Comparison of different methods for the determination of total organic carbon and humic substances in Brazilian soils

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Fernandes,Raphael Bragança Alves
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Carvalho Junior,Ildeu Afonso de, Ribeiro Junior,Emerson Silva, Mendonça,Eduardo de Sá
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Ceres
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-737X2015000500496
Resumo: ABSTRACTAiming to compare three different methods for the determination of organic carbon (OC) in the soil and fractions of humic substances, seventeen Brazilian soil samples of different classes and textures were evaluated. Amounts of OC in the soil samples and the humic fractions were measured by the dichromate-oxidation method, with and without external heating in a digestion block at 130 °C for 30 min; by the loss-on-ignition method at 450 °C during 5 h and at 600 °C during 6 h; and by the dry combustion method. Dry combustion was used as reference in order to measure the efficiency of the other methods. Soil OC measured by the dichromate-oxidation method with external heating had the highest efficiency and the best results comparing to the reference method. When external heating was not used, the mean recovery efficiency dropped to 71%. The amount of OC was overestimated by the loss-on-ignition methods. Regression equations obtained between total OC contents of the reference method and those of the other methods showed relatively good adjustment, but all intercepts were different from zero (p < 0.01), which suggests that more accuracy can be obtained using not one single correction factor, but considering also the intercept. The Walkley-Black method underestimated the OC contents of the humic fractions, which was associated with the partial oxidation of the humin fraction. Better results were obtained when external heating was used. For the organic matter fractions, the OC in the humic and fulvic acid fractions can be determined without external heating if the reference method is not available, but the humin fraction requires the external heating.
id UFV-5_53414708fff1fca7d4d0f244fbc8f5e4
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0034-737X2015000500496
network_acronym_str UFV-5
network_name_str Revista Ceres
repository_id_str
spelling Comparison of different methods for the determination of total organic carbon and humic substances in Brazilian soilsWalkley-Black methoddichromate-oxidationloss on ignitionABSTRACTAiming to compare three different methods for the determination of organic carbon (OC) in the soil and fractions of humic substances, seventeen Brazilian soil samples of different classes and textures were evaluated. Amounts of OC in the soil samples and the humic fractions were measured by the dichromate-oxidation method, with and without external heating in a digestion block at 130 °C for 30 min; by the loss-on-ignition method at 450 °C during 5 h and at 600 °C during 6 h; and by the dry combustion method. Dry combustion was used as reference in order to measure the efficiency of the other methods. Soil OC measured by the dichromate-oxidation method with external heating had the highest efficiency and the best results comparing to the reference method. When external heating was not used, the mean recovery efficiency dropped to 71%. The amount of OC was overestimated by the loss-on-ignition methods. Regression equations obtained between total OC contents of the reference method and those of the other methods showed relatively good adjustment, but all intercepts were different from zero (p < 0.01), which suggests that more accuracy can be obtained using not one single correction factor, but considering also the intercept. The Walkley-Black method underestimated the OC contents of the humic fractions, which was associated with the partial oxidation of the humin fraction. Better results were obtained when external heating was used. For the organic matter fractions, the OC in the humic and fulvic acid fractions can be determined without external heating if the reference method is not available, but the humin fraction requires the external heating.Universidade Federal de Viçosa2015-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-737X2015000500496Revista Ceres v.62 n.5 2015reponame:Revista Ceresinstname:Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)instacron:UFV10.1590/0034-737X201562050011info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFernandes,Raphael Bragança AlvesCarvalho Junior,Ildeu Afonso deRibeiro Junior,Emerson SilvaMendonça,Eduardo de Sáeng2015-09-28T00:00:00ZRevista
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparison of different methods for the determination of total organic carbon and humic substances in Brazilian soils
title Comparison of different methods for the determination of total organic carbon and humic substances in Brazilian soils
spellingShingle Comparison of different methods for the determination of total organic carbon and humic substances in Brazilian soils
Fernandes,Raphael Bragança Alves
Walkley-Black method
dichromate-oxidation
loss on ignition
title_short Comparison of different methods for the determination of total organic carbon and humic substances in Brazilian soils
