A Biomechanical Analysis of the Interlock Suture and a Modified Kessler-Loop Lock Flexor Tendon Suture

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Yang, Wenfeng
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Qiao, Dan, Ren, Yuanfei, Dong, Yvjin, Shang, Yaohua, Zhang, Tiehui
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Clinics
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/140037
Resumo: OBJECTIVE: In this work, we attempted to develop a modified single-knot Kessler-loop lock suture technique and compare the biomechanical properties associated with this single-knot suture technique with those associated with the conventional modified Kessler and interlock suture techniques. METHODS: In this experiment, a total of 18 porcine flexor digitorum profundus tendons were harvested and randomly divided into three groups. The tendons were transected and then repaired using three different techniques, including modified Kessler suture with peritendinous suture, interlock suture with peritendinous suture, and modified Kessler-loop lock suture with peritendinous suture. Times required for suturing were recorded and compared among groups. The groups were also compared with respect to 2-mm gap load, ultimate failure load, and gap at failure. RESULTS: For tendon repair, compared with the conventional modified Kessler suture technique, the interlock and modified Kessler-loop lock suture techniques resulted in significantly improved biomechanical properties. However, there were no significant differences between the interlock and modified Kessler-loop lock techniques with respect to biomechanical properties, gap at failure, and time required. CONCLUSIONS: The interlock and modified Kessler-loop lock techniques for flexor tendon sutures produce similar mechanical characteristics in vitro.
id USP-19_5e71df4a203a08918fa5e1ff087badbf
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/140037
network_acronym_str USP-19
network_name_str Clinics
repository_id_str
spelling A Biomechanical Analysis of the Interlock Suture and a Modified Kessler-Loop Lock Flexor Tendon SutureTendon RepairAnimal ExperimentationFlexor TendonOBJECTIVE: In this work, we attempted to develop a modified single-knot Kessler-loop lock suture technique and compare the biomechanical properties associated with this single-knot suture technique with those associated with the conventional modified Kessler and interlock suture techniques. METHODS: In this experiment, a total of 18 porcine flexor digitorum profundus tendons were harvested and randomly divided into three groups. The tendons were transected and then repaired using three different techniques, including modified Kessler suture with peritendinous suture, interlock suture with peritendinous suture, and modified Kessler-loop lock suture with peritendinous suture. Times required for suturing were recorded and compared among groups. The groups were also compared with respect to 2-mm gap load, ultimate failure load, and gap at failure. RESULTS: For tendon repair, compared with the conventional modified Kessler suture technique, the interlock and modified Kessler-loop lock suture techniques resulted in significantly improved biomechanical properties. However, there were no significant differences between the interlock and modified Kessler-loop lock techniques with respect to biomechanical properties, gap at failure, and time required. CONCLUSIONS: The interlock and modified Kessler-loop lock techniques for flexor tendon sutures produce similar mechanical characteristics in vitro.Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo2017-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/14003710.6061/clinics/2017(09)10Clinics; v. 72 n. 9 (2017); 582-587Clinics; Vol. 72 Núm. 9 (2017); 582-587Clinics; Vol. 72 No. 9 (2017); 582-5871980-53221807-5932reponame:Clinicsinstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/140037/135237Copyright (c) 2017 Clinicsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessYang, WenfengQiao, DanRen, YuanfeiDong, YvjinShang, YaohuaZhang, Tiehui2017-10-25T11:34:41Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/140037Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinicsPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/oai||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br1980-53221807-5932opendoar:2017-10-25T11:34:41Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv A Biomechanical Analysis of the Interlock Suture and a Modified Kessler-Loop Lock Flexor Tendon Suture
title A Biomechanical Analysis of the Interlock Suture and a Modified Kessler-Loop Lock Flexor Tendon Suture
spellingShingle A Biomechanical Analysis of the Interlock Suture and a Modified Kessler-Loop Lock Flexor Tendon Suture
Yang, Wenfeng
Tendon Repair
Animal Experimentation
Flexor Tendon
title_short A Biomechanical Analysis of the Interlock Suture and a Modified Kessler-Loop Lock Flexor Tendon Suture
title_full A Biomechanical Analysis of the Interlock Suture and a Modified Kessler-Loop Lock Flexor Tendon Suture
title_fullStr A Biomechanical Analysis of the Interlock Suture and a Modified Kessler-Loop Lock Flexor Tendon Suture
title_full_unstemmed A Biomechanical Analysis of the Interlock Suture and a Modified Kessler-Loop Lock Flexor Tendon Suture
title_sort A Biomechanical Analysis of the Interlock Suture and a Modified Kessler-Loop Lock Flexor Tendon Suture
author Yang, Wenfeng
author_facet Yang, Wenfeng
Qiao, Dan
Ren, Yuanfei
Dong, Yvjin
Shang, Yaohua
Zhang, Tiehui
author_role author
author2 Qiao, Dan
Ren, Yuanfei
Dong, Yvjin
Shang, Yaohua
Zhang, Tiehui
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Yang, Wenfeng
Qiao, Dan
Ren, Yuanfei
Dong, Yvjin
Shang, Yaohua
Zhang, Tiehui
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Tendon Repair
Animal Experimentation
Flexor Tendon
topic Tendon Repair
Animal Experimentation
Flexor Tendon
description OBJECTIVE: In this work, we attempted to develop a modified single-knot Kessler-loop lock suture technique and compare the biomechanical properties associated with this single-knot suture technique with those associated with the conventional modified Kessler and interlock suture techniques. METHODS: In this experiment, a total of 18 porcine flexor digitorum profundus tendons were harvested and randomly divided into three groups. The tendons were transected and then repaired using three different techniques, including modified Kessler suture with peritendinous suture, interlock suture with peritendinous suture, and modified Kessler-loop lock suture with peritendinous suture. Times required for suturing were recorded and compared among groups. The groups were also compared with respect to 2-mm gap load, ultimate failure load, and gap at failure. RESULTS: For tendon repair, compared with the conventional modified Kessler suture technique, the interlock and modified Kessler-loop lock suture techniques resulted in significantly improved biomechanical properties. However, there were no significant differences between the interlock and modified Kessler-loop lock techniques with respect to biomechanical properties, gap at failure, and time required. CONCLUSIONS: The interlock and modified Kessler-loop lock techniques for flexor tendon sutures produce similar mechanical characteristics in vitro.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-10-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/140037
10.6061/clinics/2017(09)10
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/140037
identifier_str_mv 10.6061/clinics/2017(09)10
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/140037/135237
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Clinics
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Clinics
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Clinics; v. 72 n. 9 (2017); 582-587
Clinics; Vol. 72 Núm. 9 (2017); 582-587
Clinics; Vol. 72 No. 9 (2017); 582-587
1980-5322
1807-5932
reponame:Clinics
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Clinics
collection Clinics
repository.name.fl_str_mv Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br
_version_ 1787713180159442944