Bats from Fazenda Intervales, Southeastern Brazil: species account and comparison between different sampling methods

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Portfors, Christine V.
Data de Publicação: 2000
Outros Autores: Fenton, M. Brock, Aguiar, Ludmilla M. de S., Baumgarten, Julio E., Vonhof, Maarten J., Bouchard, Sylvie, Faria, Deborah M. de, Pedro, Wagner André [UNESP], Rauntenbach, Naas I. L., Zortea, Marlon
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0101-81752000000200022
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/28336
Resumo: Assessing the composition of an area's bat fauna is typically accomplished by using captures or by monitoring echolocation calls with bat detectors. The two methods may not provide the same data regarding species composition. Mist nets and harp traps may be biased towards sampling low flying species, and bat detectors biased towards detecting high intensity echolocators. A comparison of the bat fauna of Fazenda Intervales, southeastern Brazil, as revealed by mist nets and harp trap captures, checking roosts and by monitoring echolocation calls of flying bats illustrates this point. A total of 17 species of bats was sampled. Fourteen bat species were captured and the echolocation calls of 12 species were recorded, three of them not revealed by mist nets or harp traps. The different sampling methods provided different pictures of the bat fauna. Phyllostomid bats dominated the catches in mist nets, but in the field their echolocation calls were never detected. No single sampling approach provided a complete assessment of the bat fauna in the study area. In general, bats producing low intensity echolocation calls, such as phyllostomids, are more easily assessed by netting, and bats producing high intensity echolocation calls are better surveyed by bat detectors. The results demonstrate that a combined and varied approach to sampling is required for a complete assessment of the bat fauna of an area.
id UNSP_518deeceaaee30027d61e8abd3b54dd8
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/28336
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Bats from Fazenda Intervales, Southeastern Brazil: species account and comparison between different sampling methodsAtlantic rain forestbatsbat detectorchiropteradiversityecholocationsampling methodssoutheastern BrazilAssessing the composition of an area's bat fauna is typically accomplished by using captures or by monitoring echolocation calls with bat detectors. The two methods may not provide the same data regarding species composition. Mist nets and harp traps may be biased towards sampling low flying species, and bat detectors biased towards detecting high intensity echolocators. A comparison of the bat fauna of Fazenda Intervales, southeastern Brazil, as revealed by mist nets and harp trap captures, checking roosts and by monitoring echolocation calls of flying bats illustrates this point. A total of 17 species of bats was sampled. Fourteen bat species were captured and the echolocation calls of 12 species were recorded, three of them not revealed by mist nets or harp traps. The different sampling methods provided different pictures of the bat fauna. Phyllostomid bats dominated the catches in mist nets, but in the field their echolocation calls were never detected. No single sampling approach provided a complete assessment of the bat fauna in the study area. In general, bats producing low intensity echolocation calls, such as phyllostomids, are more easily assessed by netting, and bats producing high intensity echolocation calls are better surveyed by bat detectors. The results demonstrate that a combined and varied approach to sampling is required for a complete assessment of the bat fauna of an area.Northeastern Ohio Universities College of Medicine Department of NeurobiologyYork University Department of BiologyUniversidade de Brasília (UnB) Departamento de EcologiaUniversidade Estadual de Campinas Departamento de ZoologiaUniversidade Estadual Paulista Departamento de Apoio, Produção e Saúde AnimalTransvaal MuseumUniversidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCar) Programa de Pós-graduação em Ecologia e Recursos NaturaisUniversidade Estadual Paulista Departamento de Apoio, Produção e Saúde AnimalSociedade Brasileira de ZoologiaNortheastern Ohio Universities College of Medicine Department of NeurobiologyYork University Department of BiologyUniversidade de Brasília (UnB)Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Transvaal MuseumUniversidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCar)Portfors, Christine V.Fenton, M. BrockAguiar, Ludmilla M. de S.Baumgarten, Julio E.Vonhof, Maarten J.Bouchard, SylvieFaria, Deborah M. dePedro, Wagner André [UNESP]Rauntenbach, Naas I. L.Zortea, Marlon2014-05-20T15:12:19Z2014-05-20T15:12:19Z2000-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article533-538application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0101-81752000000200022Revista Brasileira de Zoologia. Sociedade Brasileira de Zoologia, v. 17, n. 2, p. 533-538, 2000.0101-8175http://hdl.handle.net/11449/2833610.1590/S0101-81752000000200022S0101-81752000000200022S0101-81752000000200022.pdf2685769620605055SciELOreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengRevista Brasileira de Zoologiainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-12-10T06:16:02Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/28336Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462023-12-10T06:16:02Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Bats from Fazenda Intervales, Southeastern Brazil: species account and comparison between different sampling methods
title Bats from Fazenda Intervales, Southeastern Brazil: species account and comparison between different sampling methods
spellingShingle Bats from Fazenda Intervales, Southeastern Brazil: species account and comparison between different sampling methods
Portfors, Christine V.
