Dosimetria da Pena: a (im)possibilidade da fixação abaixo do mínimo legal na segunda fase

• Autor(a) principal: Silva Junior, José Carlos
• Data de Publicação: 2019
• Tipo de documento: Trabalho de conclusão de curso
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Repositório Universitário da Ânima (RUNA)
• Texto Completo: https://repositorio.animaeducacao.com.br/handle/ANIMA/5903
• topic: Dosimetria da pena; Segunda fase; Pena provisória; Súmula 231 do STJ

The purpose of this paper is to analyze the possibility (s) of establishing the legal basis of the second stage of the analysis of the sentence in relation to the summary 231 of the STJ based on the doctrinal treaties, jurisprudential and current legislation. An in-depth analysis will be done on the three-phase system of Nelson Hungria and at all times a penalty can be mitigated. To do so, it is a qualitative approach, since visa can be a pity that can be mitigated. With regard to the procedure, you can also do the bibliographic survey on the legal issues, jurisprudence and articles of the legislation. The study of the level of interest used in the research, conducted in an exploratory study, sought greater intimacy with the object of the study. The conclusion is made of a summary 231 of the STJ is in a way to overcome, since it is based fundamental in the two-phase system and that goes against the article 65 of the Penal Code, characterizing a violation of the principle of legality making it the summary unconstitutional where there is great doctrinal support.