Comparison between biodegradable polymers from cassava starch and glycerol as additives to biogas production

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Cremonez, Paulo André
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Feiden, Armin, Teleken, Joel Gustavo, Souza, Samuel Nelson Melegari de, Feroldi, Michael, Meier, Thompson Weiser, Teleken, Jhony Tiago, Dieter, Jonathan
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/22090
Resumo: In this study, we compared cassava starch-based biodegradable polymers (PBMs) and glycerol (G) as additives used to increase biogas production from the co-digestion of swine wastewater (ARS). We chose to work with an inoculum comprising 40% (v/v) of the total volume of the reactor; this inoculum was obtained from a Canadian model digester for treating swine waste. In the anaerobic digestion process, batch reactors were used on a laboratory scale with a total volume of approximately 4 L and a working volume of 3.2 L. Three treatments were conducted to compare the efficiency of solid removal, the chemical oxygen demand (COD), and the production of biogas. The first treatment contained only swine waste; the second included the addition of glycerol at 1, 3, and 5% (w/v); and the third treatment included the addition of 1, 3, and 5% (w/v) of PBM residue in relation to the swine wastewater. From the results, it can be concluded that higher yields were obtained for the treatment with 3% PBM and 1% glycerol. Most treatments showed high removal rates of total solids and total volatile solids. Reductions lower than 70% were obtained only for treatments with PBM and glycerol at a ratio of 5%.
id UEL-11_d102da3ddb9e6e04f3bca1d264b51e5c
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/22090
network_acronym_str UEL-11
network_name_str Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Comparison between biodegradable polymers from cassava starch and glycerol as additives to biogas productionComparação entre glicerol e polímero biodegradável a base de mandioca como aditivos na biodigestão anaeróbiaAdditivesAlternative fuelsBiodegradable polymersGlycerol.In this study, we compared cassava starch-based biodegradable polymers (PBMs) and glycerol (G) as additives used to increase biogas production from the co-digestion of swine wastewater (ARS). We chose to work with an inoculum comprising 40% (v/v) of the total volume of the reactor; this inoculum was obtained from a Canadian model digester for treating swine waste. In the anaerobic digestion process, batch reactors were used on a laboratory scale with a total volume of approximately 4 L and a working volume of 3.2 L. Three treatments were conducted to compare the efficiency of solid removal, the chemical oxygen demand (COD), and the production of biogas. The first treatment contained only swine waste; the second included the addition of glycerol at 1, 3, and 5% (w/v); and the third treatment included the addition of 1, 3, and 5% (w/v) of PBM residue in relation to the swine wastewater. From the results, it can be concluded that higher yields were obtained for the treatment with 3% PBM and 1% glycerol. Most treatments showed high removal rates of total solids and total volatile solids. Reductions lower than 70% were obtained only for treatments with PBM and glycerol at a ratio of 5%.O presente trabalho tem por finalidade comparar o potencial aditivo no aumento da produção de biogás de polímeros biodegradáveis a base de fécula de mandioca (PBM) e do glicerol, já comumente empregado com essa finalidade, ambos em co-digestão com água residuária de suinocultura. Utilizou-se como matéria-prima para produção de biogás, água residual de suinocultura, material plástico biodegradável produzido a partir de fécula de mandioca e glicerina bruta proveniente do processo de produção de biodiesel. Optou-se por trabalhar com 40% (v/v) de inóculo do volume total do reator. Para a condução do processo de digestão anaeróbia empregaram-se reatores com alimentação batelada de escala laboratorial de volume total de aproximadamente 4 litros e volume útil de 3,2 litros. Foram realizados 3 tratamentos visando comparar a eficiência da remoção de sólidos, demanda química de oxigênio e produção de biogás. O primeiro tratamento conteve apenas resíduo de suíno, o segundo a adição de glicerol em percentuais de 1, 3 e 5% (m/v) no mesmo resíduo e o terceiro a adição de 1, 3 e 5% (m/v) do polímero biodegradável a base de fécula de mandioca ao resíduo suíno. A partir dos resultados pode-se concluir que as maiores produções foram obtidas no tratamento de 3% de PBM e 1% de glicerol. A maioria dos tratamentos apresentou elevadas taxas de remoção de sólidos totais e sólidos totais voláteis. Apenas os tratamentos com PBM e glicerol na proporção de 5% obtiveram reduções inferiores a 70%.UEL2016-08-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPesquisa Empírica de Campoapplication/pdfimage/pngapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfimage/pngimage/pngapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.documentapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.documentapplication/pdfimage/pngimage/pnghttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/2209010.5433/1679-0359.2016v37n4p1827Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 37 No. 4 (2016); 1827-1844Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 37 n. 4 (2016); 1827-18441679-03591676-546Xreponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELenghttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/22090/19634https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/22090/36110https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/22090/36111https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/22090/36112https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/22090/36113https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/22090/36114https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/22090/36115https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/22090/36116https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/22090/36117https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/22090/36118https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/22090/37786https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/22090/37787Cremonez, Paulo AndréFeiden, ArminTeleken, Joel GustavoSouza, Samuel Nelson Melegari deFeroldi, MichaelMeier, Thompson WeiserTeleken, Jhony TiagoDieter, Jonathaninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2016-09-02T14:56:19Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/22090Revistahttp://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrariasPUBhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/oaisemina.agrarias@uel.br1679-03591676-546Xopendoar:2016-09-02T14:56:19Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparison between biodegradable polymers from cassava starch and glycerol as additives to biogas production
Comparação entre glicerol e polímero biodegradável a base de mandioca como aditivos na biodigestão anaeróbia
title Comparison between biodegradable polymers from cassava starch and glycerol as additives to biogas production
spellingShingle Comparison between biodegradable polymers from cassava starch and glycerol as additives to biogas production
Cremonez, Paulo André
Additives
Alternative fuels
Biodegradable polymers
Glycerol.
