The Indian Protective Service Accused: The Logic of Defamation in the Dispute for the Control of Indigenous Territories in the State of Amazonas, 1931

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Santos,Ana Flávia Moreira
Data de Publicação: 2022
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Vibrant
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1809-43412022000100801
Resumo: Abstract The present article analyzes the Inquiry into the Indian Inspectorate in Amazonas and Acre, established in 1931 by order of the Federal Intervenor of the Amazonas. Taking as our approach an analysis of regional contexts, we link the inquiry to land conflicts that occurred in the previous decade, which gravitated around the imposition of a commercial monopoly on a resource historically configured as a “remedy for poverty” - Brazil nut trees. We demonstrate how narratives regarding these conflicts were triggered in the inquiry according to a logic that aimed to criminalize indigenous peoples and Indian Protective Service representatives as a way of accumulating legitimacy for the extralegal exercise of power. Finally, we illuminate the symbolic character of these disputes, which sought to restrict the legal meanings of “Indian” in order to question the legitimacy of the Indian Service in its administration of the so-called “semi-civilized peoples” and to restrict indigenous peoples’ access to State resources.
id ABA-1_9f9cf8c2e9dc27d319c10ed08e2f5c39
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1809-43412022000100801
network_acronym_str ABA-1
network_name_str Vibrant
repository_id_str
spelling The Indian Protective Service Accused: The Logic of Defamation in the Dispute for the Control of Indigenous Territories in the State of Amazonas, 1931Territorial conflictsIndian Protection ServiceHistory of AmazonasMuraMundurukuSymbolic PowerAbstract The present article analyzes the Inquiry into the Indian Inspectorate in Amazonas and Acre, established in 1931 by order of the Federal Intervenor of the Amazonas. Taking as our approach an analysis of regional contexts, we link the inquiry to land conflicts that occurred in the previous decade, which gravitated around the imposition of a commercial monopoly on a resource historically configured as a “remedy for poverty” - Brazil nut trees. We demonstrate how narratives regarding these conflicts were triggered in the inquiry according to a logic that aimed to criminalize indigenous peoples and Indian Protective Service representatives as a way of accumulating legitimacy for the extralegal exercise of power. Finally, we illuminate the symbolic character of these disputes, which sought to restrict the legal meanings of “Indian” in order to question the legitimacy of the Indian Service in its administration of the so-called “semi-civilized peoples” and to restrict indigenous peoples’ access to State resources.Associação Brasileira de Antropologia (ABA)2022-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1809-43412022000100801Vibrant: Virtual Brazilian Anthropology v.19 2022reponame:Vibrantinstname:Associação Brasileira de Antropologiainstacron:ABA10.1590/1809-43412022v19a801info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSantos,Ana Flávia Moreiraeng2022-03-03T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1809-43412022000100801Revistahttp://www.vibrant.org.br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpvibrant.aba@gmail.com1809-43411809-4341opendoar:2022-03-03T00:00Vibrant - Associação Brasileira de Antropologiafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The Indian Protective Service Accused: The Logic of Defamation in the Dispute for the Control of Indigenous Territories in the State of Amazonas, 1931
title The Indian Protective Service Accused: The Logic of Defamation in the Dispute for the Control of Indigenous Territories in the State of Amazonas, 1931
spellingShingle The Indian Protective Service Accused: The Logic of Defamation in the Dispute for the Control of Indigenous Territories in the State of Amazonas, 1931
Santos,Ana Flávia Moreira
Territorial conflicts
Indian Protection Service
History of Amazonas
Mura
Munduruku
Symbolic Power
title_short The Indian Protective Service Accused: The Logic of Defamation in the Dispute for the Control of Indigenous Territories in the State of Amazonas, 1931
title_full The Indian Protective Service Accused: The Logic of Defamation in the Dispute for the Control of Indigenous Territories in the State of Amazonas, 1931
title_fullStr The Indian Protective Service Accused: The Logic of Defamation in the Dispute for the Control of Indigenous Territories in the State of Amazonas, 1931
title_full_unstemmed The Indian Protective Service Accused: The Logic of Defamation in the Dispute for the Control of Indigenous Territories in the State of Amazonas, 1931
title_sort The Indian Protective Service Accused: The Logic of Defamation in the Dispute for the Control of Indigenous Territories in the State of Amazonas, 1931
author Santos,Ana Flávia Moreira
author_facet Santos,Ana Flávia Moreira
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Santos,Ana Flávia Moreira
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Territorial conflicts
Indian Protection Service
History of Amazonas
Mura
Munduruku
Symbolic Power
topic Territorial conflicts
Indian Protection Service
History of Amazonas
Mura
Munduruku
Symbolic Power
description Abstract The present article analyzes the Inquiry into the Indian Inspectorate in Amazonas and Acre, established in 1931 by order of the Federal Intervenor of the Amazonas. Taking as our approach an analysis of regional contexts, we link the inquiry to land conflicts that occurred in the previous decade, which gravitated around the imposition of a commercial monopoly on a resource historically configured as a “remedy for poverty” - Brazil nut trees. We demonstrate how narratives regarding these conflicts were triggered in the inquiry according to a logic that aimed to criminalize indigenous peoples and Indian Protective Service representatives as a way of accumulating legitimacy for the extralegal exercise of power. Finally, we illuminate the symbolic character of these disputes, which sought to restrict the legal meanings of “Indian” in order to question the legitimacy of the Indian Service in its administration of the so-called “semi-civilized peoples” and to restrict indigenous peoples’ access to State resources.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1809-43412022000100801
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1809-43412022000100801
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1809-43412022v19a801
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Antropologia (ABA)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Antropologia (ABA)
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Vibrant: Virtual Brazilian Anthropology v.19 2022
reponame:Vibrant
instname:Associação Brasileira de Antropologia
instacron:ABA
instname_str Associação Brasileira de Antropologia
instacron_str ABA
institution ABA
reponame_str Vibrant
collection Vibrant
repository.name.fl_str_mv Vibrant - Associação Brasileira de Antropologia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv vibrant.aba@gmail.com
_version_ 1754302961225302016