Electrocardiographic, echocardiographic, and indirect blood pressure evaluation in dogs subjected to different sedation protocols

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Cardoso,Helena Mondardo
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Padilha,Vanessa Sasso, Tocheto,Ronise, Regalin,Douglas, Gehrcke,Martielo Ivan, Oleskovicz,Nilson
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Ciência Rural
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84782016001102043
Resumo: ABSTRACT: The present study aimed to evaluate the effects of different sedation protocols on blood pressure and echocardiographic and electrocardiographic parameters in dogs. In total, 24 male mixed-breed dogs with a mean weight of 9.87±3.0kg were used.Animals were randomly divided into four groups (n=6), which were subjected to sedation using the following protocols: acepromazine (0.05mgkg-1) and butorphanol (0.3mgkg-1) (AB); acepromazine (0.05mgkg-1)and methadone (0.5mgkg-1) (AM); acepromazine (0.03mgkg-1), methadone (0.5mgkg-1), and midazolam (0.3mgkg-1)(MAM); and methadone only (0.5mgkg-1) (M). Indirect blood pressure (BP) measurements and computerized electrocardiography (ECG) and echocardiography (ECO) were performed immediately before the application of the sedation protocol (baseline), and the same evaluations were repeated after 15 minutes. BP decreased in groups AB, MAM, and AM compared to baseline values. Electrocardiographic measurements showed decreased heart rates (HRs) after sedation in all groups, and bradycardia was observed after sedation in two dogs from group M and one animal from group AM. The P-wave duration increased after sedation in groups AM and M. After sedation, no changes in cardiac dimensions were revealed byECO.Fractional shortening (FS) decreased after sedation in the AM group, and dogs from group AB exhibited a smaller decrease in FS compared with the other groups. The cardiac index (CI) was lower in groups AM and M than in the other groups. Animals from group AB were less resistant to examination and exhibited the most favorable sedation scores. It was concluded that the combination of acepromazine and butorphanol was the best sedation protocol for performing echocardiogram measurementsbecause dogs were less resistant to examinations and echocardiographic parameters of FS and CI remained stable.
id UFSM-2_02cbb05043fde6112fdaaa054f0fc18c
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0103-84782016001102043
network_acronym_str UFSM-2
network_name_str Ciência rural (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Electrocardiographic, echocardiographic, and indirect blood pressure evaluation in dogs subjected to different sedation protocolscardiac evaluationbutorphanolacepromazinemethadonemidazolamABSTRACT: The present study aimed to evaluate the effects of different sedation protocols on blood pressure and echocardiographic and electrocardiographic parameters in dogs. In total, 24 male mixed-breed dogs with a mean weight of 9.87±3.0kg were used.Animals were randomly divided into four groups (n=6), which were subjected to sedation using the following protocols: acepromazine (0.05mgkg-1) and butorphanol (0.3mgkg-1) (AB); acepromazine (0.05mgkg-1)and methadone (0.5mgkg-1) (AM); acepromazine (0.03mgkg-1), methadone (0.5mgkg-1), and midazolam (0.3mgkg-1)(MAM); and methadone only (0.5mgkg-1) (M). Indirect blood pressure (BP) measurements and computerized electrocardiography (ECG) and echocardiography (ECO) were performed immediately before the application of the sedation protocol (baseline), and the same evaluations were repeated after 15 minutes. BP decreased in groups AB, MAM, and AM compared to baseline values. Electrocardiographic measurements showed decreased heart rates (HRs) after sedation in all groups, and bradycardia was observed after sedation in two dogs from group M and one animal from group AM. The P-wave duration increased after sedation in groups AM and M. After sedation, no changes in cardiac dimensions were revealed byECO.Fractional shortening (FS) decreased after sedation in the AM group, and dogs from group AB exhibited a smaller decrease in FS compared with the other groups. The cardiac index (CI) was lower in groups AM and M than in the other groups. Animals from group AB were less resistant to examination and exhibited the most favorable sedation scores. It was concluded that the combination of acepromazine and butorphanol was the best sedation protocol for performing echocardiogram measurementsbecause dogs were less resistant to examinations and echocardiographic parameters of FS and CI remained stable.Universidade Federal de Santa Maria2016-11-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84782016001102043Ciência Rural v.46 n.11 2016reponame:Ciência Ruralinstname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)instacron:UFSM10.1590/0103-8478cr20150456info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCardoso,Helena MondardoPadilha,Vanessa SassoTocheto,RoniseRegalin,DouglasGehrcke,Martielo IvanOleskovicz,Nilsoneng2016-09-28T00:00:00ZRevista
