Is there truth in the brazilian criminal procedure code?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Grubba, Leilane Serratine
Data de Publicação: 2017
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista do Direito Público
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/28587
Resumo: This paper searches for the ‘truth’ in the Brazilian Criminal Procedural Code; moreover, it is seen as a guarantee of the accused. Furthermore, the criminal procedure code seeks the truth at the time of a fact´s reconstruction. In addition, it characterizes a crime, and with it, there is a guarantee of a fair decision for the accused. Thus, this paper discusses the possibility or impossibility of an existing truth, which is this research´s primary focus. Nevertheless, true knowledge is a correspondence between procedural language and events that happened. Using Alexander Light’s theory, this paper presents the following hypothesis: it is not philosophically suitable to believe adequately that there is true propositional knowledge. By means of the deductive method, this paper´s first chapter is dedicated to presenting the concept of ‘criminal procedural truth’, which is the Brazilian criminal procedure code´s greatest pursuit. Sequentially, in the second chapter, this study deconstructs the idea that truth – as a mirror of reality – is the same truth of the criminal process. Therefore, if this theory is correct, one cannot admit the existence of true criminal procedure (formal or material) but only of a justified criminal procedural knowledge.
id UEL-2_011d8f926849b7cc82ce20c5d9366a8f
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/28587
network_acronym_str UEL-2
network_name_str Revista do Direito Público
repository_id_str
spelling Is there truth in the brazilian criminal procedure code?A verdade no processo penal: (im)possibilidades?Epistemology. Criminal Procedure. Truth. True Knowledge. Justification.Epistemologia. Processo penal. Verdade. Conhecimento verdadeiro. Justificação.This paper searches for the ‘truth’ in the Brazilian Criminal Procedural Code; moreover, it is seen as a guarantee of the accused. Furthermore, the criminal procedure code seeks the truth at the time of a fact´s reconstruction. In addition, it characterizes a crime, and with it, there is a guarantee of a fair decision for the accused. Thus, this paper discusses the possibility or impossibility of an existing truth, which is this research´s primary focus. Nevertheless, true knowledge is a correspondence between procedural language and events that happened. Using Alexander Light’s theory, this paper presents the following hypothesis: it is not philosophically suitable to believe adequately that there is true propositional knowledge. By means of the deductive method, this paper´s first chapter is dedicated to presenting the concept of ‘criminal procedural truth’, which is the Brazilian criminal procedure code´s greatest pursuit. Sequentially, in the second chapter, this study deconstructs the idea that truth – as a mirror of reality – is the same truth of the criminal process. Therefore, if this theory is correct, one cannot admit the existence of true criminal procedure (formal or material) but only of a justified criminal procedural knowledge.O artigo tem por objeto a busca da verdade no processo penal brasileiro. Visto como garantia do acusado, o processo busca a verdade à hora da reconstrução de um fato social tido supostamente como crime, como garantia de uma justa decisão ao acusado. Diante disso, o artigo problematiza a possibilidade ou impossibilidade da existência dessa verdade, ou seja, tem como problema de pesquisa a possibilidade de um conhecimento verdadeiro enquanto correspondência entre a linguagem processual e a realidade dos fatos ocorridos no mundo da vida. A partir da teoria de Alexandre Luz, o artigo apresenta a seguinte hipótese: não é adequado filosoficamente falar de um conhecimento proposicional verdadeiro. Utilizando o método dedutivo, o primeiro capítulo dedica-se a apresentar o que se entende por verdade processual penal e qual a grande busca do processo penal brasileiro. Sequencialmente, no segundo capítulo, o artigo busca desconstruir a ideia da existência de uma verdade enquanto espelhamento da realidade e da verdade do processo penal. Diante disso, se a teoria apresentada estiver correta, não se poderia falar de uma verdade processual penal, formal ou material, mas apenar de um conhecimento processual penal justificado.Universidade Estadual de Londrina2017-05-16info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/2858710.5433/1980-511X.2017v12n1p266Revista do Direito Público; v. 12 n. 1 (2017); 266-2861980-511Xreponame:Revista do Direito Públicoinstname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/28587/20915Copyright (c) 2017 Revista do Direito Públicoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGrubba, Leilane Serratine2017-05-17T21:16:54Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/28587Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopubPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/oai||rdpubuel@uel.br1980-511X1980-511Xopendoar:2017-05-17T21:16:54Revista do Direito Público - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Is there truth in the brazilian criminal procedure code?
A verdade no processo penal: (im)possibilidades?
title Is there truth in the brazilian criminal procedure code?
spellingShingle Is there truth in the brazilian criminal procedure code?
Grubba, Leilane Serratine
Epistemology. Criminal Procedure. Truth. True Knowledge. Justification.
Epistemologia. Processo penal. Verdade. Conhecimento verdadeiro. Justificação.
title_short Is there truth in the brazilian criminal procedure code?
title_full Is there truth in the brazilian criminal procedure code?
title_fullStr Is there truth in the brazilian criminal procedure code?
title_full_unstemmed Is there truth in the brazilian criminal procedure code?
title_sort Is there truth in the brazilian criminal procedure code?
author Grubba, Leilane Serratine
author_facet Grubba, Leilane Serratine
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Grubba, Leilane Serratine
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Epistemology. Criminal Procedure. Truth. True Knowledge. Justification.
Epistemologia. Processo penal. Verdade. Conhecimento verdadeiro. Justificação.
topic Epistemology. Criminal Procedure. Truth. True Knowledge. Justification.
Epistemologia. Processo penal. Verdade. Conhecimento verdadeiro. Justificação.
description This paper searches for the ‘truth’ in the Brazilian Criminal Procedural Code; moreover, it is seen as a guarantee of the accused. Furthermore, the criminal procedure code seeks the truth at the time of a fact´s reconstruction. In addition, it characterizes a crime, and with it, there is a guarantee of a fair decision for the accused. Thus, this paper discusses the possibility or impossibility of an existing truth, which is this research´s primary focus. Nevertheless, true knowledge is a correspondence between procedural language and events that happened. Using Alexander Light’s theory, this paper presents the following hypothesis: it is not philosophically suitable to believe adequately that there is true propositional knowledge. By means of the deductive method, this paper´s first chapter is dedicated to presenting the concept of ‘criminal procedural truth’, which is the Brazilian criminal procedure code´s greatest pursuit. Sequentially, in the second chapter, this study deconstructs the idea that truth – as a mirror of reality – is the same truth of the criminal process. Therefore, if this theory is correct, one cannot admit the existence of true criminal procedure (formal or material) but only of a justified criminal procedural knowledge.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-05-16
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artigo avaliado pelos Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/28587
10.5433/1980-511X.2017v12n1p266
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/28587
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/1980-511X.2017v12n1p266
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/28587/20915
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Revista do Direito Público
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Revista do Direito Público
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista do Direito Público; v. 12 n. 1 (2017); 266-286
1980-511X
reponame:Revista do Direito Público
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Revista do Direito Público
collection Revista do Direito Público
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista do Direito Público - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||rdpubuel@uel.br
_version_ 1750315355027275776