short |
Yield of bunching onion in mono-cropping system and intercropped with roquette with and without soil covering with chicken manure |
title_full |
Yield of bunching onion in mono-cropping system and intercropped with roquette with and without soil covering with chicken manure |
title_fullStr |
Yield of bunching onion in mono-cropping system and intercropped with roquette with and without soil covering with chicken manure |
title_full_unstemmed |
Yield of bunching onion in mono-cropping system and intercropped with roquette with and without soil covering with chicken manure |
title_sort |
Yield of bunching onion in mono-cropping system and intercropped with roquette with and without soil covering with chicken manure |
author |
Zárate, Néstor Antonio Heredia |
author_facet |
Zárate, Néstor Antonio Heredia Vieira, Maria do Carmo Graciano, João Dimas Gassi, Rosimeire Pereira Ono, Fábio Benedito Amadori, Ana Helaise |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Vieira, Maria do Carmo Graciano, João Dimas Gassi, Rosimeire Pereira Ono, Fábio Benedito Amadori, Ana Helaise |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Zárate, Néstor Antonio Heredia Vieira, Maria do Carmo Graciano, João Dimas Gassi, Rosimeire Pereira Ono, Fábio Benedito Amadori, Ana Helaise |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Allium fistulosum L. Eruca sativa Mill Intercropping Organic residue Income. Allium fistulosum L. Eruca sativa Mill Associação de culturas Resíduo orgânico Retorno. |
topic |
Allium fistulosum L. Eruca sativa Mill Intercropping Organic residue Income. Allium fistulosum L. Eruca sativa Mill Associação de culturas Resíduo orgânico Retorno. |
description |
The objectives of this work were to evaluate yield and gross income of ‘Todo Ano’ bunching onion and ‘Cultivada’ roquette under mono-cropping and intercropping system, with (C) and without (S) soil covering with chicken manure (CF). Harvest of roquette was on 81 days after sowing and of bunching onion on 81, 139 and 174 days after planting. Height of bunching onion was influenced by type of cropping in the first harvest and by soil covering in both three harvests. The greatest and the smallest average fresh masses of bunching onion which were obtained in the first (1.55 and 3.58 t ha-1) and in the second (1.31 and 3.07 t ha-1) re-sprouting were superior in 355.88% and 285.29% and in 203.39% and 160.17%, respectively, than the smallest (0.34 t ha-1) and the greatest yield (1.18 t ha-1) of the first harvest. The highest height (24.59 cm) and the greatest fresh mass (11.40 t ha-1) of roquette plants were from mono-cropping system with CF soil covering. Relating Land Equivalent Ratios-LER (1.29 and 1.71) with gross income (R$ 34,695.95 and 16,251.10) which were obtained from soils CCF and SCF, respectively, it was observed that the smaller LER induced the best gross income. For bunching onion, the highest yield and gross income were obtained with mono-cropping system in soil CCF and, for Dourados market, the resprouting of plants can be used. For roquette, intercrop system with bunching onion in soil CCF was the best. |
publishDate |
2006 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2006-07-30 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/2490 10.5433/1679-0359.2006v27n4p505 |
url |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/2490 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5433/1679-0359.2006v27n4p505 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/2490/2115 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UEL |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UEL |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 27 No. 4 (2006); 505-514 Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 27 n. 4 (2006); 505-514 1679-0359 1676-546X reponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) instacron:UEL |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
instacron_str |
UEL |
institution |
UEL |
reponame_str |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
collection |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
semina.agrarias@uel.br |
_version_ |
1799306058142842880 |