Atlantic rain forest
bats
bat detector
chiroptera
diversity
echolocation
sampling methods
southeastern Brazil
title_short Bats from Fazenda Intervales, Southeastern Brazil: species account and comparison between different sampling methods
title_full Bats from Fazenda Intervales, Southeastern Brazil: species account and comparison between different sampling methods
title_fullStr Bats from Fazenda Intervales, Southeastern Brazil: species account and comparison between different sampling methods
title_full_unstemmed Bats from Fazenda Intervales, Southeastern Brazil: species account and comparison between different sampling methods
title_sort Bats from Fazenda Intervales, Southeastern Brazil: species account and comparison between different sampling methods
author Portfors, Christine V.
author_facet Portfors, Christine V.
Fenton, M. Brock
Aguiar, Ludmilla M. de S.
Baumgarten, Julio E.
Vonhof, Maarten J.
Bouchard, Sylvie
Faria, Deborah M. de
Pedro, Wagner André [UNESP]
Rauntenbach, Naas I. L.
Zortea, Marlon
author_role author
author2 Fenton, M. Brock
Aguiar, Ludmilla M. de S.
Baumgarten, Julio E.
Vonhof, Maarten J.
Bouchard, Sylvie
Faria, Deborah M. de
Pedro, Wagner André [UNESP]
Rauntenbach, Naas I. L.
Zortea, Marlon
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Northeastern Ohio Universities College of Medicine Department of Neurobiology
York University Department of Biology
Universidade de Brasília (UnB)
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
Transvaal Museum
Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCar)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Portfors, Christine V.
Fenton, M. Brock
Aguiar, Ludmilla M. de S.
Baumgarten, Julio E.
Vonhof, Maarten J.
Bouchard, Sylvie
Faria, Deborah M. de
Pedro, Wagner André [UNESP]
Rauntenbach, Naas I. L.
Zortea, Marlon
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Atlantic rain forest
bats
bat detector
chiroptera
diversity
echolocation
sampling methods
southeastern Brazil
topic Atlantic rain forest
bats
bat detector
chiroptera
diversity
echolocation
sampling methods
southeastern Brazil
description Assessing the composition of an area's bat fauna is typically accomplished by using captures or by monitoring echolocation calls with bat detectors. The two methods may not provide the same data regarding species composition. Mist nets and harp traps may be biased towards sampling low flying species, and bat detectors biased towards detecting high intensity echolocators. A comparison of the bat fauna of Fazenda Intervales, southeastern Brazil, as revealed by mist nets and harp trap captures, checking roosts and by monitoring echolocation calls of flying bats illustrates this point. A total of 17 species of bats was sampled. Fourteen bat species were captured and the echolocation calls of 12 species were recorded, three of them not revealed by mist nets or harp traps. The different sampling methods provided different pictures of the bat fauna. Phyllostomid bats dominated the catches in mist nets, but in the field their echolocation calls were never detected. No single sampling approach provided a complete assessment of the bat fauna in the study area. In general, bats producing low intensity echolocation calls, such as phyllostomids, are more easily assessed by netting, and bats producing high intensity echolocation calls are better surveyed by bat detectors. The results demonstrate that a combined and varied approach to sampling is required for a complete assessment of the bat fauna of an area.
publishDate 2000
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2000-06-01
2014-05-20T15:12:19Z
2014-05-20T15:12:19Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0101-81752000000200022
Revista Brasileira de Zoologia. Sociedade Brasileira de Zoologia, v. 17, n. 2, p. 533-538, 2000.
0101-8175
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/28336
10.1590/S0101-81752000000200022
S0101-81752000000200022
S0101-81752000000200022.pdf
2685769620605055
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0101-81752000000200022
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/28336
identifier_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Zoologia. Sociedade Brasileira de Zoologia, v. 17, n. 2, p. 533-538, 2000.
0101-8175
10.1590/S0101-81752000000200022
S0101-81752000000200022
S0101-81752000000200022.pdf
2685769620605055
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Zoologia
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 533-538
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Zoologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Zoologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv SciELO
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1792962040102387712