Processing yield of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus Linnaeus, 1757) and pacu (Piaractus mesopotamicus Holmberg, 1887) - DOI: 10.4025/actascianimsci.v25i1.2068

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Faria, Regina Helena Sant'Ana de
Data de Publicação: 2008
Outros Autores: Souza, Maria Luiza Rodrigues de, Wagner, Petra Maria, Povh, Jayme Aparecido, Ribeiro, Ricardo Pereira
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Online)
Texto Completo: http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSci/article/view/2068
Resumo: It has been analysed the processing yield of Oreochromis niloticus and Piaractus mesopotamicus. A total of 20 individuals from each species, presenting a mean weight of 816,0 &plusmn; 74,0g and 1958,0 &plusmn; 164,0g, and total length of 33.6 &plusmn; 1,1cm and 42.4 &plusmn; 1,2cm, respectively, for tilapia and pacu. They were killed with thermical shock, weighed, measured, then extracted internal organs and fillets. The fillet yield was higher in pacu (p < 0,01) than those observed in tilapia. These values for pacu were superior (p < 0.01) to tilapia’s. These values were 51.60% for fillet with skin and 46.73% without skin, while for tilapia they were 39.21% and 36.44%, respectively. There were no significant difference for the yield on the visceral carcass and skin between the two species. The percentage for the tilapia’s head (28.34%) was significantly superior (p < 0.01) to pacu’s (16.57%). Individuals with big and long head promoted low fillet yield, as verified for tilapia, and those with small head as pacu, the yield ranges higher values, evidencing the existence of a inverse relationship between the size of the head and fillet yield.
id UEM-7_1ec29f722d25d5808cc7006e427331bb
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/2068
network_acronym_str UEM-7
network_name_str Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Processing yield of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus Linnaeus, 1757) and pacu (Piaractus mesopotamicus Holmberg, 1887) - DOI: 10.4025/actascianimsci.v25i1.2068Rendimento do processamento da tilápia do Nilo (Oreochromis niloticus Linnaeus, 1757) e do pacu (Piaractus mesopotamicus Holmberg, 1887) - DOI: 10.4025/actascianimsci.v25i1.2068Oreochromis niloticusPiaractus mesopotamicusfiletagemrendimento do processamentofilé de peixe5.04.00.00-2 ZootecniaIt has been analysed the processing yield of Oreochromis niloticus and Piaractus mesopotamicus. A total of 20 individuals from each species, presenting a mean weight of 816,0 &plusmn; 74,0g and 1958,0 &plusmn; 164,0g, and total length of 33.6 &plusmn; 1,1cm and 42.4 &plusmn; 1,2cm, respectively, for tilapia and pacu. They were killed with thermical shock, weighed, measured, then extracted internal organs and fillets. The fillet yield was higher in pacu (p < 0,01) than those observed in tilapia. These values for pacu were superior (p < 0.01) to tilapia’s. These values were 51.60% for fillet with skin and 46.73% without skin, while for tilapia they were 39.21% and 36.44%, respectively. There were no significant difference for the yield on the visceral carcass and skin between the two species. The percentage for the tilapia’s head (28.34%) was significantly superior (p < 0.01) to pacu’s (16.57%). Individuals with big and long head promoted low fillet yield, as verified for tilapia, and those with small head as pacu, the yield ranges higher values, evidencing the existence of a inverse relationship between the size of the head and fillet yield.Analisou-se o rendimento do processamento da tilápia (Oreochromis niloticus) e do pacu (Piaractus mesopotamicus), sendo um total de 20 exemplares de cada espécie, com peso médio de 816,0 &plusmn; 74,0g e 1958,0 &plusmn;164,0g, e comprimento total médio de 33,6 &plusmn; 1,1cm e 42,4 &plusmn; 1,2cm, respectivamente. Estes foram abatidos por meio de choque térmico, pesados, medidos, eviscerados e filetados. O pacu apresentou um rendimento de filé superior (p < 0,01) ao da tilápia, sendo de 51,60% para filé com pele e 46,73% sem pele, enquanto que para tilápia foi igual a 39,21% e 36,44%, respectivamente. Não houve diferença significativa quanto ao rendimento de carcaça eviscerada e pele entre as duas espécies. A porcentagem da cabeça da tilápia (28,34%) foi significativamente superior (p < 0,01) em relação ao pacu (16,57%). Os peixes de cabeça grande e comprimida proporcionam baixos rendimentos de filé, como verificado para a tilápia, e, possuindo cabeça pequena, como o pacu, o rendimento atinge valores mais altos, evidenciando a existência de uma relação inversa entre tamanho da cabeça e rendimento de filé.Editora da Universidade Estadual de Maringá2008-04-17info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSci/article/view/206810.4025/actascianimsci.v25i1.2068Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences; Vol 25 No 1 (2003); 21-24Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences; v. 25 n. 1 (2003); 21-241807-86721806-2636reponame:Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)instacron:UEMporhttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSci/article/view/2068/1422Faria, Regina Helena Sant'Ana deSouza, Maria Luiza Rodrigues deWagner, Petra MariaPovh, Jayme AparecidoRibeiro, Ricardo Pereirainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-11-23T18:39:36Zoai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/2068Revistahttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSciPUBhttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSci/oaiactaanim@uem.br||actaanim@uem.br|| rev.acta@gmail.com1807-86721806-2636opendoar:2022-11-23T18:39:36Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Processing yield of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus Linnaeus, 1757) and pacu (Piaractus mesopotamicus Holmberg, 1887) - DOI: 10.4025/actascianimsci.v25i1.2068
