Determination of lethal doses 50 and 100 of propofol in lipid emulsion nor nanoemulsion intraperitoneally in mice

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Gehrcke, Martielo Ivan
Data de Publicação: 2012
Outros Autores: Rosa, Ademir Cassiano da, Tamanho, Renato Batista, Moraes, Aury Nunes de, Oleskovicz, Nilson
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/11339
Resumo: The formulation of a drug can interfere with its absorption into the circulatory system and may result in changes in the dose required to achieve that particular effect. The aim of this study was to determine the lethal dose 50 (LD 50) and 100 (LD100) of a nanoemulsion of propofol and the lipid emulsion in mice intraperitoneally. One hundred sixty animals weighing 36.47±4.6g, which were distributed randomly into two groups: NANO and EMU who received propofol 1% in the nanoemulsion and lipid emulsion, respectively, intraperitoneally. Began with a dose of 250mg/kg (n=10) and from this isdecreased or increased the dose until achieving 0 and 100% of deaths in each group thus formed were seven subgroups in NANO (each subgroup n = 10) at doses 200, 250, 325, 350, 400, 425 and 475 mg/kg and in EMU eight subgroups (n= 10 each subset) 250, 325, 350, 400, 425, 475, 525 and 575 mg/kg. In the CONTROL group (n=10) animals received saline in the largest volume used in the other groups to rule out death by the volume injected. Analysis of LD 50 and LD 100 were obtained by linear regression. The LD 50 was 320, 95 mg / kg and 4243, 51mg / kg and the LD 100 was445.99 mg / kg and 595.31 mg / kg to groups NANO and EMU, respectively. It follows that nanoemulsion is propofol in 25% more potent compared to the lipid emulsionintraperitoneally. 
id UEL-11_be066838319b0bb8750a8c362fe5a3fd
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/11339
network_acronym_str UEL-11
network_name_str Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Determination of lethal doses 50 and 100 of propofol in lipid emulsion nor nanoemulsion intraperitoneally in miceDeterminação das doses letal 50 e 100 do propofol em nanoemulsão ou em emulsão lipídica pela via intraperitoneal em camundongosLethal dosePotencyPropofolNanoemulsionMice.5.05.01.01-1Dose letalPotênciaPropofolNanoemulsãoCamundongos.5.05.01.01-1The formulation of a drug can interfere with its absorption into the circulatory system and may result in changes in the dose required to achieve that particular effect. The aim of this study was to determine the lethal dose 50 (LD 50) and 100 (LD100) of a nanoemulsion of propofol and the lipid emulsion in mice intraperitoneally. One hundred sixty animals weighing 36.47±4.6g, which were distributed randomly into two groups: NANO and EMU who received propofol 1% in the nanoemulsion and lipid emulsion, respectively, intraperitoneally. Began with a dose of 250mg/kg (n=10) and from this isdecreased or increased the dose until achieving 0 and 100% of deaths in each group thus formed were seven subgroups in NANO (each subgroup n = 10) at doses 200, 250, 325, 350, 400, 425 and 475 mg/kg and in EMU eight subgroups (n= 10 each subset) 250, 325, 350, 400, 425, 475, 525 and 575 mg/kg. In the CONTROL group (n=10) animals received saline in the largest volume used in the other groups to rule out death by the volume injected. Analysis of LD 50 and LD 100 were obtained by linear regression. The LD 50 was 320, 95 mg / kg and 4243, 51mg / kg and the LD 100 was445.99 mg / kg and 595.31 mg / kg to groups NANO and EMU, respectively. It follows that nanoemulsion is propofol in 25% more potent compared to the lipid emulsionintraperitoneally. A formulação de um fármaco pode interferir na sua absorção para o sistema circulatório, podendo resultar em alterações da dose necessária para que se consiga determinado efeito. O objetivo deste estudo foi determinar as doses letais 50 (DL 50) e 100 (DL100) do propofol em nanoemulsão e emulsão lipídica em camundongos pela via intraperitoneal. Foram utilizados 160 animais pesando 36,47 ± 4,6g, os quais foram distribuídos aleatoriamente em dois grupos: NANO e EMU que receberam propofol à 1% em nanoemulsão e em emulsão lipídica, respectivamente, pela via intraperitoneal. Iniciou-se com a dose de 250mg/kg (n=10) e a partir desta diminuiu-se ou aumentou-se a dose até que se obtivesse 0 e 100% de óbitos em cada grupo, desta forma foram constituídos sete subgrupos no NANO (n=10 cada subgrupo) nas doses de 200, 250, 325, 350, 400, 425 e 475 mg/kg e oito subgrupos no EMU (n=10 cada subgrupo) 250, 325, 350, 400, 425, 475, 525 e 575 mg/kg. No grupo CONTROLE (n=10) os animais receberam solução fisiológica no maior volume utilizado nos demais grupos para descartar óbito pelo volume injetado. As análises de DL50 e DL 100 foram obtidas através de regressão linear simples. A DL 50 foi de 320,95 mg/kg e 423,51 mg/kg e a DL 100 foi de de 445,99 mg/kg e 595,31 mg/kg para os grupos NANO e EMU, respectivamente. Conclui-se que o propofol em nanoemulsão é 25 % mais potente quando comparado à emulsão lipídica pela via intraperitoneal.UEL2012-10-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfimage/bmphttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/1133910.5433/1679-0359.2012v33n5p1911Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 33 No. 5 (2012); 1911-1918Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 33 n. 5 (2012); 1911-19181679-03591676-546Xreponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/11339/11571https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/11339/32881https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/11339/33048Gehrcke, Martielo IvanRosa, Ademir Cassiano daTamanho, Renato BatistaMoraes, Aury Nunes deOleskovicz, Nilsoninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2015-11-19T18:37:23Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/11339Revistahttp://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrariasPUBhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/oaisemina.agrarias@uel.br1679-03591676-546Xopendoar:2015-11-19T18:37:23Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Determination of lethal doses 50 and 100 of propofol in lipid emulsion nor nanoemulsion intraperitoneally in mice
Determinação das doses letal 50 e 100 do propofol em nanoemulsão ou em emulsão lipídica pela via intraperitoneal em camundongos
title Determination of lethal doses 50 and 100 of propofol in lipid emulsion nor nanoemulsion intraperitoneally in mice
spellingShingle Determination of lethal doses 50 and 100 of propofol in lipid emulsion nor nanoemulsion intraperitoneally in mice
Gehrcke, Martielo Ivan
Lethal dose
Potency
Propofol
Nanoemulsion
Mice.
