Avaliação da contagem plaquetária pelo contador automático QBC Vet Autoread comparado com estimativa em esfregaço sanguíneo e contagem em hemocitômetro
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2010 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2010v31n4p1001 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/117579 |
Resumo: | The platelet blood count in laboratorial routine provides to the clinician important information about the hemostasis of the patient. There are many techniques described, however the gold standard techniques realized in hemocytometer spent a lot of time, making this technique impracticable in great routines. This research had the intent to evaluate if the automatic veterinary blood counter QBC Vet Autoread (R), whose results get five minutes to be ready, is capable to offer a trustworthy platelet count number. To this end, were evaluated the correlations among three different forms of platelets count in dogs: count in automatic blood counter QBC Vet Autoread (R), estimative in blood smear and the gold standard method by manual count in hemocytometer. The viability and confidence use of automatic blood counters of the medicine veterinary routine. Seventeen dogs were chosen randomly way, in the medical and surgical routine of HOVET-USP. The analysis revel high correlation between the hemocytometer and the estimative in blood smear (r=0,875) and between the hemocytometer and automatic blood count by QBC Vet Autoread (R) (r=0,939). Conclude that the platelet blood cont by QBC Vet Autoread (R), in addition to be fast, it's more truthful when compared with estimative in blood smear, although the latter one also had elevated correlation. However, morphological analysis through the smears cannot be dismissed because none of the other two techniques evaluated have the ability to assess platelet morphological changes. |
id |
UNSP_a22e40a6fa01e890cdac8d240ab2a64c |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/117579 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Avaliação da contagem plaquetária pelo contador automático QBC Vet Autoread comparado com estimativa em esfregaço sanguíneo e contagem em hemocitômetroEvaluation of platelet count by automatic blood counter QBC Vet Autoread (R) compared with blood smear estimative and count by hemocytometerCount of plateletscaninehemocytometerblood smear estimativeQBC Vet Autoread (R)The platelet blood count in laboratorial routine provides to the clinician important information about the hemostasis of the patient. There are many techniques described, however the gold standard techniques realized in hemocytometer spent a lot of time, making this technique impracticable in great routines. This research had the intent to evaluate if the automatic veterinary blood counter QBC Vet Autoread (R), whose results get five minutes to be ready, is capable to offer a trustworthy platelet count number. To this end, were evaluated the correlations among three different forms of platelets count in dogs: count in automatic blood counter QBC Vet Autoread (R), estimative in blood smear and the gold standard method by manual count in hemocytometer. The viability and confidence use of automatic blood counters of the medicine veterinary routine. Seventeen dogs were chosen randomly way, in the medical and surgical routine of HOVET-USP. The analysis revel high correlation between the hemocytometer and the estimative in blood smear (r=0,875) and between the hemocytometer and automatic blood count by QBC Vet Autoread (R) (r=0,939). Conclude that the platelet blood cont by QBC Vet Autoread (R), in addition to be fast, it's more truthful when compared with estimative in blood smear, although the latter one also had elevated correlation. However, morphological analysis through the smears cannot be dismissed because none of the other two techniques evaluated have the ability to assess platelet morphological changes.Univ Oeste Paulista, Fac Integrado Campo Mourao, Sao Paulo, BrazilUniv Oeste Paulista, UNOESTE, Sao Paulo, BrazilUNESP FO, Sao Paulo, BrazilUniv Sao Paulo, Fac Med Vet & Zootecnia, VCI, Dept Cirurgia, BR-05508 Sao Paulo, BrazilHOVET USP, Setor Anestesia, Sao Paulo, BrazilUniv Estadual Londrina, Londrina, PR, BrazilUniv Metropolitana Santos, Santos, SP, BrazilUNESP FO, Sao Paulo, BrazilUniv Estadual LondrinaUniv Oeste PaulistaUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Universidade de São Paulo (USP)Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)Univ Metropolitana SantosSchweirgert, Augusto [UNESP]Rezende, Fabio HosoiFantoni, Denise TabacchiMoroz, Ludmila Rodrigues2015-03-18T15:56:27Z2015-03-18T15:56:27Z2010-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article1001-1008application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2010v31n4p1001Semina-ciencias Agrarias. Londrina: Univ Estadual Londrina, v. 31, n. 4, p. 1001-1008, 2010.1676-546Xhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/11757910.5433/1679-0359.2010v31n4p1001WOS:000285295400020WOS000285295400020.pdfWeb of Sciencereponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPporSemina-ciencias Agrarias0.349info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-10-26T06:12:49Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/117579Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462023-10-26T06:12:49Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Avaliação da contagem plaquetária pelo contador automático QBC Vet Autoread comparado com estimativa em esfregaço sanguíneo e contagem em hemocitômetro Evaluation of platelet count by automatic blood counter QBC Vet Autoread (R) compared with blood smear estimative and count by hemocytometer |