Rendimento do processamento da tilápia do Nilo (Oreochromis niloticus Linnaeus, 1757) e do pacu (Piaractus mesopotamicus Holmberg, 1887) - DOI: 10.4025/actascianimsci.v25i1.2068
title Processing yield of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus Linnaeus, 1757) and pacu (Piaractus mesopotamicus Holmberg, 1887) - DOI: 10.4025/actascianimsci.v25i1.2068
spellingShingle Processing yield of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus Linnaeus, 1757) and pacu (Piaractus mesopotamicus Holmberg, 1887) - DOI: 10.4025/actascianimsci.v25i1.2068
Faria, Regina Helena Sant'Ana de
Oreochromis niloticus
Piaractus mesopotamicus
filetagem
rendimento do processamento
filé de peixe
5.04.00.00-2 Zootecnia
title_short Processing yield of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus Linnaeus, 1757) and pacu (Piaractus mesopotamicus Holmberg, 1887) - DOI: 10.4025/actascianimsci.v25i1.2068
title_full Processing yield of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus Linnaeus, 1757) and pacu (Piaractus mesopotamicus Holmberg, 1887) - DOI: 10.4025/actascianimsci.v25i1.2068
title_fullStr Processing yield of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus Linnaeus, 1757) and pacu (Piaractus mesopotamicus Holmberg, 1887) - DOI: 10.4025/actascianimsci.v25i1.2068
title_full_unstemmed Processing yield of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus Linnaeus, 1757) and pacu (Piaractus mesopotamicus Holmberg, 1887) - DOI: 10.4025/actascianimsci.v25i1.2068
title_sort Processing yield of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus Linnaeus, 1757) and pacu (Piaractus mesopotamicus Holmberg, 1887) - DOI: 10.4025/actascianimsci.v25i1.2068
author Faria, Regina Helena Sant'Ana de
author_facet Faria, Regina Helena Sant'Ana de
Souza, Maria Luiza Rodrigues de
Wagner, Petra Maria
Povh, Jayme Aparecido
Ribeiro, Ricardo Pereira
author_role author
author2 Souza, Maria Luiza Rodrigues de
Wagner, Petra Maria
Povh, Jayme Aparecido
Ribeiro, Ricardo Pereira
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Faria, Regina Helena Sant'Ana de
Souza, Maria Luiza Rodrigues de
Wagner, Petra Maria
Povh, Jayme Aparecido
Ribeiro, Ricardo Pereira
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Oreochromis niloticus
Piaractus mesopotamicus
filetagem
rendimento do processamento
filé de peixe
5.04.00.00-2 Zootecnia
topic Oreochromis niloticus
Piaractus mesopotamicus
filetagem
rendimento do processamento
filé de peixe
5.04.00.00-2 Zootecnia
description It has been analysed the processing yield of Oreochromis niloticus and Piaractus mesopotamicus. A total of 20 individuals from each species, presenting a mean weight of 816,0 &plusmn; 74,0g and 1958,0 &plusmn; 164,0g, and total length of 33.6 &plusmn; 1,1cm and 42.4 &plusmn; 1,2cm, respectively, for tilapia and pacu. They were killed with thermical shock, weighed, measured, then extracted internal organs and fillets. The fillet yield was higher in pacu (p < 0,01) than those observed in tilapia. These values for pacu were superior (p < 0.01) to tilapia’s. These values were 51.60% for fillet with skin and 46.73% without skin, while for tilapia they were 39.21% and 36.44%, respectively. There were no significant difference for the yield on the visceral carcass and skin between the two species. The percentage for the tilapia’s head (28.34%) was significantly superior (p < 0.01) to pacu’s (16.57%). Individuals with big and long head promoted low fillet yield, as verified for tilapia, and those with small head as pacu, the yield ranges higher values, evidencing the existence of a inverse relationship between the size of the head and fillet yield.
publishDate 2008
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2008-04-17
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSci/article/view/2068
10.4025/actascianimsci.v25i1.2068
url http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSci/article/view/2068
identifier_str_mv 10.4025/actascianimsci.v25i1.2068
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSci/article/view/2068/1422
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora da Universidade Estadual de Maringá
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora da Universidade Estadual de Maringá
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences; Vol 25 No 1 (2003); 21-24
Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences; v. 25 n. 1 (2003); 21-24
1807-8672
1806-2636
reponame:Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
instacron:UEM
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
instacron_str UEM
institution UEM
reponame_str Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Online)
collection Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv actaanim@uem.br||actaanim@uem.br|| rev.acta@gmail.com
_version_ 1750315260055650304