title_full Comparison of different methods for the determination of total organic carbon and humic substances in Brazilian soils
title_fullStr Comparison of different methods for the determination of total organic carbon and humic substances in Brazilian soils
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of different methods for the determination of total organic carbon and humic substances in Brazilian soils
title_sort Comparison of different methods for the determination of total organic carbon and humic substances in Brazilian soils
author Fernandes,Raphael Bragança Alves
author_facet Fernandes,Raphael Bragança Alves
Carvalho Junior,Ildeu Afonso de
Ribeiro Junior,Emerson Silva
Mendonça,Eduardo de Sá
author_role author
author2 Carvalho Junior,Ildeu Afonso de
Ribeiro Junior,Emerson Silva
Mendonça,Eduardo de Sá
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Fernandes,Raphael Bragança Alves
Carvalho Junior,Ildeu Afonso de
Ribeiro Junior,Emerson Silva
Mendonça,Eduardo de Sá
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Walkley-Black method
dichromate-oxidation
loss on ignition
topic Walkley-Black method
dichromate-oxidation
loss on ignition
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv ABSTRACTAiming to compare three different methods for the determination of organic carbon (OC) in the soil and fractions of humic substances, seventeen Brazilian soil samples of different classes and textures were evaluated. Amounts of OC in the soil samples and the humic fractions were measured by the dichromate-oxidation method, with and without external heating in a digestion block at 130 °C for 30 min; by the loss-on-ignition method at 450 °C during 5 h and at 600 °C during 6 h; and by the dry combustion method. Dry combustion was used as reference in order to measure the efficiency of the other methods. Soil OC measured by the dichromate-oxidation method with external heating had the highest efficiency and the best results comparing to the reference method. When external heating was not used, the mean recovery efficiency dropped to 71%. The amount of OC was overestimated by the loss-on-ignition methods. Regression equations obtained between total OC contents of the reference method and those of the other methods showed relatively good adjustment, but all intercepts were different from zero (p < 0.01), which suggests that more accuracy can be obtained using not one single correction factor, but considering also the intercept. The Walkley-Black method underestimated the OC contents of the humic fractions, which was associated with the partial oxidation of the humin fraction. Better results were obtained when external heating was used. For the organic matter fractions, the OC in the humic and fulvic acid fractions can be determined without external heating if the reference method is not available, but the humin fraction requires the external heating.
description ABSTRACTAiming to compare three different methods for the determination of organic carbon (OC) in the soil and fractions of humic substances, seventeen Brazilian soil samples of different classes and textures were evaluated. Amounts of OC in the soil samples and the humic fractions were measured by the dichromate-oxidation method, with and without external heating in a digestion block at 130 °C for 30 min; by the loss-on-ignition method at 450 °C during 5 h and at 600 °C during 6 h; and by the dry combustion method. Dry combustion was used as reference in order to measure the efficiency of the other methods. Soil OC measured by the dichromate-oxidation method with external heating had the highest efficiency and the best results comparing to the reference method. When external heating was not used, the mean recovery efficiency dropped to 71%. The amount of OC was overestimated by the loss-on-ignition methods. Regression equations obtained between total OC contents of the reference method and those of the other methods showed relatively good adjustment, but all intercepts were different from zero (p < 0.01), which suggests that more accuracy can be obtained using not one single correction factor, but considering also the intercept. The Walkley-Black method underestimated the OC contents of the humic fractions, which was associated with the partial oxidation of the humin fraction. Better results were obtained when external heating was used. For the organic matter fractions, the OC in the humic and fulvic acid fractions can be determined without external heating if the reference method is not available, but the humin fraction requires the external heating.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-10-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-737X2015000500496
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-737X2015000500496
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/0034-737X201562050011
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Viçosa
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Viçosa
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Ceres v.62 n.5 2015
reponame:Revista Ceres
instname:Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)
instacron:UFV
instname_str Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)
instacron_str UFV
institution UFV
reponame_str Revista Ceres
collection Revista Ceres
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1728006781975658496