Safeguarding. A key dispositif of UNESCO’s Convention for the Safeguarding of Intangible Cultural Heritage

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Arantes,Antonio
Data de Publicação: 2019
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Vibrant
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1809-43412019000100300
Resumo: Abstract The expression ‘safeguarding intangible cultural heritage’ was formed within the context of transformations in the instruments and strategies for protecting cultural elements usually designated ‘folklore and traditional (and popular) culture’.1 The adoption of a ‘cultural heritage approach’ to this subject was a somewhat turbulent process that drew, since the mid-twentieth century, a winding path of dialogues with, and divergences from, common sense notions and mainstream preservationist culture. Throughout this process, political and conceptual possibilities for social engineering were envisaged, some were discarded, choices were legitimized and, no less importantly, networks were formed of agents and narrators of the political and legal negotiations that eventually lead to designing UNESCO ICH Convention as officially adopted. This path will be explored in the following comments on the formation of safeguarding as a cultural heritage policy dispositive2 and significant contrasts to other instruments, in relation to which it has acquired specificity, meaning and scope.
id ABA-1_7ea828142596cd8e1f7c931e7caad2d4
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1809-43412019000100300
network_acronym_str ABA-1
network_name_str Vibrant
repository_id_str
spelling Safeguarding. A key dispositif of UNESCO’s Convention for the Safeguarding of Intangible Cultural HeritageUnescoConvention for the Safeguarding of Intangible Cultural Heritagesafeguardingcultural heritage dispositifsintellectual ethnographyAbstract The expression ‘safeguarding intangible cultural heritage’ was formed within the context of transformations in the instruments and strategies for protecting cultural elements usually designated ‘folklore and traditional (and popular) culture’.1 The adoption of a ‘cultural heritage approach’ to this subject was a somewhat turbulent process that drew, since the mid-twentieth century, a winding path of dialogues with, and divergences from, common sense notions and mainstream preservationist culture. Throughout this process, political and conceptual possibilities for social engineering were envisaged, some were discarded, choices were legitimized and, no less importantly, networks were formed of agents and narrators of the political and legal negotiations that eventually lead to designing UNESCO ICH Convention as officially adopted. This path will be explored in the following comments on the formation of safeguarding as a cultural heritage policy dispositive2 and significant contrasts to other instruments, in relation to which it has acquired specificity, meaning and scope.Associação Brasileira de Antropologia (ABA)2019-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1809-43412019000100300Vibrant: Virtual Brazilian Anthropology v.16 2019reponame:Vibrantinstname:Associação Brasileira de Antropologiainstacron:ABA10.1590/1809-43412019v16a201info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessArantes,Antonioeng2019-09-10T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1809-43412019000100300Revistahttp://www.vibrant.org.br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpvibrant.aba@gmail.com1809-43411809-4341opendoar:2019-09-10T00:00Vibrant - Associação Brasileira de Antropologiafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Safeguarding. A key dispositif of UNESCO’s Convention for the Safeguarding of Intangible Cultural Heritage
title Safeguarding. A key dispositif of UNESCO’s Convention for the Safeguarding of Intangible Cultural Heritage
spellingShingle Safeguarding. A key dispositif of UNESCO’s Convention for the Safeguarding of Intangible Cultural Heritage
Arantes,Antonio
Unesco
Convention for the Safeguarding of Intangible Cultural Heritage
safeguarding
cultural heritage dispositifs
intellectual ethnography
title_short Safeguarding. A key dispositif of UNESCO’s Convention for the Safeguarding of Intangible Cultural Heritage
title_full Safeguarding. A key dispositif of UNESCO’s Convention for the Safeguarding of Intangible Cultural Heritage
title_fullStr Safeguarding. A key dispositif of UNESCO’s Convention for the Safeguarding of Intangible Cultural Heritage
title_full_unstemmed Safeguarding. A key dispositif of UNESCO’s Convention for the Safeguarding of Intangible Cultural Heritage
title_sort Safeguarding. A key dispositif of UNESCO’s Convention for the Safeguarding of Intangible Cultural Heritage
author Arantes,Antonio
author_facet Arantes,Antonio
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Arantes,Antonio
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Unesco
Convention for the Safeguarding of Intangible Cultural Heritage
safeguarding
cultural heritage dispositifs
intellectual ethnography
topic Unesco
Convention for the Safeguarding of Intangible Cultural Heritage
safeguarding
cultural heritage dispositifs
intellectual ethnography
description Abstract The expression ‘safeguarding intangible cultural heritage’ was formed within the context of transformations in the instruments and strategies for protecting cultural elements usually designated ‘folklore and traditional (and popular) culture’.1 The adoption of a ‘cultural heritage approach’ to this subject was a somewhat turbulent process that drew, since the mid-twentieth century, a winding path of dialogues with, and divergences from, common sense notions and mainstream preservationist culture. Throughout this process, political and conceptual possibilities for social engineering were envisaged, some were discarded, choices were legitimized and, no less importantly, networks were formed of agents and narrators of the political and legal negotiations that eventually lead to designing UNESCO ICH Convention as officially adopted. This path will be explored in the following comments on the formation of safeguarding as a cultural heritage policy dispositive2 and significant contrasts to other instruments, in relation to which it has acquired specificity, meaning and scope.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1809-43412019000100300
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1809-43412019000100300
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1809-43412019v16a201
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Antropologia (ABA)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Antropologia (ABA)
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Vibrant: Virtual Brazilian Anthropology v.16 2019
reponame:Vibrant
instname:Associação Brasileira de Antropologia
instacron:ABA
instname_str Associação Brasileira de Antropologia
instacron_str ABA
institution ABA
reponame_str Vibrant
collection Vibrant
repository.name.fl_str_mv Vibrant - Associação Brasileira de Antropologia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv vibrant.aba@gmail.com
_version_ 1754302960968400896