Globalization, constitution and foreign policy: comparative analysis of citizen participation in brasil, chile and colombia

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Cademartori, Sérgio Urquhart de
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Miranda, José Alberto Antunes de
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista do Direito Público
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/27011
Resumo: The sovereign state is, as a rule, the entity established under public law with representation and capacity for dialogue in an international level. There is consistent evidence that liberal and democratic institutions give primacy to the executive power when shaping foreign policy in presidential and parliamentary countries. This paper aims to conduct a comparative study of the constitutions of Brazil, Colombia, and Chile on the existing mechanisms that allow for civil society ?s participation in foreign policy. The preferred method of study is the examination of the theoretical framework of participation and analyzes the constitutions that show possible mechanisms of civil society ?s participation in foreign policy. However, the result of this study indicates that the constitutions of Brazil, Chile, and Colombia indicates a slow change towards greater participation of civil society in the production and influencing of foreign policy within these countries. In conclusion, the current participation of civil society is strictly punctual and varies depending on the structural shape of the constitution of these countries.
id UEL-2_00f5d1b684710a78903333bce444d880
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/27011
network_acronym_str UEL-2
network_name_str Revista do Direito Público
repository_id_str
spelling Globalization, constitution and foreign policy: comparative analysis of citizen participation in brasil, chile and colombiaGlobalização, constituição e política externa: analise comparada da participação cidadã no Brasil, Chile e ColombiaDemocracyConstitutionForeign Policy.DemocraciaConstituiçãoPolítica ExternaDemocracia.The sovereign state is, as a rule, the entity established under public law with representation and capacity for dialogue in an international level. There is consistent evidence that liberal and democratic institutions give primacy to the executive power when shaping foreign policy in presidential and parliamentary countries. This paper aims to conduct a comparative study of the constitutions of Brazil, Colombia, and Chile on the existing mechanisms that allow for civil society ?s participation in foreign policy. The preferred method of study is the examination of the theoretical framework of participation and analyzes the constitutions that show possible mechanisms of civil society ?s participation in foreign policy. However, the result of this study indicates that the constitutions of Brazil, Chile, and Colombia indicates a slow change towards greater participation of civil society in the production and influencing of foreign policy within these countries. In conclusion, the current participation of civil society is strictly punctual and varies depending on the structural shape of the constitution of these countries.O Estado soberano é, em regra, a pessoa estabelecida de direito público com capacidade de representação e interlocução no âmbito internacional. Há indícios consistentes de que institucionalidades liberais e democráticas dão primazia ao poder Executivo na formação da agenda da política externa, em países presidencialistas ou parlamentaristas. O objetivo desse trabalho é realizar um estudo comparativo dos mecanismos existentes nas Constituições do Brasil, da Colômbia e do Chile de participação da sociedade civil no âmbito da política externa. O método de trabalho constitui-se no exame do referencial teórico sobre o tema e análise das Constituições existentes nos respectivos países que demostrem ou não haver mecanismos de participação da sociedade civil mais efetivos na política externa. São percebidas a partir da análise das constituições do Brasil, do Chile e da Colômbia mudanças muito lentas no sentido de maior participação da sociedade civil na produção da política externa no âmbito desses países. A participação da sociedade civil é estritamente pontual, muito em função do que determina a Constituição dos mesmos.Universidade Estadual de Londrina2016-12-23info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/2701110.5433/1980-511X.2016v11n3p311Revista do Direito Público; v. 11 n. 3 (2016); 311-3451980-511Xreponame:Revista do Direito Públicoinstname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/27011/20538Copyright (c) 2016 Revista do Direito Públicoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCademartori, Sérgio Urquhart deMiranda, José Alberto Antunes de2017-02-25T23:06:50Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/27011Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopubPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/oai||rdpubuel@uel.br1980-511X1980-511Xopendoar:2017-02-25T23:06:50Revista do Direito Público - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Globalization, constitution and foreign policy: comparative analysis of citizen participation in brasil, chile and colombia
Globalização, constituição e política externa: analise comparada da participação cidadã no Brasil, Chile e Colombia
title Globalization, constitution and foreign policy: comparative analysis of citizen participation in brasil, chile and colombia
spellingShingle Globalization, constitution and foreign policy: comparative analysis of citizen participation in brasil, chile and colombia
Cademartori, Sérgio Urquhart de
Democracy
Constitution
Foreign Policy.
Democracia
Constituição
Política Externa
Democracia.
title_short Globalization, constitution and foreign policy: comparative analysis of citizen participation in brasil, chile and colombia
title_full Globalization, constitution and foreign policy: comparative analysis of citizen participation in brasil, chile and colombia
title_fullStr Globalization, constitution and foreign policy: comparative analysis of citizen participation in brasil, chile and colombia
title_full_unstemmed Globalization, constitution and foreign policy: comparative analysis of citizen participation in brasil, chile and colombia
title_sort Globalization, constitution and foreign policy: comparative analysis of citizen participation in brasil, chile and colombia
author Cademartori, Sérgio Urquhart de
author_facet Cademartori, Sérgio Urquhart de
Miranda, José Alberto Antunes de
author_role author
author2 Miranda, José Alberto Antunes de
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Cademartori, Sérgio Urquhart de
Miranda, José Alberto Antunes de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Democracy
Constitution
Foreign Policy.
Democracia
Constituição
Política Externa
Democracia.
topic Democracy
Constitution
Foreign Policy.
Democracia
Constituição
Política Externa
Democracia.
description The sovereign state is, as a rule, the entity established under public law with representation and capacity for dialogue in an international level. There is consistent evidence that liberal and democratic institutions give primacy to the executive power when shaping foreign policy in presidential and parliamentary countries. This paper aims to conduct a comparative study of the constitutions of Brazil, Colombia, and Chile on the existing mechanisms that allow for civil society ?s participation in foreign policy. The preferred method of study is the examination of the theoretical framework of participation and analyzes the constitutions that show possible mechanisms of civil society ?s participation in foreign policy. However, the result of this study indicates that the constitutions of Brazil, Chile, and Colombia indicates a slow change towards greater participation of civil society in the production and influencing of foreign policy within these countries. In conclusion, the current participation of civil society is strictly punctual and varies depending on the structural shape of the constitution of these countries.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-12-23
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artigo avaliado pelos Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/27011
10.5433/1980-511X.2016v11n3p311
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/27011
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/1980-511X.2016v11n3p311
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/27011/20538
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2016 Revista do Direito Público
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2016 Revista do Direito Público
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista do Direito Público; v. 11 n. 3 (2016); 311-345
1980-511X
reponame:Revista do Direito Público
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Revista do Direito Público
collection Revista do Direito Público
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista do Direito Público - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||rdpubuel@uel.br
_version_ 1750315354699071488