Factors that affect the response of rural beef cattle property to technical assistance
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/29202 |
Resumo: | The aim is to evaluate the factors that affect the response to technical assistance in beef cattle farms. Data were collected from 19 rural properties with the main economic activity focused on beef cattle, assisted by the technical and managerial program (ATER). The information was got from technical visits and structured interviews for 24 months. To assess the impact of the application of technological innovations on assisted properties, we analyzed the participation of the owner in technological training and implementation of other technology besides pasture reform; productivity, profitability, and production increment were determined in the period before and after the ATER. The producers technological training could not increase (P>0.05) productivity. The best responses (P<0.05) of productive increase (6% in productivity/ha) by technical assistance combined with pasture reform, and some other technological innovations, such as livestock-crop integration, and introducing a new species of forages, and fixed-time artificial insemination. These responses occurred in properties with low productivity (linear effect and ranking correlation of -0.62) and with the occupation of around 60% of the area (quadratic effect and ranking correlation of -0.50), independent (P>0.05) of the owners qualification and the percentage of degraded area. We can conclude that pasture reform should not be used as the only technological innovation at the beginning of the technical assistance process in beef cattle. An economic occupancy rate of the property close to 60% of the total area allows for a greater response to technological advances. |
id |
UNIFEI_6b3253804ea9e762def7aedbd73a6d4a |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/29202 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Factors that affect the response of rural beef cattle property to technical assistanceFactores que inciden en la respuesta de la propiedad rural ganadera de carne a la asistencia técnicaFatores que afetam a resposta da propriedade rural de bovinocultura de corte à assistência técnica CerradoEconomic answerPasture reformRural extensionTechnologic innovation.CerradoExtensão ruralInovação tecnológicaReforma das pastagensResposta econômica.CerradoExtensión ruralInnovación tecnológicaReforma de pastosRespuesta económica.The aim is to evaluate the factors that affect the response to technical assistance in beef cattle farms. Data were collected from 19 rural properties with the main economic activity focused on beef cattle, assisted by the technical and managerial program (ATER). The information was got from technical visits and structured interviews for 24 months. To assess the impact of the application of technological innovations on assisted properties, we analyzed the participation of the owner in technological training and implementation of other technology besides pasture reform; productivity, profitability, and production increment were determined in the period before and after the ATER. The producers technological training could not increase (P>0.05) productivity. The best responses (P<0.05) of productive increase (6% in productivity/ha) by technical assistance combined with pasture reform, and some other technological innovations, such as livestock-crop integration, and introducing a new species of forages, and fixed-time artificial insemination. These responses occurred in properties with low productivity (linear effect and ranking correlation of -0.62) and with the occupation of around 60% of the area (quadratic effect and ranking correlation of -0.50), independent (P>0.05) of the owners qualification and the percentage of degraded area. We can conclude that pasture reform should not be used as the only technological innovation at the beginning of the technical assistance process in beef cattle. An economic occupancy rate of the property close to 60% of the total area allows for a greater response to technological advances.El objetivo es evaluar los factores que inciden en la respuesta a la asistencia técnica en fincas de ganado vacuno de carne. Los datos fueron obtenido de 19 propiedades rurales con actividad económica principal enfocada en la ganadería de carne, asistidos por el programa de asistencia técnica (ATER). La información se obtuvo de visitas técnicas y entrevistas estructuradas durante 24 meses. Para evaluar el impacto de la aplicación de innovaciones tecnológicas en las propiedades asistidas, se analizó la participación del propietario en la capacitación tecnológica y la implementación de otras tecnologías además de la reforma de pastos. Se determinó la productividad, la rentabilidad y el incremento de la producción, en el período anterior y posterior al ATER. La capacitación tecnológica de los productores no logró incrementar (P>0.05) la productividad. Las mejores respuestas para aumentar la producción (6% en productividad/ha) por asistencia técnica se obtuvieron cuando se combinó con la reforma de pastos, alguna otra innovación tecnológica, como la integración ganadería-cultivo, la introducción de nuevas especies forrajeras y la inseminación artificial a tiempo fijo. Estas respuestas ocurrieron en propiedades con baja productividad (efecto lineal y correlación de ranking de -0.62) y con ocupación en torno al 60% del área (efecto cuadrático y correlación de ranking de -0.50), independientes (P>0.05) de la calificación del propietario y el porcentaje de área degradada. Se puede concluir que la reforma de pastos no debe ser utilizada como la única innovación tecnológica al inicio del proceso de asistencia técnica en ganado vacuno de carne. Además, una tasa de ocupación económica del predio cercana al 60% del área total permite una mayor respuesta a los avances tecnológicos.Objetiva-se avaliar os fatores que afetam a resposta à assistência técnica em propriedades de bovinocultura de corte. Foram coletados dados de 19 propriedades rurais com atividade econômica principal voltada para bovinocultura de corte, assistidos pelo programa de assistência técnica (ATER). As informações foram obtidas a partir de visitas técnicas e entrevistas estruturadas durante 24 meses. Para avaliar o impacto da aplicação das inovações tecnológicas nas propriedades assistidas foi analisado a participação do proprietário na capacitação tecnológica e a implantação de outra tecnologia além da reforma de pastagem; foram determinadas a produtividade, rentabilidade e o incremento produtivo, no período anterior e após a ATER. A capacitação tecnológica dos produtores não foi capaz de incrementar (P>0,05) a produtividade. As