Glyphosate and imazapyr to eucalyptus sprout control: application to the main stem before the harvesting of the tree

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Montes, William Gomes
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Santos, Leonardo David Tuffi, Barros, Rodrigo Eduardo, Almeida, Wellington, Abreu, Antônio Junior Silva, Reis, Matheus Mendes, Donato, Luan Mateus Silva, Ferreira, Guilherme Augusto de Paiva
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Ciência Florestal (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/40102
Resumo: Herbicide spraying on eucalyptus regrowth prior to planting reform is a common practice in the forest sector. However, several operations are needed in the same area for an effective sprout control. The objective of this work was to evaluate the efficiency of the herbicides glyphosate and imazapyr, applied to the main stem before the harvesting of the tree to eucalyptus sprouts control. There were set up 7 treatments, with application of doses of 3.0; 4.0; and 5.0 mL/stem of glyphosate (Gli-Up® 360g i.a L-1) and doses of 0.3; 0.5; and 0.7 mL/stem of imazapyr (Chopper Florestal® 250g i.a. L-1), in addition to a control treatment. The herbicide spraying consisted of the directed spraying of the herbicides on incisions carried out on the stem of the trees. The harvest of the trees was carried out 30 days after the herbicide spraying. Assessments about the number of sprouts per stump were carried out, the number of stump with presence of coppice, height and control efficiency of the coppice 150 days after harvesting. The glyphosate spraying promoted reduction of the sprout development and vigor. However, even with this reduction, it was observed presence of sprouts in at least 80% of the assessed stumps. The spraying of the dose of 3 mL of glyphosate promoted values next to 80% of control efficiency. Nevertheless, it was observed that new control operations would be necessary. The spraying of imazapyr was inefficient with control efficiency values less than 25%. In conclusion, the application of glyphosate to the main stem before the harvesting of the tree presents reduction in the eucalyptus sprout development. Additionally, the application of imazapyr, in the doses and form application tested, is not recommended to eucalyptus sprout control.
id UFSM-6_1a58afef8822fc71842b9c5b0bba9f45
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/40102
network_acronym_str UFSM-6
network_name_str Ciência Florestal (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Glyphosate and imazapyr to eucalyptus sprout control: application to the main stem before the harvesting of the treeGlyphosate e imazapyr no controle de brotações de eucalipto: aplicação no fuste principal anterior ao corte da árvoreEucalyptus grandis x Eucalyptus urophyllaSprouts eradicationUnwanted sproutsChemistry controlEucalyptus grandis x Eucalyptus urophyllaErradicação de brotaçõesBrotações indesejadasControle químicoHerbicide spraying on eucalyptus regrowth prior to planting reform is a common practice in the forest sector. However, several operations are needed in the same area for an effective sprout control. The objective of this work was to evaluate the efficiency of the herbicides glyphosate and imazapyr, applied to the main stem before the harvesting of the tree to eucalyptus sprouts control. There were set up 7 treatments, with application of doses of 3.0; 4.0; and 5.0 mL/stem of glyphosate (Gli-Up® 360g i.a L-1) and doses of 0.3; 0.5; and 0.7 mL/stem of imazapyr (Chopper Florestal® 250g i.a. L-1), in addition to a control treatment. The herbicide spraying consisted of the directed spraying of the herbicides on incisions carried out on the stem of the trees. The harvest of the trees was carried out 30 days after the herbicide spraying. Assessments about the number of sprouts per stump were carried out, the number of stump with presence of coppice, height and control efficiency of the coppice 150 days after harvesting. The glyphosate spraying promoted reduction of the sprout development and vigor. However, even with this reduction, it was observed presence of sprouts in at least 80% of the assessed stumps. The spraying of the dose of 3 mL of glyphosate promoted values next to 80% of control efficiency. Nevertheless, it was observed that new control operations would be necessary. The spraying of imazapyr was inefficient with control