Globalization, constitution and foreign policy: comparative analysis of citizen participation in brasil, chile and colombia
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista do Direito Público |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/27011 |
Resumo: | The sovereign state is, as a rule, the entity established under public law with representation and capacity for dialogue in an international level. There is consistent evidence that liberal and democratic institutions give primacy to the executive power when shaping foreign policy in presidential and parliamentary countries. This paper aims to conduct a comparative study of the constitutions of Brazil, Colombia, and Chile on the existing mechanisms that allow for civil society ?s participation in foreign policy. The preferred method of study is the examination of the theoretical framework of participation and analyzes the constitutions that show possible mechanisms of civil society ?s participation in foreign policy. However, the result of this study indicates that the constitutions of Brazil, Chile, and Colombia indicates a slow change towards greater participation of civil society in the production and influencing of foreign policy within these countries. In conclusion, the current participation of civil society is strictly punctual and varies depending on the structural shape of the constitution of these countries. |
id |
UEL-2_00f5d1b684710a78903333bce444d880 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/27011 |
network_acronym_str |
UEL-2 |
network_name_str |
Revista do Direito Público |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Globalization, constitution and foreign policy: comparative analysis of citizen participation in brasil, chile and colombiaGlobalização, constituição e política externa: analise comparada da participação cidadã no Brasil, Chile e ColombiaDemocracyConstitutionForeign Policy.DemocraciaConstituiçãoPolítica ExternaDemocracia.The sovereign state is, as a rule, the entity established under public law with representation and capacity for dialogue in an international level. There is consistent evidence that liberal and democratic institutions give primacy to the executive power when shaping foreign policy in presidential and parliamentary countries. This paper aims to conduct a comparative study of the constitutions of Brazil, Colombia, and Chile on the existing mechanisms that allow for civil society ?s participation in foreign policy. The preferred method of study is the examination of the theoretical framework of participation and analyzes the constitutions that show possible mechanisms of civil society ?s participation in foreign policy. However, the result of this study indicates that the constitutions of Brazil, Chile, and Colombia indicates a slow change towards greater participation of civil society in the production and influencing of foreign policy within these countries. In conclusion, the current participation of civil society is strictly punctual and varies depending on the structural shape of the constitution of these countries.O Estado soberano é, em regra, a pessoa estabelecida de direito público com capacidade de representação e interlocução no âmbito internacional. Há indícios consistentes de que institucionalidades liberais e democráticas dão primazia ao poder Executivo na formação da agenda da política externa, em países presidencialistas ou parlamentaristas. O objetivo desse trabalho é realizar um estudo comparativo dos mecanismos existentes nas Constituições do Brasil, da Colômbia e do Chile de participação da sociedade civil no âmbito da política externa. O método de trabalho constitui-se no exame do referencial teórico sobre o tema e análise das Constituições existentes nos respectivos países que demostrem ou não haver mecanismos de participação da sociedade civil mais efetivos na política externa. São percebidas a partir da análise das constituições do Brasil, do Chile e da Colômbia mudanças muito lentas no sentido de maior participação da sociedade civil na produção da política externa no âmbito desses países. A participação da sociedade civil é estritamente pontual, muito em função do que determina a Constituição dos mesmos.Universidade Estadual de Londrina2016-12-23info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/2701110.5433/1980-511X.2016v11n3p311Revista do Direito Público; v. 11 n. 3 (2016); 311-3451980-511Xreponame:Revista do Direito Públicoinstname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/27011/20538Copyright (c) 2016 Revista do Direito Públicoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCademartori, Sérgio Urquhart deMiranda, José Alberto Antunes de2017-02-25T23:06:50Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/27011Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopubPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/oai||rdpubuel@uel.br1980-511X1980-511Xopendoar:2017-02-25T23:06:50Revista do Direito Público - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Globalization, constitution and foreign policy: comparative analysis of citizen participation in brasil, chile and colombia Globalização, constituição e política externa: analise comparada da participação cidadã no Brasil, Chile e Colombia |
title |
Globalization, constitution and foreign policy: comparative analysis of citizen participation in brasil, chile and colombia |
spellingShingle |
Globalization, constitution and foreign policy: comparative analysis of citizen participation in brasil, chile and colombia Cademartori, Sérgio Urquhart de Democracy Constitution Foreign Policy. Democracia Constituição Política Externa Democracia. |
title_short |
Globalization, constitution and foreign policy: comparative analysis of citizen participation in brasil, chile and colombia |
title_full |
Globalization, constitution and foreign policy: comparative analysis of citizen participation in brasil, chile and colombia |
title_fullStr |
Globalization, constitution and foreign policy: comparative analysis of citizen participation in brasil, chile and colombia |
title_full_unstemmed |
Globalization, constitution and foreign policy: comparative analysis of citizen participation in brasil, chile and colombia |
title_sort |
Globalization, constitution and foreign policy: comparative analysis of citizen participation in brasil, chile and colombia |
author |
Cademartori, Sérgio Urquhart de |
author_facet |
Cademartori, Sérgio Urquhart de Miranda, José Alberto Antunes de |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Miranda, José Alberto Antunes de |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Cademartori, Sérgio Urquhart de Miranda, José Alberto Antunes de |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Democracy Constitution Foreign Policy. Democracia Constituição Política Externa Democracia. |
topic |
Democracy Constitution Foreign Policy. Democracia Constituição Política Externa Democracia. |
description |
The sovereign state is, as a rule, the entity established under public law with representation and capacity for dialogue in an international level. There is consistent evidence that liberal and democratic institutions give primacy to the executive power when shaping foreign policy in presidential and parliamentary countries. This paper aims to conduct a comparative study of the constitutions of Brazil, Colombia, and Chile on the existing mechanisms that allow for civil society ?s participation in foreign policy. The preferred method of study is the examination of the theoretical framework of participation and analyzes the constitutions that show possible mechanisms of civil society ?s participation in foreign policy. However, the result of this study indicates that the constitutions of Brazil, Chile, and Colombia indicates a slow change towards greater participation of civil society in the production and influencing of foreign policy within these countries. In conclusion, the current participation of civil society is strictly punctual and varies depending on the structural shape of the constitution of these countries. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-12-23 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artigo avaliado pelos Pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/27011 10.5433/1980-511X.2016v11n3p311 |
url |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/27011 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5433/1980-511X.2016v11n3p311 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/27011/20538 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2016 Revista do Direito Público info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2016 Revista do Direito Público |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista do Direito Público; v. 11 n. 3 (2016); 311-345 1980-511X reponame:Revista do Direito Público instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) instacron:UEL |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
instacron_str |
UEL |
institution |
UEL |
reponame_str |
Revista do Direito Público |
collection |
Revista do Direito Público |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista do Direito Público - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||rdpubuel@uel.br |
_version_ |
1799305932013830144 |