A Modified Flexor Tendon Suture Technique Combining Kessler and Loop Lock Flexor Tendon Sutures

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Yang, Wenfeng
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Li, Jvtao, Su, Yuewen, Liang, Wu, Ren, Yuanfei, Dong, Yvjin, Shang, Yaohua, Zhong, Sheng, Xu, Lianchun, Zhang, Tiehui
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Clinics
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/191923
Resumo: OBJECTIVES: In the present study, a novel single knot tenorrhaphy was developed by combining the modified Kessler flexor tendon suture (MK) with the loop lock technique. METHODS: A total of 48 porcine flexor digitorum profundus tendons were collected and randomly divided into six groups. The tendons were transversely cut and then repaired using six different techniques, the MK method, double knot Kessler-loop lock flexor tendon suture (DK), and single knot Kessler-loop lock flexor tendon suture (SK), each in combination with the epitendinous suture (P), and the same three techniques without P. Furthermore, by performing the load-to-failure tests, the biomechanical properties and the time taken to complete a repair, for each tenorrhaphy, were assessed. RESULTS: Compared to the MK+P method, DK+P was more improved, thereby enhancing the ultimate tensile strength. The SK+P method, which required fewer knots than DK+P, was easier to perform. Moreover, the SK+P repair increased the force at a 2-mm gap formation, while requiring lesser knots than DK+P. CONCLUSION: As opposed to the traditional MK+P method, the SK+P method was improved and exhibited better biomechanical properties, which may facilitate early mobilization after the repair.
id USP-19_7b59e20d5efa2f14b9539ad6fdb95144
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/191923
network_acronym_str USP-19
network_name_str Clinics
repository_id_str
spelling A Modified Flexor Tendon Suture Technique Combining Kessler and Loop Lock Flexor Tendon SuturesFlexor TendonHand SurgeryKessler-Loop Lock SutureBiomechanical PropertyOBJECTIVES: In the present study, a novel single knot tenorrhaphy was developed by combining the modified Kessler flexor tendon suture (MK) with the loop lock technique. METHODS: A total of 48 porcine flexor digitorum profundus tendons were collected and randomly divided into six groups. The tendons were transversely cut and then repaired using six different techniques, the MK method, double knot Kessler-loop lock flexor tendon suture (DK), and single knot Kessler-loop lock flexor tendon suture (SK), each in combination with the epitendinous suture (P), and the same three techniques without P. Furthermore, by performing the load-to-failure tests, the biomechanical properties and the time taken to complete a repair, for each tenorrhaphy, were assessed. RESULTS: Compared to the MK+P method, DK+P was more improved, thereby enhancing the ultimate tensile strength. The SK+P method, which required fewer knots than DK+P, was easier to perform. Moreover, the SK+P repair increased the force at a 2-mm gap formation, while requiring lesser knots than DK+P. CONCLUSION: As opposed to the traditional MK+P method, the SK+P method was improved and exhibited better biomechanical properties, which may facilitate early mobilization after the repair.Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo2021-11-09info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/19192310.6061/clinics/2021/e2358Clinics; v. 76 (2021); e2358Clinics; Vol. 76 (2021); e2358Clinics; Vol. 76 (2021); e23581980-53221807-5932reponame:Clinicsinstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/191923/176898Copyright (c) 2021 Clinicsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessYang, Wenfeng Li, Jvtao Su, Yuewen Liang, Wu Ren, Yuanfei Dong, Yvjin Shang, Yaohua Zhong, Sheng Xu, Lianchun Zhang, Tiehui 2021-11-09T14:37:35Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/191923Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinicsPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/oai||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br1980-53221807-5932opendoar:2021-11-09T14:37:35Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv A Modified Flexor Tendon Suture Technique Combining Kessler and Loop Lock Flexor Tendon Sutures
title A Modified Flexor Tendon Suture Technique Combining Kessler and Loop Lock Flexor Tendon Sutures
spellingShingle A Modified Flexor Tendon Suture Technique Combining Kessler and Loop Lock Flexor Tendon Sutures
Yang, Wenfeng
Flexor Tendon
Hand Surgery
Kessler-Loop Lock Suture
Biomechanical Property
title_short A Modified Flexor Tendon Suture Technique Combining Kessler and Loop Lock Flexor Tendon Sutures
title_full A Modified Flexor Tendon Suture Technique Combining Kessler and Loop Lock Flexor Tendon Sutures
title_fullStr A Modified Flexor Tendon Suture Technique Combining Kessler and Loop Lock Flexor Tendon Sutures
title_full_unstemmed A Modified Flexor Tendon Suture Technique Combining Kessler and Loop Lock Flexor Tendon Sutures
title_sort A Modified Flexor Tendon Suture Technique Combining Kessler and Loop Lock Flexor Tendon Sutures
author Yang, Wenfeng
author_facet Yang, Wenfeng
Li, Jvtao
Su, Yuewen
Liang, Wu
Ren, Yuanfei
Dong, Yvjin
Shang, Yaohua
Zhong, Sheng
Xu, Lianchun
Zhang, Tiehui
author_role author
author2 Li, Jvtao
Su, Yuewen
Liang, Wu
Ren, Yuanfei
Dong, Yvjin
Shang, Yaohua
Zhong, Sheng
Xu, Lianchun
Zhang, Tiehui
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Yang, Wenfeng
Li, Jvtao
Su, Yuewen
Liang, Wu
Ren, Yuanfei
Dong, Yvjin
Shang, Yaohua
Zhong, Sheng
Xu, Lianchun
Zhang, Tiehui
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Flexor Tendon
Hand Surgery
Kessler-Loop Lock Suture
Biomechanical Property
topic Flexor Tendon
Hand Surgery
Kessler-Loop Lock Suture
Biomechanical Property
description OBJECTIVES: In the present study, a novel single knot tenorrhaphy was developed by combining the modified Kessler flexor tendon suture (MK) with the loop lock technique. METHODS: A total of 48 porcine flexor digitorum profundus tendons were collected and randomly divided into six groups. The tendons were transversely cut and then repaired using six different techniques, the MK method, double knot Kessler-loop lock flexor tendon suture (DK), and single knot Kessler-loop lock flexor tendon suture (SK), each in combination with the epitendinous suture (P), and the same three techniques without P. Furthermore, by performing the load-to-failure tests, the biomechanical properties and the time taken to complete a repair, for each tenorrhaphy, were assessed. RESULTS: Compared to the MK+P method, DK+P was more improved, thereby enhancing the ultimate tensile strength. The SK+P method, which required fewer knots than DK+P, was easier to perform. Moreover, the SK+P repair increased the force at a 2-mm gap formation, while requiring lesser knots than DK+P. CONCLUSION: As opposed to the traditional MK+P method, the SK+P method was improved and exhibited better biomechanical properties, which may facilitate early mobilization after the repair.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-11-09
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/191923
10.6061/clinics/2021/e2358
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/191923
identifier_str_mv 10.6061/clinics/2021/e2358
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/191923/176898
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Clinics
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Clinics
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Clinics; v. 76 (2021); e2358
Clinics; Vol. 76 (2021); e2358
Clinics; Vol. 76 (2021); e2358
1980-5322
1807-5932
reponame:Clinics
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Clinics
collection Clinics
repository.name.fl_str_mv Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br
_version_ 1787713182405492736