Comparação da analgesia pós-operatória com uso de metadona versus morfina em cirurgia cardíaca

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Carvalho, Ana Carolina
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Sebold, Fábio Jean Goulart, Calegari, Patrícia Mello Garcia, Oliveira, Benhur Heleno de, Schuelter-Trevisol, Fabiana
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Universitário da Ânima (RUNA)
Texto Completo: http://www.scielo.br/pdf/rba/v68n2/0034-7094-rba-68-02-0122.pdf
https://repositorio.animaeducacao.com.br/handle/ANIMA/2635
Resumo: Background and objectives: Pain is an aggravating factor of postoperative morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of methadone versus morphine using thenumerical rating scale of pain and postoperative on-demand analgesia in patients undergoing myocardial revascularization. Method: A randomized, double-blind, parallel clinical trial was performed with patients under-going coronary artery bypass grafting. The subjects were randomly divided into two groups: Morphine Group (MoG) and Methadone Group (MeG). At the end of cardiac surgery, 0.1 mg.kg−1adjusted body weight of methadone or morphine was administered intravenously. Patients were referred to the ICU, where the following was assessed: extubation time, time to first analgesic request, number of analgesic and antiemetic drug doses within 36 hours, numerical pain scale at 12, 24, and 36 hours postoperatively, and occurrence of adverse effects. Results: Each group comprised 50 patients. Methadone showed 22% higher efficacy than morphine as it yielded a number-needed-to-treat (NNT) score of 6 and number-needed-to-harm(NNH) score of 16. The MeG showed a mean score of 1.9 ± 2.2 according to the numerical pain scale at 24 hours after surgery, whereas as the MoG showed a mean score of 2.9 ± 2.6 (p = 0.029).The MeG required less morphine (29%) than the MoG (43%) (p = 0.002). However, the time to first analgesic request in the postoperative period was 145.9 ± 178.5 minutes in the MeG, and269.4 ± 252.9 in the MoG (p = 0.005).Conclusions: Methadone was effective for analgesia in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting without extracorporeal circulation.
id Ânima_ae4095b8ca9e054d09c9cde0bce7dc2f
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.animaeducacao.com.br:ANIMA/2635
network_acronym_str Ânima
network_name_str Repositório Universitário da Ânima (RUNA)
repository_id_str
spelling Comparação da analgesia pós-operatória com uso de metadona versus morfina em cirurgia cardíacaComparison of postoperative analgesia with methadone versus morphine in cardiac surgeryMetadonaMorfinaDor pós-operatóriaCirurgia cardíacaBackground and objectives: Pain is an aggravating factor of postoperative morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of methadone versus morphine using thenumerical rating scale of pain and postoperative on-demand analgesia in patients undergoing myocardial revascularization. Method: A randomized, double-blind, parallel clinical trial was performed with patients under-going coronary artery bypass grafting. The subjects were randomly divided into two groups: Morphine Group (MoG) and Methadone Group (MeG). At the end of cardiac surgery, 0.1 mg.kg−1adjusted body weight of methadone or morphine was administered intravenously. Patients were referred to the ICU, where the following was assessed: extubation time, time to first analgesic request, number of analgesic and antiemetic drug doses within 36 hours, numerical pain scale at 12, 24, and 36 hours postoperatively, and occurrence of adverse effects. Results: Each group comprised 50 patients. Methadone showed 22% higher efficacy than morphine as it yielded a number-needed-to-treat (NNT) score of 6 and number-needed-to-harm(NNH) score of 16. The MeG showed a mean score of 1.9 ± 2.2 according to the numerical pain scale at 24 hours after surgery, whereas as the MoG showed a mean score of 2.9 ± 2.6 (p = 0.029).The MeG required less morphine (29%) than the MoG (43%) (p = 0.002). However, the time to first analgesic request in the postoperative period was 145.9 ± 178.5 minutes in the MeG, and269.4 ± 252.9 in the MoG (p = 0.005).Conclusions: Methadone was effective for analgesia in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting without extracorporeal circulation.Justificativa e objetivos: A dor é fator agravante da morbidade e mortalidade pós-operatória. O objetivo foi comparar o efeito da metadona versus morfina quanto à dor e demanda de analgesia pós-operatória em pacientes submetidos à revascularizac¸ão do miocárdio. Método: Ensaio clínico randomizado, duplo-cego, em paralelo. Pacientes submetidos à cirurgia de revascularizac¸ão do miocárdio foram randomizados por blocos em dois grupos: Grupo Morfina (Gmo) e Grupo Metadona (Gme). No fim da cirurgia cardíaca, 0,1 mg.Kg−1 peso corrigido de metadona ou morfina foi administrado por via venosa. Os pacientes foram levados à UTI, onde foram avaliados o tempo até a extubac¸ão e a necessidade do primeiro analgésico, o número de doses necessárias de analgésicos e antieméticos em 36 horas, a escala numérica de dor em 12, 24 e 36 horas após a cirurgia e a ocorrência de efeitos adversos. Resultados: Foram incluídos 50 pacientes em cada grupo. A metadona apresentou eficácia 22% maior do que a morfina com Number Needed to Treat (NNT) de 6 e Number Needed to Harm (NNH) de 16. Gme apresentou média de dor pela escala numérica em 24 horas após o procedimento de 1,9±2,2 em comparac¸ão com o Gmo, cuja média foi de 2,9±2,6 (p = 0,029). O Gme necessitou de menos morfina de resgate 29% do que o grupo Gmo 43% (p = 0,002). Entretanto, o tempo até a necessidade de analgésico no pós-operatório foi de 145,9±178,5 minutosmno Grupo Gme e de 269,4±252,9 no Gmo (p = 0,005). Conclusões: A metadona mostrou-se eficiente para a analgesia em cirurgias cardíacas derevascularizac¸ão do miocárdio sem circulac¸ão extracorpórea.Não há.2019-07-25T14:15:52Z2020-11-26T17:36:09Z2019-07-25T14:15:52Z2020-11-26T17:36:09Z2018info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article122-127application/pdf0034-7094http://www.scielo.br/pdf/rba/v68n2/0034-7094-rba-68-02-0122.pdfhttps://repositorio.animaeducacao.com.br/handle/ANIMA/263568Rio de JaneiroAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazilhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCarvalho, Ana CarolinaSebold, Fábio Jean GoulartCalegari, Patrícia Mello GarciaOliveira, Benhur Heleno deSchuelter-Trevisol, Fabianaporreponame:Repositório Universitário da Ânima (RUNA)instname:Ânima Educaçãoinstacron:Ânima2021-08-11T18:35:33Zoai:repositorio.animaeducacao.com.br:ANIMA/2635Repositório InstitucionalPRIhttps://repositorio.animaeducacao.com.br/oai/requestcontato@animaeducacao.com.bropendoar:2021-08-11T18:35:33Repositório Universitário da Ânima (RUNA) - Ânima Educaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparação da analgesia pós-operatória com uso de metadona versus morfina em cirurgia cardíaca
Comparison of postoperative analgesia with methadone versus morphine in cardiac surgery
title Comparação da analgesia pós-operatória com uso de metadona versus morfina em cirurgia cardíaca
spellingShingle Comparação da analgesia pós-operatória com uso de metadona versus morfina em cirurgia cardíaca
Carvalho, Ana Carolina
Metadona
Morfina
Dor pós-operatória
Cirurgia cardíaca
title_short Comparação da analgesia pós-operatória com uso de metadona versus morfina em cirurgia cardíaca
title_full Comparação da analgesia pós-operatória com uso de metadona versus morfina em cirurgia cardíaca
title_fullStr Comparação da analgesia pós-operatória com uso de metadona versus morfina em cirurgia cardíaca
title_full_unstemmed Comparação da analgesia pós-operatória com uso de metadona versus morfina em cirurgia cardíaca
title_sort Comparação da analgesia pós-operatória com uso de metadona versus morfina em cirurgia cardíaca
author Carvalho, Ana Carolina
author_facet Carvalho, Ana Carolina
Sebold, Fábio Jean Goulart
Calegari, Patrícia Mello Garcia
Oliveira, Benhur Heleno de
Schuelter-Trevisol, Fabiana
author_role author
author2 Sebold, Fábio Jean Goulart
Calegari, Patrícia Mello Garcia
Oliveira, Benhur Heleno de
Schuelter-Trevisol, Fabiana
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Carvalho, Ana Carolina
Sebold, Fábio Jean Goulart
Calegari, Patrícia Mello Garcia
Oliveira, Benhur Heleno de
Schuelter-Trevisol, Fabiana
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Metadona
Morfina
Dor pós-operatória
Cirurgia cardíaca
topic Metadona
Morfina
Dor pós-operatória
Cirurgia cardíaca
description Background and objectives: Pain is an aggravating factor of postoperative morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of methadone versus morphine using thenumerical rating scale of pain and postoperative on-demand analgesia in patients undergoing myocardial revascularization. Method: A randomized, double-blind, parallel clinical trial was performed with patients under-going coronary artery bypass grafting. The subjects were randomly divided into two groups: Morphine Group (MoG) and Methadone Group (MeG). At the end of cardiac surgery, 0.1 mg.kg−1adjusted body weight of methadone or morphine was administered intravenously. Patients were referred to the ICU, where the following was assessed: extubation time, time to first analgesic request, number of analgesic and antiemetic drug doses within 36 hours, numerical pain scale at 12, 24, and 36 hours postoperatively, and occurrence of adverse effects. Results: Each group comprised 50 patients. Methadone showed 22% higher efficacy than morphine as it yielded a number-needed-to-treat (NNT) score of 6 and number-needed-to-harm(NNH) score of 16. The MeG showed a mean score of 1.9 ± 2.2 according to the numerical pain scale at 24 hours after surgery, whereas as the MoG showed a mean score of 2.9 ± 2.6 (p = 0.029).The MeG required less morphine (29%) than the MoG (43%) (p = 0.002). However, the time to first analgesic request in the postoperative period was 145.9 ± 178.5 minutes in the MeG, and269.4 ± 252.9 in the MoG (p = 0.005).Conclusions: Methadone was effective for analgesia in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting without extracorporeal circulation.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018
2019-07-25T14:15:52Z
2019-07-25T14:15:52Z
2020-11-26T17:36:09Z
2020-11-26T17:36:09Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv 0034-7094
http://www.scielo.br/pdf/rba/v68n2/0034-7094-rba-68-02-0122.pdf
https://repositorio.animaeducacao.com.br/handle/ANIMA/2635
identifier_str_mv 0034-7094
url http://www.scielo.br/pdf/rba/v68n2/0034-7094-rba-68-02-0122.pdf
https://repositorio.animaeducacao.com.br/handle/ANIMA/2635
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 68
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazil
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazil
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 122-127
application/pdf
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv Rio de Janeiro
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Universitário da Ânima (RUNA)
instname:Ânima Educação
instacron:Ânima
instname_str Ânima Educação
instacron_str Ânima
institution Ânima
reponame_str Repositório Universitário da Ânima (RUNA)
collection Repositório Universitário da Ânima (RUNA)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Universitário da Ânima (RUNA) - Ânima Educação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv contato@animaeducacao.com.br
_version_ 1767415849853911040