Bats from Fazenda Intervales, Southeastern Brazil: species account and comparison between different sampling methods

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Portfors, Christine V.
Data de Publicação: 2000
Outros Autores: Fenton, M. Brock, Aguiar, Ludmilla Moura de Souza, Baumgarten, Julio E., Vonhof, Maarten J., Bouchard, Sylvie, Faria, Deborah M. de, Pedro, Wagner A., Rauntenbach, Naas I. L., Zortea, Marlon
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UnB
Texto Completo: http://repositorio.unb.br/handle/10482/25613
https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0101-81752000000200022
Resumo: Assessing the composition of an area's bat fauna is typically accomplished by using captures or by monitoring echolocation calls with bat detectors. The two methods may not provide the same data regarding species composition. Mist nets and harp traps may be biased towards sampling low flying species, and bat detectors biased towards detecting high intensity echolocators. A comparison of the bat fauna of Fazenda Intervales, southeastern Brazil, as revealed by mist nets and harp trap captures, checking roosts and by monitoring echolocation calls of flying bats illustrates this point. A total of 17 species of bats was sampled. Fourteen bat species were captured and the echolocation calls of 12 species were recorded, three of them not revealed by mist nets or harp traps. The different sampling methods provided different pictures of the bat fauna. Phyllostomid bats dominated the catches in mist nets, but in the field their echolocation calls were never detected. No single sampling approach provided a complete assessment of the bat fauna in the study area. In general, bats producing low intensity echolocation calls, such as phyllostomids, are more easily assessed by netting, and bats producing high intensity echolocation calls are better surveyed by bat detectors. The results demonstrate that a combined and varied approach to sampling is required for a complete assessment of the bat fauna of an area.
id UNB_b95ea3759b4c33327152b9593fa8843d
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio2.unb.br:10482/25613
network_acronym_str UNB
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UnB
repository_id_str
spelling Portfors, Christine V.Fenton, M. BrockAguiar, Ludmilla Moura de SouzaBaumgarten, Julio E.Vonhof, Maarten J.Bouchard, SylvieFaria, Deborah M. dePedro, Wagner A.Rauntenbach, Naas I. L.Zortea, Marlon2017-12-07T04:32:54Z2017-12-07T04:32:54Z2000Rev. Bras. Zool.,v.17,n.2,p.533-538,2000http://repositorio.unb.br/handle/10482/25613https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0101-81752000000200022Assessing the composition of an area's bat fauna is typically accomplished by using captures or by monitoring echolocation calls with bat detectors. The two methods may not provide the same data regarding species composition. Mist nets and harp traps may be biased towards sampling low flying species, and bat detectors biased towards detecting high intensity echolocators. A comparison of the bat fauna of Fazenda Intervales, southeastern Brazil, as revealed by mist nets and harp trap captures, checking roosts and by monitoring echolocation calls of flying bats illustrates this point. A total of 17 species of bats was sampled. Fourteen bat species were captured and the echolocation calls of 12 species were recorded, three of them not revealed by mist nets or harp traps. The different sampling methods provided different pictures of the bat fauna. Phyllostomid bats dominated the catches in mist nets, but in the field their echolocation calls were never detected. No single sampling approach provided a complete assessment of the bat fauna in the study area. In general, bats producing low intensity echolocation calls, such as phyllostomids, are more easily assessed by netting, and bats producing high intensity echolocation calls are better surveyed by bat detectors. The results demonstrate that a combined and varied approach to sampling is required for a complete assessment of the bat fauna of an area.Em processamentoSociedade Brasileira de ZoologiaBats from Fazenda Intervales, Southeastern Brazil: species account and comparison between different sampling methodsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleAtlantic rain forestbatsbat detectorchiropteradiversityecholocationsampling methodssoutheastern Brazilinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessengreponame:Repositório Institucional da UnBinstname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB)instacron:UNBORIGINALv17n2a22.pdfapplication/pdf1809786http://repositorio2.unb.br/jspui/bitstream/10482/25613/1/v17n2a22.pdf1c05a070c0a7d1d06724f3739645baf7MD51open access10482/256132023-09-28 17:47:52.153open accessoai:repositorio2.unb.br:10482/25613Biblioteca Digital de Teses e DissertaçõesPUBhttps://repositorio.unb.br/oai/requestopendoar:2023-09-28T20:47:52Repositório Institucional da UnB - Universidade de Brasília (UnB)false
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Bats from Fazenda Intervales, Southeastern Brazil: species account and comparison between different sampling methods
title Bats from Fazenda Intervales, Southeastern Brazil: species account and comparison between different sampling methods
spellingShingle Bats from Fazenda Intervales, Southeastern Brazil: species account and comparison between different sampling methods
Portfors, Christine V.