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Electrocardiographic, echocardiographic, and indirect blood pressure evaluation in dogs subjected to different sedation protocols
title Electrocardiographic, echocardiographic, and indirect blood pressure evaluation in dogs subjected to different sedation protocols
spellingShingle Electrocardiographic, echocardiographic, and indirect blood pressure evaluation in dogs subjected to different sedation protocols
Cardoso,Helena Mondardo
cardiac evaluation
butorphanol
acepromazine
methadone
midazolam
title_short Electrocardiographic, echocardiographic, and indirect blood pressure evaluation in dogs subjected to different sedation protocols
title_full Electrocardiographic, echocardiographic, and indirect blood pressure evaluation in dogs subjected to different sedation protocols
title_fullStr Electrocardiographic, echocardiographic, and indirect blood pressure evaluation in dogs subjected to different sedation protocols
title_full_unstemmed Electrocardiographic, echocardiographic, and indirect blood pressure evaluation in dogs subjected to different sedation protocols
title_sort Electrocardiographic, echocardiographic, and indirect blood pressure evaluation in dogs subjected to different sedation protocols
author Cardoso,Helena Mondardo
author_facet Cardoso,Helena Mondardo
Padilha,Vanessa Sasso
Tocheto,Ronise
Regalin,Douglas
Gehrcke,Martielo Ivan
Oleskovicz,Nilson
author_role author
author2 Padilha,Vanessa Sasso
Tocheto,Ronise
Regalin,Douglas
Gehrcke,Martielo Ivan
Oleskovicz,Nilson
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Cardoso,Helena Mondardo
Padilha,Vanessa Sasso
Tocheto,Ronise
Regalin,Douglas
Gehrcke,Martielo Ivan
Oleskovicz,Nilson
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv cardiac evaluation
butorphanol
acepromazine
methadone
midazolam
topic cardiac evaluation
butorphanol
acepromazine
methadone
midazolam
description ABSTRACT: The present study aimed to evaluate the effects of different sedation protocols on blood pressure and echocardiographic and electrocardiographic parameters in dogs. In total, 24 male mixed-breed dogs with a mean weight of 9.87±3.0kg were used.Animals were randomly divided into four groups (n=6), which were subjected to sedation using the following protocols: acepromazine (0.05mgkg-1) and butorphanol (0.3mgkg-1) (AB); acepromazine (0.05mgkg-1)and methadone (0.5mgkg-1) (AM); acepromazine (0.03mgkg-1), methadone (0.5mgkg-1), and midazolam (0.3mgkg-1)(MAM); and methadone only (0.5mgkg-1) (M). Indirect blood pressure (BP) measurements and computerized electrocardiography (ECG) and echocardiography (ECO) were performed immediately before the application of the sedation protocol (baseline), and the same evaluations were repeated after 15 minutes. BP decreased in groups AB, MAM, and AM compared to baseline values. Electrocardiographic measurements showed decreased heart rates (HRs) after sedation in all groups, and bradycardia was observed after sedation in two dogs from group M and one animal from group AM. The P-wave duration increased after sedation in groups AM and M. After sedation, no changes in cardiac dimensions were revealed byECO.Fractional shortening (FS) decreased after sedation in the AM group, and dogs from group AB exhibited a smaller decrease in FS compared with the other groups. The cardiac index (CI) was lower in groups AM and M than in the other groups. Animals from group AB were less resistant to examination and exhibited the most favorable sedation scores. It was concluded that the combination of acepromazine and butorphanol was the best sedation protocol for performing echocardiogram measurementsbecause dogs were less resistant to examinations and echocardiographic parameters of FS and CI remained stable.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-11-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84782016001102043
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84782016001102043
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/0103-8478cr20150456
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Ciência Rural v.46 n.11 2016
reponame:Ciência Rural
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
instacron:UFSM
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
instacron_str UFSM
institution UFSM
reponame_str Ciência Rural
collection Ciência Rural
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1749140550527746048