title_short Comparison between biodegradable polymers from cassava starch and glycerol as additives to biogas production
title_full Comparison between biodegradable polymers from cassava starch and glycerol as additives to biogas production
title_fullStr Comparison between biodegradable polymers from cassava starch and glycerol as additives to biogas production
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between biodegradable polymers from cassava starch and glycerol as additives to biogas production
title_sort Comparison between biodegradable polymers from cassava starch and glycerol as additives to biogas production
author Cremonez, Paulo André
author_facet Cremonez, Paulo André
Feiden, Armin
Teleken, Joel Gustavo
Souza, Samuel Nelson Melegari de
Feroldi, Michael
Meier, Thompson Weiser
Teleken, Jhony Tiago
Dieter, Jonathan
author_role author
author2 Feiden, Armin
Teleken, Joel Gustavo
Souza, Samuel Nelson Melegari de
Feroldi, Michael
Meier, Thompson Weiser
Teleken, Jhony Tiago
Dieter, Jonathan
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Cremonez, Paulo André
Feiden, Armin
Teleken, Joel Gustavo
Souza, Samuel Nelson Melegari de
Feroldi, Michael
Meier, Thompson Weiser
Teleken, Jhony Tiago
Dieter, Jonathan
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Additives
Alternative fuels
Biodegradable polymers
Glycerol.
topic Additives
Alternative fuels
Biodegradable polymers
Glycerol.
description In this study, we compared cassava starch-based biodegradable polymers (PBMs) and glycerol (G) as additives used to increase biogas production from the co-digestion of swine wastewater (ARS). We chose to work with an inoculum comprising 40% (v/v) of the total volume of the reactor; this inoculum was obtained from a Canadian model digester for treating swine waste. In the anaerobic digestion process, batch reactors were used on a laboratory scale with a total volume of approximately 4 L and a working volume of 3.2 L. Three treatments were conducted to compare the efficiency of solid removal, the chemical oxygen demand (COD), and the production of biogas. The first treatment contained only swine waste; the second included the addition of glycerol at 1, 3, and 5% (w/v); and the third treatment included the addition of 1, 3, and 5% (w/v) of PBM residue in relation to the swine wastewater. From the results, it can be concluded that higher yields were obtained for the treatment with 3% PBM and 1% glycerol. Most treatments showed high removal rates of total solids and total volatile solids. Reductions lower than 70% were obtained only for treatments with PBM and glycerol at a ratio of 5%.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-08-30
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Pesquisa Empírica de Campo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/22090
10.5433/1679-0359.2016v37n4p1827
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/22090
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/1679-0359.2016v37n4p1827
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/22090/19634
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/22090/36110
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/22090/36111
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/22090/36112
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/22090/36113
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/22090/36114
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/22090/36115
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/22090/36116
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/22090/36117
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/22090/36118
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/22090/37786
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/22090/37787
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
image/png
application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
image/png
image/png
application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
application/pdf
image/png
image/png
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv UEL
publisher.none.fl_str_mv UEL
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 37 No. 4 (2016); 1827-1844
Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 37 n. 4 (2016); 1827-1844
1679-0359
1676-546X
reponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
collection Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv semina.agrarias@uel.br
_version_ 1750315422552424448