The Test of Proportionality in the Constitutional Court of Peru and the Supreme Federal Court

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Gavião Filho, Anizio Pires
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Guidolin, Renata Vielmo
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.unijui.edu.br/index.php/direitoshumanosedemocracia/article/view/13607
Resumo: The purpose of this investigation is to examine the application of the proportionality test by the Constitutional Court of Peru and the Supreme Federal Court. The proportionality test is a central tool in the jurisdiction of the democratic constitutional Rule of Law. In a constitution with a catalog of fundamental rights, only justified restrictions based on the proportionality test are allowed. The problem of applying the proportionality test is central, justifying examining how constitutional courts employ this methodological tool. Analysis of decisions by the Constitutional Court of Peru shows application of the standard model, widely disseminated, configured in the subtests of the legitimacy of the end, adequacy, necessity and proportionality in the strict sense. Analysis of decisions of the Supreme Federal Court shows the prevalence of indistinct and not rigorous application of a general and broad idea of ​​proportionality, more like a rhetorical-argumentative topoi, sometimes identified with reasonability or weighting. In some decisions, the application of the proportionality test in the configuration of the standard model can be tracked. In comparison, the decisions of the Constitutional Court of Peru are superior to those of the Supreme Federal Court as to the quality of the reasoning for the application of the proportionality test. Comparative bibliographic research and comparative case analyze. Hypothetical deductive method.  
id UNIJ-1_6116f6bb8ac92fac108f0c79160cf0b3
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revistas.unijui.edu.br:article/13607
network_acronym_str UNIJ-1
network_name_str Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia
repository_id_str
spelling The Test of Proportionality in the Constitutional Court of Peru and the Supreme Federal CourtO Teste da Proporcionalidade no Tribunal Constitucional do Peru e no Supremo Tribunal FederalTeste da proporcionalidadeAplicabilidadeDireito comparadoJurisprudênciaTribunal Constitucional PeruanoProportionalityAplicabilityComparative LawJurisprudencePeruvian Constitutional CourtThe purpose of this investigation is to examine the application of the proportionality test by the Constitutional Court of Peru and the Supreme Federal Court. The proportionality test is a central tool in the jurisdiction of the democratic constitutional Rule of Law. In a constitution with a catalog of fundamental rights, only justified restrictions based on the proportionality test are allowed. The problem of applying the proportionality test is central, justifying examining how constitutional courts employ this methodological tool. Analysis of decisions by the Constitutional Court of Peru shows application of the standard model, widely disseminated, configured in the subtests of the legitimacy of the end, adequacy, necessity and proportionality in the strict sense. Analysis of decisions of the Supreme Federal Court shows the prevalence of indistinct and not rigorous application of a general and broad idea of ​​proportionality, more like a rhetorical-argumentative topoi, sometimes identified with reasonability or weighting. In some decisions, the application of the proportionality test in the configuration of the standard model can be tracked. In comparison, the decisions of the Constitutional Court of Peru are superior to those of the Supreme Federal Court as to the quality of the reasoning for the application of the proportionality test. Comparative bibliographic research and comparative case analyze. Hypothetical deductive method.        A presente investigação tem por finalidade examinar a aplicação do teste da proporcionalidade pelo Tribunal Constitucional do Peru e pelo Supremo Tribunal Federal. A questão a ser respondida é a seguinte: Como o Tribunal Constitucional do Peru e o Supremo Tribunal Federal aplicam o teste da proporcionalidade? O teste da proporcionalidade é uma ferramenta central da jurisdição do Estado de direito constitucional democrático. Em uma constituição com catálogo de direitos fundamentais somente são admitidas restrições justificadas com base no teste da proporcionalidade. O problema da aplicação do teste da proporcionalidade é central, justificando-se examinar como os tribunais constitucionais empregam essa ferramenta metodológica. A análise de decisões do Tribunal Constitucional do Peru mostra a aplicação do modelo standard, amplamente difundido, configurado nos subtestes da legitimidade do fim, da adequação, da necessidade e proporcionalidade em sentido estrito. A análise de decisões do Supremo Tribunal Federal evidencia a prevalência de aplicação indistinta e não rigorosa de uma ideia geral e ampla de proporcionalidade, mais como um topoi retórico-argumentativo, identificada com razoabilidade ou ponderação. Em algumas decisões, pode ser rastreada a aplicação do teste da proporcionalidade na configuração do modelo standard. Comparativamente, as decisões do Tribunal Constitucional do Peru são superiores às do Supremo Tribunal Federal em relação à qualidade da fundamentação da aplicação do teste da proporcionalidade. A pesquisa é bibliográfica, com análise de casos comparativa, e o método é o hipotético-dedutivo.  