title |
Avaliação da contagem plaquetária pelo contador automático QBC Vet Autoread comparado com estimativa em esfregaço sanguíneo e contagem em hemocitômetro |
spellingShingle |
Avaliação da contagem plaquetária pelo contador automático QBC Vet Autoread comparado com estimativa em esfregaço sanguíneo e contagem em hemocitômetro Schweirgert, Augusto [UNESP] Count of platelets canine hemocytometer blood smear estimative QBC Vet Autoread (R) |
title_short |
Avaliação da contagem plaquetária pelo contador automático QBC Vet Autoread comparado com estimativa em esfregaço sanguíneo e contagem em hemocitômetro |
title_full |
Avaliação da contagem plaquetária pelo contador automático QBC Vet Autoread comparado com estimativa em esfregaço sanguíneo e contagem em hemocitômetro |
title_fullStr |
Avaliação da contagem plaquetária pelo contador automático QBC Vet Autoread comparado com estimativa em esfregaço sanguíneo e contagem em hemocitômetro |
title_full_unstemmed |
Avaliação da contagem plaquetária pelo contador automático QBC Vet Autoread comparado com estimativa em esfregaço sanguíneo e contagem em hemocitômetro |
title_sort |
Avaliação da contagem plaquetária pelo contador automático QBC Vet Autoread comparado com estimativa em esfregaço sanguíneo e contagem em hemocitômetro |
author |
Schweirgert, Augusto [UNESP] |
author_facet |
Schweirgert, Augusto [UNESP] Rezende, Fabio Hosoi Fantoni, Denise Tabacchi Moroz, Ludmila Rodrigues |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Rezende, Fabio Hosoi Fantoni, Denise Tabacchi Moroz, Ludmila Rodrigues |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Univ Oeste Paulista Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) Universidade de São Paulo (USP) Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) Univ Metropolitana Santos |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Schweirgert, Augusto [UNESP] Rezende, Fabio Hosoi Fantoni, Denise Tabacchi Moroz, Ludmila Rodrigues |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Count of platelets canine hemocytometer blood smear estimative QBC Vet Autoread (R) |
topic |
Count of platelets canine hemocytometer blood smear estimative QBC Vet Autoread (R) |
description |
The platelet blood count in laboratorial routine provides to the clinician important information about the hemostasis of the patient. There are many techniques described, however the gold standard techniques realized in hemocytometer spent a lot of time, making this technique impracticable in great routines. This research had the intent to evaluate if the automatic veterinary blood counter QBC Vet Autoread (R), whose results get five minutes to be ready, is capable to offer a trustworthy platelet count number. To this end, were evaluated the correlations among three different forms of platelets count in dogs: count in automatic blood counter QBC Vet Autoread (R), estimative in blood smear and the gold standard method by manual count in hemocytometer. The viability and confidence use of automatic blood counters of the medicine veterinary routine. Seventeen dogs were chosen randomly way, in the medical and surgical routine of HOVET-USP. The analysis revel high correlation between the hemocytometer and the estimative in blood smear (r=0,875) and between the hemocytometer and automatic blood count by QBC Vet Autoread (R) (r=0,939). Conclude that the platelet blood cont by QBC Vet Autoread (R), in addition to be fast, it's more truthful when compared with estimative in blood smear, although the latter one also had elevated correlation. However, morphological analysis through the smears cannot be dismissed because none of the other two techniques evaluated have the ability to assess platelet morphological changes. |
publishDate |
2010 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2010-01-01 2015-03-18T15:56:27Z 2015-03-18T15:56:27Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2010v31n4p1001 Semina-ciencias Agrarias. Londrina: Univ Estadual Londrina, v. 31, n. 4, p. 1001-1008, 2010. 1676-546X http://hdl.handle.net/11449/117579 10.5433/1679-0359.2010v31n4p1001 WOS:000285295400020 WOS000285295400020.pdf |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2010v31n4p1001 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/117579 |
identifier_str_mv |
Semina-ciencias Agrarias. Londrina: Univ Estadual Londrina, v. 31, n. 4, p. 1001-1008, 2010. 1676-546X 10.5433/1679-0359.2010v31n4p1001 WOS:000285295400020 WOS000285295400020.pdf |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Semina-ciencias Agrarias 0.349 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
1001-1008 application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Univ Estadual Londrina |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Univ Estadual Londrina |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Web of Science reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1797789521379590144 |