Safeguarding. A key dispositif of UNESCO’s Convention for the Safeguarding of Intangible Cultural Heritage
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Vibrant |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1809-43412019000100300 |
Resumo: | Abstract The expression ‘safeguarding intangible cultural heritage’ was formed within the context of transformations in the instruments and strategies for protecting cultural elements usually designated ‘folklore and traditional (and popular) culture’.1 The adoption of a ‘cultural heritage approach’ to this subject was a somewhat turbulent process that drew, since the mid-twentieth century, a winding path of dialogues with, and divergences from, common sense notions and mainstream preservationist culture. Throughout this process, political and conceptual possibilities for social engineering were envisaged, some were discarded, choices were legitimized and, no less importantly, networks were formed of agents and narrators of the political and legal negotiations that eventually lead to designing UNESCO ICH Convention as officially adopted. This path will be explored in the following comments on the formation of safeguarding as a cultural heritage policy dispositive2 and significant contrasts to other instruments, in relation to which it has acquired specificity, meaning and scope. |
id |
ABA-1_7ea828142596cd8e1f7c931e7caad2d4 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1809-43412019000100300 |
network_acronym_str |
ABA-1 |
network_name_str |
Vibrant |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Safeguarding. A key dispositif of UNESCO’s Convention for the Safeguarding of Intangible Cultural HeritageUnescoConvention for the Safeguarding of Intangible Cultural Heritagesafeguardingcultural heritage dispositifsintellectual ethnographyAbstract The expression ‘safeguarding intangible cultural heritage’ was formed within the context of transformations in the instruments and strategies for protecting cultural elements usually designated ‘folklore and traditional (and popular) culture’.1 The adoption of a ‘cultural heritage approach’ to this subject was a somewhat turbulent process that drew, since the mid-twentieth century, a winding path of dialogues with, and divergences from, common sense notions and mainstream preservationist culture. Throughout this process, political and conceptual possibilities for social engineering were envisaged, some were discarded, choices were legitimized and, no less importantly, networks were formed of agents and narrators of the political and legal negotiations that eventually lead to designing UNESCO ICH Convention as officially adopted. This path will be explored in the following comments on the formation of safeguarding as a cultural heritage policy dispositive2 and significant contrasts to other instruments, in relation to which it has acquired specificity, meaning and scope.Associação Brasileira de Antropologia (ABA)2019-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1809-43412019000100300Vibrant: Virtual Brazilian Anthropology v.16 2019reponame:Vibrantinstname:Associação Brasileira de Antropologiainstacron:ABA10.1590/1809-43412019v16a201info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessArantes,Antonioeng2019-09-10T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1809-43412019000100300Revistahttp://www.vibrant.org.br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpvibrant.aba@gmail.com1809-43411809-4341opendoar:2019-09-10T00:00Vibrant - Associação Brasileira de Antropologiafalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Safeguarding. A key dispositif of UNESCO’s Convention for the Safeguarding of Intangible Cultural Heritage |
title |
Safeguarding. A key dispositif of UNESCO’s Convention for the Safeguarding of Intangible Cultural Heritage |
spellingShingle |
Safeguarding. A key dispositif of UNESCO’s Convention for the Safeguarding of Intangible Cultural Heritage Arantes,Antonio Unesco Convention for the Safeguarding of Intangible Cultural Heritage safeguarding cultural heritage dispositifs intellectual ethnography |
title_short |
Safeguarding. A key dispositif of UNESCO’s Convention for the Safeguarding of Intangible Cultural Heritage |
title_full |
Safeguarding. A key dispositif of UNESCO’s Convention for the Safeguarding of Intangible Cultural Heritage |
title_fullStr |
Safeguarding. A key dispositif of UNESCO’s Convention for the Safeguarding of Intangible Cultural Heritage |
title_full_unstemmed |
Safeguarding. A key dispositif of UNESCO’s Convention for the Safeguarding of Intangible Cultural Heritage |
title_sort |
Safeguarding. A key dispositif of UNESCO’s Convention for the Safeguarding of Intangible Cultural Heritage |
author |
Arantes,Antonio |
author_facet |
Arantes,Antonio |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Arantes,Antonio |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Unesco Convention for the Safeguarding of Intangible Cultural Heritage safeguarding cultural heritage dispositifs intellectual ethnography |
topic |
Unesco Convention for the Safeguarding of Intangible Cultural Heritage safeguarding cultural heritage dispositifs intellectual ethnography |
description |
Abstract The expression ‘safeguarding intangible cultural heritage’ was formed within the context of transformations in the instruments and strategies for protecting cultural elements usually designated ‘folklore and traditional (and popular) culture’.1 The adoption of a ‘cultural heritage approach’ to this subject was a somewhat turbulent process that drew, since the mid-twentieth century, a winding path of dialogues with, and divergences from, common sense notions and mainstream preservationist culture. Throughout this process, political and conceptual possibilities for social engineering were envisaged, some were discarded, choices were legitimized and, no less importantly, networks were formed of agents and narrators of the political and legal negotiations that eventually lead to designing UNESCO ICH Convention as officially adopted. This path will be explored in the following comments on the formation of safeguarding as a cultural heritage policy dispositive2 and significant contrasts to other instruments, in relation to which it has acquired specificity, meaning and scope. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1809-43412019000100300 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1809-43412019000100300 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/1809-43412019v16a201 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Antropologia (ABA) |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Antropologia (ABA) |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Vibrant: Virtual Brazilian Anthropology v.16 2019 reponame:Vibrant instname:Associação Brasileira de Antropologia instacron:ABA |
instname_str |
Associação Brasileira de Antropologia |
instacron_str |
ABA |
institution |
ABA |
reponame_str |
Vibrant |
collection |
Vibrant |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Vibrant - Associação Brasileira de Antropologia |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
vibrant.aba@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1754302960968400896 |