Comparação da flexibilidade, qualidade de vida e capacidade funcional entre idosos ativos e sedentários dos meios urbano e rural

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Navega, Marcelo Tavella [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2011
Outros Autores: Miguel, Tais Pereira [UNESP], Del-Masso, Maria Candida Soares [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://submission-mtprehabjournal.com/revista/article/view/56/21
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/115033
Resumo: Introduction:The regular practice of physical activity is being used as a therapeutic resource to the elderly population, with the objective of reduction of the losses provoked by the growing old process. The home place (urban or rural) is still little explored in literature about your infl uence in the physical capacity of the elderly people. Objective: The aim of this study was to value and compare the quality of life, motion and functional capacity between physically active and sedentary elderly people, residents in the urban and rural area. Methods: Sixty people with age above 60 years old were valued, 20 physically active residents in the urban area (66,5 ± 4,32 years), 20 sedentary residents in the urban area (68,8± 7,24 years), 10 physically active residents in the rural area (64,4±2,46 years) and 10 sedentary residents in the rural area (68±5,78 years). It was realized the evaluation of the fl exibility (previous fl exon of the trunk), mobility (timed up and go test), a six-minute walk test and answered a quality of life’s questionnaire SF-36. To compare the results obtained by the two groups was used the Kruskal-Wallis test, and the signifi cant presence of the test was performed post hoc Newman-Keuls. The level of signifi cance used in statistical analysis was 5% (p<0,05).Results: It was observed that the physically active elderly people obtaine better performance on the six-minutes walk test. It wasn’t found difference in the mobility among the groups. In relation to the quality of life, the elderly residents in the rural area, were better in the component Vitally. In relation to the fl exibility the elderly residents in the urban area obtained the best results. So, we can conclude that the practice of physical activity realized by the volunteers contributed to a better functional capacity, observed by the biggest distance gone through on the walk test. The rural home place positively infl uenced the vitality control, while the fl exibility was worse presented in these elderly people.
id UNSP_5363382f112864243c0debdff7b26d1e
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/115033
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Comparação da flexibilidade, qualidade de vida e capacidade funcional entre idosos ativos e sedentários dos meios urbano e ruralCompare between physically active and sedentary elderly people, residents in the urban and rural areaidosoenvelhecimentoFlexibilidadeIntroduction:The regular practice of physical activity is being used as a therapeutic resource to the elderly population, with the objective of reduction of the losses provoked by the growing old process. The home place (urban or rural) is still little explored in literature about your infl uence in the physical capacity of the elderly people. Objective: The aim of this study was to value and compare the quality of life, motion and functional capacity between physically active and sedentary elderly people, residents in the urban and rural area. Methods: Sixty people with age above 60 years old were valued, 20 physically active residents in the urban area (66,5 ± 4,32 years), 20 sedentary residents in the urban area (68,8± 7,24 years), 10 physically active residents in the rural area (64,4±2,46 years) and 10 sedentary residents in the rural area (68±5,78 years). It was realized the evaluation of the fl exibility (previous fl exon of the trunk), mobility (timed up and go test), a six-minute walk test and answered a quality of life’s questionnaire SF-36. To compare the results obtained by the two groups was used the Kruskal-Wallis test, and the signifi cant presence of the test was performed post hoc Newman-Keuls. The level of signifi cance used in statistical analysis was 5% (p<0,05).Results: It was observed that the physically active elderly people obtaine better performance on the six-minutes walk test. It wasn’t found difference in the mobility among the groups. In relation to the quality of life, the elderly residents in the rural area, were better in the component Vitally. In relation to the fl exibility the elderly residents in the urban area obtained the best results. So, we can conclude that the practice of physical activity realized by the volunteers contributed to a better functional capacity, observed by the biggest distance gone through on the walk test. The rural home place positively infl uenced the vitality control, while the fl exibility was worse presented in these elderly people.Introdução: A prática regular de atividade física vem sendo utilizada como recurso terapêutico para população idosa, com objetivo de redução das perdas desencadeadas pelo processo de envelhecimento. A área de moradia (urbana ou rural) ainda é pouco explorada na literatura sobre sua infl uência na capacidade física dos idosos. Objetivos: avaliar e comparar a qualidade de vida, mobilidade e capacidade funcional entre idosos ativos fi sicamente e sedentários, moradores da zona urbana e rural. Métodos: Foram avaliados 60 indivíduos com idade acima de 60 anos, sendo 20 ativos fi - sicamente moradores da zona urbana (66,5 ±4,32 anos), 20 sedentários moradores da zona urbana (68,8±7,24 anos), 10 ativos fi sicamente moradores da zona rural (64,4±2,46 anos) e 10 sedentários moradores da zona rural (68,6±5,78 anos). Foram realizadas as avaliações da fl exibilidade, mobilidade, teste de caminhada de seis minutos e respondido o questionário de qualidade de vida SF-36. Para comparar os resultados foi utilizado o teste Kruskal-Wallis e o post hoc Newman-Keuls (p< 0,05). Resultados: foi observado que os idosos ativos fi sicamente obtiveram melhor desempenho no teste de caminhada. Não foi encontrada diferença na mobilidade entre os grupos. Em relação à qualidade de vida, os idosos moradores da zona rural mostraram-se melhores no componente Vitalidade. Em relação à fl exibilidade os idosos moradores da zona urbana obtiveram melhores resultados. Conclusões: a prática de atividade física realizada pelos voluntários contribuiu para uma melhor capacidade funcional. A área de moradia rural infl uenciou positivamente o domínio vitalidade, enquanto a fl exibilidade mostrou-se pior nesses idosos.Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho, Departamento de Fisioterapia e Terapia Ocupacional, Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências - Campus de Marília, Marília, Avenida Hygino Muzzi Filho, 737, Mirante, CEP 17525900, SP, BrasilUniversidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho, Departamento de Fisioterapia e Terapia Ocupacional, Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências - Campus de Marília, Marília, Avenida Hygino Muzzi Filho, 737, Mirante, CEP 17525900, SP, BrasilUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Navega, Marcelo Tavella [UNESP]Miguel, Tais Pereira [UNESP]Del-Masso, Maria Candida Soares [UNESP]2015-02-24T13:57:42Z2015-02-24T13:57:42Z2011info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article712-721application/pdfhttp://submission-mtprehabjournal.com/revista/article/view/56/21Terapia Manual, v. 09, n. 46, p. 712-721, 2011.1677-5937http://hdl.handle.net/11449/115033ISSN16775937-2011-09-46-712-721.pdf1153464448003029Currículo Lattesreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPporTerapia Manualinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-11-12T06:09:56Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/115033Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462023-11-12T06:09:56Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparação da flexibilidade, qualidade de vida e capacidade funcional entre idosos ativos e sedentários dos meios urbano e rural
Compare between physically active and sedentary elderly people, residents in the urban and rural area
title Comparação da flexibilidade, qualidade de vida e capacidade funcional entre idosos ativos e sedentários dos meios urbano e rural
spellingShingle Comparação da flexibilidade, qualidade de vida e capacidade funcional entre idosos ativos e sedentários dos meios urbano e rural
Navega, Marcelo Tavella [UNESP]
idoso
envelhecimento
Flexibilidade
title_short Comparação da flexibilidade, qualidade de vida e capacidade funcional entre idosos ativos e sedentários dos meios urbano e rural
title_full Comparação da flexibilidade, qualidade de vida e capacidade funcional entre idosos ativos e sedentários dos meios urbano e rural
title_fullStr Comparação da flexibilidade, qualidade de vida e capacidade funcional entre idosos ativos e sedentários dos meios urbano e rural
title_full_unstemmed Comparação da flexibilidade, qualidade de vida e capacidade funcional entre idosos ativos e sedentários dos meios urbano e rural
title_sort Comparação da flexibilidade, qualidade de vida e capacidade funcional entre idosos ativos e sedentários dos meios urbano e rural
author Navega, Marcelo Tavella [UNESP]
author_facet Navega, Marcelo Tavella [UNESP]
Miguel, Tais Pereira [UNESP]
Del-Masso, Maria Candida Soares [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Miguel, Tais Pereira [UNESP]
Del-Masso, Maria Candida Soares [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Navega, Marcelo Tavella [UNESP]
Miguel, Tais Pereira [UNESP]
Del-Masso, Maria Candida Soares [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv idoso
envelhecimento
Flexibilidade
topic idoso
envelhecimento
Flexibilidade
description Introduction:The regular practice of physical activity is being used as a therapeutic resource to the elderly population, with the objective of reduction of the losses provoked by the growing old process. The home place (urban or rural) is still little explored in literature about your infl uence in the physical capacity of the elderly people. Objective: The aim of this study was to value and compare the quality of life, motion and functional capacity between physically active and sedentary elderly people, residents in the urban and rural area. Methods: Sixty people with age above 60 years old were valued, 20 physically active residents in the urban area (66,5 ± 4,32 years), 20 sedentary residents in the urban area (68,8± 7,24 years), 10 physically active residents in the rural area (64,4±2,46 years) and 10 sedentary residents in the rural area (68±5,78 years). It was realized the evaluation of the fl exibility (previous fl exon of the trunk), mobility (timed up and go test), a six-minute walk test and answered a quality of life’s questionnaire SF-36. To compare the results obtained by the two groups was used the Kruskal-Wallis test, and the signifi cant presence of the test was performed post hoc Newman-Keuls. The level of signifi cance used in statistical analysis was 5% (p<0,05).Results: It was observed that the physically active elderly people obtaine better performance on the six-minutes walk test. It wasn’t found difference in the mobility among the groups. In relation to the quality of life, the elderly residents in the rural area, were better in the component Vitally. In relation to the fl exibility the elderly residents in the urban area obtained the best results. So, we can conclude that the practice of physical activity realized by the volunteers contributed to a better functional capacity, observed by the biggest distance gone through on the walk test. The rural home place positively infl uenced the vitality control, while the fl exibility was worse presented in these elderly people.
publishDate 2011
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2011
2015-02-24T13:57:42Z
2015-02-24T13:57:42Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://submission-mtprehabjournal.com/revista/article/view/56/21
Terapia Manual, v. 09, n. 46, p. 712-721, 2011.
1677-5937
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/115033
ISSN16775937-2011-09-46-712-721.pdf
1153464448003029
url http://submission-mtprehabjournal.com/revista/article/view/56/21
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/115033
identifier_str_mv Terapia Manual, v. 09, n. 46, p. 712-721, 2011.
1677-5937
ISSN16775937-2011-09-46-712-721.pdf
1153464448003029
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Terapia Manual
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 712-721
application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Currículo Lattes
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799964905539895296