Publicar ou perecer: uma análise crítico¬normativa das características e dos efeitos dos modelos cientométrico e bibliométrico adotados no Brasil

• Autor(a) principal: Vilaça, Murilo Mariano
• Data de Publicação: 2013
• Tipo de documento: Tese
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UERJ
• Texto Completo: http://www.bdtd.uerj.br/handle/1/10366
• topic: Commodification of Education; Scientometrics; Bibliometrics; Pressure to publish; Academic-scientific misconduct; Mercantilização da educação; Cientometria; Bibliometria; Pressão por publicação; Más condutas acadêmico-científicas; Publicações científicas; CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::EDUCACAO::PLANEJAMENTO E AVALIACAO EDUCACIONAL::POLITICA EDUCACIONAL

This PhD Thesis analyzes the characteristic sand effects of scientometrics and bibliometrics adopted in Brazil. First, in order to contextualize the theme, I review the literature on the commodification of education process. My goal is to demonstrate the business inclination facing the educational public policies, especially those assumed to the Graduate level. Furthermore, I select and analyze some concepts that help me to understand the theme as well a show they keep the inadequacy of the logic of market economy in order to manage the Academy and the science. In the second part of the thesis, I focus on the criteria used to determine the rank of Graduate Programs and distinguish researchers between them. The thesis to be defended is that the CAPES evaluation for Graduate level is based on a standard productivity model called periodicracy which creates a strong pressure to publish articles in academic and scientific journals, since these products are privileged in the current objectivist measurement model. Therefore produce/publish articles becomes the preeminent Academic-scientific performance. This entails the creation of an academic scientific market and a market of publications, which creates a propitious environment for the occurrence of Academic-scientific misconduct.