Avaliação em filosofia: um estudo sobre concepções e práticas de professores

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Pinto, Guilherme dos Santos
Data de Publicação: 2018
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM
Texto Completo: http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/15611
Resumo: The theme "Evaluation in philosophy" covered several moments of my academic trajectory and, in view of its relevance to teaching philosophy, motivated this master's research. This study was developed in the Postgraduate Program in Education of UFSM, based on the Line of Research School Practices and Public Policies (LP2).With this study we aim to identify and problematize conceptions and practices of evaluation of philosophy teachers; describe the different conceptions of evaluation produced in the area of education; present the theoretical and legal contributions on evaluation in philosophy; identify and problematize the daily confrontations of philosophy teachers in the evaluation processes; and to understand and problematize the way that philosophy teachers evaluate the philosophical skills of their students. The research was developed based on a philosophical study, which is understood as a problematizing study, having as support the authors dedicated to the theme of philosophy teaching: Lidia Maria Rodrigo (2009); Alejandro Cerletti (2009); Renata Aspis and Silvio Gallo (2009); Silvio Gallo (2008; 2012); Walter Kohan (2008) and Guillermo Obiols (2002). The materiality of the research were semi-structured interviews, developed with philosophy teachers from four (4) public high schools in Santa Maria. The criterion of choice was the highest average number of students per class in the city. The data produced from the interviews were grouped into preestablished categories: teaching methodologies; philosophical skills; teaching and learning in philosophy; evaluation concepts (with the subcategory: the evaluation feedback); and difficulties to evaluate in philosophy. As results we indicate that the teachers interviewed have a great difficulty to talk about evaluation and about the philosophical skills they develop. Of the four (4) teachers interviewed, three (3) evaluate in line with the conception of philosophy teaching that they have and seek to accomplish in their classes. Thus, it is concluded that the results are very relevant and that the theme needs to be increasingly explored, in order to deepen and signal other reflections.
id UFSM-20_0f38c2c70222af07b6fd22ae384543ae
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ufsm.br:1/15611
network_acronym_str UFSM-20
network_name_str Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM
repository_id_str 3913
spelling 2019-02-12T12:29:46Z2019-02-12T12:29:46Z2018-08-29http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/15611The theme "Evaluation in philosophy" covered several moments of my academic trajectory and, in view of its relevance to teaching philosophy, motivated this master's research. This study was developed in the Postgraduate Program in Education of UFSM, based on the Line of Research School Practices and Public Policies (LP2).With this study we aim to identify and problematize conceptions and practices of evaluation of philosophy teachers; describe the different conceptions of evaluation produced in the area of education; present the theoretical and legal contributions on evaluation in philosophy; identify and problematize the daily confrontations of philosophy teachers in the evaluation processes; and to understand and problematize the way that philosophy teachers evaluate the philosophical skills of their students. The research was developed based on a philosophical study, which is understood as a problematizing study, having as support the authors dedicated to the theme of philosophy teaching: Lidia Maria Rodrigo (2009); Alejandro Cerletti (2009); Renata Aspis and Silvio Gallo (2009); Silvio Gallo (2008; 2012); Walter Kohan (2008) and Guillermo Obiols (2002). The materiality of the research were semi-structured interviews, developed with philosophy teachers from four (4) public high schools in Santa Maria. The criterion of choice was the highest average number of students per class in the city. The data produced from the interviews were grouped into preestablished categories: teaching methodologies; philosophical skills; teaching and learning in philosophy; evaluation concepts (with the subcategory: the evaluation feedback); and difficulties to evaluate in philosophy. As results we indicate that the teachers interviewed have a great difficulty to talk about evaluation and about the philosophical skills they develop. Of the four (4) teachers interviewed, three (3) evaluate in line with the conception of philosophy teaching that they have and seek to accomplish in their classes. Thus, it is concluded that the results are very relevant and that the theme needs to be increasingly explored, in order to deepen and signal other reflections.O tema “Avaliação em filosofia” percorreu diversos momentos da minha trajetória acadêmica e, em vista da sua relevância para o ensino de filosofia, motivou esta pesquisa de mestrado. O referido estudo foi desenvolvido no Programa de Pós Graduação em Educação da UFSM, com base na Linha de Pesquisa Práticas Escolares e Políticas Públicas (LP2). Com este estudo objetivamos identificar e problematizar