Comparação da analgesia pós-operatória com uso de metadona versus morfina em cirurgia cardíaca
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Universitário da Ânima (RUNA) |
Texto Completo: | http://www.scielo.br/pdf/rba/v68n2/0034-7094-rba-68-02-0122.pdf https://repositorio.animaeducacao.com.br/handle/ANIMA/2635 |
Resumo: | Background and objectives: Pain is an aggravating factor of postoperative morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of methadone versus morphine using thenumerical rating scale of pain and postoperative on-demand analgesia in patients undergoing myocardial revascularization. Method: A randomized, double-blind, parallel clinical trial was performed with patients under-going coronary artery bypass grafting. The subjects were randomly divided into two groups: Morphine Group (MoG) and Methadone Group (MeG). At the end of cardiac surgery, 0.1 mg.kg−1adjusted body weight of methadone or morphine was administered intravenously. Patients were referred to the ICU, where the following was assessed: extubation time, time to first analgesic request, number of analgesic and antiemetic drug doses within 36 hours, numerical pain scale at 12, 24, and 36 hours postoperatively, and occurrence of adverse effects. Results: Each group comprised 50 patients. Methadone showed 22% higher efficacy than morphine as it yielded a number-needed-to-treat (NNT) score of 6 and number-needed-to-harm(NNH) score of 16. The MeG showed a mean score of 1.9 ± 2.2 according to the numerical pain scale at 24 hours after surgery, whereas as the MoG showed a mean score of 2.9 ± 2.6 (p = 0.029).The MeG required less morphine (29%) than the MoG (43%) (p = 0.002). However, the time to first analgesic request in the postoperative period was 145.9 ± 178.5 minutes in the MeG, and269.4 ± 252.9 in the MoG (p = 0.005).Conclusions: Methadone was effective for analgesia in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting without extracorporeal circulation. |
id |
Ânima_ae4095b8ca9e054d09c9cde0bce7dc2f |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.animaeducacao.com.br:ANIMA/2635 |
network_acronym_str |
Ânima |
network_name_str |
Repositório Universitário da Ânima (RUNA) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Comparação da analgesia pós-operatória com uso de metadona versus morfina em cirurgia cardíacaComparison of postoperative analgesia with methadone versus morphine in cardiac surgeryMetadonaMorfinaDor pós-operatóriaCirurgia cardíacaBackground and objectives: Pain is an aggravating factor of postoperative morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of methadone versus morphine using thenumerical rating scale of pain and postoperative on-demand analgesia in patients undergoing myocardial revascularization. Method: A randomized, double-blind, parallel clinical trial was performed with patients under-going coronary artery bypass grafting. The subjects were randomly divided into two groups: Morphine Group (MoG) and Methadone Group (MeG). At the end of cardiac surgery, 0.1 mg.kg−1adjusted body weight of methadone or morphine was administered intravenously. Patients were referred to the ICU, where the following was assessed: extubation time, time to first analgesic request, number of analgesic and antiemetic drug doses within 36 hours, numerical pain scale at 12, 24, and 36 hours postoperatively, and occurrence of adverse effects. Results: Each group comprised 50 patients. Methadone showed 22% higher efficacy than morphine as it yielded a number-needed-to-treat (NNT) score of 6 and number-needed-to-harm(NNH) score of 16. The MeG showed a mean score of 1.9 ± 2.2 according to the numerical pain scale at 24 hours after surgery, whereas as the MoG showed a mean score of 2.9 ± 2.6 (p = 0.029).The MeG required less morphine (29%) than the MoG (43%) (p = 0.002). However, the time to first analgesic request in the postoperative period was 145.9 ± 178.5 minutes in the MeG, and269.4 ± 252.9 in the MoG (p = 0.005).Conclusions: Methadone was effective for analgesia in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting without extracorporeal circulation.Justificativa e objetivos: A dor é fator agravante da morbidade e mortalidade pós-operatória. O objetivo foi comparar o efeito da metadona versus morfina quanto à dor e demanda de analgesia pós-operatória em pacientes submetidos à revascularizac¸ão do miocárdio. Método: Ensaio clínico randomizado, duplo-cego, em paralelo. Pacientes submetidos à cirurgia de revascularizac¸ão do miocárdio foram randomizados por blocos em dois grupos: Grupo Morfina (Gmo) e Grupo Metadona (Gme). No fim da cirurgia cardíaca, 0,1 mg.Kg−1 peso corrigido de metadona ou morfina foi administrado por via venosa. Os pacientes foram levados à UTI, onde foram avaliados o tempo até a extubac¸ão e a necessidade do primeiro analgésico, o número de doses necessárias de analgésicos e antieméticos em 36 horas, a escala numérica de dor em 12, 24 e 36 horas após a cirurgia e a ocorrência de efeitos adversos. Resultados: Foram incluídos 50 pacientes em cada grupo. A metadona apresentou eficácia 22% maior do que a morfina com Number Needed to Treat (NNT) de 6 e Number Needed to Harm (NNH) de 16. Gme apresentou média de dor pela escala numérica em 24 horas após o procedimento de 1,9±2,2 em comparac¸ão com o Gmo, cuja média foi de 2,9±2,6 (p = 0,029). O Gme necessitou de menos morfina de resgate 29% do que o grupo Gmo 43% (p = 0,002). Entretanto, o tempo até a necessidade de analgésico no pós-operatório foi de 145,9±178,5 minutosmno Grupo Gme e de 269,4±252,9 no Gmo (p = 0,005). Conclusões: A metadona mostrou-se eficiente para a analgesia em cirurgias cardíacas derevascularizac¸ão do miocárdio sem circulac¸ão extracorpórea.Não