5.05.01.01-1
Dose letal
Potência
Propofol
Nanoemulsão
Camundongos.
5.05.01.01-1
title_short Determination of lethal doses 50 and 100 of propofol in lipid emulsion nor nanoemulsion intraperitoneally in mice
title_full Determination of lethal doses 50 and 100 of propofol in lipid emulsion nor nanoemulsion intraperitoneally in mice
title_fullStr Determination of lethal doses 50 and 100 of propofol in lipid emulsion nor nanoemulsion intraperitoneally in mice
title_full_unstemmed Determination of lethal doses 50 and 100 of propofol in lipid emulsion nor nanoemulsion intraperitoneally in mice
title_sort Determination of lethal doses 50 and 100 of propofol in lipid emulsion nor nanoemulsion intraperitoneally in mice
author Gehrcke, Martielo Ivan
author_facet Gehrcke, Martielo Ivan
Rosa, Ademir Cassiano da
Tamanho, Renato Batista
Moraes, Aury Nunes de
Oleskovicz, Nilson
author_role author
author2 Rosa, Ademir Cassiano da
Tamanho, Renato Batista
Moraes, Aury Nunes de
Oleskovicz, Nilson
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Gehrcke, Martielo Ivan
Rosa, Ademir Cassiano da
Tamanho, Renato Batista
Moraes, Aury Nunes de
Oleskovicz, Nilson
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Lethal dose
Potency
Propofol
Nanoemulsion
Mice.
5.05.01.01-1
Dose letal
Potência
Propofol
Nanoemulsão
Camundongos.
5.05.01.01-1
topic Lethal dose
Potency
Propofol
Nanoemulsion
Mice.
5.05.01.01-1
Dose letal
Potência
Propofol
Nanoemulsão
Camundongos.
5.05.01.01-1
description The formulation of a drug can interfere with its absorption into the circulatory system and may result in changes in the dose required to achieve that particular effect. The aim of this study was to determine the lethal dose 50 (LD 50) and 100 (LD100) of a nanoemulsion of propofol and the lipid emulsion in mice intraperitoneally. One hundred sixty animals weighing 36.47±4.6g, which were distributed randomly into two groups: NANO and EMU who received propofol 1% in the nanoemulsion and lipid emulsion, respectively, intraperitoneally. Began with a dose of 250mg/kg (n=10) and from this isdecreased or increased the dose until achieving 0 and 100% of deaths in each group thus formed were seven subgroups in NANO (each subgroup n = 10) at doses 200, 250, 325, 350, 400, 425 and 475 mg/kg and in EMU eight subgroups (n= 10 each subset) 250, 325, 350, 400, 425, 475, 525 and 575 mg/kg. In the CONTROL group (n=10) animals received saline in the largest volume used in the other groups to rule out death by the volume injected. Analysis of LD 50 and LD 100 were obtained by linear regression. The LD 50 was 320, 95 mg / kg and 4243, 51mg / kg and the LD 100 was445.99 mg / kg and 595.31 mg / kg to groups NANO and EMU, respectively. It follows that nanoemulsion is propofol in 25% more potent compared to the lipid emulsionintraperitoneally. 
publishDate 2012
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2012-10-30
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/11339
10.5433/1679-0359.2012v33n5p1911
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/11339
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/1679-0359.2012v33n5p1911
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/11339/11571
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/11339/32881
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/11339/33048
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
image/bmp
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv UEL
publisher.none.fl_str_mv UEL
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 33 No. 5 (2012); 1911-1918
Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 33 n. 5 (2012); 1911-1918
1679-0359
1676-546X
reponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
collection Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv semina.agrarias@uel.br
_version_ 1750315415030988800