Construção residencial unifamiliar em paredes de concreto pré-moldada: comparativo entre métodos tradicional (alvenaria em bloco cerâmicos) e pré-moldados

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Souza, Fernando Martins de
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Rufino, Lucas Machado
Tipo de documento: Trabalho de conclusão de curso
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Universitário da Ânima (RUNA)
Texto Completo: https://repositorio.animaeducacao.com.br/handle/ANIMA/4339
Resumo: This work aims to compare the traditional constructional method in reinforced concrete structure and masonry of ceramic blocks with the system of precast concrete walls. Analyzing the main characteristics of each system, their peculiarities and main differences, this work brings a study of a case that aims to analyze the potential involved in the industrialization of the civil construction sector, based on the monitoring of a real work of a single family residence, consolidated under the traditional method, through images, interviews, direct observation, and also a technical interview in a company specialized in the precast method. The results showed that the traditional construction system presented a total direct cost of R$ 77,777.82, a little above the construction system in precast concrete panels, which had a total direct cost of R $ 77,263.91. However it was found that the execution time between the two methods was reduced by almost half, where, for the traditional system, it takes 66 working days to obtain the walls lifted and with its regularized surface. In the precast method, it takes only 31 working days to reach the same phase. This way, it was considered that the suggested constructive method is viable and brings considerable benefits in relation to the traditional method, since it brings indicators of quality, economy in time of execution, demand of labor, environment and financial. However, it is concluded that its implementation becomes more financially viable for large-scale production.
id Ânima_41f3e23552422378dc631d6b057d3d60
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.animaeducacao.com.br:ANIMA/4339
network_acronym_str Ânima
network_name_str Repositório Universitário da Ânima (RUNA)
repository_id_str
spelling Construção residencial unifamiliar em paredes de concreto pré-moldada: comparativo entre métodos tradicional (alvenaria em bloco cerâmicos) e pré-moldadosConstruction of unifamiliary residential in pre-molded concrete walls: comparative between traditional methods (masonry in block ceramics) and pre-moldedPré-fabricadosPré-moldadosMétodos construtivosAlvenaria tradicionalThis work aims to compare the traditional constructional method in reinforced concrete structure and masonry of ceramic blocks with the system of precast concrete walls. Analyzing the main characteristics of each system, their peculiarities and main differences, this work brings a study of a case that aims to analyze the potential involved in the industrialization of the civil construction sector, based on the monitoring of a real work of a single family residence, consolidated under the traditional method, through images, interviews, direct observation, and also a technical interview in a company specialized in the precast method. The results showed that the traditional construction system presented a total direct cost of R$ 77,777.82, a little above the construction system in precast concrete panels, which had a total direct cost of R $ 77,263.91. However it was found that the execution time between the two methods was reduced by almost half, where, for the traditional system, it takes 66 working days to obtain the walls lifted and with its regularized surface. In the precast method, it takes only 31 working days to reach the same phase. This way, it was considered that the suggested constructive method is viable and brings considerable benefits in relation to the traditional method, since it brings indicators of quality, economy in time of execution, demand of labor, environment and financial. However, it is concluded that its implementation becomes more financially viable for large-scale production.Este trabalho tem a finalidade de comparar o método construtivo tradicional em estrutura de concreto armado e alvenaria de blocos cerâmicos com o sistema de paredes pré-moldadas de concreto. Analisando as principais características de cada sistema, suas peculiaridades e principais diferenças, este trabalho traz um estudo de caso que visa a analisar os potenciais envolvidos na industrialização do setor de construção civil, com base no acompanhamento de uma obra real, de residência unifamiliar, consolidada sob o método tradicional, por meio de imagens, entrevistas, observação direta, além de entrevista técnica com uma empresa especializada no método pré-moldado. Obteve-se como resultado que o sistema construtivo tradicional apresentou custo direto total de R$ 77.777,82, pouco acima do sistema construtivo em painéis pré-moldados em concreto armado, que apresentou custo direto total de R$ 77.263,91. Porém, verificou-se que o prazo de execução entre os dois métodos reduziu quase que pela metade, onde, para o sistema tradicional são necessários 66 dias úteis para conseguir as paredes levantadas e com sua superfície regularizada, no método pré-moldado, são necessários apenas 31 dias úteis para que a obra esteja com esta mesma fase concluída. Desta forma, julgou-se que o método construtivo sugerido é viável e traz benefícios consideráveis em relação ao método tradicional, pois traz indicadores de qualidade, de economia em tempo de execução, demanda de mão de obra, meio ambiente e financeiro. Entretanto, conclui-se que sua implantação se torna, financeiramente, mais