Investigação da utilização do método construtivo Light Steel Frame como viabilidade econômica para ampliação do bloco CETTAL da UNISUL/Tubarão

• Autor(a) principal: Krieger, Amanda Spillere
• Data de Publicação: 2018
• Outros Autores: Cardoso, Victória Bittencourt
• Tipo de documento: Trabalho de conclusão de curso
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Repositório Universitário da Ânima (RUNA)
• Texto Completo: https://repositorio.animaeducacao.com.br/handle/ANIMA/4462
• topic: Construção civil; Light Steel Frame; Sistemas alternativos

Because of factors like the the advent of technology, the need to meet demands in a more immediate way, lack of increased productivity and consecutive loss reduction, civil construction has sought alternative constructive methods to traditional ones. In the midst of this context, the Light Steel Frame (LSF) is one of the alternatives currently available in the market. It consists of a dry system, basically designed by cold-galvanized steel profiles for the structure and closing panels of the most varied types. However, even Brazil being one of the largest steel producers in the world, the system is still little used by several factors. In this way, the present study, through a wide bibliographical survey and a case study, has the objective of, under the technical-economic perspective, present the differences between execution through the conventional system and through the Light Steel Frame of the third floor of the Unisul/Tubarão, block G. The bibliographic research showed that the Light Steel Frame is an industrialized system, dry, clean and sustainable, besides fast, compared to the conventional system. As for the cost of the work, to the case presented study, the LSF system proved to be as less advantageous compared to the conventional system. On the other hand, the LSF presented a shorter delivery time because it is an industrialized system, which guarantees a greater productivity. Putting the results of both budgets side by side and taking into account that the LSF is Only 52,35% more onerous than the conventional system. It might be said that the LSF has greater viability of execution, since its execution deadlines are significantly lower, what served as the main criterion for the choice of the system.