efficiency values less than 25%. In conclusion, the application of glyphosate to the main stem before the harvesting of the tree presents reduction in the eucalyptus sprout development. Additionally, the application of imazapyr, in the doses and form application tested, is not recommended to eucalyptus sprout control.A pulverização de herbicidas sobre a rebrota do eucalipto é uma prática comum no setor florestal. Entretanto, observa-se a necessidade de várias operações em uma mesma área para controle das brotações. Objetivou-se avaliar a eficiência dos herbicidas glyphosate e imazapyr, aplicados no fuste principal antes do corte raso das árvores, no controle de brotações de eucalipto. Foram implantados sete tratamentos representados por doses de 3,0; 4,0 e 5,0 mL/fuste de glyphosate (Gli-Up® 360 g i.a L-1) e das doses de 0,3; 0,5 e 0,7 mL/fuste de imazapyr (Chopper Florestal® 250 g i.a. L-1), além de um tratamento-testemunha. A aplicação dos herbicidas foi realizada em inserções feitas nos fustes das árvores. Aos 30 dias após aplicação dos herbicidas, realizou-se o corte das árvores. Aos 150 dias após o corte das árvores, foram realizadas avaliações do número de brotações por cepa, número de cepas com presença de brotações, altura e a eficiência de controle das brotações. A aplicação de glyphosate promoveu redução do vigor das brotações. Porém, observou-se emissão de brotações em pelo menos 80% das cepas avaliadas. A aplicação da dose de 3 mL de glyphosate promoveu porcentagens de 80% de eficiência de controle. Contudo, observou-se que operações de controle adicionais seriam necessárias. A aplicação de imazapyr mostrou-se ineficiente com controle inferior a 25%. Portanto, conclui-se que a aplicação de glyphosate no fuste da árvore em pré-corte reduz o vigor de brotações de eucalipto. Adicionalmente, a aplicação de imazapyr, nas doses e forma de aplicação testadas, não é recomendada para controle de brotações de eucalipto.Universidade Federal de Santa Maria2021-11-17info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdftext/htmltext/xmlhttps://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/4010210.5902/1980509840102Ciência Florestal; Vol. 31 No. 4 (2021); 1654-1670Ciência Florestal; v. 31 n. 4 (2021); 1654-16701980-50980103-9954reponame:Ciência Florestal (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)instacron:UFSMporhttps://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/40102/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/40102/49110https://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/40102/52457Copyright (c) 2021 Ciência Florestalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMontes, William GomesSantos, Leonardo David TuffiBarros, Rodrigo EduardoAlmeida, WellingtonAbreu, Antônio Junior SilvaReis, Matheus MendesDonato, Luan Mateus SilvaFerreira, Guilherme Augusto de Paiva2023-04-20T17:33:35Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/40102Revistahttp://www.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||cienciaflorestal@ufsm.br|| cienciaflorestal@gmail.com|| cf@smail.ufsm.br1980-50980103-9954opendoar:2023-04-20T17:33:35Ciência Florestal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Glyphosate and imazapyr to eucalyptus sprout control: application to the main stem before the harvesting of the tree
Glyphosate e imazapyr no controle de brotações de eucalipto: aplicação no fuste principal anterior ao corte da árvore
title Glyphosate and imazapyr to eucalyptus sprout control: application to the main stem before the harvesting of the tree
spellingShingle Glyphosate and imazapyr to eucalyptus sprout control: application to the main stem before the harvesting of the tree
Montes, William Gomes
Eucalyptus grandis x Eucalyptus urophylla
Sprouts eradication
Unwanted sprouts
Chemistry control
Eucalyptus grandis x Eucalyptus urophylla
Erradicação de brotações
Brotações indesejadas
Controle químico
title_short Glyphosate and imazapyr to eucalyptus sprout control: application to the main stem before the harvesting of the tree
title_full Glyphosate and imazapyr to eucalyptus sprout control: application to the main stem before the harvesting of the tree
title_fullStr Glyphosate and imazapyr to eucalyptus sprout control: application to the main stem before the harvesting of the tree
title_full_unstemmed Glyphosate and imazapyr to eucalyptus sprout control: application to the main stem before the harvesting of the tree