EDITORA UNIJUI2023-12-21info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.unijui.edu.br/index.php/direitoshumanosedemocracia/article/view/1360710.21527/2317-5389.2023.22.13607Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia; v. 11 n. 22 (2023): REVISTA DIREITOS HUMANOS E DEMOCRACIA; e136072317-5389reponame:Revista Direitos Humanos e Democraciainstname:Universidade Regional do Noroeste do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul (UNIJUI)instacron:UNIJUIporhttps://www.revistas.unijui.edu.br/index.php/direitoshumanosedemocracia/article/view/13607/7627Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Direitos Humanos e Democraciahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGavião Filho, Anizio Pires Guidolin, Renata Vielmo2023-10-10T11:18:32Zoai:ojs.revistas.unijui.edu.br:article/13607Revistahttps://www.revistas.unijui.edu.br/index.php/direitoshumanosedemocracia/oai2317-53892317-5389opendoar:2023-10-10T11:18:32Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia - Universidade Regional do Noroeste do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul (UNIJUI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The Test of Proportionality in the Constitutional Court of Peru and the Supreme Federal Court
O Teste da Proporcionalidade no Tribunal Constitucional do Peru e no Supremo Tribunal Federal
title The Test of Proportionality in the Constitutional Court of Peru and the Supreme Federal Court
spellingShingle The Test of Proportionality in the Constitutional Court of Peru and the Supreme Federal Court
Gavião Filho, Anizio Pires
Teste da proporcionalidade
Aplicabilidade
Direito comparado
Jurisprudência
Tribunal Constitucional Peruano
Proportionality
Aplicability
Comparative Law
Jurisprudence
Peruvian Constitutional Court
title_short The Test of Proportionality in the Constitutional Court of Peru and the Supreme Federal Court
title_full The Test of Proportionality in the Constitutional Court of Peru and the Supreme Federal Court
title_fullStr The Test of Proportionality in the Constitutional Court of Peru and the Supreme Federal Court
title_full_unstemmed The Test of Proportionality in the Constitutional Court of Peru and the Supreme Federal Court
title_sort The Test of Proportionality in the Constitutional Court of Peru and the Supreme Federal Court
author Gavião Filho, Anizio Pires
author_facet Gavião Filho, Anizio Pires
Guidolin, Renata Vielmo
author_role author
author2 Guidolin, Renata Vielmo
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Gavião Filho, Anizio Pires
Guidolin, Renata Vielmo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Teste da proporcionalidade
Aplicabilidade
Direito comparado
Jurisprudência
Tribunal Constitucional Peruano
Proportionality
Aplicability
Comparative Law
Jurisprudence
Peruvian Constitutional Court
topic Teste da proporcionalidade
Aplicabilidade
Direito comparado
Jurisprudência
Tribunal Constitucional Peruano
Proportionality
Aplicability
Comparative Law
Jurisprudence
Peruvian Constitutional Court
description The purpose of this investigation is to examine the application of the proportionality test by the Constitutional Court of Peru and the Supreme Federal Court. The proportionality test is a central tool in the jurisdiction of the democratic constitutional Rule of Law. In a constitution with a catalog of fundamental rights, only justified restrictions based on the proportionality test are allowed. The problem of applying the proportionality test is central, justifying examining how constitutional courts employ this methodological tool. Analysis of decisions by the Constitutional Court of Peru shows application of the standard model, widely disseminated, configured in the subtests of the legitimacy of the end, adequacy, necessity and proportionality in the strict sense. Analysis of decisions of the Supreme Federal Court shows the prevalence of indistinct and not rigorous application of a general and broad idea of ​​proportionality, more like a rhetorical-argumentative topoi, sometimes identified with reasonability or weighting. In some decisions, the application of the proportionality test in the configuration of the standard model can be tracked. In comparison, the decisions of the Constitutional Court of Peru are superior to those of the Supreme Federal Court as to the quality of the reasoning for the application of the proportionality test. Comparative bibliographic research and comparative case analyze. Hypothetical deductive method.  
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-12-21
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.unijui.edu.br/index.php/direitoshumanosedemocracia/article/view/13607
10.21527/2317-5389.2023.22.13607
url https://www.revistas.unijui.edu.br/index.php/direitoshumanosedemocracia/article/view/13607
identifier_str_mv 10.21527/2317-5389.2023.22.13607
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.unijui.edu.br/index.php/direitoshumanosedemocracia/article/view/13607/7627
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv EDITORA UNIJUI
publisher.none.fl_str_mv EDITORA UNIJUI
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia; v. 11 n. 22 (2023): REVISTA DIREITOS HUMANOS E DEMOCRACIA; e13607
2317-5389
reponame:Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia
instname:Universidade Regional do Noroeste do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul (UNIJUI)
instacron:UNIJUI
instname_str Universidade Regional do Noroeste do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul (UNIJUI)
instacron_str UNIJUI
institution UNIJUI
reponame_str Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia
collection Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia - Universidade Regional do Noroeste do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul (UNIJUI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1798315161357910016

Registros relacionados