concepções e práticas de avaliação de professores de filosofia; descrever as diferentes concepções de avaliação produzidas na área da educação; apresentar os aportes teóricos e legais sobre avaliação em filosofia; identificar e problematizar os enfrentamentos cotidianos de professores de filosofia nos processos de avaliação; e compreender e problematizar o modo como os professores de filosofia avaliam as habilidades filosóficas de seus alunos. A pesquisa foi desenvolvida com base num estudo filosófico, o qual se compreende como um estudo problematizador, tendo por sustentação os autores dedicados ao tema do ensino de filosofia: Lidia Maria Rodrigo (2009); Alejandro Cerletti (2009); Renata Aspis e Silvio Gallo (2009); Silvio Gallo (2008; 2012); Walter Kohan (2008) e Guillermo Obiols (2002). A materialidade da investigação foram entrevistas semiestruturadas, desenvolvidas com professores de filosofia de quatro (4) escolas públicas de ensino médio de Santa Maria. O critério de escolha foi a maior média de alunos por turma na cidade. Os dados produzidos a partir das entrevistas foram agrupados em categorias pré-estabelecidas: metodologias de ensino; habilidades filosóficas; ensino e aprendizagem de filosofia; concepções de avaliação (com a subcategoria: o feedback avaliativo); e dificuldades para avaliar em Filosofia. Como resultados indicamos que os professores entrevistados tem uma grande dificuldade de falar sobre avaliação e sobre habilidades filosóficas que desenvolvem. Dos quatro (4) professores entrevistados, três (3) avaliam em consonância com a concepção de ensino de filosofia que têm e buscam realizar em suas aulas. Assim, conclui-se que os resultados são bastante relevantes e que a temática necessita ser cada vez mais explorada, com o propósito de aprofundar e sinalizar outras reflexões.porUniversidade Federal de Santa MariaCentro de EducaçãoPrograma de Pós-Graduação em EducaçãoUFSMBrasilEducaçãoAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAvaliaçãoFilosofiaConcepçõesEnsino médioEvaluationPhilosophyConceptionsHigh schoolCNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::EDUCACAOAvaliação em filosofia: um estudo sobre concepções e práticas de professoresEvaluation in philosophy: a study on conceptions and practices of teachersinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisTomazetti, Elisete Medianeirahttp://lattes.cnpq.br/3942924352722374Salva, Suelihttp://lattes.cnpq.br/8144640957398714Mendonça, Samuelhttp://lattes.cnpq.br/6369572439782922http://lattes.cnpq.br/2466333390925995Pinto, Guilherme dos Santos700800000006600fb013dc0-4954-467f-ba4a-c04757300e98c53e3a19-17a1-4c39-8cfc-cad89fa85c799eed5dee-d3ee-4bf1-acf4-a27e5bcd3d85b65c795e-9530-4eaa-b692-f54c156eddcbreponame:Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSMinstname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)instacron:UFSMORIGINALDIS_PPGEDUCACAO_2018_PINTO_GUILHERME.pdfDIS_PPGEDUCACAO_2018_PINTO_GUILHERME.pdfDissertação de Mestradoapplication/pdf1634203http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/15611/1/DIS_PPGEDUCACAO_2018_PINTO_GUILHERME.pdf6593f42382ceee1bf87844a40129f54fMD51CC-LICENSElicense_rdflicense_rdfapplication/rdf+xml; charset=utf-8805http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/15611/2/license_rdf4460e5956bc1d1639be9ae6146a50347MD52LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-81956http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/15611/3/license.txt2f0571ecee68693bd5cd3f17c1e075dfMD53TEXTDIS_PPGEDUCACAO_2018_PINTO_GUILHERME.pdf.txtDIS_PPGEDUCACAO_2018_PINTO_GUILHERME.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain354828http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/15611/4/DIS_PPGEDUCACAO_2018_PINTO_GUILHERME.pdf.txt0036d5295dee8a44029314201f88d90dMD54THUMBNAILDIS_PPGEDUCACAO_2018_PINTO_GUILHERME.pdf.jpgDIS_PPGEDUCACAO_2018_PINTO_GUILHERME.pdf.jpgIM Thumbnailimage/jpeg2830http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/15611/5/DIS_PPGEDUCACAO_2018_PINTO_GUILHERME.pdf.jpg72408d6e3aaf75fd56164db977603d7aMD551/156112022-06-30 10:16:29.482oai:repositorio.ufsm.br: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ório Institucionalhttp://repositorio.ufsm.br/PUBhttp://repositorio.ufsm.br/oai/requestopendoar:39132022-06-30T13:16:29Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)false
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv Avaliação em filosofia: um estudo sobre concepções e práticas de professores
dc.title.alternative.eng.fl_str_mv Evaluation in philosophy: a study on conceptions and practices of teachers
title Avaliação em filosofia: um estudo sobre concepções e práticas de professores
spellingShingle Avaliação em filosofia: um estudo sobre concepções e práticas de professores
Pinto, Guilherme dos Santos
Avaliação
Filosofia
Concepções
Ensino médio
Evaluation
Philosophy
Conceptions
High school
CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::EDUCACAO
title_short Avaliação em filosofia: um estudo sobre concepções e práticas de professores
title_full Avaliação em filosofia: um estudo sobre concepções e práticas de professores
title_fullStr Avaliação em filosofia: um estudo sobre concepções e práticas de professores
title_full_unstemmed Avaliação em filosofia: um estudo sobre concepções e práticas de professores
title_sort Avaliação em filosofia: um estudo sobre concepções e práticas de professores