viável para produção em larga escala.Santos, Rangel Pereira dosSouza, Fernando Martins deRufino, Lucas Machado2017-11-30T04:21:34Z2020-11-26T23:39:05Z2017-11-30T04:21:34Z2020-11-26T23:39:05Z2017info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis97application/pdfimage/jpeghttps://repositorio.animaeducacao.com.br/handle/ANIMA/4339Engenharia Civil - TubarãoTubarão-SCAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazilhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessporreponame:Repositório Universitário da Ânima (RUNA)instname:Ânima Educaçãoinstacron:Ânima2020-12-01T17:28:37Zoai:repositorio.animaeducacao.com.br:ANIMA/4339Repositório InstitucionalPRIhttps://repositorio.animaeducacao.com.br/oai/requestcontato@animaeducacao.com.bropendoar:2020-12-01T17:28:37Repositório Universitário da Ânima (RUNA) - Ânima Educaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Construção residencial unifamiliar em paredes de concreto pré-moldada: comparativo entre métodos tradicional (alvenaria em bloco cerâmicos) e pré-moldados
Construction of unifamiliary residential in pre-molded concrete walls: comparative between traditional methods (masonry in block ceramics) and pre-molded
title Construção residencial unifamiliar em paredes de concreto pré-moldada: comparativo entre métodos tradicional (alvenaria em bloco cerâmicos) e pré-moldados
spellingShingle Construção residencial unifamiliar em paredes de concreto pré-moldada: comparativo entre métodos tradicional (alvenaria em bloco cerâmicos) e pré-moldados
Souza, Fernando Martins de
Pré-fabricados
Pré-moldados
Métodos construtivos
Alvenaria tradicional
title_short Construção residencial unifamiliar em paredes de concreto pré-moldada: comparativo entre métodos tradicional (alvenaria em bloco cerâmicos) e pré-moldados
title_full Construção residencial unifamiliar em paredes de concreto pré-moldada: comparativo entre métodos tradicional (alvenaria em bloco cerâmicos) e pré-moldados
title_fullStr Construção residencial unifamiliar em paredes de concreto pré-moldada: comparativo entre métodos tradicional (alvenaria em bloco cerâmicos) e pré-moldados
title_full_unstemmed Construção residencial unifamiliar em paredes de concreto pré-moldada: comparativo entre métodos tradicional (alvenaria em bloco cerâmicos) e pré-moldados
title_sort Construção residencial unifamiliar em paredes de concreto pré-moldada: comparativo entre métodos tradicional (alvenaria em bloco cerâmicos) e pré-moldados
author Souza, Fernando Martins de
author_facet Souza, Fernando Martins de
Rufino, Lucas Machado
author_role author
author2 Rufino, Lucas Machado
author2_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Santos, Rangel Pereira dos
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Souza, Fernando Martins de
Rufino, Lucas Machado
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Pré-fabricados
Pré-moldados
Métodos construtivos
Alvenaria tradicional
topic Pré-fabricados
Pré-moldados
Métodos construtivos
Alvenaria tradicional
description This work aims to compare the traditional constructional method in reinforced concrete structure and masonry of ceramic blocks with the system of precast concrete walls. Analyzing the main characteristics of each system, their peculiarities and main differences, this work brings a study of a case that aims to analyze the potential involved in the industrialization of the civil construction sector, based on the monitoring of a real work of a single family residence, consolidated under the traditional method, through images, interviews, direct observation, and also a technical interview in a company specialized in the precast method. The results showed that the traditional construction system presented a total direct cost of R$ 77,777.82, a little above the construction system in precast concrete panels, which had a total direct cost of R $ 77,263.91. However it was found that the execution time between the two methods was reduced by almost half, where, for the traditional system, it takes 66 working days to obtain the walls lifted and with its regularized surface. In the precast method, it takes only 31 working days to reach the same phase. This way, it was considered that the suggested constructive method is viable and brings considerable benefits in relation to the traditional method, since it brings indicators of quality, economy in time of execution, demand of labor, environment and financial. However, it is concluded that its implementation becomes more financially viable for large-scale production.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-11-30T04:21:34Z
2017-11-30T04:21:34Z
2017
2020-11-26T23:39:05Z
2020-11-26T23:39:05Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis
format bachelorThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.animaeducacao.com.br/handle/ANIMA/4339
url https://repositorio.animaeducacao.com.br/handle/ANIMA/4339
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Engenharia Civil - Tubarão
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazil
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazil
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 97
application/pdf
image/jpeg
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv Tubarão-SC
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Universitário da Ânima (RUNA)
instname:Ânima Educação
instacron:Ânima
instname_str Ânima Educação
instacron_str Ânima
institution Ânima
reponame_str Repositório Universitário da Ânima (RUNA)
collection Repositório Universitário da Ânima (RUNA)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Universitário da Ânima (RUNA) - Ânima Educação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv contato@animaeducacao.com.br
_version_ 1767415811317694464