há.2019-07-25T14:15:52Z2020-11-26T17:36:09Z2019-07-25T14:15:52Z2020-11-26T17:36:09Z2018info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article122-127application/pdf0034-7094http://www.scielo.br/pdf/rba/v68n2/0034-7094-rba-68-02-0122.pdfhttps://repositorio.animaeducacao.com.br/handle/ANIMA/263568Rio de JaneiroAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazilhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCarvalho, Ana CarolinaSebold, Fábio Jean GoulartCalegari, Patrícia Mello GarciaOliveira, Benhur Heleno deSchuelter-Trevisol, Fabianaporreponame:Repositório Universitário da Ânima (RUNA)instname:Ânima Educaçãoinstacron:Ânima2021-08-11T18:35:33Zoai:repositorio.animaeducacao.com.br:ANIMA/2635Repositório InstitucionalPRIhttps://repositorio.animaeducacao.com.br/oai/requestcontato@animaeducacao.com.bropendoar:2021-08-11T18:35:33Repositório Universitário da Ânima (RUNA) - Ânima Educaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Comparação da analgesia pós-operatória com uso de metadona versus morfina em cirurgia cardíaca Comparison of postoperative analgesia with methadone versus morphine in cardiac surgery |
title |
Comparação da analgesia pós-operatória com uso de metadona versus morfina em cirurgia cardíaca |
spellingShingle |
Comparação da analgesia pós-operatória com uso de metadona versus morfina em cirurgia cardíaca Carvalho, Ana Carolina Metadona Morfina Dor pós-operatória Cirurgia cardíaca |
title_short |
Comparação da analgesia pós-operatória com uso de metadona versus morfina em cirurgia cardíaca |
title_full |
Comparação da analgesia pós-operatória com uso de metadona versus morfina em cirurgia cardíaca |
title_fullStr |
Comparação da analgesia pós-operatória com uso de metadona versus morfina em cirurgia cardíaca |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparação da analgesia pós-operatória com uso de metadona versus morfina em cirurgia cardíaca |
title_sort |
Comparação da analgesia pós-operatória com uso de metadona versus morfina em cirurgia cardíaca |
author |
Carvalho, Ana Carolina |
author_facet |
Carvalho, Ana Carolina Sebold, Fábio Jean Goulart Calegari, Patrícia Mello Garcia Oliveira, Benhur Heleno de Schuelter-Trevisol, Fabiana |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Sebold, Fábio Jean Goulart Calegari, Patrícia Mello Garcia Oliveira, Benhur Heleno de Schuelter-Trevisol, Fabiana |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Carvalho, Ana Carolina Sebold, Fábio Jean Goulart Calegari, Patrícia Mello Garcia Oliveira, Benhur Heleno de Schuelter-Trevisol, Fabiana |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Metadona Morfina Dor pós-operatória Cirurgia cardíaca |
topic |
Metadona Morfina Dor pós-operatória Cirurgia cardíaca |
description |
Background and objectives: Pain is an aggravating factor of postoperative morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of methadone versus morphine using thenumerical rating scale of pain and postoperative on-demand analgesia in patients undergoing myocardial revascularization. Method: A randomized, double-blind, parallel clinical trial was performed with patients under-going coronary artery bypass grafting. The subjects were randomly divided into two groups: Morphine Group (MoG) and Methadone Group (MeG). At the end of cardiac surgery, 0.1 mg.kg−1adjusted body weight of methadone or morphine was administered intravenously. Patients were referred to the ICU, where the following was assessed: extubation time, time to first analgesic request, number of analgesic and antiemetic drug doses within 36 hours, numerical pain scale at 12, 24, and 36 hours postoperatively, and occurrence of adverse effects. Results: Each group comprised 50 patients. Methadone showed 22% higher efficacy than morphine as it yielded a number-needed-to-treat (NNT) score of 6 and number-needed-to-harm(NNH) score of 16. The MeG showed a mean score of 1.9 ± 2.2 according to the numerical pain scale at 24 hours after surgery, whereas as the MoG showed a mean score of 2.9 ± 2.6 (p = 0.029).The MeG required less morphine (29%) than the MoG (43%) (p = 0.002). However, the time to first analgesic request in the postoperative period was 145.9 ± 178.5 minutes in the MeG, and269.4 ± 252.9 in the MoG (p = 0.005).Conclusions: Methadone was effective for analgesia in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting without extracorporeal circulation. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018 2019-07-25T14:15:52Z 2019-07-25T14:15:52Z 2020-11-26T17:36:09Z 2020-11-26T17:36:09Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
0034-7094 http://www.scielo.br/pdf/rba/v68n2/0034-7094-rba-68-02-0122.pdf https://repositorio.animaeducacao.com.br/handle/ANIMA/2635 |
identifier_str_mv |
0034-7094 |
url |
http://www.scielo.br/pdf/rba/v68n2/0034-7094-rba-68-02-0122.pdf https://repositorio.animaeducacao.com.br/handle/ANIMA/2635 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
68 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazil http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazil http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
122-127 application/pdf |
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv |
Rio de Janeiro |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Universitário da Ânima (RUNA) instname:Ânima Educação instacron:Ânima |
instname_str |
Ânima Educação |
instacron_str |
Ânima |
institution |
Ânima |
reponame_str |
Repositório Universitário da Ânima (RUNA) |
collection |
Repositório Universitário da Ânima (RUNA) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Universitário da Ânima (RUNA) - Ânima Educação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
contato@animaeducacao.com.br |
_version_ |
1767415849853911040 |