Effect of using inoculant on elephant grass silage with additives

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Silva, Ana Rebeca Pires da
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Dias, Fabio Jacobs, Rufino, João Paulo Ferreira, Tanaka, Ewerton de Souza, Lopes, Maycom Marinho
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSci/article/view/50533
Resumo: This study aimed to evaluate the use of inoculant on silage of elephant grass, wet brewery waste and buriti meal at different silo opening times. The experimental silage tested was composed of 50% elephant grass, 30% wet brewery waste, and 20% buriti meal. The experimental design was randomized block in a factorial arrangement (2 x 4), where the treatments consisted of the use or not of inoculant during silage processing, and four silo opening times (7, 14, 21, and 28 days). Data collected were firstly subjected to ANOVA and subsequent Tukey’s test. Results were considered significant at p ≤ 0.05. The use of inoculant in silage production provided more acidic pH (p < 0.05) and higher (p < 0.05) effluent losses. Longer silo opening times resulted in more alkaline pH (p < 0.05) and higher (p < 0.05) effluent losses. The use of inoculant in silage production and longer silo opening times provided higher (p < 0.05) content of ash, crude protein, and fats, and lower (p < 0.05) content of dry matter and fiber (neutral and acid detergent). However, there was no interaction between the factors evaluated in this study. It was concluded that the inoculant may be used in the production of elephant grass silages, wet brewery waste, and buriti meal, providing a more acidic pH, higher effluent losses, lower contents of dry matter and fiber, and higher nutritional content. As the opening time was extended up to 28 days, there was more alkaline pH, higher effluent losses, lower dry matter and fiber content, and higher nutritional content.
id UEM-7_bcf7f19320205631139bcfc6566da271
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/50533
network_acronym_str UEM-7
network_name_str Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Effect of using inoculant on elephant grass silage with additives Effect of using inoculant on elephant grass silage with additives dry matter; effluent losses; ensiling; fiber, forage.dry matter; effluent losses; ensiling; fiber, forage.This study aimed to evaluate the use of inoculant on silage of elephant grass, wet brewery waste and buriti meal at different silo opening times. The experimental silage tested was composed of 50% elephant grass, 30% wet brewery waste, and 20% buriti meal. The experimental design was randomized block in a factorial arrangement (2 x 4), where the treatments consisted of the use or not of inoculant during silage processing, and four silo opening times (7, 14, 21, and 28 days). Data collected were firstly subjected to ANOVA and subsequent Tukey’s test. Results were considered significant at p ≤ 0.05. The use of inoculant in silage production provided more acidic pH (p < 0.05) and higher (p < 0.05) effluent losses. Longer silo opening times resulted in more alkaline pH (p < 0.05) and higher (p < 0.05) effluent losses. The use of inoculant in silage production and longer silo opening times provided higher (p < 0.05) content of ash, crude protein, and fats, and lower (p < 0.05) content of dry matter and fiber (neutral and acid detergent). However, there was no interaction between the factors evaluated in this study. It was concluded that the inoculant may be used in the production of elephant grass silages, wet brewery waste, and buriti meal, providing a more acidic pH, higher effluent losses, lower contents of dry matter and fiber, and higher nutritional content. As the opening time was extended up to 28 days, there was more alkaline pH, higher effluent losses, lower dry matter and fiber content, and higher nutritional content.This study aimed to evaluate the use of inoculant on silage of elephant grass, wet brewery waste and buriti meal at different silo opening times. The experimental silage tested was composed of 50% elephant grass, 30% wet brewery waste, and 20% buriti meal. The experimental design was randomized block in a factorial arrangement (2 x 4), where the treatments consisted of the use or not of inoculant during silage processing, and four silo opening times (7, 14, 21, and 28 days). Data collected were firstly subjected to ANOVA and subsequent Tukey’s test. Results were considered significant at p ≤ 0.05. The use of inoculant in silage production provided more acidic pH (p < 0.05) and higher (p < 0.05) effluent losses. Longer silo opening times resulted in more alkaline pH (p < 0.05) and higher (p < 0.05) effluent losses. The use of inoculant in silage production and longer silo opening times provided higher (p < 0.05) content of ash, crude protein, and fats, and lower (p < 0.05) content of dry matter and fiber (neutral and acid detergent). However, there was no interaction between the factors evaluated in this study. It was concluded that the inoculant may be used in the production of elephant grass silages, wet brewery waste, and buriti meal, providing a more acidic pH, higher effluent losses, lower contents of dry matter and fiber, and higher nutritional content. As the opening time was extended up to 28 days, there was more alkaline pH, higher effluent losses, lower dry matter and fiber content, and higher nutritional content.Editora da Universidade Estadual de Maringá2020-06-08info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSci/article/view/5053310.4025/actascianimsci.v42i1.50533Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences; Vol 42 (2020): Publicação contínua; e50533Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences; v. 42 (2020): Publicação contínua; e505331807-86721806-2636reponame:Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)instacron:UEMenghttps://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSci/article/view/50533/751375150194Copyright (c) 2020 Acta Scientiarum. Animal Scienceshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSilva, Ana Rebeca Pires daDias, Fabio JacobsRufino, João Paulo FerreiraTanaka, Ewerton de SouzaLopes, Maycom Marinho2020-11-16T18:33:10Zoai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/50533Revistahttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSciPUBhttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSci/oaiactaanim@uem.br||actaanim@uem.br|| rev.acta@gmail.com1807-86721806-2636opendoar:2020-11-16T18:33:10Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Effect of using inoculant on elephant grass silage with additives
Effect of using inoculant on elephant grass silage with additives
title Effect of using inoculant on elephant grass silage with additives
spellingShingle Effect of using inoculant on elephant grass silage with additives
Silva, Ana Rebeca Pires da
dry matter; effluent losses; ensiling; fiber, forage.