melhores respostas de incremento produtivo (6% na produtividade/ha) pela assistência técnica foram obtidas quando se combinou com a reforma das pastagens, alguma outra inovação tecnológica, como integração pecuária-lavoura, introdução de novas espécies forrageiras e inseminação artificial por tempo fixo. Essas respostas ocorreram em propriedades com baixa produtividade (efeito linear e correlação de ranking de -0,62) e com ocupação em torno de 60% da área (efeito quadrático e correlação de ranking de -0,50), independente (P>0,05) da capacitação do proprietário e da porcentagem de área degradada. Pode-se concluir que a reforma de pastagens não deve ser utilizada como única inovação tecnológica no início do processo de assistência técnica em bovinocultura de corte. Além disso, uma taxa de ocupação econômica da propriedade próxima a 60% da área total permite maior resposta ao incremento tecnológico.Research, Society and Development2022-04-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/2920210.33448/rsd-v11i6.29202Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 6; e32511629202Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 6; e32511629202Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 6; e325116292022525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIenghttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/29202/25260Copyright (c) 2022 Rudel Sanches Silva Junior; Luísa Melville Paiva; Estella Rosseto Janusckiewicz; Camilla Mendonça Silva; Henrique Jorge Fernandes https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSilva Junior, Rudel Sanches Paiva, Luísa Melville Janusckiewicz, Estella RossetoSilva, Camilla Mendonça Fernandes , Henrique Jorge 2022-05-13T18:04:10Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/29202Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:46:20.777491Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Factors that affect the response of rural beef cattle property to technical assistance Factores que inciden en la respuesta de la propiedad rural ganadera de carne a la asistencia técnica Fatores que afetam a resposta da propriedade rural de bovinocultura de corte à assistência técnica |
title |
Factors that affect the response of rural beef cattle property to technical assistance |
spellingShingle |
Factors that affect the response of rural beef cattle property to technical assistance Silva Junior, Rudel Sanches Cerrado Economic answer Pasture reform Rural extension Technologic innovation. Cerrado Extensão rural Inovação tecnológica Reforma das pastagens Resposta econômica. Cerrado Extensión rural Innovación tecnológica Reforma de pastos Respuesta económica. |
title_short |
Factors that affect the response of rural beef cattle property to technical assistance |
title_full |
Factors that affect the response of rural beef cattle property to technical assistance |
title_fullStr |
Factors that affect the response of rural beef cattle property to technical assistance |
title_full_unstemmed |
Factors that affect the response of rural beef cattle property to technical assistance |
title_sort |
Factors that affect the response of rural beef cattle property to technical assistance |
author |
Silva Junior, Rudel Sanches |
author_facet |
Silva Junior, Rudel Sanches Paiva, Luísa Melville Janusckiewicz, Estella Rosseto Silva, Camilla Mendonça Fernandes , Henrique Jorge |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Paiva, Luísa Melville Janusckiewicz, Estella Rosseto Silva, Camilla Mendonça Fernandes , Henrique Jorge |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Silva Junior, Rudel Sanches Paiva, Luísa Melville Janusckiewicz, Estella Rosseto Silva, Camilla Mendonça Fernandes , Henrique Jorge |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Cerrado Economic answer Pasture reform Rural extension Technologic innovation. Cerrado Extensão rural Inovação tecnológica Reforma das pastagens Resposta econômica. Cerrado Extensión rural Innovación tecnológica Reforma de pastos Respuesta económica. |
topic |
Cerrado Economic answer Pasture reform Rural extension Technologic innovation. Cerrado Extensão rural Inovação tecnológica Reforma das pastagens Resposta econômica. Cerrado Extensión rural Innovación tecnológica Reforma de pastos Respuesta económica. |
description |
The aim is to evaluate the factors that affect the response to technical assistance in beef cattle farms. Data were collected from 19 rural properties with the main economic activity focused on beef cattle, assisted by the technical and managerial program (ATER). The information was got from technical visits and structured interviews for 24 months. To assess the impact of the application of technological innovations on assisted properties, we analyzed the participation of the owner in technological training and implementation of other technology besides pasture reform; productivity, profitability, and production increment were determined in the period before and after the ATER. The producers technological training could not increase (P>0.05) productivity. The best responses (P<0.05) of productive increase (6% in productivity/ha) by technical assistance combined with pasture reform, and some other technological innovations, such as livestock-crop integration, and introducing a new species of forages, and fixed-time artificial insemination. These responses occurred in properties with low productivity (linear effect and ranking correlation of -0.62) and with the occupation of around 60% of the area (quadratic effect and ranking correlation of -0.50), independent (P>0.05) of the owners qualification and the percentage of degraded area. We can conclude that pasture reform should not be used as the only technological innovation at the beginning of the technical assistance process in beef cattle. An economic occupancy rate of the property close to 60% of the total area allows for a greater response to technological advances. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-04-29 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/29202 10.33448/rsd-v11i6.29202 |
url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/29202 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v11i6.29202 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/29202/25260 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 6; e32511629202 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 6; e32511629202 Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 6; e32511629202 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
institution |
UNIFEI |
reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
collection |
Research, Society and Development |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797052836077371392 |