title_sort Glyphosate and imazapyr to eucalyptus sprout control: application to the main stem before the harvesting of the tree
author Montes, William Gomes
author_facet Montes, William Gomes
Santos, Leonardo David Tuffi
Barros, Rodrigo Eduardo
Almeida, Wellington
Abreu, Antônio Junior Silva
Reis, Matheus Mendes
Donato, Luan Mateus Silva
Ferreira, Guilherme Augusto de Paiva
author_role author
author2 Santos, Leonardo David Tuffi
Barros, Rodrigo Eduardo
Almeida, Wellington
Abreu, Antônio Junior Silva
Reis, Matheus Mendes
Donato, Luan Mateus Silva
Ferreira, Guilherme Augusto de Paiva
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Montes, William Gomes
Santos, Leonardo David Tuffi
Barros, Rodrigo Eduardo
Almeida, Wellington
Abreu, Antônio Junior Silva
Reis, Matheus Mendes
Donato, Luan Mateus Silva
Ferreira, Guilherme Augusto de Paiva
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Eucalyptus grandis x Eucalyptus urophylla
Sprouts eradication
Unwanted sprouts
Chemistry control
Eucalyptus grandis x Eucalyptus urophylla
Erradicação de brotações
Brotações indesejadas
Controle químico
topic Eucalyptus grandis x Eucalyptus urophylla
Sprouts eradication
Unwanted sprouts
Chemistry control
Eucalyptus grandis x Eucalyptus urophylla
Erradicação de brotações
Brotações indesejadas
Controle químico
description Herbicide spraying on eucalyptus regrowth prior to planting reform is a common practice in the forest sector. However, several operations are needed in the same area for an effective sprout control. The objective of this work was to evaluate the efficiency of the herbicides glyphosate and imazapyr, applied to the main stem before the harvesting of the tree to eucalyptus sprouts control. There were set up 7 treatments, with application of doses of 3.0; 4.0; and 5.0 mL/stem of glyphosate (Gli-Up® 360g i.a L-1) and doses of 0.3; 0.5; and 0.7 mL/stem of imazapyr (Chopper Florestal® 250g i.a. L-1), in addition to a control treatment. The herbicide spraying consisted of the directed spraying of the herbicides on incisions carried out on the stem of the trees. The harvest of the trees was carried out 30 days after the herbicide spraying. Assessments about the number of sprouts per stump were carried out, the number of stump with presence of coppice, height and control efficiency of the coppice 150 days after harvesting. The glyphosate spraying promoted reduction of the sprout development and vigor. However, even with this reduction, it was observed presence of sprouts in at least 80% of the assessed stumps. The spraying of the dose of 3 mL of glyphosate promoted values next to 80% of control efficiency. Nevertheless, it was observed that new control operations would be necessary. The spraying of imazapyr was inefficient with control efficiency values less than 25%. In conclusion, the application of glyphosate to the main stem before the harvesting of the tree presents reduction in the eucalyptus sprout development. Additionally, the application of imazapyr, in the doses and form application tested, is not recommended to eucalyptus sprout control.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-11-17
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/40102
10.5902/1980509840102
url https://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/40102
identifier_str_mv 10.5902/1980509840102
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/40102/pdf
https://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/40102/49110
https://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/40102/52457
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Ciência Florestal
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Ciência Florestal
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
text/html
text/xml
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Ciência Florestal; Vol. 31 No. 4 (2021); 1654-1670
Ciência Florestal; v. 31 n. 4 (2021); 1654-1670
1980-5098
0103-9954
reponame:Ciência Florestal (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
instacron:UFSM
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
instacron_str UFSM
institution UFSM
reponame_str Ciência Florestal (Online)
collection Ciência Florestal (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Ciência Florestal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||cienciaflorestal@ufsm.br|| cienciaflorestal@gmail.com|| cf@smail.ufsm.br
_version_ 1789434751467126784