dry matter; effluent losses; ensiling; fiber, forage.
title_short Effect of using inoculant on elephant grass silage with additives
title_full Effect of using inoculant on elephant grass silage with additives
title_fullStr Effect of using inoculant on elephant grass silage with additives
title_full_unstemmed Effect of using inoculant on elephant grass silage with additives
title_sort Effect of using inoculant on elephant grass silage with additives
author Silva, Ana Rebeca Pires da
author_facet Silva, Ana Rebeca Pires da
Dias, Fabio Jacobs
Rufino, João Paulo Ferreira
Tanaka, Ewerton de Souza
Lopes, Maycom Marinho
author_role author
author2 Dias, Fabio Jacobs
Rufino, João Paulo Ferreira
Tanaka, Ewerton de Souza
Lopes, Maycom Marinho
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Silva, Ana Rebeca Pires da
Dias, Fabio Jacobs
Rufino, João Paulo Ferreira
Tanaka, Ewerton de Souza
Lopes, Maycom Marinho
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv dry matter; effluent losses; ensiling; fiber, forage.
dry matter; effluent losses; ensiling; fiber, forage.
topic dry matter; effluent losses; ensiling; fiber, forage.
dry matter; effluent losses; ensiling; fiber, forage.
description This study aimed to evaluate the use of inoculant on silage of elephant grass, wet brewery waste and buriti meal at different silo opening times. The experimental silage tested was composed of 50% elephant grass, 30% wet brewery waste, and 20% buriti meal. The experimental design was randomized block in a factorial arrangement (2 x 4), where the treatments consisted of the use or not of inoculant during silage processing, and four silo opening times (7, 14, 21, and 28 days). Data collected were firstly subjected to ANOVA and subsequent Tukey’s test. Results were considered significant at p ≤ 0.05. The use of inoculant in silage production provided more acidic pH (p < 0.05) and higher (p < 0.05) effluent losses. Longer silo opening times resulted in more alkaline pH (p < 0.05) and higher (p < 0.05) effluent losses. The use of inoculant in silage production and longer silo opening times provided higher (p < 0.05) content of ash, crude protein, and fats, and lower (p < 0.05) content of dry matter and fiber (neutral and acid detergent). However, there was no interaction between the factors evaluated in this study. It was concluded that the inoculant may be used in the production of elephant grass silages, wet brewery waste, and buriti meal, providing a more acidic pH, higher effluent losses, lower contents of dry matter and fiber, and higher nutritional content. As the opening time was extended up to 28 days, there was more alkaline pH, higher effluent losses, lower dry matter and fiber content, and higher nutritional content.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-06-08
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSci/article/view/50533
10.4025/actascianimsci.v42i1.50533
url https://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSci/article/view/50533
identifier_str_mv 10.4025/actascianimsci.v42i1.50533
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSci/article/view/50533/751375150194
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora da Universidade Estadual de Maringá
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora da Universidade Estadual de Maringá
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences; Vol 42 (2020): Publicação contínua; e50533
Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences; v. 42 (2020): Publicação contínua; e50533
1807-8672
1806-2636
reponame:Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
instacron:UEM
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
instacron_str UEM
institution UEM
reponame_str Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Online)
collection Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv actaanim@uem.br||actaanim@uem.br|| rev.acta@gmail.com
_version_ 1799315362982920192