Atlantic rain forest
bats
bat detector
chiroptera
diversity
echolocation
sampling methods
southeastern Brazil
title_short Bats from Fazenda Intervales, Southeastern Brazil: species account and comparison between different sampling methods
title_full Bats from Fazenda Intervales, Southeastern Brazil: species account and comparison between different sampling methods
title_fullStr Bats from Fazenda Intervales, Southeastern Brazil: species account and comparison between different sampling methods
title_full_unstemmed Bats from Fazenda Intervales, Southeastern Brazil: species account and comparison between different sampling methods
title_sort Bats from Fazenda Intervales, Southeastern Brazil: species account and comparison between different sampling methods
author Portfors, Christine V.
author_facet Portfors, Christine V.
Fenton, M. Brock
Aguiar, Ludmilla Moura de Souza
Baumgarten, Julio E.
Vonhof, Maarten J.
Bouchard, Sylvie
Faria, Deborah M. de
Pedro, Wagner A.
Rauntenbach, Naas I. L.
Zortea, Marlon
author_role author
author2 Fenton, M. Brock
Aguiar, Ludmilla Moura de Souza
Baumgarten, Julio E.
Vonhof, Maarten J.
Bouchard, Sylvie
Faria, Deborah M. de
Pedro, Wagner A.
Rauntenbach, Naas I. L.
Zortea, Marlon
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Portfors, Christine V.
Fenton, M. Brock
Aguiar, Ludmilla Moura de Souza
Baumgarten, Julio E.
Vonhof, Maarten J.
Bouchard, Sylvie
Faria, Deborah M. de
Pedro, Wagner A.
Rauntenbach, Naas I. L.
Zortea, Marlon
dc.subject.keyword.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Atlantic rain forest
bats
bat detector
chiroptera
diversity
echolocation
sampling methods
southeastern Brazil
topic Atlantic rain forest
bats
bat detector
chiroptera
diversity
echolocation
sampling methods
southeastern Brazil
description Assessing the composition of an area's bat fauna is typically accomplished by using captures or by monitoring echolocation calls with bat detectors. The two methods may not provide the same data regarding species composition. Mist nets and harp traps may be biased towards sampling low flying species, and bat detectors biased towards detecting high intensity echolocators. A comparison of the bat fauna of Fazenda Intervales, southeastern Brazil, as revealed by mist nets and harp trap captures, checking roosts and by monitoring echolocation calls of flying bats illustrates this point. A total of 17 species of bats was sampled. Fourteen bat species were captured and the echolocation calls of 12 species were recorded, three of them not revealed by mist nets or harp traps. The different sampling methods provided different pictures of the bat fauna. Phyllostomid bats dominated the catches in mist nets, but in the field their echolocation calls were never detected. No single sampling approach provided a complete assessment of the bat fauna in the study area. In general, bats producing low intensity echolocation calls, such as phyllostomids, are more easily assessed by netting, and bats producing high intensity echolocation calls are better surveyed by bat detectors. The results demonstrate that a combined and varied approach to sampling is required for a complete assessment of the bat fauna of an area.
publishDate 2000
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2000
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2017-12-07T04:32:54Z
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2017-12-07T04:32:54Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv Rev. Bras. Zool.,v.17,n.2,p.533-538,2000
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://repositorio.unb.br/handle/10482/25613
dc.identifier.doi.pt_BR.fl_str_mv https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0101-81752000000200022
identifier_str_mv Rev. Bras. Zool.,v.17,n.2,p.533-538,2000
url http://repositorio.unb.br/handle/10482/25613
https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0101-81752000000200022
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Zoologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Zoologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UnB
instname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB)
instacron:UNB
instname_str Universidade de Brasília (UnB)
instacron_str UNB
institution UNB
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UnB
collection Repositório Institucional da UnB
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://repositorio2.unb.br/jspui/bitstream/10482/25613/1/v17n2a22.pdf
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 1c05a070c0a7d1d06724f3739645baf7
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UnB - Universidade de Brasília (UnB)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1797405464032444416