author Pinto, Guilherme dos Santos
author_facet Pinto, Guilherme dos Santos
author_role author
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv Tomazetti, Elisete Medianeira
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/3942924352722374
dc.contributor.referee1.fl_str_mv Salva, Sueli
dc.contributor.referee1Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/8144640957398714
dc.contributor.referee2.fl_str_mv Mendonça, Samuel
dc.contributor.referee2Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/6369572439782922
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/2466333390925995
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Pinto, Guilherme dos Santos
contributor_str_mv Tomazetti, Elisete Medianeira
Salva, Sueli
Mendonça, Samuel
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Avaliação
Filosofia
Concepções
Ensino médio
topic Avaliação
Filosofia
Concepções
Ensino médio
Evaluation
Philosophy
Conceptions
High school
CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::EDUCACAO
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Evaluation
Philosophy
Conceptions
High school
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::EDUCACAO
description The theme "Evaluation in philosophy" covered several moments of my academic trajectory and, in view of its relevance to teaching philosophy, motivated this master's research. This study was developed in the Postgraduate Program in Education of UFSM, based on the Line of Research School Practices and Public Policies (LP2).With this study we aim to identify and problematize conceptions and practices of evaluation of philosophy teachers; describe the different conceptions of evaluation produced in the area of education; present the theoretical and legal contributions on evaluation in philosophy; identify and problematize the daily confrontations of philosophy teachers in the evaluation processes; and to understand and problematize the way that philosophy teachers evaluate the philosophical skills of their students. The research was developed based on a philosophical study, which is understood as a problematizing study, having as support the authors dedicated to the theme of philosophy teaching: Lidia Maria Rodrigo (2009); Alejandro Cerletti (2009); Renata Aspis and Silvio Gallo (2009); Silvio Gallo (2008; 2012); Walter Kohan (2008) and Guillermo Obiols (2002). The materiality of the research were semi-structured interviews, developed with philosophy teachers from four (4) public high schools in Santa Maria. The criterion of choice was the highest average number of students per class in the city. The data produced from the interviews were grouped into preestablished categories: teaching methodologies; philosophical skills; teaching and learning in philosophy; evaluation concepts (with the subcategory: the evaluation feedback); and difficulties to evaluate in philosophy. As results we indicate that the teachers interviewed have a great difficulty to talk about evaluation and about the philosophical skills they develop. Of the four (4) teachers interviewed, three (3) evaluate in line with the conception of philosophy teaching that they have and seek to accomplish in their classes. Thus, it is concluded that the results are very relevant and that the theme needs to be increasingly explored, in order to deepen and signal other reflections.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2018-08-29
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2019-02-12T12:29:46Z
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2019-02-12T12:29:46Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/15611
url http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/15611
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.cnpq.fl_str_mv 700800000006
dc.relation.confidence.fl_str_mv 600
dc.relation.authority.fl_str_mv fb013dc0-4954-467f-ba4a-c04757300e98
c53e3a19-17a1-4c39-8cfc-cad89fa85c79
9eed5dee-d3ee-4bf1-acf4-a27e5bcd3d85
b65c795e-9530-4eaa-b692-f54c156eddcb
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
Centro de Educação
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv Programa de Pós-Graduação em Educação
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv UFSM
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv Brasil
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv Educação
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
Centro de Educação
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
instacron:UFSM
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
instacron_str UFSM
institution UFSM
reponame_str Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM
collection Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/15611/1/DIS_PPGEDUCACAO_2018_PINTO_GUILHERME.pdf
http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/15611/2/license_rdf
http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/15611/3/license.txt
http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/15611/4/DIS_PPGEDUCACAO_2018_PINTO_GUILHERME.pdf.txt
http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/15611/5/DIS_PPGEDUCACAO_2018_PINTO_GUILHERME.pdf.jpg
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 6593f42382ceee1bf87844a40129f54f
4460e5956bc1d1639be9ae6146a50347
2f0571ecee68693bd5cd3f17c1e075df
0036d5295dee8a44029314201f88d90d
72408d6e3aaf75fd56164db977603d7a
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1794523942478675968